What's new

China-EU Geopolitics: News & Discussions

Well, the Senkaku can serve as a good starting point since you brought it up.

Although I empathize easily with the repulsion towards a mercantile based
acquisition as constituting a National prerogative later, this is a case known
to land and maritime dispute. More recent than say the Louisiana purchase,
one can find the Labrador split from Québec province to Newfoundland.
In dispute since 1809, it was settled in 1927 and enforced after 1949. The
deciding opinion was cast in the Queen's Privy Council in London! Québec
still doesn't recognize it as valid and would refute fight it upon independence.

By such precedents ( Labrador was originally transferred through the 1763
Treaty of Paris but a lot of it was acquired by a corporation based in NL ( sic ))
passing of land through State inheritance from individuals does constitute a
sovereign ownership.

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, because as said I don't really agree with this,
but it is legal if not right.

Still good day though, Tay.
 
.
There'r three useful cards held on BeiJIng's hands:

1. "Made in China"
2. RMB cash
3. Powerful military


Using above to deal with troubles from West and Some small countries. Playing the balance between economy & military. So whatever E.U, U.S, Japan, Vietnam all welcome !
Europa is a shi*t now. I just can't wait so see our Muslim friends to take away white lands.
Trump will bing them another hit, also to US's little non-white puppet regimes.
 
.
There is a HUGE difference of 1.4 million square mile between English Channel and 9 Dashed Line claimed by China!!!

France and the Eu has no say this this matter. This is like China conducting patrols through the English channel.
 
. .
That particular member us known to make ridiculous comments, from nuking other countries to offensive things like making genocide statements...and the other Chinese members here likes such comments from him.

Anyways, the fact that China knows that sea area is rich is resources and is a major shipping lane. By taking control of that sea area (and hijacking other countries' EEZ) means that they have control over a vast major shipping lane and can exploit resources regardless of whether they are allowed to do so in others' EEZ.

Anybody that likes(seriously) Buddhapalms ultra trumps comments is nuts. :rofl:

@dy1022

Meanwhile.......

ceremonie-d-accueil.jpg.jpg

passex-weifan.jpg.jpg

Don't mind some ultra nationalistic Chinese members here. If their leaders were to follow their logic and comments , then China will be even more isolated militarily than it is already in the region making enemy with every country in the world including Europe and potential friends. I don't see who they think will/should be in their side with such a mentality. Lol

SOME(not all, as there are some sensible Chinese members here) of them have this mentality of blowing any little thing out out proportion as far as it doesnt go their way and making crazy remarks of how they will conquer that said country. Lol. Its getting childish.
At least Russian members here are far more mature and sensible.:)
 
. .
It's called South America for a reason.

View attachment 309471

I can use garbage reasoning too:partay:.



Only because like most of the American members, they found a different forum to go to:lol:.

Do the Russians even post outside of their own sub-forum here:unsure:?


Mexico / and South America won't appreciate you assuming they will participate in global domination efforts

Navigating with respect means a friendly gesture and respectful attitude , flying weapons and firing missiles will only make China , uncomfortable

Canadians already met with China last week , and their Loonie got a good boost !!!

r


Canada sees no problem in South Sea china
 
. . .
What you said doesn't matter. We aren't going to confront china,we are just ensuring that our freedom of navigation in the area remains and to maintain good relations with every countries in the area.
As if the chinese were going to attack our ships. At best they can send jets to buzz our ships. @Cossack25A1
What do you mean by, "Freedom Of Navigation"? Are you guys really buying the the US's BS?
China has never blocked any commercial ships, China will always support FON. It's the US that sends their navy all the way to SCS and gives an excuse of FON. It's more like, "Freedom To Espionage" on China's sovereignty.
I didn't know the French are so gullible.
 
Last edited:
.
Well the westerners (mostly US media) is creating stories about some sorta of problem navigating South China sea , when reality the sea is so BIG there is no problem , however some nations continue to get close to Chinese ships and their property (Islands)
 
.
This thread is pure BS. China DOES not, DID not and WILL not block any commercial ship. Every sane person sees through the USA's agenda.
 
.
This thread is pure BS. China DOES not, DID not and WILL not block any commercial ship. Every sane person sees through the USA's agenda.

They just keep repeating the same lies over and over again, that China's goal is to STOP commercial shipping and STOP "freedom of navigation" yet China has never done anything of that sort. Quite the contrary, China depends on the sea lanes opening so why would China shoot itself on the foot?
 
. .
Pls save your oil, just come and destroy China's artificial islands!
Don't waste your time whining, you have more important stuff at home for example refugees and migrants.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom