China and India : Brothers at Odds Who Shared the Same Destiny?

[Sanchez]

[QUOTE="SrNair, post: 7658904, member: 150861
On topic .Had it been an autocratic rule we would have been.develop like that so easily.But that is not the case here .We are a democratic nation.[/QUOTE]

Be honest，Indian. You had had a socialist party in power for decades. You couldn't do it and still cann't.

 

[SrNair]

[QUOTE="SrNair, post: 7658904, member: 150861
On topic .Had it been an autocratic rule we would have been.develop like that so easily.But that is not the case here .We are a democratic nation.

Be honest，Indian. You had had a socialist party in power for decades. You couldn't do it and still cann't.[/QUOTE]


Be honest ,Chinese You dont have iota of knowledge about democracy and unique democratic structure of India .In you China CCP can bulldoze entire building in the name of development .Chinese will gratefully accept any kind of shit from your CCP.
But in our nation if anyone dares to do that people will revolt against them.
Oyr blood wont allow suppression .We will always revolt if the develooment is against ourtradition..

 

[Jlaw]

You have got it wrong. This cousin thing is prevalent with your all weather friend on our west, not us. BTW what do you know about the term called "cousin"?? Do you have any idea with your one child policy?

this co-worker is from India so they are not wrong. In fact he recently moved out because he cannot stand sharing a tiny room with 3 adults. His house has 11 adults living in it but the house is meant for 4 adults max.

 

[Place Of Space]

International politcs decides Indian attitude and actions, attacking China.

India got independence and PRC established at the similar time. China in cold war was sanctioned by America and West Europe, later having conflicts with USSR, this was the main reason India dared to attack China in 1962 and occupied vast Chinese territory. Actually after India got independence, it immediately attacked almost all neighbors, from Pakistan, Kashmir kingdom, Sikkim kingdom, China, east Pakistan (BD), Manipur kingdom, Assam...India done so many, has it met any challenges or punishment? Not a serious one at all. If without American suppression, China in 1960's could beat India competely, and solved the southwestern threat forever.

That's the reason I repeat in this forum again and again: Chinese govt should improve relationship with America (in the case China-Russia , west Europe relation has been normalized. ), then concentrate on Indian threats. We all know the jungle rule, when a lion fighting with another lion,especially one lion is obvious stronger, the hyena would always wait and grap the lion's prey. India definitely played a hyena role in these conflicts in 1960-....

@Chinese-Dragon @Shotgunner51 @Jlaw @AndrewJin This can try to be a common view among Chinese society.

By the way, Buddhism is only a very small part of Chinese culture, Confucianism/imperial power in the past always donimated the country and people in every aspects. Buddhism or Taoism more like symbol in Chinese society, religion which were sino-lized never controlled Chinese brain.
@ito @SrNair @Lure @Luca1 @me_itsme @Parashu

 

[Shotgunner51]

Let me clear this point for you. The backwardness that he claims is only in the economic means. He actually compared the life expectancy and GDP Per capita and despite Western GDP Per capita is much higher throughout the last 2 centuries, Chinese and Indian life expectancy outgrowths their GDP Per capita.

So backwardness is definitely no cultural (I wouldn't even watch a video with such an absurd thesis let. Alone posting here) but in terms of economics and narrow it down more in terms of GDP Per capita.

The guy has nothing against Asians, he likes the culture and he clearly acknowledges past domination of Asia. The video is the completely opposite of what you have imagined.

Thanks bro, you always make good threads!

On topic I have nothing against this fellow personally nor do I care whether he likes our culture or not. Yes, it's about the economic comparison. The points are that firstly he made comparison by excluding the advanced eastern part from "Asia", excluding the underdeveloped part from "Europe", that's a continental-scale mistake. Then he concluded the economic comparison between the two continents which have been civilized for thousands of years, using the last two centuries.

China made a bunch of geo-economic (& geo-strategic) mistakes hence it has been down for two centuries, and now is back on track of resurgence, slowly but progressively. Moreover, rest of East Asia has already been highly advanced for a long time, so what's the surprise about the Mainland making a come back? There is no need for guys like him to act like wise discoverers of big secrets, all these are very normal.

 

[Borr]

back to the topic. That dude just thought too high of his race. He simply didn't get born during the long ages when Eu being the barbarian backwaters of global civilization.

 

[Jlaw]

International politcs decides Indian attitude and actions, attacking China.

India got independence and PRC established at the similar time. China in cold war was sanctioned by America and West Europe, later having conflicts with USSR, this was the main reason India dared to attack China in 1962 and occupied vast Chinese territory. Actually after India got independence, it immediately attacked almost all neighbors, from Pakistan, Kashmir kingdom, Sikkim kingdom, China, east Pakistan (BD), Manipur kingdom, Assam...India done so many, has it met any challenges or punishment? Not a serious one at all. If without American suppression, China in 1960's could beat India competely, and solved the southwestern threat forever.

That's the reason I repeat in this forum again and again: Chinese govt should improve relationship with America (in the case China-Russia , west Europe relation has been normalized. ), then concentrate on Indian threats. We all know the jungle rule, when a lion fighting with another lion,especially one lion is obvious stronger, the hyena would always wait and grap the lion's prey. India definitely played a hyena role in these conflicts in 1960-....

@Chinese-Dragon @Shotgunner51 @Jlaw @AndrewJin This can try to be a common view among Chinese society.

By the way, Buddhism is only a very small part of Chinese culture, Confucianism/imperial power in the past always donimated the country and people in every aspects. Buddhism or Taoism more like symbol in Chinese society, religion which were sino-lized never controlled Chinese brain.
@ito @SrNair @Lure @Luca1 @me_itsme @Parashu

Indian crimes are mainly ignored in the western media because they are no threat to western hegemony. In fact, India embraces the western world from making English as official language, democracy and having a UK style legal system.

China is a main threat to western world domination thus China is demonize.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

On topic .Had it been an autocratic rule we would have been.develop like that so easily.But that is not the case here .We are a democratic nation.

But the classic argument against autocratic rule is that it is inefficient and unable to handle development and change. Thus, autocratic rule is said to be inferior for purely pragmatic reasons. You should have been at a huge advantage if that was true.

 

[TheTruth]

Stop hoarding dollars and then start preaching. Withdraw from tibet then india and china can disengage from the enmity. No body is our master.

Get out of "Northeast India," Ladakh, Sikkim, Goa, and Hyderabad and we can talk.

 

[Nan Yang]

Be honest，Indian. You had had a socialist party in power for decades. You couldn't do it and still cann't.


Be honest ,Chinese You dont have iota of knowledge about democracy and unique democratic structure of India .In you China CCP can bulldoze entire building in the name of development .Chinese will gratefully accept any kind of shit from your CCP.
But in our nation if anyone dares to do that people will revolt against them.
Oyr blood wont allow suppression .We will always revolt if the develooment is against ourtradition..

Not entirely true.
Unlike China, your nation has no history of popular revolt.

 

[Misay]

Actually it is the other way: Chinese love anything white and almost forgot their culture and traditions. India on the other hand still follow its culture.

White represents the dead，in China.Nobody will wear only white clothes.Poor fool in India.

 

[Rasengan]

Such a hilarious thread where the Chinese members literally destroyed the propagandists Indian mindset.

 

[Luca1]

Be honest，Indian. You had had a socialist party in power for decades. You couldn't do it and still cann't.

Be honest ,Chinese You dont have iota of knowledge about democracy and unique democratic structure of India .In you China CCP can bulldoze entire building in the name of development .Chinese will gratefully accept any kind of shit from your CCP.
But in our nation if anyone dares to do that people will revolt against them.
Oyr blood wont allow suppression .We will always revolt if the develooment is against ourtradition..[/QUOTE]

India represents failure of democracy. If every democracy is like India, than dictatorship would be the prefer form of government.

Thankfully, there are better representation of democracy than the failed Indian state.

 

[Jlaw]

Did you ask him how many bath rooms do they have. And if any of the bathrooms has toilets?

He was living in Canada. We have toilets here. But the funny story is this. There are two married couples living in the same house. So he said when they need to have sex, everyone has to leave the house .

 

[SrNair]

Be honest ,Chinese You dont have iota of knowledge about democracy and unique democratic structure of India .In you China CCP can bulldoze entire building in the name of development .Chinese will gratefully accept any kind of shit from your CCP.
But in our nation if anyone dares to do that people will revolt against them.
Oyr blood wont allow suppression .We will always revolt if the develooment is against ourtradition..

India represents failure of democracy. If every democracy is like India, than dictatorship would be the prefer form of government.

Thankfully, there are better representation of democracy than the failed Indian state.[/QUOTE]

@Luca1 What is your qualification and credibility to question our democracy ?If you dont have any then please dont quote me .We dont need your certificate

Not entirely true.
Unlike China, your nation has no history of popular revolt.

What do you know about our history ?
An east Asian try to teach Indians about their history .
pathetic attempt.

Chinese didnt even faced 1/10 of the invasion from foreign barbarians like we faced during our earlier centuries .And none of them including Brits couldnt established their total dominance over us.
They were always faced revolt from native Indians.

But the classic argument against autocratic rule is that it is inefficient and unable to handle development and change. Thus, autocratic rule is said to be inferior for purely pragmatic reasons. You should have been at a huge advantage if that was true.

GCC also have autorcratic rule.But they are even developed than you.