What's new

Blood sanctions: Iranian boy dies from medicine shortage

RFS_Br

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
1,237
Reaction score
0
Country
Brazil
Location
Brazil
Blood sanctions: Iranian boy dies from medicine shortage

Published: 16 November, 2012, 20:33

nikoubazl-morteza-reuters.n.jpg


Reuters / Morteza Nikoubazl

Western sanctions on Iran have affected not only the nation’s oil revenues, but also human lives. A teenage boy has died from hemophilia due to a shortage of medicine caused by strict EU and US sanctions on the Islamic republic.

Fifteen-year-old Manouchehr Esmaili-Liousi died in hospital after his family failed to find the medicine needed to treat his disease, Iranian news agencies reported.
It is the first civilian death believed to be directly linked to economic sanctions from the US and the EU, The Guardian reports.

Although the sanctions are not directly targeting the pharmaceutical and medical sectors, the measures have affected banks and trade restrictions – making it difficult for patients to get access to vital medicine.

“This is against human rights…Even in wars, women and children and patients are protected by some impunity based on international treaties…But sanctions hitting medicine in Iran are causing a silent death and are a ploy to hurt the health of Iranian people,” the director of Iran’s hemophilia society, Ahmad Ghavidel, said, as quoted by Irna news agency.

Hemophilia patients seem to be among the hardest hit because, according to Ghavidel, 75 per cent of medicines for the treatment of hemophilia are made in the US and EU. He said hemophilia medicines have reduced to a third of the former level supplies since the sanctions took effect.
In October, a medical charity warned that a shortage of medicines caused by sanctions was putting millions of lives at risk.

“More than anything else, we have a lack of medicines for patients suffering from cancer and multiple sclerosis,” head of Iran’s Charity Foundation for Special Diseases, Fatemeh Hashemi, told news website Tabnak at the time.

However, the US and EU did not make any changes or amendments to the sanctions.
Two large Iranian plants that produce medicine have recently been closed because it has become nearly impossible to import the chemical compounds needed for drug production.
Overall, officials estimate that around 6 million patients are potentially affected by the shortages – including many with cancer.

Every day, patients line up at special pharmacies in Tehran, where those suffering from cancer, hemophilia, thalassemia, kidney problems, and other diseases wait to hear good news – that their required medicine is available. However, more often than not, they are told the pharmacies no longer have any of the foreign-made drugs.

Small infants are among those affected by the sanctions because the availability of baby milk has been affected, too.

Iran cannot produce certain types of infant milk, so it relies primarily on imports. But because of the sanctions, the country is seeing less milk on the shelves. Those fortunate enough to find milk are paying nearly double what they used to pay.
Children have been hospitalized as a result of the milk shortages, although there have been no reports of deaths.

If the sanctions continue, Iran could also face a huge food shortage because the country relies on significant imports of wheat, rice and other products.

Opponents of the sanctions say the shortage – as well as the death of Manouchehr – proves that the measures negatively affect ordinary Iranians instead of their rulers.

“My mom, us, other patients, we are all caught in the middle of this political battle…we don’t have any influence on nuclear policies. We are victims,” Ali, a 26-year-old Iranian whose mother has cancer, told the New York Times.

No end in sight

Washington and its allies have long accused Iran of using its nuclear weapons capabilities to build atomic weapons – a claim Tehran adamantly denies.

US President Barack Obama has stated that the crippling sanctions against Iran must continue until Tehran complies with international obligations on its nuclear activities.

Just days after he was reelected, Obama rolled out a new set of sanctions aimed at senior Iranian officials and related entities.

The US tightened its already strict sanctions on Iran in July. The new sanctions target the country’s energy and petrochemical industries and restrict exchanges with Iranian banks.

Earlier this year, the EU announced that it was prohibiting transactions between European companies and Iranian banks, limiting areas of trade “in order to choke off revenue that Iran is using for its nuclear program.”

_______________________________________

Considering that the standard definition of terrorism is the purposeful targeting of civilians for political reasons, shouldn't sanctions count as a form of terrorism, namely economic terrorism? This can't be about peace or the Iranian nuclear program. How does depriving sick people from medicines advance diplomacy or negotiations? Sanctions should be counted as a form of warfare -- perhaps the worst kind of warfare, for in real war at least the party under aggression has the opportunity to respond to its tormentors and try to establish a deterrent against them. In sanctions, meanwhile, the aggressor countries suffer nothing and can keep on the abuse for as long as they want -- the worst, most cowardly kind of warfare. -- RFS.
 
. .
Ayatollahs at fault here..if they had not been passing childish remarks about erasing others from the face of the earth and supporting rag tag terrorist groups they would have not irked the world with their nuclear activities and would not have invited sanctions!
 
. .
An analyse an Iranian made on another website:

Suffering by design--Shortage of medicine in Iran

The Islamic republic of Iran has been very vocal recently regarding the impact of sanctions on medicine imports. The Iranian representative in the United Nations was quoted by press TV to say "Mr. Ban Ki-moon! Here is my question: On the basis of which law and which moral, religious and human criterion, are the evil powers and arrogant countries imposing embargoes on the supply of medications and primary healthcare requirements of a nation’s children, women and men while the United Nations, which is headed by you, remains silent?” (1)

Even US news organizations have picked up on this story. The NY times published an article titled "Iran Sanctions Take Unexpected Toll on Medical Imports" By Thomas Erdbrink on November 2, 2012. The article noted that "Though the unilateral sanctions put in place by the United States and the European Union have exemptions for medicines and medical equipment, as well as foodstuffs, companies interested in selling such merchandise to Iran require a special license from the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control." The article also pointed out that despite the treasury department's recent steps to ease bureaucratic barriers to authorized exports to Iran, most banks are not inclined to deal with Iran, making payment to suppliers very difficult.(2)

PBS ran a story on November 8, 2012 titled "Sanctions' Ill Effects, Part 1: The Disappearance of Lifesaving Drugs". The conclusions were similar to above. (3)

As a healthcare professional I thought it would be interesting to dig a little deeper and see what, if any, steps were taken by the regime to alleviate this "medicine shortage" problem, or is it simply aggravating the problem in the hope of using the resulting human suffering as a tool to fight the sanctions in general.

Looking at the Farsi language headlines in Iran, it wasn't very hard to see the other side of this story. Perhaps someone should recommend to the NY times and PBS to do the same.

The Iranian Health Minister Marziyeh Vahid Dastjerdi was quoted by ISNA to say "We don't know what happened to the hard currency allocated to the purchase of medicine"
(وزیر بهداشت: نمیدانیم ارز مرجع دارو کجا مصرف شده است). The same article quoted Ms. Dastjerdi to say that out of the annual $2.5 billion allocated for the purchase and import of medicine, the Iranian central bank has only provided $600 million thus far. (4)

Mehr news posted an article that claimed that the allocated "medicine purchase" dollars were reassigned for the purchase of luxury goods such as makeup and luxury cars. The media article almost appeared to shift the blame of underfunding of the "medicine purchase program" to the the middle and upper classes who purchase the above mentioned luxury products. (5)
(ارز دارو همه جا خرج میشود غیر از دارو/ از لوازم آرایشی تا خودروی لوکس":خبرگزاری مهر")

Ettelaat newspaper reported that the head of the parliament committee on health (the equivalent of the health and human services committee in the USA) was critical of the government's handling of funding of the healthcare sector. He also confirmed the same figure of $600 million being the only amount provided by the central bank for the purchase and import of medicine this year. (6)

So could this "medicine shortage" crisis be a result of the 76% drop in the "medicine purchase" budget, or is it all due to the western sanctions as the regime claims?

Lets assume for the sake of argument that the facts about the drastic healthcare budget cuts are not a factor, and Iran truly wants to import medicine but can't. The next question to ask is if there is a way for Iran to purchase medicine without having to jump through hoops?

Some of you may remember discussions here about the new payment system Iran had agreed to with India whereby Iran gets paid for its oil in rupees deposited into a bank account in India which can then be used by Iran to purchase Indian products, including medicine.

The Wall Street journal ran an article recently in which it was reported that Mr. Rafeegue Ahmed, the president of the Federation of Indian export organization had indicated that such an account was indeed opened with an initial amount equivalent to $500 million and that it was expected to eventually hold $4.5 billion of Iranian oil sales revenue. The WSJ also reported that businesses on both sides had signed deals valued at an estimated $3 billion for shipment of goods, such as "rice, wheat, soy meal and pharmaceutical products".(7)

Perhaps someone should remind the Iranian regime that India happens to be a major pharmaceuticals producer and that the Iranian oil money sitting in Indian banks in local currency is available for medical purchases. Easier said than done I'm sure, as Iran may not see the upside in solving the "medicine shortage" in the country when it can get so much anti-sanction publicity from it.

In the meantime Iranian patients are sure to be left to fend for themselves with no light at the end of this tunnel, as the regime clings to its nuclear policies and the west remain committed to forcing Iran to change its behavior through sanctions.

I should mention that the healthcare system in Iran haven't totally been neglected by the Iranian government; 60 hospital were recently issued warning about the dress code of their nurses. (8) It's nice to see the regime is still focused on the "below the waist" concerns of society, even at a time of national crisis.

Uskowi on Iran -
 
.
Ayatollahs at fault here..if they had not been passing childish remarks about erasing others from the face of the earth and supporting rag tag terrorist groups they would have not irked the world with their nuclear activities and would not have invited sanctions!

Who's imposing the sanctions, and making the point to target civilians, and restrict medicines inflow to Iran, is the West. The only one responsible for the sanctions is therefore the West.

This is very interesting: the West loves to accuse Arabs and other Muslims for blaming it for its problems. However, the West never assumes responsibility for its own actions -- instead, it blames them on its Middle Eastern victims. When the West drones civilians, who's at fault? The Taliban! And when it starves Iranians? It's the Ayatollahs!

That those absurd talking points are now being parroted even by non-Westerners is a pity.

And spare from this BS that Iran has threatened to erase anyone. Even some Israeli officials have admitted that that wasn't true.
 
.
Too much reliance on western goods results in these scenarios..
We have seen it happening in Iraq and didn't learn the lesson,and now similar situation in Iran......

we are so reliant on western imports that they dont need to fire missiles on us to destroy us...All they have to do is block flow of money by blocking their Banking systems for us,and stop exporting drugs to us...
People will die of Disease and crops will fail.....as all pesticides and Genetically modified seeds are imported from west....

These are great weaknesses of Muslim world and we need to address these weaknesses of ours...
 
. . .
Too much reliance on western goods results in these scenarios..
We have seen it happening in Iraq and didn't learn the lesson,and now similar situation in Iran......

we are so reliant on western imports that they dont need to fire missiles on us to destroy us...All they have to do is block flow of money by blocking their Banking systems for us,and stop exporting drugs to us...
People will die of Disease and crops will fail.....as all pesticides and Genetically modified seeds are imported from west....

These are great weaknesses of Muslim world and we need to address these weaknesses of ours...

There is no 'too much reliance on west' in Iran.
We produce more than 97% of our medics inside the country.The remaining 3% are those expensive advanced drugs,like ones for cancers or Hemophilia.Iran is actively trying to produce them too,and I think as they promised,they will achieve it in a few months.

Regarding to drug productions,Iran is one of the most independent countries in Asia and ME.
Iraq was a whole different history.It practically,did not produce anything by itself.
 
.
Iran can sanction them back. Nations are free to block trade with whomever they want. If Iran was smart, it could have bettered its relations with the Arabs, and trade with them concerning products it cannot produce. But no, Iran has completely isolated itself from its own neighbors.
 
.
Many Iranians are not blaming the US for the economic malaise they are in now

In any country there will be a share of the people who'll have dissenting positions according to pre-determined biases. This is not what this is about. Don't you think for yourself? Look at the facts and see who is it that is halting medicine inflows to Iran. It is Western leaders. No matter one's position regarding Iran's nuclear program, there's no reason to punish ordinary people over that. Making innocents suffer because of a political agenda is terrorism, no matter who's practicing them -- Jihadis or Western politicians -- and what the West is doing to Iranians constitutes economic terrorism.
 
.
Iran can sanction them back. Nations are free to block trade with whomever they want. If Iran was smart, it could have bettered its relations with the Arabs, and trade with them concerning products it cannot produce.

What do the Arabs produce Iranians can't make themselves?
 
. .
Who's at fault here? Both sides. Who can change the status quo? Both sides. Who will gain more from changing the status quo? Obviously Iran and the Iranian people.

Americans are scum, but they're foreigners. I consider the mullahs to be even bigger scum.



Era, kiro mikhay gool bezani? Khodeto ke nemitooni gool bezani. Mese rooz roshane ke bazandeye in jang kie, akharo aghebate tamame in majaraha ham az beyn raftane belkole Irane. Bish az 3 dahast ke Iran dare be birahe mire. Edame bedin bebinin be koja miresin. Bazandash khodeti va khoonevadat. Man ke inja rahatam, tamame khoonevadamam injaan. Be fekre khodet nisti hade aghal be fekre khoonevadeye khodet bash.

Akhe to in mamlekat ayandei vojood dare? Hamechi be goh keshide shode.

Vaghteshe shero veraya khomainiro bezarin kenar be baghiyeye donya be peyvandin.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom