What's new

Bihar : What Went Wrong ???

Bihar : What Went Wrong ???


  • Total voters
    21
Get the **** out of this thread nasty little slitty eyed Pinoy!!
Delete it he is just the Philipine and don't know much about bihar. Let him know the past and t
Brahmins were the brains behind the whole thing. There is no confusion behind that.

What has your caste anything to do with it ? (except for demonstrating that you are a casteist)



LOL.....If the bond between the muslims and pandit were strong then the pandits would still be in the valley :lol:


Only the façade of "tolerance" exit, once militancy allowed them to remove that mask, the pandits were thrown out like fly in the tea.

Your opposition to their moving is irrelevant. They moved because they wanted to live and that too with dignity. The GoI and the people of India failed them.

Listen Raktaka, Don't judge what I am saying for been Biased. I am only portraying what I feel or what brain tell me what should be the right. @Kashmiri Pandit might find my post offensive, but its to the ground. The biggest blunder was done by a kashmiri pandit named Pandit Jawahar lal nehru, who was by heart kashmiri. First blunder

1. He ran to the UN in 1947 thus laid the foundation of Kashmir as disputed state, and IA to stopped without capturing each inch of land captured by Pakistani infiltration which could have been achieved easily by Indian army.

2. Second blunder by his daughter Mrs Indira Gandhi in 1971 for not forcing Pakistan to returned occupied kashmir.

3. Blunder by P. Nehru to agree for Rule-370 and giving kashmir special previllage to have own constitution, why not annexed as per Sardar vallav Bhai Patel Formula, thus don't allow other people specially from Punjab to settle in Kashmir, buy lands, hotels, apples and nuts farms, thus ending Pandits supremacy in the valley. thus the difference in population on the basis of religion was always there.

4. Blunder of freeing 5 terrorist for the daughter of Mufti Moh. Sayeed, Rubia sayeed, fueling the dreams of some radicals to achieve independance thru voilence like JKLF.


These are my small compilations for full story I have to write full book.

Ok now your second part, i.e Why Kashmiri Ran to Jammu and N. Delhi -- Because

Sorry @Kashmiri Pandit but I have to admit that kashmiri pandit lack courage, they are more like Baniya. Kashmiri Sikh are living there. And not all area are muslim majority and not all kashmiri muslims were brainwashed except few radicals. For you who doubt bonds between hindu muslim kashmiri -- Many Muslims helped pandits to hide from millitants from being killed, and the one who help the hindu with their Mules and Pitto who carries them to the shrines like Vaishnoo Mata and Amarnath Cave.
 
.
Delete it he is just the Philipine and don't know much about bihar. Let him know the past and t
You don't know that bloke,he is a known Filipino troll who only comes here with the purpose of trolling.I only replied him back in his own coin:coffee:!!
 
. .
Actually it took several attack to distroy the Nalanda completely. Nalanda at that time had 2.5 Lakh student at the the extreme which with todays standard around 25 Lakh, do the calculation
Where do you get these numbers? :hitwall: Don't degrade Nalanda's dignity with your joke numbers.
 
. .
TH03-SURENDRA-MAKE_2606893f.jpg
 
.
Lemme reply to your sarcasm.
Dont take it wrong. you already said that if any muslim ruler tried to reduce oppression on pagans people of Bengal revolted and they adored the caliphate, so are they still doing it under the islamic republic of Bangladesh?
The Caliphate does not exist nowadays
From what i heard, Baghdadi declared himself as one, many people of subcontinent are joining him already.
We in BD are staunch Muslims subscribing the true tenets of Islam which prescribes tolerance, peace, love and social justice.
No comments.

Brahmins were the brains behind the whole thing. There is no confusion behind that.
Really!!! it were the Kshatriyas and vaishyas along with Brahmins who wanted a hierarchy which provided them the supremacy over the Shudras, they together deteoriorated the Varna system to form Caste system.

They would had never allowed the these social changes if they were not been benefited. Now all the blame is on the brahmins who were and are sufferers from as early as 6th century due to the deed of few poster-boy Brahmins and the rest two castes.
 
.
Really!!! it were the Kshatriyas and vaishyas along with Brahmins who wanted a hierarchy which provided them the supremacy over the Shudras, they together deteoriorated the Varna system to form Caste system.

They have never allowed the these social changes if they were not been benefited. Now all the blame is on the brahmins who were and are sufferers from as early as 6th century due to the deed of few poster-boy Brahmins and the rest two castes.

LOL...there was no supremacy over the Shudras :lol:

The Shudras were given as much respect and space as other castes and all castes were proud of themselves. No one was greater or smaller.

This has been established multiple times and Shudras did not allow their children to marry into other castes.

The caste system was hardened when the society where varna existed could nt be defended from external aggression which weakened and destroyed the social structure and society.

Consequently all temporary corrective steps only worsen the situation as society never got an opportunity to recover due to the continuous invasion and destruction of culture and society from across the Hindu kush.
 
.
LOL...there was no supremacy over the Shudras :lol:
Really???:o::o:o_O

The Shudras were given as much respect and space as other castes and all castes were proud of themselves. No one was greater or smaller.

This has been established multiple times and Shudras did not allow their children to marry into other castes.

The caste system was hardened when the society where varna existed could nt be defended from external aggression which weakened and destroyed the social structure and society.

Consequently all temporary corrective steps only worsen the situation as society never got an opportunity to recover due to the continuous invasion and destruction of culture and society from across the Hindu kush.
What you are trying to say???
 
.
Really???:o::o:o_O

What you are trying to say???

In simple worlds.

Continuous Invasion by Non Dharmics --> social structure based on Dharma break down --> support for Dharma / scriptures disappear -- > Desperate attempt to survive and save Dharma and scriptures -- > Result is knee jerk reaction and modifications in social structure --> Invasion continue --> Corrupted structure attempts to correct itself --> British decided to promote corrupt structure for their own benefit -- > Rift in society --> Divide and Rule .
 
.
In simple worlds.

Continuous Invasion by Non Dharmics --> social structure based on Dharma break down --> support for Dharma / scriptures disappear -- > Desperate attempt to survive and save Dharma and scriptures -- > Result is knee jerk reaction and modifications in social structure --> Invasion continue --> Corrupted structure attempts to correct itself --> British decided to promote corrupt structure for their own benefit -- > Rift in society --> Divide and Rule .
I do agree on almost all points. There is no point of argument then.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom