What's new

China media says Indian troops will be kicked out of disputed area

CAD

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2017
Messages
608
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The state-controlled Global Media says New Delhi must be taught a ‘bitter lesson’ over the military face-off in Sikkim border


sikkim-nathula-after-china-border-chinese-international_98e10214-6134-11e7-8e9a-26934b659213.jpg


Chinese army at Nathu la pass. The face-off erupted early June in an area along the Sikkim border which China calls Donglang and is also known as Doklam plateau.(HT Photo)

India will be “kicked” out from the area of an ongoing military standoff with China and suffer “greater losses” than it did during the 1962 war, Chinese official media warned on Wednesday, adding that New Delhi needed to be taught a “bitter lesson” for trespassing across the border.

  • The editorial in Global Times is the harshest yet by China’s state-controlled media since the face-off erupted early June in an area along the Sikkim border which China calls Donglang and is also known as Doklam plateau.

    “We firmly believe that the face-off in the Donglang area will end up with the Indian troops in retreat. The Indian military can choose to return to its territory with dignity, or be kicked out of the area by Chinese soldiers,” said Times, a tabloid affiliated to the Communist party mouthpiece People’s Daily.

    The Global Times is known for its nationalistic outlook and frequently publishes anti-India editorials and articles.

    Read | China’s PLA warns India: ‘Learn lessons from 1962 defeat, stop clamouring for war’

    “The Chinese public is infuriated by India’s provocation. We believe the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is powerful enough to expel Indian troops out of Chinese territory,” it said, adding, “This time, we must teach New Delhi a bitter lesson.”

    It said India’s “real purpose” was aimed at blocking block China’s road construction project in the area.

    “The Cold War-obsessed India is suspicious that China is building the road to cut off the Siliguri Corridor, an area held by Indians as strategically important for India to control its turbulent northeast area,” the Times said in reference to the “chicken’s neck”, a narrow strip of land that connects India’s mainland to seven border states.

    “India is taking the risk to betray the historical agreement and wants to force China to swallow the result,” it added. Beijing accuses India of violating an 1890 border agreement between Britain and China.

    Read | Is China punishing India for its Belt and Road stance while testing Modi and Trump?

    The Times referred to defence minister Arun Jaitley’s comments indicating that India was better prepared than in 1962, the editorial said: “Jaitley is right that the India of 2017 is different from that of 1962 -- India will suffer greater losses than in 1962 if it incites military conflicts”. The editorial also accused India of treating Bhutan as a “vassal state” and coercing Thimphu into supporting New Delhi.

    “...The Indian media claimed in recent days that New Delhi ‘shouldn’t abandon Bhutan’. India is humiliating the civilisation of the 21st century,” it said.

    In a separate editorial, China Daily, the other state-controlled English newspaper, said by “trespassing” into Chinese-controlled territory, “…India may be trying to make a point. It is reportedly worried that the Chinese road construction may represent a significant change in the status quo with serious security implications for India, according to its foreign ministry.”

    Read | War is possible if conflict with India is not handled properly: Chinese observers

    “But such worries could have been allayed through dialogue and consultation using the mechanisms that are already in place and which have long helped the two sides maintain peace and tranquility in the region since their short border war in 1962,” the China Daily said.

    “Perhaps its defeat in that war (1962) was too humiliating for some in the Indian military and that is why they are talking belligerently this time,” it said.

    “The trespassing by the Indian troops runs counter to the Indian government’s longstanding and rightful position. It should respect China’s territorial integrity and withdraw its troops back across the border,” the newspaper said.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...sputed-area/story-HMLlc1qfKkOVUNieu7aSOM.html
 
. . .
By what!!
Kung fu? :rofl:
These cheerleaders are dancing on every hollow tune..
Lets see how many countries are pissed off of China first..
Today BBC said that Vietnam also started drilling in SCS..
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
if the war starts which I don't wish to happen, will the Indians here say it is "unexpected" like 1962?
 
. .
Waiting for fireworks.
Go to Kashmir then.We are making Kebab everyday.
I am thinking their leadership is watching 'crouching tiger, hidden dragon' movie too many times and believe all the crap shown in that. ;)

China is now officially reaching the same status as North korea.
They have been giving same hollow jibber jabber against Singapore Vietnam & such countries since decades for drilling or running frigates around..
Don't have enough balls to fire a single bullet.Let alone India.
China have most armed neighbors pissed off against them than any country in existence.
Another side Pakistanis,who claim Chinese achievements as their own happen to wish for war should mind that your army chiefs were clueless about Iranian drones hovering your heads for months..:rofl: Cheerleading ka kaam hi baki h tum logo k lie..
 
.
hahha another humiliation for india

i guess they are now use to of it:lol:
 
.
Don't worry ....... after 1962, NOTHING china does is "unexpected" :lol:

We are not that Naive anymore. LOL.
OK, so India can not use "unexpected" as an excuse this time.

Let's assume India wins the war, we then place India as No. 3 military power in the world, great! China will pay for the war, give India part of her land, I think China is rich enough to pay for the war.

Now, what happens, if India loses the war, China asks India pay for the war? give part of India's land to China? I would like to know how Indian here in the forum here feel about give China money and land?
 
.
OK, so India can not use "unexpected" as an excuse this time.

Let's assume India wins the war, we then place India as No. 3 military power in the world, great! China will pay for the war, give India part of her land, I think China is rich enough to pay for the war.

Now, what happens, if India loses the war, China asks India pay for the war? give part of India's land to China? I would like to know how Indian here in the forum here feel about give China money and land?
India is too big to loose a war

Chinese are To far from their mainland to win war


a6f233c64c68c255a229d3b031267a6d.jpg
 
.
OK, so India can not use "unexpected" as an excuse this time.

Let's assume India wins the war, we then place India as No. 3 military power in the world, great! China will pay for the war, give India part of her land, I think China is rich enough to pay for the war.

Now, what happens, if India loses the war, China asks India pay for the war? give part of India's land to China? I would like to know how Indian here in the forum here feel about give China money and land?
In a war between two big nations like India and China, no one would be a winner. Chimpin would be a basket case nut if he think he can wage a war on India over a barren terrain, and win it without serious implications on China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom