What's new

Britain says to "beef up" defence of disputed Falkland Islands

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
Britain says to "beef up" defence of disputed Falkland Islands | Zee News
Last Updated: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 - 16:08
London: Britain plans to "beef up" its defences of the disputed Falkland Islands to ensure they are properly protected, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon said on Tuesday, in comments likely to irk Argentina which still lays claim to the archipelago.


Tensions over the Falklands still crackle more than 30 years after Argentine forces seized them and Britain sent a task force to retake them in a brief war which saw more than 600 Argentine and 255 British servicemen killed.

"I`m going to be announcing to parliament later today how we are going to beef up the defences there," Fallon, who is due to make a statement on the subject at 1230 GMT, told Sky news.

The Argentine government claims the islands, which are 300 miles off the Argentine coast and 8,000 miles from Britain, as its own and has stepped up a campaign to get what it calls Las Malvinas back.

"We have to respond to that and make sure that the islands are properly protected. We have to take account of any future and possible threats to the islands," Fallon told BBC Radio.

The Sun newspaper reported on Tuesday that Russia was working on a deal to lease 12 long range bombers to Argentina.

"That particular deal hasn`t been confirmed," Fallon said, saying a threat remained nonetheless. "It is a very live threat, we have to respond to it," he said.

Reuters
 
.
Wonder how much natural wealth lies beneath the island...
 
.
Wonder how much natural wealth lies beneath the island...


UK has legitimate right to beef up the security of the Falklands.

Argentina is and has always been the aggressor.


they wanna buy Chinese jets and weapons well two can play that game.


a few more typhoons and a modern SAM system is the perfect counter move.
 
.
UK has legitimate right to beef up the security of the Falklands.

Argentina is and has always been the aggressor.


they wanna buy Chinese jets and weapons well two can play that game.


a few more typhoons and a modern SAM system is the perfect counter move.

Yep, that's what you say. I'm sure you have heard the story of the other side too.

You still haven't answered my question though. There must be a lot of natural wealth involved considering how the UK (which lies thousands of miles away) is willing to put so much at risk...
 
.
Yep, that's what you say. I'm sure you have heard the story of the other side too.

You still haven't answered my question though. There must be a lot of natural wealth involved considering how the UK (which lies thousands of miles away) is willing to put so much at risk...



Falklands have been British since 1833. the people voted on a referendum that they wish to stay a British Territory
Falkland Islands sovereignty referendum, 2013 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

resources or not they won't abandon them.

Argentina has no claim to the so called Malvinas
 
Last edited:
.
UK has legitimate right to beef up the security of the Falklands.

Argentina is and has always been the aggressor.


they wanna buy Chinese jets and weapons well two can play that game.


a few more typhoons and a modern SAM system is the perfect counter move.

Argentina cannot be an aggressor since the land belongs to them.
 
.
Falklands have been British since 1833. the people voted on a referendum that they wish to stay a British Territory
Falkland Islands sovereignty referendum, 2013 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

resources or not they won't abandon them.

Argentina has no claim to the so called Malvinas.

They do though. The Argentinians lay claim to this island and it makes perfect sense that it belongs to them. How can a country that belongs to the other side of the hemisphere lay claim on something thousands of miles away is beyond me. The only reason coming to my mind are resources. It certainly isn't due to the lovely tiny cute Hobbits living on the island...

Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Yep, that's what you say. I'm sure you have heard the story of the other side too.

You still haven't answered my question though. There must be a lot of natural wealth involved considering how the UK (which lies thousands of miles away) is willing to put so much at risk...
I dont think its natural wealth, its because argies attacked and PM of britain decided to fight.. did wonders to her career but britain has to defend the island forever, which is not cheap.
recently they struck oil so that can take care of cost and even make it profitable for UK. But even without that brits wont back off, its an emotional issue now, people lost lives.
 
.
I dont think its natural wealth, its because argies attacked and PM of britain decided to fight.. did wonders to her career but britain has to defend the island forever, which is not cheap.
recently they struck oil so that can take care of cost and even make it profitable for UK. But even without that brits wont back off, its an emotional issue now, people lost lives.

That is what it has become over time. A matter of ego and emotions. Though, energy resources and minerals are a big part of it all.

Economy of the Falkland Islands - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It has nothing to do with Argentina attacking Britain. The Brits have historically inhabited the island with settlers. The island has been invaded by the Brits on multiple occasions. The referendum held by the Brits was bound to go in their favour.

PS. For the record, I have nothing to gain by siding with any part in this conflict.
 
Last edited:
.
Argentina cannot be an aggressor since the land belongs to them.


how did you come to the conclusion.

that's like me saying all of Pakistan and Kashmir belongs to India.
which is more truer than the Falklands belonging to Argentina.

They do though. The Argentinians lay claim to this island and it makes perfect sense that it belongs to them. How can a country that belongs to the other side of the hemisphere lay claim on something thousands of miles away is beyond me. The only reason coming to my mind are resources. It certainly isn't due to the lovely tiny cute Hobbits living on the island...

Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


not sure how a country that never existed before the Falkands was British can have such a dispute, lol
 
.
how did you come to the conclusion.

that's like me saying all of Pakistan and Kashmir belongs to India.
which is more truer than the Falklands belonging to Argentina.




not sure how a country that never existed before the Falkands was British can have such a dispute, lol

That's what you like to think and claim for obvious reasons, but we beg to differ with you on this. The island belongs to Argentina in our opinion. Feel free to differ though like we differ on a million other things. Not that it matters one tiny bit.
 
Last edited:
.
That's what you like to think and claim for obvious reasons, but we beg to differ with you on this. The island belongs to Argentina in our opinion. Feel free to differ though like we differ on a million other things. Not that it matters one tiny bit.

yet you still haven't even given a single good reason why it belongs to Argentina, lol

Falklands.permanence.png


if the UK can't have Falklands it should go to France if not France the U.S, by damn will some crybabies get it :rofl:
 
.
yet you still haven't even given a single good reason why it belongs to Argentina, lol

Falklands.permanence.png


if the UK can't have Falklands it should go to France if not France the U.S, by damn will some crybabies get it :rofl:

I have already given plenty of reasons in my previous posts, but you are failing to comprehend them. You have obviously already made up your mind and picked a side. Anything I say will fall on deaf ears.

Yep, just like past colonies. Pass them on... That sounds very familiar if you know what I mean.
 
.
I have already given plenty of reasons in my previous posts, but you are failing to comprehend them. You have obviously already made up your mind and picked a side. Anything I say will fall on deaf ears.

Yep, just like past colonies. Pass them on... That sounds very familiar if you know what I mean.

I looked back and I don't see any reasons and solid evidence that the Falklands belong to Argentina besides the "lay claim"
and how a country thousands of miles away can lay claim which they don't lay claim it is theirs and has been before Argentina even existed before anyone made a claim. distance and resources is your entire reasoning t it seems which really doesn't matter considering how the Falklands have been part of the UK for hundreds of years before any valuable resource like oil was even a thought.
They do though. The Argentinians lay claim to this island and it makes perfect sense that it belongs to them. How can a country that belongs to the other side of the hemisphere lay claim on something thousands of miles away is beyond me. The only reason coming to my mind are resources. It certainly isn't due to the lovely tiny cute Hobbits living on the island...

Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
.
Unfortunately Argentina didn't become a country until 1810.
Before then they were Spanish subjects.

So it looks like they never had those islands
 
.
Back
Top Bottom