What's new

China Answers US Challenge in South China Sea With Propaganda

yolo2016

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 25, 2015
Messages
599
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
United States
@TaiShang :yahoo::dance3:

The Chinese regime was quick to mobilize its own forces after the U.S. Navy sent the USS Lassen destroyer late Monday to patrol within 12 nautical miles of China’s man-made islands in the disputed South China Sea.

Rather than send warships or jets, however, the Chinese regime mobilized a very different system—its vast network of propaganda agents, state-run news outlets, and systems to control the flow of information.

The response highlights the approach the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has built to fight modern conflicts. It uses what the Pentagon has branded a “non-kinetic” form of fighting, which targets human perception and forms the CCP’s core strategy for taking the South China Sea.

Almost all the CCP’s propaganda channels use an identical line.

Soon after the U.S. exercise, more than 200 million users of the WeChat smartphone messaging app in China received a message on their news feeds, obtained by Epoch Times, which claimed the U.S. military “illegally” entered “China’s South Sea.”

The message appears to reflect the line being pushed out by the CCP’s propaganda arms, and is designed to instill notions that what the United States did was both aggressive and illegal, built on the concept unrecognized by other nations that the CCP is right to have a military perimeter around the man-made islands.

A similar line was picked up by the Chinese news program, “Xinwen Lianbo,” which is the most watched and most heavily controlled news program in China. Andrew Chubb, a doctoral candidate in International Relations, wrote on his “South Sea Conversations” blog that the program, which airs on the state-run CCTV, “carries the Party Line to the masses.”

The show’s host states the U.S. warship “illegally” entered waters near “China’s relevant islands and reefs in the Spratly archipelago.”

Similar to China’s state-run Xinhua news outlet, Chubb notes the CCTV program presents the CCP’s general line on a topic and “legitimizes other media to focus on the issue.”

He wrote, “This must reflect a choice by the ruling party that it wants the issue near the top of the broad public’s agenda, at least in the short term.”

The conventional channels also seemed to use this line. The Chinese Foreign Ministry released a statement saying the U.S. ship “illegally” entered “China’s Spratly Islands.”

The ‘Three Warfares’
The CCP has been hard at work for the last two years dredging sand, and pumping it onto reefs and shallow waters in the Spratly Island and Paracel Island chains of the South China Sea.

Using this method, it has built five artificial islands in the South China Sea, which it now claims as Chinese territory. Despite the fact that the Spratly Islands, in particular, are close to 1,000 miles south of China’s southernmost point on Hainan Island, the CCP claims an unofficial defensive perimeter around the man-made islands, which other nations largely do not acknowledge.

To challenge these claims, the United States is holding “freedom of navigation” exercises, meant to ensure that international ships can still pass freely through the South China Sea.

The Chinese response to these exercises closely follows the CCP’s main strategy in the South China Sea, which the Pentagon and U.S. defense experts have previously detailed.

The Chinese regime calls this strategy the Three Warfares, which consists of media warfare, psychological warfare, and legal warfare.

The system technically breaks down propaganda into three roles: one to control what’s being said in the press, another to target the psychology of their adversaries, and a third to validate their claims by manipulating international laws.
 
.
I don't think US navy is going to be stopped by Chinese propaganda.

Until other nations and ships start using their identification codes, the 9 yard dash will continue to be irrelevant. I don't see this changing unless China starts attacking ships that refuse to comply with their navy and use their identification codes, in which case they would be the aggressor and whole region would turn south very quickly.
 
.
I don't think US navy is going to be stopped by Chinese propaganda.
This is targeting the Chinese public, not US. Not even the spineless Obama is going to be that feckless.

In the old days, the Chinese public would not matter one whit. But today, given the various reforms that inevitably gave the Chinese public a little bit more say in what their government is doing -- a lollipop -- the Party needs as much approval, or at least the facade of it, as it can rile up from the Chinese public.
 
.
Isn't the patrol in the name of "Freedom of Navigation" a propaganda itself?

"No, it's not. We actually achieved more than the effect of a public stunt!" Seriously?
What an irony:usflag:
 
.
Isn't the patrol in the name of "Freedom of Navigation" a propaganda itself?

"No, it's not. We actually achieved more than the effect of a public stunt!" Seriously?
What an irony:usflag:

You think sending our warships into an area, where you threaten us with war or dire actions, is propaganda?

China is but a gnat in this equation, and we will do as we do, per international law, and you can't do jack to stop us! :china::omghaha:
 
.
You think sending our warships into an area, where you threaten us with war or dire actions, is propaganda?
We "threaten" you? Yeah so typical. How did we threaten you when you send your warship to our doorsteps uninvited?
China is but a gnat in this equation, and we will do as we do, per international law, and you can't do jack to stop us! :china::omghaha:
But you haven't done jack. Did I miss anything?:sarcastic:

Put it this way. If you can't stop us from building the islands, all you're doing is puffing hot air, or propaganda for a better name.
 
.
We "threaten" you? Yeah so typical. How did we threaten you when you send your warship to our doorsteps uninvited?

But you haven't done jack. Did I miss anything?:sarcastic:

Put it this way. If you can't stop us from building the islands, all you're doing is puffing hot air, or propaganda for a better name.

Huffing and puffing is issuing war threats over it, creating propaganda plans, and asking our U.S ambassador to "come talk" to the CCP, and listen to how upset the chinese are.

We don't need to do anything about them islands that mother nature, or a daisy cutter can't do in seconds. :lol:

There is a case in the international court being adjudicated on this issue, and we have plenty of options to be played out. Did I miss anything?lol
 
Last edited:
.
Isn't the patrol in the name of "Freedom of Navigation" a propaganda itself?

"No, it's not. We actually achieved more than the effect of a public stunt!" Seriously?
What an irony:usflag:
No, it is not. Because we actually challenged allies when they made claims as well.
 
.
I admire america's brave effort, thanks to their freedom of navigation patrols China finally stopped building islands.
Oh wait China is still building its islands. Poor america, they never win. :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom