What's new

BBC : WHO to investigate virus origins in China's Wuhan

Chanakyaa

BANNED
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
6,538
Reaction score
-36
Country
India
Location
India
Covid: WHO to investigate virus origins in China's Wuhan
Published2 days ago
Share
Related Topics

media captionCovid-19: How everyday life has changed in Wuhan
A team of 10 international scientists will travel to the Chinese city of Wuhan next month to investigate the origins of Covid-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) has said.
Beijing has been reluctant to agree to an independent inquiry and it has taken many months of negotiations for the WHO to be allowed access to the city.
The virus is thought to have come from a market in the city selling animals.
But the search for the source has led to tensions, notably with the US.
President Donald Trump's administration has accused China of trying to conceal the initial outbreak.
What is the aim of the investigation?
A biologist on the team travelling to Wuhan told the Associated Press news agency that the WHO was not seeking to apportion blame, but rather to prevent future outbreaks.
"It's really not about finding a guilty country," Fabian Leendertz of Germany's Robert Koch Institute said.
"It's about trying to understand what happened and then see if, based on those data, we can try to reduce the risk in the future."
Dr Leendertz said the aim was to find out when the virus began circulating and whether or not it originated in Wuhan.
The mission was expected to last four or five weeks, he added.
Where and when was the virus first detected?
In the early days of the virus, it was traced to a so-called "wet market" in Wuhan, Hubei province, and it was suggested that this was where it made the leap from animals to humans.
But experts now believe it may simply have been amplified there.
Research suggests that coronaviruses capable of infecting humans may have been circulating undetected in bats for decades.
Last December, a Chinese doctor at Wuhan Central Hospital - Li Wenliang - tried to warn fellow medics about a possible outbreak of a new disease, but was told by police to "stop making false comments" and was investigated for "spreading rumours".
Dr Li died in February after contracting the virus while treating patients in the city.
Vendors are selling fish in an open market in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, 2 December 2020
IMAGE COPYRIGHTGETTY IMAGES
image captionIt was initially believed that the virus originated at a so-called "wet market" in Wuhan
In April, suspicions and allegations emerged that the virus might have leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan.
US State Department cables came to light suggesting that embassy officials were worried about biosecurity there.
The office of the US national intelligence director said at the time that while the virus was not man-made or genetically modified, officials were investigating whether the outbreak began through contact with animals or through a laboratory accident.
Recent reports in Chinese media have suggested that Covid-19 could have started outside China.
But analysts say the reports are without foundation, and the campaign reflects anxiety within the leadership in Beijing about damage to the country's international reputation from the pandemic.
line

Will access to Wuhan provide answers?
Analysis by Naomi Grimley, BBC health correspondent
The question of an independent inquiry into the origins of the virus has become embroiled in international geopolitics and rows about the WHO.
The Trump administration has always taken a hard line, arguing that the WHO has been too soft on China and citing examples of officials praising the Chinese regime for its actions such as locking down Wuhan, mass testing and its publication of the genetic code of the virus.
However, lots of other countries also said there needed to be a proper inquiry - including Australia and the UK. The Associated Press revealed transcripts of video calls from WHO officials complaining back in January that they had not received the right data they needed from the Chinese authorities. A two-man WHO team that visited China this summer had difficulty negotiating access to Wuhan.
This trip, when it does happen, will probably concentrate on fundamental biological questions: did the virus originally come from bats? Was there an "intermediate host" linking bats to humans? And were Wuhan wet markets at the centre of the initial outbreak?
line

What has been the response to China's reporting of the virus?
China's tackling of the developing crisis was praised in January by the head of the WHO's Health Emergencies Programme, Dr Mike Ryan, who said the "challenge is great but the response has been massive".
Beijing had helped slow the spread of the virus, the WHO said, by quickly volunteering to share its knowledge of the virus's genetic code.
However, the US - among a number of other countries - raised questions about whether China was fully transparent when the virus first emerged there.
In March, the head of the WHO in China, Dr Gauden Galea, told the BBC there were "shortcomings" in tackling the outbreak in the early days, but that experts would look at how issues could be avoided in the future.

media captionDr Gauden Galea, WHO head in China: "The country itself has already announced that there were shortcomings"
Mr Trump later attacked the WHO itself for being too "China-centric" in praising Beijing, saying the organisation "really blew it" with its early guidance during the outbreak.
He announced that he was pulling the US out of the body and said funding would be redirected elsewhere.
However, US President-elect Joe Biden, who is due to be sworn in on 20 January, has since set up a foreign policy team tasked with keeping America in the WHO.


 
.
Welcome, now we are going to get more international medical experts proving the origin not being from China. We always trust and work very well with WHO.
 
.
1.67M dead because somebody refused to declare a pandemic until the middle of March...






Screen Shot 2020-12-18 at 6.24.19 PM.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
1.67M dead because somebody refused to declare a pandemic until the middle of March...






View attachment 697704
But Trump said this was just another flu or cold and discouraged people from wearing masks, why Americans always blame the wrong people?
 
.
I would not have approved this unless Europe and North America do the same.

This is like investigating Japan into their origins, and when you find somebody from October who had this in Japan, WHO says that is the first person with this and this spread from Japan.

You have to test those who got sick in the nursing homes in the US, most of that data is probably violated and substituted and false now, still China should not agree to be the only to be investigated. It only plays into trump blame game.

So China has to allow an investigation which is gonna reveal China had this in Sept or October 2019, much like Italy. Proving this was worldwide then. And has to be open with the investigation.

Basic thing libertarians are taught is you don't allow anybody in your country to investigate you, even if they find no fault of China in this, they could speak with Uighurs who will tell of 1 million Uighurs sent to detention re-education camps. You don't let others investigate you. Serbia started WWI to prevent that. That is your sovereignty.
 
.
China just shows she is a responsible big nation willing to cooperate with international organisations, unlike manchild Trump throwing a tantrum and quit WHO all together. Hopefully other nations will follow China's move and open their doors for WHO investigations as well.
 
.
But Trump said this was just another flu or cold and discouraged people from wearing masks, why Americans always blame the wrong people?

Trump never complained about countries banning flights from the US to prevent the spread...China cried racism racism racism.
 
Last edited:
.
I wonder what has happened to all the decent journalists at BBC?

Writing an article based on half truth to subvert their political biases is a very naughty idea. But that's British.

WHO had immediately despatched their virologists and investigative team to Wuhan back in January this year after it was reported by China but they are merely doing it officially now because of UN.

https://www.quora.com/More-than-100...n-Abdul-Rahman?ch=3&share=bc7a5f75&srid=oN39E

It is just their duty to investiigate on the etymology of this COVID outbreak first reported and discovered in Wuhan by China CDC like they were doing in Africa and Mexico.

Although H1N1 was called the Mexican Flu, it was in fact originated from USA then spread to the rest of the world.
Interestly the bat that was supposedly found to be infected with COVID is a species not found in China but an Indian bat. This was revealed by a US General.
But that does not means the disease came from India. There are many theories and some are conspiracies.

Don't forget USA has 200 military biological laboratories outside of USA. Don't asked me why, USA placed its biological laboratory outside of USA.

To be fair, even the Wuhan vaccine laboratory has a US origin.

So why did Trump quit WHO and even blocked WHO investigators and sheir families from entering USA?
Is it to stop them from investigating Fort Detrick biological laboratory or elsewhere?
 
.
It was the first epicenter so it makes sense to find the cause and avoid another tragedy in the future.

It is better to accept than remain in denial.
 
.
Northern Italy was a concurrent epicenter, and perhaps before Wuhan.




And this is only because Italians are looking, while other parts of the world, namely the USA, are deliberately not looking for cases in 2019. There are probably many parts of the world with cases in autumn 2019.
 
. . . . . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom