What's new

Bush seeks record military spending in 2009

mujahideen

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
0
Bush seeks record military spending in 2009

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush asked Congress on Monday to spend at least $606.4 billion on the U.S. military in the next budget year, including nearly $184 billion that will bolster top U.S. contractors like Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co.

If approved by Congress it would be the 11th straight year of growth in military spending and would surpass World War II spending when adjusted for inflation.

The total includes $515.4 billion for the Defense Department's baseline budget, $21 billion for Energy Department nuclear-weapons programs and an initial $70 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan in early fiscal 2009, which starts Oct. 1.

The blueprint calls for boosting the size of the Army to 532,400 active duty troops, a jump of 7,000 over the current level, part of a multiyear plan to grow ground forces. Marine Corps strength would rise to 194,000 next year, up 5,000 from the number requested this year.

The request would fund "an agile, highly trained, and lethal fighting force... and sustain the United States' technological advantage over current and potential enemies," Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in a statement.

The core Pentagon budget would rise $35.9 billion, or 7.5 percent in nominal terms and five percent adjusted for inflation, from the levels approved by Congress for fiscal 2008.

Of the total, $183.8 billion would go to military modernization, up $8.3 billion, or 4.7 percent, from this year's approved level. But this would be $3.9 billion, or 2.1 percent, below projections by the Pentagon last year.

Some $104.2 billion would go for arms ranging from Lockheed and Boeing fighter jets, warships built by Northrop Grumman Corp and General Dynamics Corp, to missiles built by Raytheon Co.

The sum sought for weapons-buying was down $6.3 billion, or 5.7 percent, from the level that had been projected by the Pentagon a year ago, according to McAleese & Associates, a national security law firm in McLean, Virginia.

The budget for the Army, bearing the brunt of the wars, would rise 9.6 percent to $140.7 billion in 2009.

"This 'migration' of funds from procurement does not bode well for (the Pentagon's) long-term modernization plans," said Steven Kosiak, director of budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington.

To continue building a layered shield against ballistic missiles that could be fired by countries like Iran and North Korea, Bush sought $10.5 billion, an increase of 600 million.

The blueprint seeks $45.6 billion to purchase F-35, F-22, F/A-18 and V-22 aircraft along with remotely piloted drones and modernization of a slew of missiles.

Adding $102.5 billion in war spending that Bush has sought for 2008 but that Congress has not yet approved, Kosiak estimated defense outlays for fiscal 2009, including at least some of this sum, would top $675 billion.

By contrast, China's announced military budget totaled less than one-tenth of this in 2007, at $46.7 billion, while Russia's totaled $33 billion, according to figures compiled by the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

As a share of the projected $15.2 trillion U.S. gross domestic product, U.S. military-related outlays of $675 billion in fiscal 2009 would total 4.4 percent of GDP, Kosiak estimated.

By comparison, U.S. military spending accounted for 14.2 percent of GDP in 1953 during the Korean War and 9.4 percent of GDP in 1968 at the height of the Vietnam War, he said.
 
.
$750 Million For Hypersonics
By Bill Sweetman at 1/25/2008

More reports suggest that the FY2009 budget will indeed include money for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) hypersonic demonstrator, named Blackswift. Ares and our colleagues over at Danger Room have been covering this since mid-2007 and the outlines have now emerged clearly.

It's a $750 million program to produce a small unmanned demonstrator - F-16-size or smaller - that will be able to fly off a runway, get to Mach 6 or higher, decelerate and land under power, using relatively conventional fuel. The key goal is not the speed so much as the combination of speed and utility: the Blackswift does not need air launch or rocket boost, burn special fuel or land in a high-speed glide. DARPA's videos even show it taxiing under its own power.

791ba945aca0c47ee9be377543bdf68b.jpg


Ares Homepage
 
.
The americans are getting obsessed with increasing the military technology gap. they are trying the old cold war trick again. spend more on military, force your opponent to spend more, and break them under economic strain. it worked with russia. i doubt it'll work on china.
 
.
This time US will go down the drain simply, because Russia is least pushed to spend on military so massively. They cant bomb the whole world simultaneously wipe off humanity all together even if they acquire bestest of technology.
 
.
The americans are getting obsessed with increasing the military technology gap. they are trying the old cold war trick again. spend more on military, force your opponent to spend more, and break them under economic strain. it worked with russia. i doubt it'll work on china.

Russian economy was commodity based and Americans had manufacturing This time Americans economy is service based and Chinese have manufacturing guess who will lose this race.
 
.
Growing reliance on drones to cost Pentagon $3.4bn

WASHINGTON, Feb 6: When a US Predator drone brought down a top Al Qaeda leader last week, it underscored the war-fighting power of unmanned aircraft which are being eyed for even greater use in Afghanistan. They would consume at least $3.4 billion in the Pentagon’s proposed budget for 2009.

Defence Secretary Robert Gates will be travelling to a meeting of Nato defence ministers this week to discuss military needs in Afghanistan, which include more such eyes-in-the sky. Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said on Tuesday that the demand for intelligence-gathering aircraft there, as well as in Iraq, ‘’has never been higher.’’

According to military officials and budget documents, the Pentagon’s spending proposal would buy more of the larger, costlier and deadlier Air Force Predators and Reapers than in the current budget year. The hunter-killer drones are armed with missiles and can relay photos and video rapidly to troops on the ground.Early last week, Abu Laith Al Libi, a major Al Qaeda leader, was killed when a Predator fired on a suspected terrorist safe house in Waziristan. Predators, used by the Air Force and the CIA, are armed with Hellfire anti-tank missiles. Officials have not confirmed whose Predator struck Al Libi, although all signs point to the CIA’s.

Overall, the Defence Department is asking for $2.6 billion in its base budget for a variety of drones for the Air Force, Army and Marines. Also, the Navy is looking for at least $800 million for continuing research and development, particularly regarding drones that can take off and land vertically from its ships.

The Pentagon also has a pending request for $460 million in emergency war funding for unmanned aircraft that has not been approved by Congress. That money is not included in the 2009 budget proposal but in a supplemental request for purchase this year. The 2008 budget included about $2.3 billion for drones.

“’The secretary is doing everything within his power to make sure that the commanders on the ground have as many intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets as humanly possible,” Morrell told reporters during a briefing on Tuesday.

He said Gates, who will leave on Wednesday for a Nato meeting in Lithuania, will urge defence ministers there to do all they can to meet the needs of the military in Afghanistan. Gen John Craddock, the top Nato commander and chief of US European Command, told The Associated Press last week that the military was looking for more surveillance and other intelligence-gathering systems to help aid the fight in Afghanistan.—AP

Growing reliance on drones to cost Pentagon $3.4bn -DAWN - Top Stories; February 07, 2008
 
.
Russian economy was commodity based and Americans had manufacturing This time Americans economy is service based and Chinese have manufacturing guess who will lose this race.

Good point, but the USSR was communist, while China is getting increasingly capitalist, so I think they will be able to diversify their economy pretty soon. At least until the US owes China massive debt, China is in the clear.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom