What's new

BJP's role in the 1984 Sikh riots

Bhai Zakir

BANNED
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
2,371
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
BJP's role in the 1984 Sikh riots

- When BJP was in the power both at Central Govt. and state Delhi Govt. the BJP have tried to save BJP and RSS leaders and members.

- BJP removed their names in the FIR or destroyed the records.


sikh+riot+rss.jpg


sikh+riot+rss2.jpg


375047_10201246411788786_1843846100_n.jpg


Rss, Bjp Role During 1984 Nov. Sikh Genocide : Rock Solid Proof - WHAT'S HAPPENING? - The Voice of Sikhs
 
hello bahi kaise ho.. now 1984 riots....
dear aare development pe bat karoo..
religion is for man . not other way round..
if economy does not come in line .. there will be more disparity more inequality more unemployment more cime and more riots..
why ... why...... again again 1984, 2002..
RIP all who are dead in those..
but think about future buddy
blame game willl have only one result..
u and me and society and india as looser
nothing else..
 
I told Bhai Zakir not to play with our Sentiments in this thread, but cause of his HATE for MODI + BJP + HINDUS, he couldn't refrain himself from spamming & starting this thread. :ashamed:

What a young army officer saw in '84 riots
He is putting his perspective with proof (a news story)....
Thats a beauty of democracy..
we/I may not agree with his view but he have right to put his view .. till anyone dont go overboard
 
I have listen this from the sikhs themselves that there were RSS guys who saved and hide many sikhs from congoons. Some sikh members here can confirm this too.

listening Gyani Jail Singh's daughter's old interview on Times now and she is saying that Jail Singh tried to call PM office and many congress leaders to help innocent sikhs but no one given him assurance and he was very disappointed. Now this shows Congress's hate towards Sikhs.
 
Last edited:
hello bahi kaise ho.. now 1984 riots....
dear aare development pe bat karoo..
religion is for man . not other way round..
if economy does not come in line .. there will be more disparity more inequality more unemployment more cime and more riots..
why ... why...... again again 1984, 2002..
RIP all who are dead in those..
but think about future buddy
blame game willl have only one result..
u and me and society and india as looser
nothing else..

The reason i feel for discussing historical mistakes is so that they may not occur again. One must learn from ones past otherwise they may happen again, only by discussing them and finding solutions will you be able to avoid them in future. Otherwise this thing will continue to happen again and again.

The system of justice should ideally work so as to create examples of punishment for sinners so that they may fear doing those sins/crimes again. Had it effectively happened after 1984, perhaps 2002 could have been avoided and so on so forth.

PS:- I know i am a Pakistani and before you throw the problems of Pakistan at my face, i would like to say that wont help another riot, another human tragedy in your country
 
Very Good.But BJP is created in 1980 ,how can it play a major role in a major riots after 4 years.
Bhai Zakir sab you can post your opinion it is your right ,perhaps you may have reason for that.For now we will support BJP at any cost.No doubt in that.We dont have a problem with BJP.They dont do any harm to us.But Congress made our life so hell.No one cant live with this life expense.Honestly I can tell.In the name of secularism minorities got excessive advantage from Congress government.But they dont care about poor majorities.We are done with this congress and its fake secularism.
 
I have listen this from the sikhs themselves that there were RSS guys who saved and hide many sikhs from congoons. Some sikh members here can confirm this too.

listening Gyani Jail Singh's daughter's old interview on Times now and she is saying that Jail Singh tried to call PM office and many congress leaders to help innocent sikhs but no one given him assurance and he was very disappointed. Now this shows Congress's hate towards Sikhs.

I am from kerala.I am from Hindu family.My mother relatives are in New Delhi when this riots happens.They shocked when they saw atrocities against Sikhs.Congress criminals knock each door one by one and check them whether they are sikh people.If they are sikhs their life is over.They also check our relatives house.Some of their friends also help sikhs for hiding from slaughter.
 
I am from kerala.I am from Hindu family.My mother relatives are in New Delhi when this riots happens.They shocked when they saw atrocities against Sikhs.Congress criminals knock each door one by one and check them whether they are sikh people.If they are sikhs their life is over.They also check our relatives house.Some of their friends also help sikhs for hiding from slaughter.
I agree with you here. Many delhites can confirm this. @GURU DUTT @Parul
 
I agree with you here. Many delhites can confirm this. @GURU DUTT @Parul

What he is saying is absolutely true.

However, Bhai Zakir, is pissing every where 'cause of his hate for Namo & Bjp. I pity on him. He doesn't have IOTA of about 84 Genocide but still trying to defend his masters........:cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
The reason i feel for discussing historical mistakes is so that they may not occur again. One must learn from ones past otherwise they may happen again, only by discussing them and finding solutions will you be able to avoid them in future. Otherwise this thing will continue to happen again and again.

The system of justice should ideally work so as to create examples of punishment for sinners so that they may fear doing those sins/crimes again. Had it effectively happened after 1984, perhaps 2002 could have been avoided and so on so forth.

PS:- I know i am a Pakistani and before you throw the problems of Pakistan at my face, i would like to say that wont help another riot, another human tragedy in your country
You are welcome.. constructive criticism is always welcome...
as human being you have every right to put your view to benefit of others irrespective of nationality..
You are right History/past is building brick of nation make your as people are architect some events /bricks are wrongly placed..we should learn why .. how to avoid it in future..
system of justice is taken own course.
1984 - trial is still on after 30 yrs .. justice delayed is justice denied ....
instead of putting energy to speed up the case and let judiciary declare whether anyone is guilty..
why we are declaring it..
2002 - SC declared its verdict based on SIT appointed by him.

point is .... what is objective of debate ?
1. To give justice to riots victim?
2. votes for election in 2014 ?

we all have to decide this..

every time in election congress come with this ...
if they were sincere in giving justice they should have expedite process by SIT by SC . did they?

1984 anti-Sikh riots: Supreme Court dismisses Sajjan Kumar's plea, asks him to face trial for murder | NDTV.com
1984 anti-Sikh riots case reopened against Jagdish Tytler | NDTV.com

this is the transparency of congress..

as its 1984 thread i m not quoting bjp. they also did the same

I am from kerala.I am from Hindu family.My mother relatives are in New Delhi when this riots happens.They shocked when they saw atrocities against Sikhs.Congress criminals knock each door one by one and check them whether they are sikh people.If they are sikhs their life is over.They also check our relatives house.Some of their friends also help sikhs for hiding from slaughter.
bhai zakir and fsayed
can you reply now.. please now no new poster ..and no rocket science with yuva josh.....
 
The Law of Karma ? Even India's Minorities & Liberal Elite Are Turning to Narendra Modi
Until recently, Narendra Modi, India's Prime Ministerial hopeful for the 2014 elections, was a hate figure for many of us. By 'us', I refer to a small but highly visible minority of well educated, somewhat Westernised and haughtily self-righteous members of India's rapidly growing liberal elite.

It is this elite of supposedly open-minded and judicious do-gooders, which includes media personalities, cultural influencers, NRIs and expatriates, who viewed the assumed truths about Modi almost exclusively through the prism of the Godhra massacre, and more pertinently, by virtue of information consumed about Modi through the country's mass media.

Irrespective of substance, Modi's naked aggression whilst speaking at public rallies, his broken English, and his anachronous self-projection were also almost always less attractive to us, whether we admit it or not, than the allure of the polished, articulate and oh-so charming 'statesmen' who regularly and effortlessly branded Modi a mass murderer. His links with the RSS were of course the final nail in the Modi coffin of our minds.

The RSS concerns were also prevalent before the universally respected former BJP statesman, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, assumed office. It was believed that his lifelong links to the organisation would permit them to project their homogenised worldview - which is, ironically for a right-wing Hindu organisation, counterintuitive to an all-embracing Hindu ethos - through a Prime Minister Vajpayee, upon the polity, culture and federal structure of India. Neither concern, in retrospect, was even close to valid. Modi's twelve years as Chief Minister of Gujarat further bear testament to an almost identical political philosophy as Vajpayee; relentless development, communal harmony, and institutionalised decentralisation of power (not to be confused with assertive leadership).

As for the abhorrent events of 2002, India's courts have sentenced an unprecedented number of those proven to have been associated with the crime, but has dismissed each and every case against Modi himself. These repeated court verdicts must be respected, as enunciated by British MP Barry Gardiner.

It goes without saying that if Modi had been proven guilty, he would deserve the world's, let alone India's unreserved condemnation. Instead, a majority of India's electorate have observed the verdict of her courts, themselves a final bastion of independence within the country's much abused democratic apparatus, in spite of what many allege to have been an orchestrated campaign of defamation against Modi.

Incorruptible stalwarts of modern India, including the revered former President Abdul Kalam, have repeatedly praised Modi's leadership; the same mass media that vilified Modi for over a decade is belatedly repudiating its 'Godhra-Modi-Godhra-Modi' obsession, and re-focussing the election debate to that of development. That in turn plays to Modi's greatest strengths, and of course benefits the country most of all, as it compels all political parties to address the novel ideas of good governance and dispensation of duty.

These are the very ideals upon which Modi stakes his reputation, and due to which it appears an increasing number of Indians, from tycoons to tea boys, seem excited by the prospect of his leadership of the country. A former tea boy himself, Modi has presided over rapid reductions in child malnutrition, a noticeable increase in the gender ratio in favour of females, as well the near-neutralisation of poverty differentials between communities. The latter is a bedrock of Modi's 'development mantra', which specifically eschews India's much despised 'vote-bank' politics:

"Yes, I am opposed to political tools that are used to manipulate our people. When you talk about Hindus or Muslims, Dalits or Brahmins, I talk about development for all of our people." Narendra Modi.
To suggest that Muslim celebrities, business leaders, journalists, statesmen and even clerics support Modi for personal gain is an insult to the integrity of a proud and self-respecting community, and to our collective intelligence; to incessantly abjure an occasionally rambunctious Modi, a man in whom such supporters may witness sincerity, integrity, vision, competence and a sense of duty for a country that he loves, is to subsist in perpetual denial.

Watch: Narendra Modi Talk About Development at The 2013 India Today Conclave
Even Pakistan has sought the assistance of Modi's Gujarat to help solve its power crisis, and one of Pakistan's leading newspapers documents what many in India already discern; that Modi's model of development, which is antagonistic to a languid political elite accustomed to bribing minorities through the begging bowls of reservations, subvention and food processors, actually delivers results by treating all Indians as equals, a message that has been deliberately obscured by Modi's opponents.

From tackling corruption, to developing India; from protecting the environment, to assuring the safety of the citizens of India's North East; and from pursuing a carrot-and-stick foreign policy of equals with China and the US, to the reassertion of the primacy of women in Indian society, Modi has a perspective, a policy and a plan-in-waiting for India.

The unrelenting demonisation of Modi has not only failed monumentally, it has also backfired spectacularly; having transcended a smear campaign of industrial proportions, a decade of legal prosecution, international boycotts, the accusations (and subsequent dismissal) of numerous 'tutored' witnesses, the alleged hijacking of a well-meaning anti-corruption movement, not to mention assassination attempts, even his most bitter detractors should contemplate why this man still wins the hearts and minds of hundreds of millions of Indians, and concede that he may also, finally, deserve a modicum of respect. They should also humbly reconcile with these two eternal truths:

Nobody is immune from the laws of karma.
Satyameva Jayate - the truth always prevails.

The rest of us should have an open mind as to whether the dehumanised Narendra Modi projected to us is a reality, or a fabricated myth.

Don't fight me with politics and dirt; fight me instead on the battlegrounds of development, protection of women and communal harmony. I'm more than happy to fight these battles for India. Narendra Modi.
 
Back
Top Bottom