What's new

BGB opts for compromise over Dibir Haor -

idune

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
-40
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
BGB opts for compromise over Dibir Haor
Wetland divided temporarily to ‘avoid violence’

Zaman Monir . Sylhet

Border Guard Bangladesh on Sunday opted for a compromise with Indian Border Security Force by agreeing to a temporary settlement of the dispute over Dibir Haor, a bordering wetland, at Jaintapur in Sylhet, by demarcating the area allowing ‘uninterrupted access’ of Indians to the land in adverse possession.

BGB and BSF temporarily divided the haor into two parts giving one portion to Bangladeshis and the other to Indians to ‘avoid violence’ although the area has been part of Bangladesh territory over the years, the BGB officials told New Age.
The decision to divide the adversely possessed marshland of 55.3 acres was taken at a flag meeting at Jaintapur border around midday between the battalion-level officials of BGB and BSF, according to BGB.

BGB 5 battalion commanding officer lieutenant colonel Shafiul Azam confirmed the decision.
He said the BSF officials had shown a supportive attitude during the flag meeting to settle the dispute in a peaceful way.

‘After the meeting, we [officials of both sides] have specified a part, which would a little more than a half of Dibir Haor, for Bangladesh and another part for Indians to settle the dispute between the citizens of the two countries,’ he said.

Home ministry’s additional secretary (political) Kamal Uddin Ahmed said, ‘Bangladesh and India have agreed to maintain a status quo over all APLs, including Dibir Haor until the matter is resolved between the two governments.’

He said there was no scope for dividing any APL between the two countries to settle the dispute.
Kamal, also head of the Joint Boundary Working Group, told New Age that the APLs were already surveyed and their possessions would be settled under the land protocol which was signed by India and Bangladesh in 2011, but yet to be ratified by the Indian government.
Shafiul, however, added that they had nothing to do about specifying the actual ownership of the disputed land until the ministries concerned of the two countries reached a decision in this regard.

The BGB and BSF camp commander-level officials, who met in a flag meeting on Friday at Dibir Haor, decided to convene the talks between the battalion-level officials of the two border guards to reach in a decision on the issue, the officials said.

BGB 5 battalion commanding officer lieutenant colonel Shafiul Azam led the Bangladesh side while BSF 108 battalion commanding officer Debendra Bifth led the Indian side in the flag meeting that started at 11:45am and ended at 2:30pm, the BGB officials said.

But the decision on dividing the Dibir Haor between the citizens of Bangladesh and India has caused resentment among Bangladeshi villagers in Jaintapur border area, locals claimed.
They said that the decision to leave a part of Dibir Haor went in favour of Indian nationals, when a number of APLs in different areas along the border remained under Indian occupation.
Solaiman Miah, a resident of Dibir Haor village, told New Age in the afternoon that the BGB officials had asked them not to go fishing in the Kendri Beel, a water body in the Dibir Haor area located some 300 metres inside Bangladesh territory.


‘The BGB officials informed us that Kendri Beel would remain in the possession of Indian nationals from now on,’ Solaiman said, adding that it would be difficult for them to accept that people of the other country would fish in the beel adjacent to their homes, which had been in their [Bangladeshis] possession for a long time.

Jaintapur border turned tense on Thursday morning after a group of Indian nationals backed by the BSF infiltrated more than 300 metres in Bangladesh territory and started fishing in Dibir Haor, ignoring the objection of Bangladeshis. The situation calmed in the afternoon after the BSF authorities agreed to take back their citizens from Dibir Haor and convene a flag meeting in this regard, local sources said.

The BSF personnel allegedly resisted Bangladeshi villagers on December 13 when they went to fish in Dibir Haor. They also fired in the air on that day to scare away Bangladeshis, the sources said.

In March 2010, more than 20 Bangladeshi villagers sustained bullet injuries when the BSF opened fire after a group of villagers tried to prevent Indian nationals from fishing in Dibir Haor.

New Age | Newspaper
 
.
it seems BSF was the only force doing rounds.. BDR men were taking a nap. Consequently, BSF men harrassed BD people at will .. :lol:

sounds like a script straight from Ram Gopal Verma's stable :lol:
 
.
by demarcating the area allowing ‘uninterrupted access’ of Indians to the land in adverse possession.

That land was ours always. Will we ever get it back? Indo-awami crooks ripped off this country big time over the last 4 years.


it seems BSF was the only force doing rounds.. BDR men were taking a nap. Consequently, BSF men harrassed BD people at will .. :lol:

sounds like a script straight from Ram Gopal Verma's stable :lol:

This is no $hit from anandabazar or Toilet news. Rather than blaming the messenger praise your BAL dalals and your GOI superb diplomatic and strategic investment on BAL. U should be proud of GOI's accomplishments.:)
 
.
Indian highhandedness continues

THE temporary demarcation of Dibir Haor on Sunday, allowing ‘uninterrupted access’ of Indians to almost half of the adversely possessed marshland of 55.3 acres some 300 metres inside Bangladesh territory, marks yet another meek surrender by the Awami League-led government to the continued highhandedness of their Congress-led Indian counterpart.

According to a report front-paged in New Age on Monday, the decision on the temporary demarcation was made at a battalion-level flag meeting between the Border Guards Bangladesh and the Border Security Force, supposedly to ‘settle the dispute between the citizens of the two countries’ and thus ‘avoid violence’. However, an additional secretary of the home ministry insisted that there was no scope for dividing any adversely possessed land as ‘Bangladesh and India have agreed to maintain a status quo over all APLs, including Dibir Haor, until the matter is resolved between the two governments’.

The question then is: on whose authority or permission did the Border Guards Bangladesh enter into such an agreement with their Indian counterparts?

Moreover, it is not the first time that the border guards and the incumbent political administration have made a retreat in the face of atrocities and excesses by the BSF, with apparent indulgence, if not tacit support, from New Delhi. In May 2010, in the face of continued killing of Bangladeshis by the BSF, the AL-led government imposed a restriction on night-time movement of people on the frontier, in line with recommendations from the Border Guards Bangladesh, called the Bangladesh Rifles then.

Simply put, instead of taking a strong position against the BSF atrocities and excesses, and thus making New Delhi take effective steps to rein in their marauding border guards, the incumbents curtailed the people’s constitutional right to the freedom of movement.

Regardless of the AL-led government’s claim of its having turned a new chapter in the Bangladesh-India relations, the reality on the ground seems to be that New Delhi is in no mood to resolve the bilateral disputes that it itself has given rise to. Ever since Bangladesh’s emergence as an independent state, India has sought to take undue advantage of the former’s gratitude for its supportive role during the former’s war of independence. Be it in bilateral trade or sharing of trans-boundary rivers or demarcation of border, New Delhi has sought to impose its will on Dhaka, hardly ever treating the latter as an equal. In such asymmetric relations, it is hardly surprising thus that India has repeatedly defaulted on keeping its part of the bargain. It is pertinent to point out here that India has not yet ratified the protocol on exchange of adversely possessed lands although it was signed more than a year ago. Suffice it to say, the people have become increasingly infuriated with India’s highhanded attitude and apparent unwillingness to take effective steps to resolve the bilateral irritants it itself has created.

What the Bangladesh government needs to realise is that as long as it keep ceding ground to its Indian counterpart in bilateral disputes, the latter would continue with its highhanded attitude. Therefore, the incumbents need to stand its ground and force New Delhi to live up to its commitments. Revocation of the temporary demarcation of Dibar Haor would be a good start.

Meanwhile, conscious sections of society need to raise their voice against the utter disregard displayed by the Indian government for the legitimate rights and genuine grievances of Bangladesh and its people

New Age | Newspaper
 
.
Simple gentlemen....Just use your ballot and change your political force that you do like...And please make sure that your choosen new GOV is not ready to compromise your desired issues...Till that point you have to bear with the sequence of events that is happening around you...Or else...create an Egypt kind revolution to see the change...
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom