What's new

China cranks propaganda, Xi Jinping's cult of personality into overdrive ahead of party congress

The Chinese constitution was modified to include Xi's name in it. Something about "Xi's Thoughts" or some similar nonsense.

Your grandparents had to live under "Mao's Thoughts" and carried that famous 'Little Red Book'. Now it looks like YOU might have to live under "Xi's Thoughts" and carry your own version of 'Little Red Book'.

It is kinda sad for the Chinese people, that they seems to be destined -- or cursed -- to live under charismatic leaderships instead of genuine governance by the people.
There's a general attitude in the Chinese people nowadays,which is that as long as the country gets stronger and more muscular on the world stage,and also as long as our domestic environment gets more prosperous n lucrative,if that can be achieved,then the people don't care about who is ruling the country to achieve that,we know autocracy makes our lives full of uncertainties,but people here would rather believe bad things will rarely be happening on them,provided the lives of most people are not affected,then we don't care about all the shadowy things done by the government N instead still hail them for doing a good job,and the negative side of it is that this type of rising has bumped out numerous amount of losers who disguise themselves with patriotism and eager to cause social upheavals,this type of ppl is similar to the red guards in the cultural revolution and the scums of Boxer rebellion,yea,just like that Wang guy,these trashed added a stroke of doom on China's future as you described
 
.
The Chinese constitution was modified to include Xi's name in it. Something about "Xi's Thoughts" or some similar nonsense.

Your grandparents had to live under "Mao's Thoughts" and carried that famous 'Little Red Book'. Now it looks like YOU might have to live under "Xi's Thoughts" and carry your own version of 'Little Red Book'.

It is kinda sad for the Chinese people, that they seems to be destined -- or cursed -- to live under charismatic leaderships instead of genuine governance by the people.

Actually, the Chinese constitution does not include Xi's name. Editing national constitution is very difficult. It is the content of CCP's constitution.

There's a general attitude in the Chinese people nowadays,which is that as long as the country gets stronger and more muscular on the world stage,and also as long as our domestic environment gets more prosperous n lucrative,if that can be achieved,then the people don't care about who is ruling the country to achieve that,we know autocracy makes our lives full of uncertainties,but people here would rather believe bad things will rarely be happening on them,provided the lives of most people are not affected,then we don't care about all the shadowy things done by the government N instead still hail them for doing a good job,and the negative side of it is that this type of rising has bumped out numerous amount of losers who disguise themselves with patriotism and eager to cause social upheavals,this type of ppl is similar to the red guards in the cultural revolution and the scums of Boxer rebellion,yea,just like that Wang guy,these trashed added a stroke of doom on China's future as you described

Your personal attack make you like a real loser. Is it make any sense to repeat "m***er f***er" several dozen times?
 
.
Actually, the Chinese constitution does not include Xi's name. Editing national constitution is very difficult. It is the content of CCP's constitution.
Not my words, buddy...

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-10/24/c_136702726.htm

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/world/asia/china-xi-jinping-communist-party.html
Approved by the party congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, which meets every five years, the change to the constitution adds a clunky new phrase — “Xi Jinping Thought for the New Era of Socialism With Chinese Special Characteristics” — alongside the hallowed names of Mao and Deng Xiaoping.
 
. . .
Essentially, a difference without distinction.

They are different. CCP constitution influence party, PRC constitution influence country. American parties commonly do not have party discipline. But Japanese and Korean parties have that.

Xi is the fourth individual be called "the core" in the history of PRC. Obviously he has more authority than his predecessor. I just figure out a mistake of your point.
 
.
Actually, the Chinese constitution does not include Xi's name. Editing national constitution is very difficult. It is the content of CCP's constitution.



Your personal attack make you like a real loser. Is it make any sense to repeat "m***er f***er" several dozen times?
Take a hike,you Mr.self-righteousness,I'm the type of person who can't stand getting swore at without "reciprocating".
 
.
funny simpletons like you are really have no clue of anything about China``:lol:```

党章(party consititution)=宪法(a country's consititution)? ```:D

Actually, the Chinese constitution does not include Xi's name. Editing national constitution is very difficult. It is the content of CCP's constitution.



Your personal attack make you like a real loser. Is it make any sense to repeat "m***er f***er" several dozen times?
the longer you play on PDF, the better you will understand why we treat China bashers and scums in such "courtesy" :lol:
I had met loads of those kind of people in the West, they are really disgusting towards Chinese eventhough we did no harm to them`````to those people in real life, engage them and hit them (which I did, and policed were involved in the last``but felt good), in virtual world````you know what farbeyonddrive did was quite on the spot````
 
.
They are different. CCP constitution influence party, PRC constitution influence country. American parties commonly do not have party discipline. But Japanese and Korean parties have that.

Xi is the fourth individual be called "the core" in the history of PRC. Obviously he has more authority than his predecessor. I just figure out a mistake of your point.
Yes, I can apart which is which, but when you have a one-party country, any distinction you try to make is meaningless.
 
.
Yes, I can apart which is which, but when you have a one-party country, any distinction you try to make is meaningless.

National constitution guide normal law, which rule all people of China. Party constitution guide party discipline, which only rule party members.
 
.
Yes, I can apart which is which, but when you have a one-party country, any distinction you try to make is meaningless.
tipical nonsense from brainwashed western simpletons``:lol:
 
.
National constitution guide normal law, which rule all people of China. Party constitution guide party discipline, which only rule party members.
And when the Party members governs the country according to Party rules, then effectively the Party's constitution IS the country's constitution.
 
.
And when the Party members governs the country according to Party rules, then effectively the Party's constitution IS the country's constitution.

You can learn how the party discipline work in Japanese and Korean parties. It is not the guidline of making policy. It is the rule within party members. For example, a male and a female has improper sexual relationship. Normal law does not influence that. However, the party discipline will influence that if they are party members. Moreover, party constitution also guide how to absorb new memebers, how to manage party organization, how to hold the activity in party and so on. Again, party constitution does not influence the enacting of laws, also does not guide government officer to make national policies. The internal rule of a company only guide the normal operation, not their business.
 
.
You can learn how the party discipline work in Japanese and Korean parties.
Parties -- plural.

Party platforms guides policies. That is why when a there is a change in political leaderships, policies changes. Sometimes abruptly, sometimes gradually. But changes occurs. That does not happen in your China. China changed only when the disaster is visible on the horizon, like when communism in the Soviet Union collapsed.
 
.
Parties -- plural.

Party platforms guides policies. That is why when a there is a change in political leaderships, policies changes. Sometimes abruptly, sometimes gradually. But changes occurs. That does not happen in your China. China changed only when the disaster is visible on the horizon, like when communism in the Soviet Union collapsed.

First, I just figure out your mistake on party constitution and national constitution. Second, new leader of CCP also means the change in policy, and the "core" of party have more authority to change that. Mao's thought, Deng'theory and Three represents (Jiang) descripted how these three "cores" made policy. Deng made a set of huge change, and Jiang's change was more gradual. Hu was not the "core", so he just did some small change on policy.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom