What's new

Featured Bilawal Bhutto Zardari threaten journalist when questioned during a presser

. . . . .
What an arrogant remark!

Yes. But a small lesson in history, if I may:

From late 1950s till his departure from the Ayub govt in 1965/66, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was a giant in the Pakistan's 'Decade of Development'; Bhutto was the architect of many policies, including the failed Operation Gibraltar in Kashmir. But he did manage to make one of the biggest foreign policy achievements in Pakistan's history: The reaching out to China without alienating America. Mind you: Pakistan was then an ally of America like today's Australia or England or some other close ally country would be. And the communist China--against whom the United States had literally fought and shed a lot of blood during the Korean War--was a big threat. And all this was before the Soviet-China split.

For Bhutto to achieve what was, and perhaps is, the singular foreign policy achievement in Pakistan's history, is a major accomplishment! No doubt he was the 'wonder boy' for Ayub Khan and no doubt, in some votes, both Ayub and Bhutto rank in the top two of Pakistan's leaders after Jinnah.

And Bhutto had many accomplishments after he become the leader of Pakistan after the Fall of Dhaka. BTW, I consider him as ONE of the architects of the Fall of Dhaka but not the principle architect.

Coming back to the topic. Bhutto, as ZAB, should live. But Bhutto, as Zardaris, should not.
 
.
Yes. But a small lesson in history, if I may:

From late 1950s till his departure from the Ayub govt in 1965/66, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was a giant in the Pakistan's 'Decade of Development'; Bhutto was the architect of many policies, including the failed Operation Gibraltar in Kashmir. But he did manage to make one of the biggest foreign policy achievements in Pakistan's history: The reaching out to China without alienating America. Mind you: Pakistan was then an ally of America like today's Australia or England or some other close ally country would be. And the communist China--against whom the United States had literally fought and shed a lot of blood during the Korean War--was a big threat. And all this was before the Soviet-China split.

For Bhutto to achieve what was, and perhaps is, the singular foreign policy achievement in Pakistan's history, is a major accomplishment! No doubt he was the 'wonder boy' for Ayub Khan and no doubt, in some votes, both Ayub and Bhutto rank in the top two of Pakistan's leaders after Jinnah.

And Bhutto had many accomplishments after he become the leader of Pakistan after the Fall of Dhaka. BTW, I consider him as ONE of the architects of the Fall of Dhaka but not the principle architect.

Coming back to the topic. Bhutto, as ZAB, should live. But Bhutto, as Zardaris, should not.
Every politician should be judged based upon his/her performance and not due to relation or merit/demerit of his/her previous generations. So, family name in politics should be irrelevant.
 
. .
Yes. But a small lesson in history, if I may:

From late 1950s till his departure from the Ayub govt in 1965/66, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was a giant in the Pakistan's 'Decade of Development'; Bhutto was the architect of many policies, including the failed Operation Gibraltar in Kashmir. But he did manage to make one of the biggest foreign policy achievements in Pakistan's history: The reaching out to China without alienating America. Mind you: Pakistan was then an ally of America like today's Australia or England or some other close ally country would be. And the communist China--against whom the United States had literally fought and shed a lot of blood during the Korean War--was a big threat. And all this was before the Soviet-China split.

For Bhutto to achieve what was, and perhaps is, the singular foreign policy achievement in Pakistan's history, is a major accomplishment! No doubt he was the 'wonder boy' for Ayub Khan and no doubt, in some votes, both Ayub and Bhutto rank in the top two of Pakistan's leaders after Jinnah.

And Bhutto had many accomplishments after he become the leader of Pakistan after the Fall of Dhaka. BTW, I consider him as ONE of the architects of the Fall of Dhaka but not the principle architect.

Coming back to the topic. Bhutto, as ZAB, should live. But Bhutto, as Zardaris, should not.
He was the reason today Bangladesh got freedom
 
.
@El Sidd Look at the josh of your twin brother Bilawal. He is such a nice person.
 
. . . .
Yes. But a small lesson in history, if I may:

From late 1950s till his departure from the Ayub govt in 1965/66, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was a giant in the Pakistan's 'Decade of Development'; Bhutto was the architect of many policies, including the failed Operation Gibraltar in Kashmir. But he did manage to make one of the biggest foreign policy achievements in Pakistan's history: The reaching out to China without alienating America. Mind you: Pakistan was then an ally of America like today's Australia or England or some other close ally country would be. And the communist China--against whom the United States had literally fought and shed a lot of blood during the Korean War--was a big threat. And all this was before the Soviet-China split.

For Bhutto to achieve what was, and perhaps is, the singular foreign policy achievement in Pakistan's history, is a major accomplishment! No doubt he was the 'wonder boy' for Ayub Khan and no doubt, in some votes, both Ayub and Bhutto rank in the top two of Pakistan's leaders after Jinnah.

And Bhutto had many accomplishments after he become the leader of Pakistan after the Fall of Dhaka. BTW, I consider him as ONE of the architects of the Fall of Dhaka but not the principle architect.

Coming back to the topic. Bhutto, as ZAB, should live. But Bhutto, as Zardaris, should not.

Is this same bhutto who is one of the key person responsible of breakup of Pakistan ? Or are you talking about someone else?

Furthermore, your statement is out of context. the time you are mentioning is the time when China was insignificant for USA and USA was not powerful enough to dictate wither you are with us or against us. It was a bipolar world. For example Pakistan had good relations with many of the pro soviet gulf states but USA never tried to stop us from having relationship with them
 
.
Furthermore, relationship with China were not that strong.

Infact changing from USA free economy block to Soviet communist block was the biggest economic and diplomatic disaster in history of Pakistan and was the start of destruction of Pak economy
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom