What's new

British Navy running short of Tomahawk missiles

Cheetah786

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
9,002
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The Navy could run out of Tomahawk missiles after a fifth of the Navy stockpile has been used against Libya, sources disclosed yesterday. Defence insiders say as many as 12 of the weapons have been fired from the hunter–killer submarine Triumph in the past four days.

If this is correct, the Navy will have used up to 20 per cent of its 64 Tomahawks in the opening salvos of the war, leading to fears that it is "burning through" its armoury.

The situation could become an embarrassment for the Government if the submarine were the only vessel within range of a number of targets but could not fulfil the mission.

The submarines are stealthy and can loiter offshore unseen before going to depth to fire the Tomahawks.

The Block Four variant of the missile can travel more than 850 miles, can be retargeted in flight and can loiter above a target for more than two hours.

It is understood that plans are being made either to resupply Triumph or send another Trafalgar–class submarine to the Mediterranean as a substitute.

Triumph can carry up to 25 missiles or torpedoes. It is likely to have been loaded with as many as 20 of the long–range strike weapons. However, it is now likely to have used half its armoury.

Questions have been raised about why the number of Tomahawks was not increased during last year's Strategic Defence and Security Review which highlighted the role for submarines to be used for "strike capability".

"At this rate we are using up five or ten per cent of our stock per day and soon it could become unsustainable," a defence industry source said. "What if the strikes go beyond a second week? We will simply run out of ammunition."

Several of the 64 Tomahawks are being serviced because their fuel and computers need to be regularly checked.

However, a senior Navy source said: "If we need to have a submarine on task we will have a submarine on task. You have to remember that the UK is part of wider coalition."

The Navy has also indicated that it could rely on the American fleet to provide emergency stocks of Tomahawks if they ran out.

A Ministry of Defence official said the Navy would still remain "poised to deliver missiles if it needs to".

He said: "As we take out static targets the number of opportunities to use the Tomahawk will decrease."

The battle to enforce the no–fly zone over Libya is costing the taxpayer millions of pounds a day.

The cost of the four–day operation to date is £28.5million, The Daily Telegraph has learnt.

The cost of putting four Tornado GR4 bombers, three Eurofighter Typhoons plus support aircraft into action is an estimated £3,216,000 a day. The Tornado costs £33,000 an hour to operate, including fuel, capital costs and crew training and the Typhoon costs £80,000 an hour.

The Storm Shadow missiles and submarine–launched Tomahawks cost £1.1million and £800,000 each.

Defence chiefs are said to be lobbying the Prime Minister to ensure that the extra costs are paid from the Treasury's reserve budget. "This is a huge issue for us," said a senior military planner. "Who is going to pay for this?"

The Government is paying almost £5billion a year for the 10,000 troops in Afghanistan.
Libya: Navy running short of Tomahawk missiles - Telegraph
 
.
If this is correct, the Navy will have used up to 20 per cent of its 64 Tomahawks in the opening salvos of the war, leading to fears that it is "burning through" its armoury.
Does 1 submarine contain 64 tomahawks??
can anyone give some more info????
 
. .
do people actully think we are low on Tomahawk missiles ? lol


this is great
 
.
So UK is not able to keep up the war due to economic reason???

---------- Post added at 11:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 PM ----------

do people actully think we are low on Tomahawk missiles ? lol


this is great

The news is talking about UK navy not US navy
 
.
they always think if an invasion occurs it carried by US, its now part of their blood.
 
. .
LOL apparently British are American now.

Not surprising though. My AP Government teacher can't spell Connecticut.
 
.
LOL apparently British are American now.

Don't even joke like that! I hate soccer and biscuits go with soup, not tea....and color doesn't have a 'u' in it. :P

Connecticut isn't important though:P

So...what the hell were they firing at? It better be important to use up that high of a percentage.
 
.
Don't even joke like that! I hate soccer and biscuits go with soup, not tea....and color doesn't have a 'u' in it. :P

Connecticut isn't important though:P

So...what the hell were they firing at? It better be important to use up that high of a percentage.

Tell them to keep firing at anything they see. Making all those tomahawks will be great for America.
 
.
You're damn right it will be. Although there's this problem

The Navy has also indicated that it could rely on the American fleet to provide emergency stocks of Tomahawks if they ran out.

They could pay us 10% now, and the rest in monthly installments.
 
. . .
Too bad they are in worse debt than we are. Maybe they should just loan out Buckingham-shire Palace for some extra dough.

This a serious point. With all the students riots against the new coalition government's austerity measures, I wonder how this news is going to go over at home.


Don't even joke like that! I hate soccer and biscuits go with soup, not tea....and color doesn't have a 'u' in it. :P

Connecticut isn't important though:P

So...what the hell were they firing at? It better be important to use up that high of a percentage.


Half of us Canadians spell colour with a 'u', I think we're a bit confused about if we're using British English or American English. I spell humour, flavour, etc with a 'u' but I spell defence with a -ce.
 
.
Too bad they are in worse debt than we are.

They can borrow the money from China. Seems to be solving all of our problems pretty well XD

I don't see why we'd give them more missiles to shoot...when we could just as easily shoot said missiles.

Missiles on layaway? Be less trouble just to mail it to Gaddafi piece by piece and hope that he gets curious and assembles it.

He doesn't seem mechanically inclined. He'd be like that kid who misses a step when building a lego set, only to find out at step 57 that he misplaced that little piece on step 4
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom