Breaking: Google pulls Huawei’s Android license, forcing it to use open source version

[gambit]

Do you have the draft copy of that law? Please explain it to me clause by clause. Then only we can dissect it's contents.

See post 22. The National Intelligence Law is not 'draft'. It is completed since '17.

 

[JSCh]

Reflect? No, what I posted was a vital component to how the US views Chinese made hardware. If what we did was 'unethical', then what your China did with the National Intelligence Law was morally criminal.

So tell us, if the Chinese government orders you to spy on your foreign employer, would you do it?

I find it really strange that you get personal when discussing a topic of Huawei and Android.

The whole world can see that US is using "Huawei MAYBE a security threat" as an excuse, and going way beyond appropriate and proportional measure to hit at Huawei, the true intent is to kneecap China technological advancement.

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

I have an Android system but never used Gmail or any other Goolge services. There are so many great alternative apps.

Yes there are! But for average user, googles services are very important nowdays. Even iPhone users choose google services like Gmail and google map over apples offering.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Pakistan should also start moving away from Apple, Microsoft, and Google, who are cooperating with the CIA spy programs against us.

YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp refuse to remove terrorist accounts and groups from their platforms which are targeting Pakistan daily.

They also hire on Israeli and Indian firms to run their websites, at the disadvantage to pro-Pakistani and pro-Kashmiri content.

We should make a closed ecosystem to promote our own alternatives to these biased organization.

Pakistan should follow the Chinese system, and jump all in with Huawei also. 200 million customers should loyally support their nation. Learn from the Chinese.

We should also establish Muslim friendly websites which removes vulgarity and blasphemous content.

This should be propagated all over the Muslim world as an alternative.

 

[damm1t]

Now we are escalating to nuclear strikes on strategic level military targets like ports! Our Dongfeng ballistic missiles are already on their way even as the Americans are patting themselves on the back.

:icantstoplaughing:

 

[Dungeness]

Huawei is being punished by the US for the possibility of "future crime". Sure, it will suffer a great deal in short term, but in a long run, the world will be questioning the legitimacy of such a unilateral action and the reliability of such a partner.

 

[Han Patriot]

See post 22. The National Intelligence Law is not 'draft'. It is completed since '17.

Well draft or not can you explain the contents?

 

[Armchair]

I am waiting for an alternative to Google and Apple. Both of them are actually spying devices that allow Israel and the US to track every person on the planet and store their detailed information. I actually use a non-smart phone for this reason and will be the first customer for a Huawei alternative.

 

[gambit]

I find it really strange that you get personal when discussing a topic of Huawei and Android.

The whole world can see that US is using "Huawei MAYBE a security threat" as an excuse, and going way beyond appropriate and proportional measure to hit at Huawei, the true intent is to kneecap China technological advancement.

There is no 'maybe' about this. Do you deny the existence of the National Intelligence Law? Simple question, no?

If the Chinese government asks Huawei for the quantity of cell phones shipped and where to, Huawei cannot refuse. How is it unreasonable to suspect the Chinese government have its hooks into business? The law erased the line between politics and business and YOU admonished US about that line?

Well draft or not can you explain the contents?

Go to post 22. Is that too difficult to do?

 

[Han Patriot]

There is no 'maybe' about this. Do you deny the existence of the National Intelligence Law? Simple question, no?

If the Chinese government asks Huawei for the quantity of cell phones shipped and where to, Huawei cannot refuse. How is it unreasonable to suspect the Chinese government have its hooks into business? The law erased the line between politics and business and YOU admonished US about that line?


Go to post 22. Is that too difficult to do?

That's an article, I need you to have the original Chinese version and translate. So you have that? As far I know Chinese law is in Mandarin. Since when did a news outlet determine Chinese laws?

 

[maithil]

Without Android, People outside China will surely choose other options. Near death knell for Huawei. Curiously this move comes right after Huawei's CEO so arrogantly dismissed US's move to blacklist Huawei.

 

[gambit]

That's an article, I need you to have the original Chinese version and translate. So you have that? As far I know Chinese law is in Mandarin. Since when did a news outlet determine Chinese laws?

Nnnnnoooo...

In post 22, I gave the DIRECT link to the Chinese goobermint. I guess it was too difficult for the Chinese members here.

 

[Clutch]

If the Chinese government asks Huawei for the quantity of cell phones shipped and where to, Huawei cannot refuse. How is it unreasonable to suspect the Chinese government have its hooks into business? The law erased the line between politics and business and YOU admonished US about that line?

The American government also requires backdoor access and monitoring of American telecom under the Patriot Act .

To accuse China exclusively is like the pot calling the kettle black...

I am waiting for an alternative to Google and Apple. Both of them are actually spying devices that allow Israel and the US to track every person on the planet and store their detailed information. I actually use a non-smart phone for this reason and will be the first customer for a Huawei alternative.

I agree...

 

[gambit]

The American government also requires backdoor access and monitoring of American telecom under the Patriot Act .

To accuse China exclusively is like the pot calling the kettle black...


I agree...

China's National Intelligence Law requires cooperation down to the individual level. The Patriot Act does not even come 1/2 way close. See post 22.

 

[Dungeness]

China's National Intelligence Law requires cooperation down to the individual level. The Patriot Act does not even come 1/2 way close. See post 22.

There is no fundamental difference, and American will be implemented 200% while Chinese ones 50% if Chinese are serious about the law.