What's new

China communist party paper says China should join TPP

Status
Not open for further replies.

William Hung

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
2,465
Reaction score
16
China communist party paper says country should join U.S.-led trade pact| Reuters

BEIJING (Reuters) - China should join at an appropriate time the U.S.-backed regional trade accord the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) as its broad aims are in line with China's own economic reform agenda, an influential Communist Party newspaper said on Sunday.

China is not among the 12 Pacific Rim countries who earlier this month agreed the trade pact, the most ambitious in a generation. The accord includes Australia and Japan among economies worth a combined $28 trillion.

China's trade minister has said the country does not feel targeted by it, but will evaluate the likely impact comprehensively.

In a commentary, the biweekly Study Times, published by the Central Party School that trains rising officials, admitted there were those in China who viewed the TPP as a "plot" to isolate and restrain the country's global ambitions.

But the broad aims of the TPP, including reducing things such as administrative approvals and protecting the environment, were what China wants to achieve too, it wrote.

China has been trying to shift to a more sustainable, ecologically-sound, consumption-led economic growth model.

"The rules of the TPP and the direction of China's reforms and opening up are in line," the newspaper said.

"China should keep paying close attention and at an appropriate time, in accordance with progress on domestic reform, join the TPP, while limiting the costs associated to the greatest degree," it added.

However, how China's state-owned industries might be affected by joining the TPP would need careful consideration, as the party has made clear their key role in the economy, the newspaper said.
 
. . .
Link to the Chinese paper please.

Edit: I checked people's daily Sunday and Saturday, both editions as well, there isn't a news stating this. Now I am really curious where did the news come from.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Link to the Chinese paper please.

Edit: I checked people's daily Sunday and Saturday, both editions as well, there isn't a news stating this. Now I am really curious where did the news come from.
Ah ha you did not check Vietnam newspaper, it really stated without China join TPP. The TPP will collapse period.
 
.
Ah ha you did not check Vietnam newspaper, it really stated without China join TPP. The TPP will collapse period.

It's just that the claim looks pretty bogus. While I don't think Reuter will outright lie, I do think it is either quoting a minor paper or it is taking the statement out of context. Hence why I request the Chinese paper source.
 
.
Everyone knows it's something impossible. I think it's just a gesture from China. Nothing else.
 
.
学习时报 is not a newspaper, but an op-ed journal I believe. I question the confidence of the writer, if the news is true. There's absolutely no need for subjugating ourselves to foreign laws. Chinese domestic law must take precedence over everything else within the borders of China, no matter what.
 
.
学习时报 is not a newspaper, but an op-ed journal I believe. I question the confidence of the writer, if the news is true. There's absolutely no need for subjugating ourselves to foreign laws. Chinese domestic law must take precedence over everything else within the borders of China, no matter what.

lol, don't like TPP much?
 
.
Oh let me get this straight? So China don't join TPP, Vietnam will collapse? If China join TPP, then China really a donkey. Lol good post.

Umm, I’m not even sure what you are saying. Maybe you are being a bit too paranoid.


Link to the Chinese paper please.

Edit: I checked people's daily Sunday and Saturday, both editions as well, there isn't a news stating this. Now I am really curious where did the news come from.

The article they got it from was directly published by a journal of the Party school for central committee of CCP (or something like that), they didn’t get it from People’s Daily, etc.

Also, Sputnik news has just published their own article on this.

lol, don't like TPP much?

What do you think about this analysis/comments from an anonymous guy?

与美国相比,我国的实力尚有差距,但正在迅速进步,迎头赶上。提升我国实力的根本途径,除了全面深化改革和扩大对外开放,别无他途。TPP的规则与我国改革开放方向相契合,在许多方面都有所体现。第一,我国在加快完善现代市场体系过程中,将建立公平开放透明的市场规则,在制定负面清单基础上,实行统一的市场准入制度,反对垄断和不正当竞争。这与TPP倡导的政策目标基本一致,符合TPP投资章节和竞争政策章节的核心理念。我国目前正在与美国商谈双边投资协定,以“准入前国民待遇+负面清单”模式为谈判基础,符合TPP规定要求。第二,TPP在技术性贸易壁垒、规则协调等多个章节中制定了旨在简化行政程序,提高行政效率,降低交易成本的规则,同时也注意保护成员国政府为促进公共政策而对经济进行合理管制的权力。我国深化改革的重要内容之一是加快转变政府职能,进一步简政放权,与此同时加强政府对市场活动的监管和宏观调控,加强各类公共服务提供,这与TPP规则的基本精神一致。第三,《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》设立专章要求加快生态文明制度建设,实行最严格的损害赔偿制度和责任追究制度,独立进行环境监管和行政执法,及时公布环境信息。TPP则要求成员国加强环境执法,不得以损害环境为代价获取贸易和投资优势,甚至明确规定环境争议属于TPP争端解决受案范围,这与《决定》精神是契合的。
  尽管TPP的基本原则与我国改革开放方向有相通之处,这并不意味着我国应马上加入TPP。对于TPP,我国应持续紧密关注,根据国内改革进展,适时选择加入,最大限度降低为加入付出的代价。
 
Last edited:
.
china-US bilateral investment treaty (BIT) has been on negotiation since 2008, and is said to be sped up in the near future to get a deal. After the BIT is signed, the next step is a FTA negotiation between US-China, which is expected to be quick. most of the items in the treat highly overlapped with TPP as released by some news. China will test those new rules from BIT/TPP in Shanghai free trade zone, before any decision on TPP can be made. The time period may be as long as a decade. who knows. So, we will see.
 
.
Umm, I’m not even sure what you are saying. Maybe you are being a bit too paranoid.




The article they got it from was directly published by a journal of the Party school for central committee of CCP (or something like that), they didn’t get it from People’s Daily, etc.

Also, Sputnik news has just published their own article on this.



What do you think about this analysis/comments from an anonymous guy?

与美国相比,我国的实力尚有差距,但正在迅速进步,迎头赶上。提升我国实力的根本途径,除了全面深化改革和扩大对外开放,别无他途。TPP的规则与我国改革开放方向相契合,在许多方面都有所体现。第一,我国在加快完善现代市场体系过程中,将建立公平开放透明的市场规则,在制定负面清单基础上,实行统一的市场准入制度,反对垄断和不正当竞争。这与TPP倡导的政策目标基本一致,符合TPP投资章节和竞争政策章节的核心理念。我国目前正在与美国商谈双边投资协定,以“准入前国民待遇+负面清单”模式为谈判基础,符合TPP规定要求。第二,TPP在技术性贸易壁垒、规则协调等多个章节中制定了旨在简化行政程序,提高行政效率,降低交易成本的规则,同时也注意保护成员国政府为促进公共政策而对经济进行合理管制的权力。我国深化改革的重要内容之一是加快转变政府职能,进一步简政放权,与此同时加强政府对市场活动的监管和宏观调控,加强各类公共服务提供,这与TPP规则的基本精神一致。第三,《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》设立专章要求加快生态文明制度建设,实行最严格的损害赔偿制度和责任追究制度,独立进行环境监管和行政执法,及时公布环境信息。TPP则要求成员国加强环境执法,不得以损害环境为代价获取贸易和投资优势,甚至明确规定环境争议属于TPP争端解决受案范围,这与《决定》精神是契合的。
  尽管TPP的基本原则与我国改革开放方向有相通之处,这并不意味着我国应马上加入TPP。对于TPP,我国应持续紧密关注,根据国内改革进展,适时选择加入,最大限度降低为加入付出的代价。


I like this broad mined, constructive thinking individual. As you probably already know, the TPP will play a role in serving as a conduit for necessary internal reforms that the CPC currently is not able to accomplish due in fact to the deep seated tendencies of civil administration as well as market realities in China. TPP will ensure that China makes the necessary environmental law reforms, corporate law as well as even more civil liberties reforms. In fact one can even argue that with TPP, China will erode the CPC's power , and prepare China to become a fertile ground for more political maturation into a democracy. :)

china-US bilateral investment treaty (BIT) has been on negotiation since 2008, and is said to be sped up in the near future to get a deal. After the BIT is signed, the next step is a FTA negotiation between US-China, which is expected to be quick. most of the items in the treat highly overlapped with TPP as released by some news. China will test those new rules from BIT/TPP in Shanghai free trade zone, before any decision on TPP can be made. The time period may be as long as a decade. who knows. So, we will see.

BIT will be realized after China is included into the TPP. Mark my words.

Umm, I’m not even sure what you are saying. Maybe you are being a bit too paranoid.




The article they got it from was directly published by a journal of the Party school for central committee of CCP (or something like that), they didn’t get it from People’s Daily, etc.

Also, Sputnik news has just published their own article on this.



What do you think about this analysis/comments from an anonymous guy?

与美国相比,我国的实力尚有差距,但正在迅速进步,迎头赶上。提升我国实力的根本途径,除了全面深化改革和扩大对外开放,别无他途。TPP的规则与我国改革开放方向相契合,在许多方面都有所体现。第一,我国在加快完善现代市场体系过程中,将建立公平开放透明的市场规则,在制定负面清单基础上,实行统一的市场准入制度,反对垄断和不正当竞争。这与TPP倡导的政策目标基本一致,符合TPP投资章节和竞争政策章节的核心理念。我国目前正在与美国商谈双边投资协定,以“准入前国民待遇+负面清单”模式为谈判基础,符合TPP规定要求。第二,TPP在技术性贸易壁垒、规则协调等多个章节中制定了旨在简化行政程序,提高行政效率,降低交易成本的规则,同时也注意保护成员国政府为促进公共政策而对经济进行合理管制的权力。我国深化改革的重要内容之一是加快转变政府职能,进一步简政放权,与此同时加强政府对市场活动的监管和宏观调控,加强各类公共服务提供,这与TPP规则的基本精神一致。第三,《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》设立专章要求加快生态文明制度建设,实行最严格的损害赔偿制度和责任追究制度,独立进行环境监管和行政执法,及时公布环境信息。TPP则要求成员国加强环境执法,不得以损害环境为代价获取贸易和投资优势,甚至明确规定环境争议属于TPP争端解决受案范围,这与《决定》精神是契合的。
  尽管TPP的基本原则与我国改革开放方向有相通之处,这并不意味着我国应马上加入TPP。对于TPP,我国应持续紧密关注,根据国内改革进展,适时选择加入,最大限度降低为加入付出的代价。


 
.
Bad news to state-owned company staff.I hope my father wont be a slave in the future.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom