What's new

China arms up MIRVs in response to South Sea crisis

BuddhaPalm

BANNED
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
912
Reaction score
-16
Country
China
Location
China
China Making Some Missiles More Powerful

David E Sanger and William J Broad, The New York Times

Washington: After decades of maintaining a minimal nuclear force, China has re-engineered many of its long-range ballistic missiles to carry multiple warheads, a step that federal officials and policy analysts say appears designed to give pause to the United States as it prepares to deploy more robust missile defenses in the Pacific.

What makes China's decision particularly notable is that the technology of miniaturizing warheads and putting three or more atop a single missile has been in Chinese hands for decades. But a succession of Chinese leaders deliberately let it sit unused; they were not interested in getting into the kind of arms race that characterized the Cold War nuclear competition between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

Now, however, President Xi Jinping appears to have altered course, at the same moment that he is building military airfields on disputed islands in the South China Sea, declaring exclusive Chinese "air defense identification zones," sending Chinese submarines through the Persian Gulf for the first time and creating a powerful new arsenal of cyber weapons.

Many of those steps have taken U.S. officials by surprise and have become evidence of the challenge the Obama administration faces in dealing with China, in particular after U.S. intelligence agencies had predicted that Xi would focus on economic development and follow the path of his predecessor, who advocated the country's "peaceful rise."

:china:
 
. .
Time to increase the nuclear arsenal of the PLA.
We will collide with their warships in the South China Sea. They will open fire with CVBG. We will strike back with island-based strike aircraft and shore-based DF-21D. Faced with defeat, they will use tactical nukes against our island outposts, wiping them out. Then we will wipe out their South Korean and Japanese bases with nukes.
 
.
B-1 bombers coming to Australia to deter Beijing's South China Sea ambitions: US
Date May 15, 2015
The US military plans to station B-1 strategic bombers and surveillance aircraft in Australia as part of efforts to deter Chinese ambitions in the South China Sea, a senior US government official has revealed in comments later downplayed by the Australian government.

During testimony before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday, US Defence Department Assistant Secretary for Asian and Pacific Security Affairs David Shear announced that in addition to the movement of US Marine and Army units around the Western Pacific region, "we will be placing additional Air Force assets in Australia as well, including B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft."

1431668829594.jpg


The US plan comes as the Obama administration moves to boost US naval forces and air power in the South China Sea to assert the right of free passage and challenge China's efforts to buttress its maritime territorial claims through the construction of airfields and artificial islands.

About 1150 US Marines began arriving in Darwin this week for six months training during the Top End's dry season. The marines are the fourth rotation of US troops deployed to the Northern Territory since 2011. The plan is to gradually increase the number of US Marines rotating through Darwin to 2500 troops by 2017.

Disclosed ahead of any statement by the Australian government, the US plan to deploy B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft to Australia comes as part of the US military's broader "pivot" to the Asia-Pacific region.

Assistant Defence Secretary Shear made it clear on Wednesday that the US intends to challenge China's claims to sovereignty over large parts of the South China Sea.

"We claim the right of innocent passage in such areas, and we exercise that right regularly, both in the South China Sea and globally," Mr Shear told the Senate Foreign Relations committee.

Similar views were expressed by Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Russel, who also told the Senate committee "No matter how much sand you pile on a reef in the South China Sea, you can't manufacture sovereignty."

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has voiced "serious concern" about the US officials's remarks.

Spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a press conference on Wednesday that China supported freedom of navigation in the South China Sea but "freedom of navigation does not give one country's military aircraft and ships free access to another country's territorial waters and airspace."

She said China would "resolutely safeguard its territorial sovereignty" and urged the US "not to take any risks or make any provocations."

An Australian Defence Department spokesperson said the department was "aware of the comments made by a US official in Congressional testimony overnight."

In an apparent reference to Assistant Secretary Shear's remarks about China added that the US Government "has contacted us to advise that the official misspoke."

The Defence Department spokesperson insisted that military cooperation between Australia and the United States is "not directed at any one country."

However the spokesperson did not dispute the report that the US plans to deploy B-1 bombers and surveillance aircraft to Australia and declined to answer specific questions about any such deployments.

"The specifics of the future force posture cooperation are yet to be finalised," the spokesperson said. "Details are subject to continuing discussions between Australia and the United States. A range a different US aircraft already visits Australia for exercises and training. Increased cooperation will build on these activities."

Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said he wasn't aware of the report but backed the Amercian -Australian alliance.

"I think our region knows we have the ANZUS alliance," he said.

"I don't think anyone's ever said we shouldn't have the American alliance but what I think Asian economies and societies want to see is deeper engagement and engagement isn't just trade," he said.


The B-1 Lancer bomber, commonly called "Bone" (originally from "B-One") was first deployed by the US Air Force in the mid 1980s and is expected to continue as a strategic bomber until the mid 2030s.

US B-52 bombers have previously been temporarily deployed to Darwin, to take part in exercises with the Royal Australian Air Force, in 2012 and in late 2014, as a consequence of a joint Force Posture Initiative agreed by former prime minister Julia Gillard and US President Barack Obama in 2011.
 
.
We will collide with their warships in the South China Sea. They will open fire with CVBG. We will strike back with island-based strike aircraft and shore-based DF-21D. Faced with defeat, they will use tactical nukes against our island outposts, wiping them out. Then we will wipe out their South Korean and Japanese bases with nukes.

Then we'll stop shopping at Walmart and all the Chinese will starve to death :D
 
. . . .
Then we'll stop shopping at Walmart and all the Chinese will starve to death :D

Then China will kick GM out of China and more Us citizens on welfare checks.

I wish the world would be as simple as it seems to you.
 
.
​China rapidly upgrading nuclear arsenal with MIRVed missiles – report — RT News

China is fast refurbishing its arsenal of silo-based long-range ballistic missiles to carry multiple independently targetable warheads, defense experts say. The move comes decades after Beijing acquired the technology, indicating a strategy change.

It has been speculated on for years that the Chinese military is upgrading some of its bigger ICBMs with Multiple Independently-targeted Reentry Vehicle technology (MIRV), which allows a single missile to carry multiple warhead across the globe and deploy them to aim at individual targets.

The assessment was endorsed by the US government in the latest Pentagon report on Chinese military might, which marked Dongfeng-5 missiles, China’s large liquid-propellant rocket capable of reaching the US, as MIRV-capable. The same report said Dongfeng-41, smaller solid-propellant road-mobile ICBMs were “possibly capable of carrying MIRVs.”

READ MORE: Watch out: Chinese Army bans wearable gadgets citing security concerns

According to The New York Times, as many as half of China’s 20 DF-5 missiles may have been upgraded by now. With a conservative estimate that each missile would carry three individual warheads, it increased the number of warheads that Beijing may fire at an enemy to 40, up from 20, the newspaper said, citing a number of defense experts.

“China’s little force is slowly getting a little bigger, and its limited capabilities are slowly getting a little better,” Hans M. Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, told NYT.

In an earlier report on the development, Kristensen said China is probably upgrading its arsenal in response to the buildup of the global antiballistic missile system by the US. Washington says it needs the system to protect itself and its allies from an attack by nations such as Iran and North Korea. But strategists in Moscow and Beijing see it as threat to the national security of their respective countries.

“If so, how ironic that the US missile defense system – intended to reduce the threat to the United States – instead would seem to have increased the threat by triggering development of MIRV on Chinese ballistic missiles that could destroy more US cities in a potential war,” Kristensen said.

The Pentagon report says China is developing a number of technologies to penetrate antimissile shields.

READ MORE: 'Ditch Cold War mentality': China hits back at US DoD report

“China is working on a range of technologies to attempt to counter US and other countries’ ballistic missile defense systems, including maneuverable reentry vehicles (MaRV), MIRVs, decoys, chaff, jamming, and thermal shielding,” it said.

China reportedly had technology needed to miniaturize nuclear warheads enough to fit several of them on a missile for decades, but chose not to upgrade its arsenal. Beijing’s nuclear deterrence strategy is to have just enough weapons that they could survive a nuclear attack and deliver monumental damage to the aggressor.

“This is obviously part of an effort to prepare for long-term competition with the United States,” Ashley J. Tellis, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a senior national security official in the George W. Bush administration, told NYT. “The Chinese are always fearful of American nuclear advantage.”

The beef-up of China’s small but punchy nuclear arsenal may trigger similar efforts from other nuclear powers in the region - India and Pakistan. So far only the US, Russia, Britain and France have deployed MIRVed ICBMs.

US make nuclear reduction senseless
Moscow indicated it may see fit to stockpile more nuclear weapons depending on US foreign policies. The warning came from Mikhail Ulyanov, chief of the non-proliferation department in the Russian foreign ministry, who is attending a UN conference on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The Russian diplomat was speaking about the New-START nuclear reduction treaty signed by the US and Russia in 2010, saying Moscow is sticking to its commitments, but would not go any further due to US behavior.

“The things the Americans are doing objectively hampers if not completely eliminates any prospect of further nuclear disarmament,” Ulyanov said.

“As of now there are no factors that would make our continued participation in the [New START] treaty counter to Russia’s interest, but hypothetically such a situation may arise from US actions, which we would not want to see,” he added.

The US and Russia have parity in nuclear weapons, but America has far more conventional forces. With Russia relying on its nuclear arsenal to safeguard it from a massive US attack, the development of the US anti-missile system is viewed as a dangerous threat to national security in Moscow.
 
.
Then China will kick GM out of China and more Us citizens on welfare checks.

I wish the world would be as simple as it seems to you.
Common American folks do not know what their government is really up to. They read sensational news and believe it.
The good news for China is that America's population is increasing with more dumb people than ever before
 
.
It was called a Pivot by Hillary. Then it was called a Re-balancing. Now these Jingo think tankers, couch potato generals are taking off the masks and calling out "Containment". The fact that Tankerland is retching out gunboat diplomacy shows that these wiseguys need to give themselves a shake. This is the post-AIIB era now where the "Shock and Awe" "American's Soft Power" "Responsibility to Intimidate" are all shown to be the undead from Teddy Roosevelt's mausoleum.

With AIIB, all of the wiseguys were out drawing a line in the sand harking the chorus line, namely Australia, Thailand, S Korea, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia not to join. Instead, the Brits, Germany, France and Italy came out of left field and crossed the line as if the Coalition of the Unwilling never existed. Rumors are that they did not even give empire a heads-up.

Now the AIIB is strictly and optional thing where the chorus line did not have to kiss the Panda butt. These colonial powers do not have any national interest in Asia and could have obeyed the line without losing faces. For these EU powers to join an Asian development institution is like the Beach Club of Tahiti voting to join with an Estonian Ice Skinny-Dipping Club, totally optional although such twinning can be welcome. So the AIIB ship-jumping certainly warms the cockles of the heart all over Asia. That is the reality of the latest comedic geopolitics.

As for advancing the military threats against China, there may be some chicken plays, rammings and shooting to happen. But as in the Black Sea, all it was needed was for an SU-25 to show a little jamming totally paralyzing an empire cruiser for all the threats of war to be restricted to brutal but losing proxy Nazis from Kyiv. And now another line in the sand, the Sochi moment where Kerry told Lavrov to ignore the Obama Axis of Evil speech where it was declared the three greatest global threats [to the empire] are 1. Ebola, 2. Russia, and 3 ISIS!!!. In true Simpsons style, "He didn't mean it!"

The "Entitlement to Intimidate" in to China and Russia, just that, a Chihuahua bark. Used to bombing militarily small and backward countries, they know that China does not have to surpass symmetrically every expense line of the porky MI budget. AA/AD has been installed for more than 3 years. If they try anything serious, there will be another line crossed to "tears and knashing of teeth".
 
Last edited:
.
during confrontation with USSR nukes weren't used how come one is even imagining about the nuclear war. Stop!
 
.
Chinese nuclear arsenal is much bigger than the few hundred nukes these 'experts' believe China has.

China has been rapidly increasing its nuclear arsenal for many many years now.

These guys actually believe China has only 250 nuclear warheads :lol:
 
.
It is only reasonable that we arm ourselves to the teeth to protect our national security. Once again, I want to remind our friends that we have a No-First Use policy.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom