What's new

Bihar for Biharis!

. . .
BS.... It happened coz india was involved and mujib n bhutto were power greedy bastards.... mujib was even trying to become the PM of entire Pakistan even after 71!!!
He was the one agitating the bangalis... who were attacking the west Pakistanis n Biharis... all these have been recorded by your own author Sarmila Bose... unlike bangalis n indians who find it easy to lie abt

Mujib's party own the election and was in a position to form the government, then what happened?

(Will join the discussion later, time to go.)
 
.
Bangladesh has a major illegal Bihari problem. These illegal foreign language speaking goons have been occupying major real estate in the heart of Dhaka and draining our resources, it is a strain to our economy since we are hardly a rich nation. Time has arrived, we take this issue to genocidal Modi, since he is the ultimate bloke to solve all illegal immigrant problems. A bengali nationalist Awami league MP has already killed a couple of them to show their rightful place is in Bihar, not in Bangladesh, we are heading in the right direction it appears.


Send back the biharis and take away your more than 2 crore Bangladeshi goons.
 
. .
wtf? they have been telling me that they have arabic lineage. damn!
Actually maybe I was wrong

"In South Asia, the term Shaikh MAY signify Arab ancestry, or other Middle-eastern or Central Asian origins."
According to wiki

Nothing stopping anyone from putting sheikh in their name, I could go do it tomorrow, no one will bat an eye lid doesn't mean I have Arab lineage. People will just think I'm posh:p
 
Last edited:
.
Mujib's party own the election and was in a position to form the government, then what happened?

mujib didnt get the mandate... the total percentage of voters was less than 40% ... around 37-8 %. almost the same percentage of as in Baluchistan... apart from him there were several bangalis who were pro Pakistan.. some who didnt care.. n some who were agitated by mujibs fiery speeches.. lying about fake accidents... for example.. in Dhaka he lied abt PA killing hundreds of bangalis in jessore... the truth? 2 bangalis were killed ... when the Brig commander of 2 East Pakistan Regiment (bangali regiment) was surrounded by thousands of bangalis lead by an awami league goon .. who incited ppl that west Pakistanis were comming to disarm 2EPR... instead the situation got out of control... the major of 2 EBR (bangali officer) tried to talk to the ppl... he talked for 45 minutes... meanwhile a vehicle of 2EBR was surrounded... 1 bangali soldier was killed... 5 kidnapped... the others thrashed n weapons snatched!! the bangali soldiers also went to Brig Arbab (the Brig Commander) ... he still didnt order any fire... but than the snatched weapons were used to fire on the army... nearly missing the brig himself!! in the cross fire 2 bangali agitators were killed n few soldiers injured.. the troops who returned fire were bangali themself... the same regiment.. tht later mutinied n killed west Pak officers,troops and even their families..



P.S:Yahya was trying to solve the tussle between bhutto n mujib.... even flew to dhaka to meet him... mujib was clearly a power greedy prick who got killed just after 4 years.... while bhutto hanged.
 
Last edited:
.
Aren't you the same people who were bitchin Burma about Rohingyas.These people should have options to both migrate to Pakistan or live in Bangladesh because they were citizens of Pakistan and also of Bangladesh.

40 years ago.

So are we going to decide someone's nationality on where their parents were a few decades ago?
 
.
Actually maybe I was wrong

"In South Asia, the term Shaikh MAY signify Arab ancestry, or other Middle-eastern or Central Asian origins."
According to wiki

Nothing stopping anyone from putting sheikh in their name, I could go do it tomorrow, no one will bat an eye lid doesn't mean I have Arab lineage. People will just think I'm posh:p
But I asked a guy from Bihar he Is a syed, he said that , normally Bdeshi shaiks are not the arabi shaiks, they are actually called so because of the businessmanship. This has nothing to do with with arabic lineage. More ove he said that, in Bdesh it will be tough to find any one of arabic linieage because only a few went there. Plus those who used to work for them, they were called as shaiks just to show respect.

and I think basically in saudi arab, people cannot put this sheikh as prefix, because it is not a name it is a title. Only those who are chosen, can be called as sheikhs.
 
.
Consider these 'illegals' as a payment for looting Bangladesh from 1947-1971 :)
i think the people who you are also referring to also built the first industries and made Bengali Muslims get something more than menial jobs for the first time in 200 years. compare that with leftist Bengali agitators who had nothing better to contribute than rioting. the only illegal here is you. go to Calcutta and find your Bengali ethnic purism, and take the new 'remittance Indians' out of BD with you

In 1947 the birth of East Pakistan happened on religious ground, but in 1971 the birth of Bangladesh happened
....due to Indian invasion of a sovereign land
 
.
But I asked a guy from Bihar he Is a syed, he said that , normally Bdeshi shaiks are not the arabi shaiks, they are actually called so because of the businessmanship. This has nothing to do with with arabic lineage. More ove he said that, in Bdesh it will be tough to find any one of arabic linieage because only a few went there. Plus those who used to work for them, they were called as shaiks just to show respect.

and I think basically in saudi arab, people cannot put this sheikh as prefix, because it is not a name it is a title. Only those who are chosen, can be called as sheikhs.
Yes you are mostly correct, most of the Arabs that came to Bengal, came to sylhet.
Ie. shah jalal, shah farhan, shah kamal, shah siddiq and numerous other disciples (360 or so).
 
Last edited:
.
mujib didnt get the mandate... the total percentage of voters was less than 40% ... around 37-8 %. almost the same percentage of as in Baluchistan... apart from him there were several bangalis who were pro Pakistan.. some who didnt care.. n some who were agitated by mujibs fiery speeches.. lying about fake accidents... for example.. in Dhaka he lied abt PA killing hundreds of bangalis in jessore... the truth? 2 bangalis were killed ... when the Brig commander of 2 East Pakistan Regiment (bangali regiment) was surrounded by thousands of bangalis lead by an awami league goon .. who incited ppl that west Pakistanis were comming to disarm 2EPR... instead the situation got out of control... the major of 2 EBR (bangali officer) tried to talk to the ppl... he talked for 45 minutes... meanwhile a vehicle of 2EBR was surrounded... 1 bangali soldier was killed... 5 kidnapped... the others thrashed n weapons snatched!! the bangali soldiers also went to Brig Arbab (the Brig Commander) ... he still didnt order any fire... but than the snatched weapons were used to fire on the army... nearly missing the brig himself!! in the cross fire 2 bangali agitators were killed n few soldiers injured.. the troops who returned fire were bangali themself... the same regiment.. tht later mutinied n killed west Pak officers,troops and even their families..



P.S:Yahya was trying to solve the tussle between bhutto n mujib.... even flew to dhaka to meet him... mujib was clearly a power greedy prick who got killed just after 4 years.... while bhutto hanged.

There should not be any tussle, in fact Yahia was not even required to talk to Bhutto. He should had called the parliament, ask it to select a PM and hand over the power. Thats how it happens in Pakistan right? Or you have a different version of democracy?

Underlying problem was all west pakistanis were in the same page including Bhutto and Yahia. Yahia was working for Bhutto and he did not want any shift of center of gravity from west to east.
 
.
There should not be any tussle, in fact Yahia was not even required to talk to Bhutto. He should had called the parliament, ask it to select a PM and hand over the power. Thats how it happens in Pakistan right? Or you have a different version of democracy?

Underlying problem was all west pakistanis were in the same page including Bhutto and Yahia. Yahia was working for Bhutto and he did not want any shift of center of gravity from west to east.

Thts BS... A little observation tells you tht Yahya had already announced mujib as the next PM... but bhutto was agitating... to solve the crisis yahya tried to negotiate between the two... while at the same time ... Mujib started bs and agitating in E.Pakistan.. infact he speeches were promoting violence which he couldnt control.. apart from tht i doubt 37% voters (2 seats went to the chakma chief and another politician) ...gave mujib any clear mandate... as for democracy .. yes and what happened just after 71? the great bangalis chose "democracy" by killing mujib n his family n than zia?
 
.
Don't tell me Pakistan had no role in destroying Afghanistan.

Pakistan supported both Masud and Hikmatyar at first, but after 92 the Tajiks and Pashtuns started killing each other. Pakistan just sided with the most "pro-Pakistan" side in the civil war. India also supported northern alliance from their Tajikistan base, why doesn't it take in at least half of the refugees?

2.5 MILLION illegal bangladeshis also live in Pakistan..

Are they Bangali or the stranded Biharis? Those stranded Biharis increase MQM's votebank so I wouldn't be surprised if they get easy citizenship.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom