Bangladesh Asia’s 2nd most gender equal country: World Economic Forum

[VikingRaider]

Ban them all. It's bad.

Why are you acting as adversary ? Did i say that they are all bad? But do you mix serials with real life? If Indian serial and real life style are actually same , then i believe that you guys are screwed up already .

 

[LASER1]

Why are you acting as adversary ? Did i say that they are all bad? But do you mix serials with real life? If Indian serial and real life style are actually same , then i believe that you guys are screwed up already .

Lol! I'm not your Adversary, or you meant Advisory? Anyway, I just gave my take on your women watching Indian serials, stop watching all serials spend time talking. I'm not saying adopt these to real life, or anything.

 

[Michael Corleone]

well i heared bengali women are too dangerous their brain work 24/7 on family politics same like india serials

Still not as good as Pakistani women

 

[Imran Khan]

Still not as good as Pakistani women

no man our women are poor calm loving .i am witness .

 

[Nilgiri]

Given that Bangladesh economy is basically run by the the RMG industry and they employ almost 80% female workforce it's not a surprise, Congrats it's not a easy task either way and they're going well on the female education front and healthcare

Philippines expat workers remittance is a major foreign exchange earner and one of the biggest employment avenues, Filipino maids are in high demand both in the Middle East and East Asia

It also somewhat depends on what index you are using (bypassing argument for time being of how credible BD data is on its women and development). In the UN HDI Gender inequality index, BD does worse than both India and Pakistan:

http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/GII

http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii

The GII is an inequality index. It measures gender inequalities in three important aspects of human development—reproductive health, measured by maternal mortality ratio and adolescent birth rates; empowerment, measured by proportion of parliamentary seats occupied by females and proportion of adult females and males aged 25 years and older with at least some secondary education; and economic status, expressed as labour market participation and measured by labour force participation rate of female and male populations aged 15 years and older. The GII is built on the same framework as the IHDI—to better expose differences in the distribution of achievements between women and men. It measures the human development costs of gender inequality. Thus the higher the GII value the more disparities between females and males and the more loss to human development.

 

[Black_cats]

It also somewhat depends on what index you are using (bypassing argument for time being of how credible BD data is on its women and development). In the UN HDI Gender inequality index, BD does worse than both India and Pakistan:

http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/GII

http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii

The GII is an inequality index. It measures gender inequalities in three important aspects of human development—reproductive health, measured by maternal mortality ratio and adolescent birth rates; empowerment, measured by proportion of parliamentary seats occupied by females and proportion of adult females and males aged 25 years and older with at least some secondary education; and economic status, expressed as labour market participation and measured by labour force participation rate of female and male populations aged 15 years and older. The GII is built on the same framework as the IHDI—to better expose differences in the distribution of achievements between women and men. It measures the human development costs of gender inequality. Thus the higher the GII value the more disparities between females and males and the more loss to human development.

Idiot just go and compare the chart for Bangladesh with Pakistan and India. Except early marriage Bangladeshi woman are way ahead of both Pakistan and India as indicated the link you have shared.

 

[nang2]

I wonder. is this equality a feature of poor countries or rich ones? the richest Asian countries couldn't even make into the top 10.

 

[Nilgiri]

Idiot just go and compare the chart for Bangladesh with Pakistan and India. Except early marriage Bangladeshi woman are way ahead of both Pakistan and India as indicated the link you have shared.

Thus shows just how much dissonance and lying BD has in the claimed numbers (when just one thing it cannot lie about as easily pushes its ranking so much worse):

I wonder. is this equality a feature of poor countries or rich ones? the richest Asian countries couldn't even make into the top 10.

Yes this is also a factor. The poorer a country is, generally the more "equal" it is, given free market gives options for people to break the poverty/low income chain faster than others.

 

[Black_cats]

Thus shows just how much dissonance and lying BD has in the claimed numbers (when just one thing it cannot lie about as easily pushes its ranking so much worse):

If you have ever done data analysis you should know there are always some exception and will go out of the range. But it does not mean that data is wrong.

Bangladesh achieved it with 40 years of hard work

 

[Nilgiri]

If you have ever done data analysis you should know there are always some exception and will go out of the range. But it does not mean that data is wrong.

Find me more exceptions then of similar magnitude to BD (given the high correlation between teenage birth rate and total fertility rate worldwide).....and their very different level of susceptibility to manipulation by illegal emigration and govt propaganda...i.e much easier to manipulate TFR compared to birth rate if you know how the integral sensitivity is across age bands.

Occam razor here is BD lies as needed for the feelings, given it has outrightly lied (and continues to defend as truth) about a 3 million number for its very own raison d'etre.

 

[Black_cats]

Look at the regression model...

It does not mean the dot outside the range is wrong. Just don't over-fit the curve.

Just for your info so that you can enlighten yourself.

https://www.kaggle.com/kanncaa1/machine-learning-tutorial-for-beginners

Find me more exceptions then of similar magnitude to BD (given the high correlation between teenage birth rate and total fertility rate worldwide).....and their very different level of susceptibility to manipulation by illegal emigration and govt propaganda...i.e much easier to manipulate TFR compared to birth rate if you know how the integral sensitivity is across age bands.

Occam razor here is BD lies as needed for the feelings, given it has outrightly lied (and continues to defend as truth) about a 3 million number for its very own raison d'etre.

Dude show me data where after 1990s illegal emigration happened in large scale specially to dirt poor regions of India.

It has been shown over and over again Bangladesh achieved these lower birth rate in 40 years. You will hardly find families now a days with more then 3 children even among the poor and lower middle class families.

 

[Nilgiri]

Look at the regression model...

It does not mean the dot outside the range is wrong. Just don't over-fit the curve.

Just for your info so that you can enlighten yourself.

https://www.kaggle.com/kanncaa1/machine-learning-tutorial-for-beginners

You do realise we are comparing massive populations and not single units of people right (as the variable of interest)? You understand what normal distribution effect does to that inherently?

Dude show me data where after 1990s illegal emigration happened in large scale specially to dirt poor regions of India.

Knock yourself out, this is just a conservative low bracket estimate:

http://www.global-migration.info/

 

[Black_cats]

You do realise we are comparing massive populations and not single units of people right (as the variable of interest)? You understand what normal distribution effect does to that inherently?

We are talking about average of individual countries. Even among poor families in Bangladesh there is not more then 3 children now a days. It does not matter when they are married. After having 1st and 2nd child they stopped taking babies. As most of the woman works, they do not prefer more babies.

You do realise we are comparing massive populations and not single units of people right (as the variable of interest)? You understand what normal distribution effect does to that inherently?



Knock yourself out, this is just a conservative low bracket estimate:

http://www.global-migration.info/

That's legal migration. Every year 500000- 1000000 people goes abroad legally.

 

[Nilgiri]

It has been shown over and over again Bangladesh achieved these lower birth rate in 40 years. You will hardly find families now a days with more then 3 children even among the poor and lower middle class families.

According to Bangladesh crappy stats with little institutional credibility.

What happens when you remove Bangladeshis from their little decrepit lying swamp and study them in more credible way in a much richer, wealthier country?

Oh thats right:

http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/papers/93139

 

[Black_cats]

According to Bangladesh crappy stats with little institutional credibility.

What happens when you remove Bangladeshis from their little decrepit lying swamp and study them in more credible way in a much richer, wealthier country?

Oh thats right:

http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/papers/93139

No one is forcing you to believe anything. Socio economic situation in Bangladesh then other countries. Those who live in Bangladesh knows it very well even poor families are not taking more then 3 kids and it is 1 in well educated families where both husband and wife works as there will be no one to take care of the babies.

All international organizations accepted lower birth rate / woman. We have no obligation to make you believe it.

Just for your info India is not even in the list.... I assume you consider India's data is credible. Go and do some development work for your woman, give them education and let them work instead of keeping with animals during their period.