What's new

Buddhist Heritage of Tamils in South India and Sri Lanka

Gibbs

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
7,319
Reaction score
7
Country
Australia
Location
Australia
Buddhist Heritage of Tamils in South India and Sri Lanka

Posted by Administrator on 31 October 2016, 3:24 pm


By

Dr.Nirmala Chandrahasan

The cultural affinities between Tamil Nadu, our closest neighbour and Sri Lanka are many but little is known of the religious ties which bound the two countries between the early years of the Christian era and the 14thcentury AD, during which time Buddhism was prevalent in South India.

Buddhism came to South India before the third Sangam period in the 2nd century BC. Pandit Hisselle Dharmaratana Maha Thera, “Buddhism in South India” states that there is evidence that Ven. Mahinda Thera, Emperor Asoka’s son, also spread the Dhamma in Tamil Nadu. The Maha Thera states, “although the chronicles say he arrived through his supernatural powers, scholars are of the opinion that he travelled by sea and called at Kaveripattinam on the east coast of Tamil Nadu on his way to Sri Lanka,” Dr. Shu Hikosaka, Director Professor of Buddhism, Institute of Asian Studies in Madras, in his book ‘Buddhism in Tamil Nadu a new perspective’ also takes the same view.

Hsuan Tsang, the Chinese 7th Century, Buddhist monk, scholar, traveller, mentions that in the Pandyan kingdom near Madurai, there is a monastery built by Mahinda Thera. He also mentions a stupa built by King Asoka in Kanchipuram. Stone inscriptions of the Emperor Asoka, Rock Edict no 3, refers to the Dhamma being spread in the Chola, and Pandya country (Tamil Nadu) and Tambapanni (Sri Lanka).

Buddhism flourished in Tamil Nadu in two phases, firstly in the early years of the Pallava rule 400-650 AD, and secondly in the Chola period mid 9th to the early 14th century AD.


There were many centres of Buddhism in Tamil Nadu among them were Kanchipuram, Kaveripattinam, Uraiyur and Nagapattinam. The Chinese Buddhist monk scholar, Hsuan Tsang, who visited India in the 7th century AD, describes Kanchipuram as a flourishing city and states that most of its population was Buddhist. He says there were over 100 Buddhist monasteries and over a thousand Buddhist monks. He also mentions the presence of 300 monks from Sri Lanka in the monastery at the Southern sector of Kanchipuram. The Pallava king Mahendra Varman in his Sanskrit work Mattavilasa Prahasana refers to the existence of many Buddhist Viharas, chief of which was the Raja Vihara.

Among the notable Buddhist scholars who were natives of or resident in the city, he mentions Rev. Dharmapala, rector of Nalanda University, who was a native of the city as was Anuruddha Thera, author of the Abhidammathsasangaha. Although there is evidence that the Rev. Buddhaghosha was resident in Kanchipuram for some time, it is not certain whether he was a native of the city although he was in all probability from the Tamil country.

Dr. Hikosaka in his book points out that during the Pallava period Tamil Nadu had outstanding Tamil monks who made remarkable contributions to Buddhist thought and learning. Among them we may mention Buddhadatte Thera who authored many books. In the Abhidhammaratana, he gives a glowing account inter-alia of Kaveripattinam and Kanchipuram and the Mahavihare at Sri Lanka. While he was in Sri Lanka, he composed many Buddhist works such as Uttara Viniccaya, Ruparupa Vibhaga and Jinalankara. Another famous Tamil monk, Buddhaghosha, contemporary of Bhuddhadatta, composed many Buddhist commentaries. Buddhaghosha made a remarkable contribution to Buddhism in Sri Lanka. He stayed and studied Buddhist precepts at the Maha Vihare in Anuradhapura. The Visuddimagga was the first work of Buddhaghosha while in Sri Lanka. While staying at the Granthakara Pirivena at Anuradhapura, he rendered Sinhalese commentaries of the Tripitakas into Pali. Another vibrant Tamil monk was Dhammapala.

He lived in the Maha Vihare at Anuradhapura and composed a commentary on Buddhaghoshas work. Dr. Hikosaka concludes that a study of the three monks shows that Tamil Nadu Buddhists were closely associated with Sri Lankan Buddhists. It will be noticed that the monks used the Pali language in their treatises just as in Europe in the middle ages, the Christian monks used Latin.

The interaction between Tamil Nadu monks and Sri Lankan monks is also mentioned in the Manimakalai, the 6th Century Tamil literary epic by Sattanar. Among the other Tamil literary epics which show the influence of Buddhism are the ‘Sillappadhihkaram,’ ‘Valaiyapathi Kundalakesi’ and ‘Jivaka Cintamani.’ The ‘Manimekalai’ is a Buddhist work that expounds the doctrines and values of Buddhism. The book also mentions Tamil Buddhists in the island of Nagadipa off the coast of Jaffna. Since Tamil Nadu was largely Buddhist, one can easily conclude that the Tamil population in the North and East of Sri Lanka was also largely Buddhist.

“The Tamil Buddhists who followed Theravada Buddhism shared common places of worship with the Sinhalese. There were also Tamil Buddhists who were followers of Mahayana Buddhism, and they had their own Mahayana temples,” states L.K. Devanda in his Book ‘Tamil Buddhism in Ancient South India and Sri Lanka.’

He points out that there are still some Tamil Buddhist establishments ‘Palli’ in the East of Sri Lanka, and possibly in the Jaffna peninsula. The best known is Velgam Vihara, which was renamed Rajaraja Perun Palli after the Chola emperor. Another was the Vikkirama Calamekan Perumpalli. Velgam Vihara also known as Natanar Kovil by the present day Tamils which stands out as the only known example of a Tamil Vihara or Buddhist Palli. In the words of Dr. Senerath Paranavithana, “an Ancient Buddhist shrine of the Tamil people.”

Some of the Tamil inscriptions found at the site record donations to this shrine and are dated in the reigns of the Chola kings Raja Raja Chola and Rajendra Chola. It was the view of Dr. Paranavithana that the date of the original foundation of the Vihara was considerably earlier.

Devanada writes today Buddhism in Sri Lanka is monopolized by the Sinhalese. There are even those who call it “Sinhala Buddhism,” seemingly unaware of the fact that it is a universal religion. This notion was propagated only in the early 20th century by revivalists such as Anagarika Dharmapala. Unfortunately, he says today the Tamils of Sri Lanka also believe that Buddhism is a Sinhalese religion and alien to them, but this was not the case in the past.

Unlike today, the ancient Buddhist /Hindu civilization in Sri Lanka and the ancient Palli /Sanskrit place names has nothing to do with ethnicity. Hence the Pali, Sanskrit place names in the North and East of Sri Lanka are part of the Tamil Buddhist heritage. The author states that the Tamil politicians, scholars, intellectuals and the Tamil media should make every effort to educate the Tamil public to be aware that Buddhism was a part of Tamil civilization, and in fact the most important part of the Tamil heritage of the North and East of Sri Lanka is its Hindu /Buddhist heritage. Hence the recent efforts by some elements to place Buddha statues in these areas to mark their ethnic presence is entirely misplaced apart from being contrary to the universal values and teachings of Buddhism.

The situation in Tamil Nadu began to change after the 7th century. With the rise of Vaishnavism and Saivism, there was a significant increase in Hindu Braminical influence. The Buddhist and Jain institutions in Tamil Nadu came under attack and they began to lose popular support and the patronage of the rulers. The Chinese scholar monk Hsuan Tsang records instances of Tamil Buddhist monks fleeing to Sri Lanka when they were worsted in religious debates and feared the repercussions of the ruler’s change of religion.

Pandit Hisselle Dharmaratana Maha Thera writes, “although Buddhism declined in the Tamil country from the 7th century onwards it was by no means eradicated.” For several centuries Buddhism still survived though in a state of decline. The continuation of the Mahavamsa states that in the 13th Century King Parakramabahu of Dambadeniya brought down Buddhist monks and scriptures from the Chola country in Tamil Nadu to revive Buddhism in Sri Lanka. During this time there was a great deal of cultural exchange between South India and Sri Lanka.”

The chief of the monks who was brought from South India was Ven. Dhammakitti. He wrote the continuation of the Mahavamsa from the time of king Srimevan up to his time. The Ven. Dipankara of Chola known as Buddhappiya came to Sri Lanka for his studies in Buddhism. He wrote the Pali poem Pajjamadhu (nectar of verses) in adoration of the Buddha. He is also the author of a Pali grammar. The Ven. Buddhamitta and Maha Kassapa were also two monks from the Chola country of Tamil Nadu. They studied the Dhamma in Sri Lanka and rendered great service to the religion, states Pandit Hisselle Dharmaratane Maha Thera.

He goes on to say that this shows that up to the 14th century there were Buddhists monasteries and centres of learning in South India. There is also evidence that during the invasion of Magha of Kalinga in Sri Lanka and the destruction of Buddhist monasteries there, monks from Sri Lanka fled to and sought refuge in monasteries in Tamil Nadu. However after the 14th century Buddhism disappeared in South India leaving only traces of its heyday in the many ruins such as we find in Amaravati.

Dr. Nirmala Chandrahasan LL.B (Ceylon) LL.M (Cambridge) Ph.D. (Colombo), Attorney-at Law ,Consultant – Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR)

http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/49328

@Godman @Nilgiri @surya kiran @Rajaraja Chola @nair @NGV-H @Joe Shearer etc..
 
Buddhist Heritage of Tamils in South India and Sri Lanka

Posted by Administrator on 31 October 2016, 3:24 pm


By

Dr.Nirmala Chandrahasan

The cultural affinities between Tamil Nadu, our closest neighbour and Sri Lanka are many but little is known of the religious ties which bound the two countries between the early years of the Christian era and the 14thcentury AD, during which time Buddhism was prevalent in South India.

Buddhism came to South India before the third Sangam period in the 2nd century BC. Pandit Hisselle Dharmaratana Maha Thera, “Buddhism in South India” states that there is evidence that Ven. Mahinda Thera, Emperor Asoka’s son, also spread the Dhamma in Tamil Nadu. The Maha Thera states, “although the chronicles say he arrived through his supernatural powers, scholars are of the opinion that he travelled by sea and called at Kaveripattinam on the east coast of Tamil Nadu on his way to Sri Lanka,” Dr. Shu Hikosaka, Director Professor of Buddhism, Institute of Asian Studies in Madras, in his book ‘Buddhism in Tamil Nadu a new perspective’ also takes the same view.

Hsuan Tsang, the Chinese 7th Century, Buddhist monk, scholar, traveller, mentions that in the Pandyan kingdom near Madurai, there is a monastery built by Mahinda Thera. He also mentions a stupa built by King Asoka in Kanchipuram. Stone inscriptions of the Emperor Asoka, Rock Edict no 3, refers to the Dhamma being spread in the Chola, and Pandya country (Tamil Nadu) and Tambapanni (Sri Lanka).

Buddhism flourished in Tamil Nadu in two phases, firstly in the early years of the Pallava rule 400-650 AD, and secondly in the Chola period mid 9th to the early 14th century AD.


There were many centres of Buddhism in Tamil Nadu among them were Kanchipuram, Kaveripattinam, Uraiyur and Nagapattinam. The Chinese Buddhist monk scholar, Hsuan Tsang, who visited India in the 7th century AD, describes Kanchipuram as a flourishing city and states that most of its population was Buddhist. He says there were over 100 Buddhist monasteries and over a thousand Buddhist monks. He also mentions the presence of 300 monks from Sri Lanka in the monastery at the Southern sector of Kanchipuram. The Pallava king Mahendra Varman in his Sanskrit work Mattavilasa Prahasana refers to the existence of many Buddhist Viharas, chief of which was the Raja Vihara.

Among the notable Buddhist scholars who were natives of or resident in the city, he mentions Rev. Dharmapala, rector of Nalanda University, who was a native of the city as was Anuruddha Thera, author of the Abhidammathsasangaha. Although there is evidence that the Rev. Buddhaghosha was resident in Kanchipuram for some time, it is not certain whether he was a native of the city although he was in all probability from the Tamil country.

Dr. Hikosaka in his book points out that during the Pallava period Tamil Nadu had outstanding Tamil monks who made remarkable contributions to Buddhist thought and learning. Among them we may mention Buddhadatte Thera who authored many books. In the Abhidhammaratana, he gives a glowing account inter-alia of Kaveripattinam and Kanchipuram and the Mahavihare at Sri Lanka. While he was in Sri Lanka, he composed many Buddhist works such as Uttara Viniccaya, Ruparupa Vibhaga and Jinalankara. Another famous Tamil monk, Buddhaghosha, contemporary of Bhuddhadatta, composed many Buddhist commentaries. Buddhaghosha made a remarkable contribution to Buddhism in Sri Lanka. He stayed and studied Buddhist precepts at the Maha Vihare in Anuradhapura. The Visuddimagga was the first work of Buddhaghosha while in Sri Lanka. While staying at the Granthakara Pirivena at Anuradhapura, he rendered Sinhalese commentaries of the Tripitakas into Pali. Another vibrant Tamil monk was Dhammapala.

He lived in the Maha Vihare at Anuradhapura and composed a commentary on Buddhaghoshas work. Dr. Hikosaka concludes that a study of the three monks shows that Tamil Nadu Buddhists were closely associated with Sri Lankan Buddhists. It will be noticed that the monks used the Pali language in their treatises just as in Europe in the middle ages, the Christian monks used Latin.

The interaction between Tamil Nadu monks and Sri Lankan monks is also mentioned in the Manimakalai, the 6th Century Tamil literary epic by Sattanar. Among the other Tamil literary epics which show the influence of Buddhism are the ‘Sillappadhihkaram,’ ‘Valaiyapathi Kundalakesi’ and ‘Jivaka Cintamani.’ The ‘Manimekalai’ is a Buddhist work that expounds the doctrines and values of Buddhism. The book also mentions Tamil Buddhists in the island of Nagadipa off the coast of Jaffna. Since Tamil Nadu was largely Buddhist, one can easily conclude that the Tamil population in the North and East of Sri Lanka was also largely Buddhist.

“The Tamil Buddhists who followed Theravada Buddhism shared common places of worship with the Sinhalese. There were also Tamil Buddhists who were followers of Mahayana Buddhism, and they had their own Mahayana temples,” states L.K. Devanda in his Book ‘Tamil Buddhism in Ancient South India and Sri Lanka.’

He points out that there are still some Tamil Buddhist establishments ‘Palli’ in the East of Sri Lanka, and possibly in the Jaffna peninsula. The best known is Velgam Vihara, which was renamed Rajaraja Perun Palli after the Chola emperor. Another was the Vikkirama Calamekan Perumpalli. Velgam Vihara also known as Natanar Kovil by the present day Tamils which stands out as the only known example of a Tamil Vihara or Buddhist Palli. In the words of Dr. Senerath Paranavithana, “an Ancient Buddhist shrine of the Tamil people.”

Some of the Tamil inscriptions found at the site record donations to this shrine and are dated in the reigns of the Chola kings Raja Raja Chola and Rajendra Chola. It was the view of Dr. Paranavithana that the date of the original foundation of the Vihara was considerably earlier.

Devanada writes today Buddhism in Sri Lanka is monopolized by the Sinhalese. There are even those who call it “Sinhala Buddhism,” seemingly unaware of the fact that it is a universal religion. This notion was propagated only in the early 20th century by revivalists such as Anagarika Dharmapala. Unfortunately, he says today the Tamils of Sri Lanka also believe that Buddhism is a Sinhalese religion and alien to them, but this was not the case in the past.

Unlike today, the ancient Buddhist /Hindu civilization in Sri Lanka and the ancient Palli /Sanskrit place names has nothing to do with ethnicity. Hence the Pali, Sanskrit place names in the North and East of Sri Lanka are part of the Tamil Buddhist heritage. The author states that the Tamil politicians, scholars, intellectuals and the Tamil media should make every effort to educate the Tamil public to be aware that Buddhism was a part of Tamil civilization, and in fact the most important part of the Tamil heritage of the North and East of Sri Lanka is its Hindu /Buddhist heritage. Hence the recent efforts by some elements to place Buddha statues in these areas to mark their ethnic presence is entirely misplaced apart from being contrary to the universal values and teachings of Buddhism.

The situation in Tamil Nadu began to change after the 7th century. With the rise of Vaishnavism and Saivism, there was a significant increase in Hindu Braminical influence. The Buddhist and Jain institutions in Tamil Nadu came under attack and they began to lose popular support and the patronage of the rulers. The Chinese scholar monk Hsuan Tsang records instances of Tamil Buddhist monks fleeing to Sri Lanka when they were worsted in religious debates and feared the repercussions of the ruler’s change of religion.

Pandit Hisselle Dharmaratana Maha Thera writes, “although Buddhism declined in the Tamil country from the 7th century onwards it was by no means eradicated.” For several centuries Buddhism still survived though in a state of decline. The continuation of the Mahavamsa states that in the 13th Century King Parakramabahu of Dambadeniya brought down Buddhist monks and scriptures from the Chola country in Tamil Nadu to revive Buddhism in Sri Lanka. During this time there was a great deal of cultural exchange between South India and Sri Lanka.”

The chief of the monks who was brought from South India was Ven. Dhammakitti. He wrote the continuation of the Mahavamsa from the time of king Srimevan up to his time. The Ven. Dipankara of Chola known as Buddhappiya came to Sri Lanka for his studies in Buddhism. He wrote the Pali poem Pajjamadhu (nectar of verses) in adoration of the Buddha. He is also the author of a Pali grammar. The Ven. Buddhamitta and Maha Kassapa were also two monks from the Chola country of Tamil Nadu. They studied the Dhamma in Sri Lanka and rendered great service to the religion, states Pandit Hisselle Dharmaratane Maha Thera.

He goes on to say that this shows that up to the 14th century there were Buddhists monasteries and centres of learning in South India. There is also evidence that during the invasion of Magha of Kalinga in Sri Lanka and the destruction of Buddhist monasteries there, monks from Sri Lanka fled to and sought refuge in monasteries in Tamil Nadu. However after the 14th century Buddhism disappeared in South India leaving only traces of its heyday in the many ruins such as we find in Amaravati.

Dr. Nirmala Chandrahasan LL.B (Ceylon) LL.M (Cambridge) Ph.D. (Colombo), Attorney-at Law ,Consultant – Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR)

http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/49328

@Godman @Nilgiri @surya kiran @Rajaraja Chola @nair @NGV-H @Joe Shearer etc..

Yep there was much patronage of Buddhism and Jainism by many Tamil dynasties.

Cholas were especially too good in this cultural promotion and diversity of many streams even though they were staunch Hindu saivites.

Pallavas from way before that were also great promoters of Buddhist culture in the Tamil region....building vihars and such...before even the Mauryan influence made them popular.

Tamil literature from many periods I have read talk fondly and with great reverence of the great Anuradhapuram...that many Tamil Buddhist monks visited and even consecrated.

There is actually much cross-influence among all the streams of Dharmic philosophy/religion in the area....dating back to before Tamil even formed as a distinct language.

One of the greatest Tamil Saivite saints for instance was a former Jain, and he brought much of the Jain perspective to much of his work and debate.

I believe Rajasinha I of Sri Lanka "converted" from Buddhism to Hinduism as well...as something of a contrast to the great Asoka that preceded him by more than a millennium.

There was never a great barrier to exist between the two unless it was put in there by yourself. For me its almost like how there's different kinds of the same flavour (say sweet).

The supposed polarisation in recent times comes from ignorance....and nothing else.

http://www.lakehouse.lk/mihintalava/gaya07.htm
 
I am not quite sure why this comes as a surprise to our Lankan friends. This is more or less a mirror image of events in India, and tracks the time difference between religious trends in north and west India, which evolved in some kind of synchronicity, and those in east and south India, equally close in time and development. While Buddhism was in decline from the end of the Palas, for instance, in Bengal, and Hinduism was favoured under the successor dynasty of the Senas, it lingered on until the savage intervention of Bakhtiar Khalji in 1193. That's the 12th Century, and there was no abrupt end, Buddhist influence continued in muted fashion for another two hundred years.
 


Buddhist monk under attack in Thanjavur

Sri_Lankan_Monk_attacked_4.png


17_monk_1397584f.jpg
 
This is no surprise. As the article points out, lots of Tamil literature have put lots of emphasis on Buddhism. Manimegalai, the famous tamil work, was a Buddhist monk. And Pallavas promoted Buddhism, and Bodhidharma, pallava prince, left Kanchi to spread Buddhism in China and Japan and through him the refined martial arts reached there.

Buddhism declined in South India mainly due to the Bhakti movement started by Adi Sankara. An famous Jain monk converted to Hinduism and he became one of the foremost devotee of Shiva and propagated Hinduism. My Tamil literature at school is full of such sources. Its not exactly an secret, and Buddhist and Jains adopted and blended practises of Hinduism too. It didnt stand out exactly as an distinct religion.
 
Chennai Buddhist temple attacked

An unidentified group on Monday night had stormed the Mahabodhi Temple in Chennai and assaulted devotees and Buddhist monks.


5ea3e7590d674d9be4582cc6f6c8e86070157686.gif
2273e1f5d4fbf9ca7a31fae8c8457fef5877fbbd.gif

Three monks were injured as a result of the attack
Indian media reported that a gang of about ten, armed with clubs, broke into the Mahabodhi Society Temple during the night and vandalised the premises and attacked the monks who tried to intervene.

Monks injured

"Two Srilankan monks and one Nepali monk suffered injuries and were treated at hospital". Said the monk in charge of the temple, Ven. Kalawane Mahanama thero.

Speaking to the BBC Sandeshaya, Mahanama thero said the authorities had arrested two suspects and police investigations had begun into the incident.

http://www.bbc.com/sinhala/news/story/2011/01/110125_mahabodiattack.shtml
 
Buddhism is a true religion of peace. I have never heard of Buddhists using violence to achieve goals. It was once a dominant religion in what is now India. Many states followed Buddhism as a state religion including asoka and cholas too. I wish by Buddhist brothers luck and success.
 
I believe Rajasinha I of Sri Lanka "converted" from Buddhism to Hinduism as well...as something of a contrast to the great Asoka that preceded him by more than a millennium.

Yes Indeed true. He had to kill his farther the King Mayadunne to ascend the thrown. He felt remorse about the incident and seeked resentment through Buddhism. However he got angry when heard that there is no forgiveness for killing parents in Buddhism.

So enraged he killed Buddhist monks and tried to eradicate Buddhism from Sri Lanka. In the meantime he got befriend with a Hindu priest called Aritta Kivendu Perumal and learnt he can be repented by converting to Hinduism for his sins.

That's why he got converted to Hinduism.
 
Yes Indeed true. He had to kill his farther the King Mayadunne to ascend the thrown. He felt remorse about the incident and seeked resentment through Buddhism. However he got angry when heard that there is no forgiveness for killing parents in Buddhism.

So enraged he killed Buddhist monks and tried to eradicate Buddhism from Sri Lanka. In the meantime he got befriend with a Hindu priest called Aritta Kivendu Perumal and learnt he can be repented by converting to Hinduism for his sins.

That's why he got converted to Hinduism.

Yes I remember reading about this a long time back when I was charting SL history. Thanks!

Many states followed Buddhism as a state religion including asoka and cholas too.

If by asoka you mean the later mauryas, it was never a state religion. Concept of state religion does not exist in most part in Dharmic philosophy because duties of the monarch are separated from religion (which is fundamentally a pursuit of truth personally). The latter is not a duty of the monarch to enforce in his state under most Dharmic systems and if he does add it (like was in case of Nepal to some extent), it is as an addition that is more identity based than anything unlike most other religious based systems that have much political confluence that have to be physically separated or admitted in total (like in case of Abrahamic religions).

Also Cholas were never buddhist themselves. They did promote Buddhism, Jainism, Vaishnavism and many other streams of Dharm in addition to staunchly maintaining their own (Shaivism). Thus there is no question of them having a state religion either (same concept as above paragraph)....much less it being Buddhism. In fact they as a dynasty were the least influenced (along with Cheras) by other Dharmic strains compared to most other major Tamil dynasties (namely Pallavas, Pandyas)
 
image.png


Waiting for a Tamil Hindu leader to condemn the atrocious and shameful behaviour of certain members of their community. This thuggery is getting out of hand and no one is calling it out. The Sinhalese and the Muslims are being attacked with impunity. What kind of 'reconciliation' is possible in this environment?


 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom