BSF Assistant Commander killed on LOC

[Windjammer]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1085066584580857856

https://twitter.com/x/status/1085094521992605696

 

[Mrc]

Snipers... Wrath of gods

 

[Mighty Lion]

Not LoC but IB/WB.

In recent book on LoC by Professor Happymon Jacob a Pakistan army general told him that Pakistan opens fire on IB to retaliate to LoC firing as they have an advantage there against BSF unlike LoC where in 70% of the areas the advantage is with Indian army.

General Arshad pointed out during a conversation in Bangkok, on the sidelines of one of our track-II dialogues, that the location of response can be anywhere within a 200-250 kilometre radius of the location where the initial firing took place: “if fired at in one area it is not necessary that you respond in the same area. If there are no good targets on the other side to respond to because they have dominating positions, the division commander will decide to respond in an area where we have an upper hand so we could give a better response to the other side.”

In other words, firing by the Pakistan Army in the Jammu sector could potentially be responded to by the Indian Army in the Rajouri sector. This “releasing of pressure elsewhere” dynamic could work at the brigade, division or even at the corps level.

 

[Areesh]

Not LoC but IB/WB.

In recent book on LoC by Professor Happymon Jacob a Pakistan army general told him that Pakistan opens fire on IB to retaliate to LoC firing as they have an advantage there against BSF unlike LoC where in 70% of the areas the advantage is with Indian army

At least a new excuse. But still an excuse

Keep trying

 

[Mighty Lion]

At least a new excuse. But still an excuse

Keep trying

Lol.
Your own general said that.
Page 187:

General Arshad pointed out during a conversation in Bangkok, on the sidelines of one of our track-II dialogues, that the location of response can be anywhere within a 200-250 kilometre radius of the location where the initial firing took place: “if fired at in one area it is not necessary that you respond in the same area. If there are no good targets on the other side to respond to because they have dominating positions, the division commander will decide to respond in an area where we have an upper hand so we could give a better response to the other side.”

In other words, firing by the Pakistan Army in the Jammu sector could potentially be responded to by the Indian Army in the Rajouri sector. This “releasing of pressure elsewhere” dynamic could work at the brigade, division or even at the corps level.

 

[Areesh]

Lol.
Your own general said that.
Page 187:

Excuse rat excuse

Face saving excuses by you

Even bharatis don't take your excuses seriously. That is how much disgraced you are

 

[Windjammer]

Not LoC but IB/WB.

In recent book on LoC by Professor Happymon Jacob a Pakistan army general told him that Pakistan opens fire on IB to retaliate to LoC firing as they have an advantage there against BSF unlike LoC where in 70% of the areas the advantage is with Indian army.

Yea, the advantage is with Indian Army only to target the civilian population.

 

[Tshering22]

This is not getting anywhere.

Something needs to be done to ensure that there is no firing on either side.

This doesn't bleed us or Pakistanis any more than the other.

 

[Mighty Lion]

Excuse rat excuse

Face saving excuses by you

Even bharatis don't take your excuses seriously. That is how much humiliated you are

Denial girl denial.

No body takes your denials seriously.

Yea, the advantage is with Indian Army only to target the civilian population.

Read what your own general said.

 

[Areesh]

Denial girl denial.

No body takes your denials seriously.

Is that why you are my personal b!tch?

Every one takes me seriously including your mom. No wonder I am far different from a rat like you

 

[Mighty Lion]

Is that why you are my personal b!tch?

Every one takes me seriously including your mom. No wonder I am far different from a rat like you

No body takes you seriusly which is why you have 1/6th of my followers on Twitter

114 followers
Even two of my side accounts had/have more followers than that.

 

[hussain0216]

Lol.
Your own general said that.
Page 187:

Right

Everyone turn to page 187

 

[Areesh]

No body takes you seriusly which is why you have 1/6th of my followers on Twitter

114 followers
Even two of my side accounts had/have more followers than that.

Twitter followers

Multiple ID rat has gone totally desperate

 

[Ahmet Pasha]

Give em hell.
We will come for your dark mushrik ašśes one day.

 

[Tom M]

Give em hell.
We will come for your dark mushrik ašśes one day.

And that will be the day you will curse your own birth. Just mark these words. LOL