What's new

Call for Beijing to work with Taiwan to reunify in Chinese-style democracy

Krueger

BANNED
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Country
United States
Location
United States
4fdc2232a3907faa8843bf52e6776a52.jpg


Hau Pei-tsun says Beijing can learn from Taiwan's experiences.

Former Taiwanese premier Hau Pei-tsun called on Beijing to abandon any threat of force against Taiwan and work with Taipei to reunify the two sides under a new "Chinese-style" democracy.

Hua told a lecture at City University in Hong Kong that the two steps were necessary to achieve "the Chinese dream", a phrase President Xi Jinping has used frequently to describe his vision for the country.

"The premise for democracy should be to stop the fighting between Chinese people and to end the era of political power that grows out of the barrel of a gun, which are key elements to realising 'the China dream'," Hau, 95, said during the Friday lecture.

The Kuomintang elder said Beijing could learn from Taiwan's experiences in implementing democracy since Kuomintang leader Chiang Kai-shek died in 1975.

He noted Lee Teng-hui's peaceful succession to president following Chiang's son, Chiang Ching-kuo, in 1988.

"Taiwan started democratic reform to end one-party rule and lifted a press ban when the domestic economy was taking off in the 1980s," said Hau, suggesting that mainlanders would desire similar political reforms as their living standard improves.

Hau's participation in the second world war and the KMT's civil war against the Communist Party earned him the rank of five-star general. He was credited with successfully defending Quemoy island during a weeks-long bombardment by the People's Liberation Army.

He resigned as chief of the general staff of Taiwan's Ministry of National Defence in 1989, after Lee appointed him premier.

Hau said that cross-strait relations had improved greatly since the end of the cold war, decreasing the threat of military conflict. The much smaller Taiwanese military long ago gave up any hope of reconquering the mainland.

"The slogans of 'countering back the mainland' created by Chiang Kai-shek and 'liberating Taiwan' by Mao Zedong several decades ago should be forgotten because none of them could be put into practice," Hau said. "The future development of cross-strait relations should stick to 'no war, no independence and gradual unification'."

He proposed a "Chinese-style" alternative to Western-style democracy in which the number of political parties would be controlled.

"The [Chinese-style] democratic system couldn't allow too many political parities," he said.

"Only major parties with at least 20 per cent of public popularity would qualify to nominate candidates."

Call for Beijing to work with Taiwan to reunify in 'Chinese-style' democracy | South China Morning Post
 
. . . .
KMT lost the war, they should come to the table as a junior partner to the CPC, under the People's Republic of China.

People's Republic? It's as hilarious as Democratic People's Republic of Korea. So tired of stupid "people" attached to every damn government offices. North Korea, a dictatorship calls itself democratic republic. What the heck does "People's Republic" even mean? Does that mean there are non-people's republic in this world?

Anyway, China does not belong to any political party. Therefore, if China unifies, I prefer a neutral and honorable historical name like the Middle Kingdom, or simply China. No need to scream to the entire world "hi look, we represent people!" So insecure and childish.

I like it :agree:. India should try to emulate same model in our parliamentarian system. Too many political parties in every state in addition to national parties literally screw the nation.

Yea, I agree. There are left and right in China already, so the people will naturally fall into two major political camps when unified.

Too many parties have no real benefits but create too much friction among different interest groups.
 
.
People's Republic? It's as hilarious as Democratic People's Republic of Korea. So tired of stupid "people" attached to every damn government offices. North Korea, a dictatorship calls itself democratic republic. What the heck does "People's Republic" even mean? Does that mean there are non-people's republic in this world?

Anyway, China does not belong to any political party. Therefore, if China unifies, I prefer a neutral and honorable historical name like the Middle Kingdom, or simply China. No need to scream to the entire world "hi look, we represent people!" So insecure and childish.



Yea, I agree. There are left and right in China already, so the people will naturally fall into two major political camps when unified.

Too many parties have no real benefits but create too much friction among different interest groups.

Who cares?

The modern China is founded by CPC, if you don't like it, then leave it. :coffee:
 
.
People's Republic? It's as hilarious as Democratic People's Republic of Korea. So tired of stupid "people" attached to every damn government offices. North Korea, a dictatorship calls itself democratic republic. What the heck does "People's Republic" even mean? Does that mean there are non-people's republic in this world?

Anyway, China does not belong to any political party. Therefore, if China unifies, I prefer a neutral and honorable historical name like the Middle Kingdom, or simply China. No need to scream to the entire world "hi look, we represent people!" So insecure and childish.



Yea, I agree. There are left and right in China already, so the people will naturally fall into two major political camps when unified.

Too many parties have no real benefits but create too much friction among different interest groups.

People's Republic of China is the name of my country. :wave:

China itself is a civilization-state. The nation-state is the PRC.

The PRC is the current incarnation of the Chinese civilization-state. Therefore it has my loyalty, simple as that.
 
.
Who cares?

The modern China is founded by CPC, if you don't like it, then leave it. :coffee:

He had left for America.

China still has ways to go before its ready to become a democracy. If it transform to fast, it could create chaos to the society and the economy. Worse, it would end up like Indian democracy. But once the thoughts and attitude of the majority of people, not just people along the coast, are open up, than it can gradually absorb democracy. It will take a while and for a big country like China, it should start democracy first in county level for a period of time, than democracy in state level and finally in the national level.
 
.
China still has ways to go before its ready to become a democracy. If it transform to fast, it could create chaos to the society and the economy.

I agree. And there is no better example than my home city of HK, which was NEVER a democracy, yet has some of the highest living and development standards on Earth.

Singapore too, they are not classified as a full democracy, but like HK they are one of the most developed cities in the world.

I feel that China must first become developed before implementing such large-scale political reform. That is the most practical and logical way forward, and this model has been proven many times before in East Asia. Develop first, political reforms later.
 
.
Call for Beijing to work with Taiwan to reunify in Chinese-style democracy
US's dog barking at China again, and China is just too weak to shut that dog's mouth up

China will have the same fate with USSR if they let the dog keep barking in front of their door day by day :pop:

I agree. And there is no better example than my home city of HK, which was NEVER a democracy, yet has some of the highest living and development standards on Earth.

Singapore too, they are not classified as a full democracy, but like HK they are one of the most developed cities in the world.

I feel that China must first become developed before implementing such large-scale political reform. That is the most practical and logical way forward, and this model has been proven many times before in East Asia. Develop first, political reforms later.
Bcz u guys are well fed dogs of US and the West when coward China is too weak to shut HK dog's mouth up, that's it
 
.
He had left for America.

China still has ways to go before its ready to become a democracy. If it transform to fast, it could create chaos to the society and the economy. Worse, it would end up like Indian democracy. But once the thoughts and attitude of the majority of people, not just people along the coast, are open up, than it can gradually absorb democracy. It will take a while and for a big country like China, it should start democracy first in county level for a period of time, than democracy in state level and finally in the national level.

China knows how to explore the true democracy instead of imitating the western 'democracy' like many other Asian nations did.

This is not the 'democracy' that we expect for our 1.3 billion nation. :coffee:

拚è*‰æ‰€ç¨…過關 潑水、勒脖藍ç¶*爆衝突 - YouTube
 
.
People's Republic of China is the name of my country. :wave:

China itself is a civilization-state. The nation-state is the PRC.

The PRC is the current incarnation of the Chinese civilization-state. Therefore it has my loyalty, simple as that.

It's great that PRC has your royalty, but have you asked people in Taiwan when unified? Have you asked other Chinese living in mainland? Let's see what's the best name and to what country we should pledge our royalty.
 
.
It's great that PRC has your royalty, but have you asked people in Taiwan when unified? Have you asked other Chinese living in mainland? Let's see what's the best name and to what country we should pledge our royalty.

The best name is still PRC, since your beloved ROC sucks a$$ in the eyes of the Chinese people.
 
.
China knows how to explore the true democracy instead of imitating the western 'democracy' like many other Asian nations did.

This is not the 'democracy' that we expect for our 1.3 billion nation. :coffee:

No. Please do not copy all of Taiwanese style democracy into China. Parliamentary style debate is one of the worse part of democracy. A strong executive is important for Asian style democracy. As for the parliament, there should be better control and rules. We do not see physical conflicts in US congress.

The best name is still PRC, since your beloved ROC sucks a$$ in the eyes of the Chinese people.

I was talking to a colleague who is from China. He told me that if there is an election in China between CCP or KMT, people would vote for KMT. Is that true?

He is from NingPo, Zhejiang.
 
.
It's great that PRC has your royalty, but have you asked people in Taiwan when unified? Have you asked other Chinese living in mainland? Let's see what's the best name and to what country we should pledge our royalty.
TW is US's dog, its just a waste to ask them abt unification coz US will never allow it :pop:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom