What's new

Cabinet opposes renewal of IPP power purchase deals

Shahzaz ud din

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
7,877
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Cabinet opposes renewal of IPP power purchase deals
By Zafar Bhutta
Published: July 20, 2019
TWEET EMAIL
2017225-image-1563562952-277-640x480.jpg

Qatar is the major LNG supplier to Pakistan. However, Australia and the United States are going to become potential suppliers in future, which may cause a decline in LNG prices. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: The cabinet has backed a proposal that opposes the renewal of power purchase agreements with independent power producers (IPPs) having 5,000-megwatt electricity generation capacity, which are expiring in a couple of years.

The proposal was submitted by Special Assistant to Prime Minister on Petroleum Division Nadeem Babar to the cabinet, chaired by Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Now, the task force on energy is working on a policy, which will be submitted to the cabinet for formal approval. “Power purchase agreements with the IPPs including Kapco and Hubco are going to expire in coming years and the government will not renew the agreements,” Babar told The Express Tribune.
This means that the government will not continue to follow the power purchase agreements on a ‘take and pay’ basis, which binds the government to pay capacity charges. However, these power plants will be able to sell electricity to the Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA) in the summer season when demand is higher compared to the winter.

The power plants were set up under the Power Policy of 1994 and were based on furnace oil. The only flaw is that the past government had not foreseen the future scenario of prices of different fuels.

At that time, the price of furnace oil stood at Rs2,843 per ton, which was cheaper than the domestically produced gas. However, the price of furnace oil has now jumped up to Rs87,000 per ton, which is many times expensive than the price of indigenous gas.

“However, in the new policy, the government will examine the future scenario of fuel and gas prices,” said Babar. Now, the imported LNG and coal have also become part of the energy basket in addition to furnace oil and domestic gas.

The government will also forecast the future LNG price. At present, Qatar is the major LNG supplier to Pakistan. However, Australia and the United States are going to become potential suppliers in future, which may cause a decline in LNG prices. A senior government official said LNG prices may come down to $2 per million British thermal units (mmbtu) in the next 10 years.

However, according to experts, the LNG suppliers will form a cartel in the global market and control production in order to keep prices at a certain level.

In the case of oil, the US shale oil boom had shaken the global market and had even broken the monopoly of Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Following this, the prices of crude oil touched $35 per barrel and several US and European companies shut down.

However, the oil-producing countries had control over crude oil production and prices again started rising. The same will happen in the case of LNG, say experts.

Pakistan has secured the cheapest LNG supply deals recently in spot purchase contracts. However, officials believe that in short and long-term contracts, Pakistan could have to pay 11-12% of Brent crude despite the lowest LNG contract at around 7% of Brent in spot purchases.

Singapore and South Korea have received contract prices of 11.8% and 11.7%, respectively. So, such scenarios should be kept in mind while framing the new power policy, an official said.

Cabinet approves plastic bag ban

Incentives in new policy

The government is considering offering economic incentives to the consumers. Officials said consumers would be offered discounted rates of electricity from the national grid when the demand stood low to lift electricity from those power plants whose contracts were going to expire.

These power plants would be asked to run and sell electricity to the consumers at discounted rates. This initiative will help operate the power plants whose contracts will not be renewed. At present, the indexation of return with the dollar is also being criticised in different quarters. Even, those power plants were receiving return in dollars which had invested in local currency.

Officials pointed out the agreements had been signed with power plants when the value of dollar was low. But the dollar value has now jumped significantly. Hence, the government will also review the issue of exchange rate in the new policy.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 20th, 2019.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.


Read more: Business , Cabinet , IPP
 
. .
That deal was done through huge kickbacks and corruption by BB one the most corrupt person in the history of mankind and though she was wife of another most corrupt person in the history Asif Zardari but in corruption she was his mother.

This deal broke the backbone of the economy. This was the first step by BB to sabotage the economy of Pakistan and also shelving the idea of Kalabagh dam.

So this deal is coming to an end after destroying the economy. BB was all about revenge... the traitorous ugly snake, a characterless person. Good that she is rotting in the grave along with Mujib
 
Last edited:
.
Unbelievable that local power companies are paid in $ meanwhile all the operation is in rupees. Same thing with LNG Terminal contract.
 
.
Oh God, what a pathetic bunch of people unable to think beyond today! No shi.t this country is in such a terrible mess. The future of fuel is Not LNG. The future is HYDROGEN FUEL. I know this because I make decisions regularly on Energy procurement and utilization. It is in my DNA to juggle between Electricity imported or Electricity produced via Gas Generation for my assets. The government here needs to diversify its Energy sources and make decisions on the better use of existing energy infrastructure. For example,

-Kick-start Production of Hydrogen and Blending of Hydrogen with natural Gas within the existing Gas infrastructure.
-Production of Ethanol fuel using Sugar cane.
-Production of Bio-Fuel via Bio-Digestors using existing access agricultural produce.
-Import only Battery/Hybrid fuel cars and ban all petrol cars.

The Achilles heel of most of the countries on this planet including China and major EU countries is source of ENERGY. Have you every wondered why USA has become the Dominant Oil and Gas producer?
 
.
The future of fuel is Not LNG. The future is HYDROGEN FUEL. I


Lol... No it isnt hydrogen.


Why hydrogen is a silly solution to the future of car fuels


By Jeremy Laird April 02, 2014 Car Tech

Synthetic hyrdrocarbons, not hydrogen, are the answer

34c0592acb0fe72ba6365915b9c242e1-320-80.png

Synthetic fuels offer a carbon-neutral way to power your car
There's good reason to think the world may need an alternative to oil when it comes to fuelling cars. But if we do, hydrogen is a silly idea.


Advertisement
Instead, synthetic carbon-neutral hydrocarbons are a far better solution. They're not as sexy, not as futuristic as hydrogen. But they deliver on the key environmental objectives and add cheapness and ease of implementation into the bargain. Here's why.






For better or worse, the car industry is on the hunt for new low-carbon fueling solutions. It's about stopping our negative impact on the environment and any effect it's having on global warming as well as planning beyond fossil fuels.


At first glance, hydrogen looks like a great option. It's been invested in heavily as a fuel over the years because it can be produced from plain old water courtesy of renewable energy sources.


Whether used in a fuel cell to produce electricity or literally set on fire in a combustion engine, the only byproduct is once again water. Hurrah.

Advertisement

It also allows for speedy refuelling and long-range travel, remits that currently prevent battery-electric vehicles from offering a solution to all our motoring needs.



Storage sticking point
Problem is, in ambient conditions hydrogen is a gas and that presents storage and fuelling problems. Unlike a liquid fuel, you can't just pump it in and out of conventional tanks.


To put it really simply, it means you need to replace pretty much every car in existence and also install some extravagantly expensive new fueling infrastructure. Then there's the new hydrogen production facilities you'll need, which will be on a pretty epic scale in order to fuel the world's cars.


That doesn't totally kill off hydrogen as a future fuel prospect. But it does guarantee any transition will take many decades and cost billions upon billions. And that begs the question if there's an alternative that could deliver similar benefits sooner and for less money. There is.


Why Hydrogen is not the Future

Hydrogen Fuel Cell (HFC) powered cars have been an industry futurama for decades with manufacturers claiming that one day we’ll all be driving H2 powered vehicles that emit only water. While initially this may appear to make sense, hydrogen is actually a poor choice for vehicles. So if hydrogen is a poor choice why have manufacturers promoted the technology over straight forward batteries?

Before we get to the drawbacks of hydrogen, let’s recap the evangelised benefits.

Quicker refuelling.

While H2 can be pumped into a tank nearly as quickly as petrol or diesel it’s not quite as straight forward. Because hydrogen is so light it has be kept at outrageously high pressures – think 10,000 PSI. This ultra high pressure adds complexity, cost, inefficiency and risk to the process.

Longer range.

While this is currently true for the most part it’s rapidly becoming an obsolete issue. EV battery range has progressed much faster than anyone (except Tesla) predicted. We’ve seen generational leaps in EV range so high that we’re probably at most a generation away from EVs with ranges that surpass that of HFC vehicles.

The operating mode.

Hydrogen has to be bought at a refueling station in exactly the same way as petrol or diesel. The fuel has to be created using some big heavy industrial plants, shipped via tankers to refuelling stations, and then sold to customers for their vehicles along with crisps and lottery tickets. In fact, it’s almost a like for like substitution from a customers perspective. This makes sense to auto manufacturers and for years they assumed that this was the only solution vehicle owners would be willing to adopt.

The entire refuelling economy is protected.

Refineries change to H2 reformering or electrolysis plants, the tanker drivers use modified tankers and refueling stations add new pumps. In the H2 economy everyone in the existing chain from fuel to vehicle continues to make money and profits every time a vehicle is refueled. This is a powerful driver and one that is threatened by the shift to BEV.

Manufacturing.

A Hydrogen Fuel Cell can be built on an assembly line. It is a combination of piping, filters and metals that are pieced together to create a power supply. Auto manufacturers have spent the last 100 years perfecting the art of building such things at high speed and high margin. Despite the fact that HFCs contain expensive metals like platinum auto companies saw a route to profitability that they just didn’t see with batteries. Until very recently the global battery manufacturing capacity wasn’t anything like what it is today. Almost all this capacity is coming from Chinese, Japanese and South Korean firms with years of experience in lithium ion production.



Efficiency?

The true issue with hydrogen though is efficiency. Let’s look at the ideal scenario for H2, one where the hydrogen is made through a process of water electrolysis using renewable energy. We’ll also assume that the hydrogen is created, compressed and stored at the refueling site itself. Assuming we start with 100kWh of cleanly generated renewable energy:



H2-HFC-Vehicle.png




As you can see, this is almost a 75% loss from the wind turbine to your car wheels in a best case scenario. This is awful. This also accounts why it costs eight times more to travel a mile in a HFC vehicle than it does in a BEV.

To summarise, hydrogen is a poor choice for passenger vehicles.
 
.
Lol... No it isnt hydrogen.


Why hydrogen is a silly solution to the future of car fuels


By Jeremy Laird April 02, 2014 Car Tech

Synthetic hyrdrocarbons, not hydrogen, are the answer

34c0592acb0fe72ba6365915b9c242e1-320-80.png

Synthetic fuels offer a carbon-neutral way to power your car
There's good reason to think the world may need an alternative to oil when it comes to fuelling cars. But if we do, hydrogen is a silly idea.


Advertisement
Instead, synthetic carbon-neutral hydrocarbons are a far better solution. They're not as sexy, not as futuristic as hydrogen. But they deliver on the key environmental objectives and add cheapness and ease of implementation into the bargain. Here's why.






For better or worse, the car industry is on the hunt for new low-carbon fueling solutions. It's about stopping our negative impact on the environment and any effect it's having on global warming as well as planning beyond fossil fuels.


At first glance, hydrogen looks like a great option. It's been invested in heavily as a fuel over the years because it can be produced from plain old water courtesy of renewable energy sources.


Whether used in a fuel cell to produce electricity or literally set on fire in a combustion engine, the only byproduct is once again water. Hurrah.

Advertisement

It also allows for speedy refuelling and long-range travel, remits that currently prevent battery-electric vehicles from offering a solution to all our motoring needs.



Storage sticking point
Problem is, in ambient conditions hydrogen is a gas and that presents storage and fuelling problems. Unlike a liquid fuel, you can't just pump it in and out of conventional tanks.


To put it really simply, it means you need to replace pretty much every car in existence and also install some extravagantly expensive new fueling infrastructure. Then there's the new hydrogen production facilities you'll need, which will be on a pretty epic scale in order to fuel the world's cars.


That doesn't totally kill off hydrogen as a future fuel prospect. But it does guarantee any transition will take many decades and cost billions upon billions. And that begs the question if there's an alternative that could deliver similar benefits sooner and for less money. There is.


Why Hydrogen is not the Future

Hydrogen Fuel Cell (HFC) powered cars have been an industry futurama for decades with manufacturers claiming that one day we’ll all be driving H2 powered vehicles that emit only water. While initially this may appear to make sense, hydrogen is actually a poor choice for vehicles. So if hydrogen is a poor choice why have manufacturers promoted the technology over straight forward batteries?

Before we get to the drawbacks of hydrogen, let’s recap the evangelised benefits.

Quicker refuelling.

While H2 can be pumped into a tank nearly as quickly as petrol or diesel it’s not quite as straight forward. Because hydrogen is so light it has be kept at outrageously high pressures – think 10,000 PSI. This ultra high pressure adds complexity, cost, inefficiency and risk to the process.

Longer range.

While this is currently true for the most part it’s rapidly becoming an obsolete issue. EV battery range has progressed much faster than anyone (except Tesla) predicted. We’ve seen generational leaps in EV range so high that we’re probably at most a generation away from EVs with ranges that surpass that of HFC vehicles.

The operating mode.

Hydrogen has to be bought at a refueling station in exactly the same way as petrol or diesel. The fuel has to be created using some big heavy industrial plants, shipped via tankers to refuelling stations, and then sold to customers for their vehicles along with crisps and lottery tickets. In fact, it’s almost a like for like substitution from a customers perspective. This makes sense to auto manufacturers and for years they assumed that this was the only solution vehicle owners would be willing to adopt.

The entire refuelling economy is protected.

Refineries change to H2 reformering or electrolysis plants, the tanker drivers use modified tankers and refueling stations add new pumps. In the H2 economy everyone in the existing chain from fuel to vehicle continues to make money and profits every time a vehicle is refueled. This is a powerful driver and one that is threatened by the shift to BEV.

Manufacturing.

A Hydrogen Fuel Cell can be built on an assembly line. It is a combination of piping, filters and metals that are pieced together to create a power supply. Auto manufacturers have spent the last 100 years perfecting the art of building such things at high speed and high margin. Despite the fact that HFCs contain expensive metals like platinum auto companies saw a route to profitability that they just didn’t see with batteries. Until very recently the global battery manufacturing capacity wasn’t anything like what it is today. Almost all this capacity is coming from Chinese, Japanese and South Korean firms with years of experience in lithium ion production.



Efficiency?

The true issue with hydrogen though is efficiency. Let’s look at the ideal scenario for H2, one where the hydrogen is made through a process of water electrolysis using renewable energy. We’ll also assume that the hydrogen is created, compressed and stored at the refueling site itself. Assuming we start with 100kWh of cleanly generated renewable energy:



H2-HFC-Vehicle.png




As you can see, this is almost a 75% loss from the wind turbine to your car wheels in a best case scenario. This is awful. This also accounts why it costs eight times more to travel a mile in a HFC vehicle than it does in a BEV.

To summarise, hydrogen is a poor choice for passenger vehicles.

Clutch, don't make your decisions in life based on news articles. The ground realities are vastly different. With all due respects, You do not have experience in the field of Energy - I do. The Nation who will master Hydrogen fuel technology will control the IP and vital industries of the future. The Criminal enterprises that rule countries like Pakistan and others will never allow such countries like Pakistan to prosper.
 
.
But how they oppose it when Nadeem Babar sitting among them that is the biggest mystery real broker/spokesman/trouble shooter of IPP's for many years
Unbelievable that local power companies are paid in $ meanwhile all the operation is in rupees. Same thing with LNG Terminal contract.
 
.
Oh God, what a pathetic bunch of people unable to think beyond today! No shi.t this country is in such a terrible mess. The future of fuel is Not LNG. The future is HYDROGEN FUEL. I know this because I make decisions regularly on Energy procurement and utilization. It is in my DNA to juggle between Electricity imported or Electricity produced via Gas Generation for my assets. The government here needs to diversify its Energy sources and make decisions on the better use of existing energy infrastructure. For example,

-Kick-start Production of Hydrogen and Blending of Hydrogen with natural Gas within the existing Gas infrastructure.
-Production of Ethanol fuel using Sugar cane.
-Production of Bio-Fuel via Bio-Digestors using existing access agricultural produce.
-Import only Battery/Hybrid fuel cars and ban all petrol cars.

The Achilles heel of most of the countries on this planet including China and major EU countries is source of ENERGY. Have you every wondered why USA has become the Dominant Oil and Gas producer?
Hydrogen was never the future. Electric vehicles are the way forward. No one is producing fuel cell based cars anymore while all major automakers are launching new EV models from small smart cars to buses and trucks. Rather soon you will electric airplanes as well.
 
.
Hydrogen was never the future. Electric vehicles are the way forward. No one is producing fuel cell based cars anymore while all major automakers are launching new EV models from small smart cars to buses and trucks. Rather soon you will electric airplanes as well.

Sorry mate, you guys have a lot to learn. I would recommend to get started by visiting the following. There is deliberate misguidance by the Western press on what is going on with the energy. Thanks.

https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcel...tural-gas-pipeline-networks-review-key-issues
Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues
 
. .
Hydrogen was never the future. Electric vehicles are the way forward. No one is producing fuel cell based cars anymore while all major automakers are launching new EV models from small smart cars to buses and trucks. Rather soon you will electric airplanes as well.

National grid will need huge transformation to be able to handle the charge points
 
.
You do not have experience in the field of Energy - I do.

How do know I dont?

Hydrogen fuel tech has been around for over 30 years. It hasn't to date impacted the hydrocarbon industry as a suitable alternative.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom