What's new

Bangladesh ahead of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan in reducing hunger

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5

Bangladesh ahead of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan in reducing hunger​

BANGLADESH

Noshin Tasnim Zaman
13 October, 2022, 03:00 pm
Last modified: 13 October, 2022, 11:15 pm

hunger_index_info.png

Infographic: TBS

Bangladesh has moved eight notches down to rank 84th among 121 countries in the Global Hunger Index (GHI) 2022, still surpassing neighbouring India (107th), Pakistan (99th) and Afghanistan (109th).

This year, the country has scored 19.6 in the index, which is considered a moderate level of hunger.

A higher score in the index implies a worsening hunger situation, whereas zero is the best score – indicating no hunger.

In the last edition of the global ranking published in 2021, Bangladesh ranked 76th out of 116 countries, with a score of 19.1.

In the last two decades, Bangladesh showed an improvement by 40% from a GHI score of 34.1 in 2000 but continued to be in the 'serious' category, the report said.

The GHI assigns the scores in five severity levels – low (9.9 or less), moderate (10.0-19.9), serious (20.0-34.9), alarming (35.0-49.9) and extremely alarming (50 or higher).

The latest index was published jointly on 13 October by international humanitarian organisation Concern Worldwide and Germany's Welthungerhilfe – one of the largest private aid organisations in the world.

The Global Hunger Index measures and tracks the hunger level globally, regionally and nationally to trigger actions for reducing hunger across the globe. The scoring process is based on four components – undernourishment, child wasting, child stunting and child mortality.

The share of child wasting or acute undernutrition in Bangladesh decreased from 14.4% during 2012-2016 to 9.8% during 2017-2021, as per the report.

Bangladesh has shown the biggest improvement in curbing child stunting. From 2012 to 2021, the country reduced child stunting or chronic undernutrition by 8.2%.

Around 11.4% of the total population are experiencing undernourishment or insufficient calorie intake in between 2019 to 2021, a decrease by 2.7% from the previous period of 2013 to 2015.

Additionally, the country witnessed a 2.9% under-five mortality rate in 2020, suggesting an improvement of only 1.1% during the period.

The report also mentions that undernourishment is an indicator of inadequate food supply and unhealthy environments.
Although Bangladesh has made considerable improvement in food security, as shown in the GHI, challenges remain.

"Persistent undernutrition represents a significant and complex barrier to building a thriving, prosperous country," said Gretta Fitzgerald, acting country director, Concern Worldwide in Bangladesh.

"There has been Covid-19 and exceptional increases in basic costs. For Bangladesh to continue on its positive trend of reducing malnutrition, robust measures must be taken to ensure that those who are most vulnerable to malnutrition are not left behind," she added.

The index includes six South Asian countries with Sri Lanka (64th) tops the ranking followed by Nepal (81th) and Bangladesh (84th). Both Sri Lanka and Nepal are placed in the "moderate" severity level.

Afghanistan (109th), India (107th) and Pakistan (99th) are the bottom three countries in South Asia. The GHI has not included Bhutan and Maldives in the 2022 report.

The GHI found that South Asia has the world's highest levels of child stunting (low body weight to height) and child wasting (malnourished or emaciated) while south Saharan countries in Africa have the highest levels of undernourishment and child mortality rates.

This year's GHI report considers one important avenue for food systems transformation – community action that engages local leaders and citizens in improving governance and accountability.

"Progress made to tackle world hunger has largely halted. The toxic cocktail of conflict, climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic had already left millions exposed to food price shocks and vulnerable to further crises," said Dominic MacSorley, chief executive of Concern Worldwide.

 
.

Bangladesh ahead of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan in reducing hunger​

BANGLADESH

Noshin Tasnim Zaman
13 October, 2022, 03:00 pm
Last modified: 13 October, 2022, 11:15 pm

hunger_index_info.png

Infographic: TBS

Bangladesh has moved eight notches down to rank 84th among 121 countries in the Global Hunger Index (GHI) 2022, still surpassing neighbouring India (107th), Pakistan (99th) and Afghanistan (109th).

This year, the country has scored 19.6 in the index, which is considered a moderate level of hunger.

A higher score in the index implies a worsening hunger situation, whereas zero is the best score – indicating no hunger.

In the last edition of the global ranking published in 2021, Bangladesh ranked 76th out of 116 countries, with a score of 19.1.

In the last two decades, Bangladesh showed an improvement by 40% from a GHI score of 34.1 in 2000 but continued to be in the 'serious' category, the report said.

The GHI assigns the scores in five severity levels – low (9.9 or less), moderate (10.0-19.9), serious (20.0-34.9), alarming (35.0-49.9) and extremely alarming (50 or higher).

The latest index was published jointly on 13 October by international humanitarian organisation Concern Worldwide and Germany's Welthungerhilfe – one of the largest private aid organisations in the world.

The Global Hunger Index measures and tracks the hunger level globally, regionally and nationally to trigger actions for reducing hunger across the globe. The scoring process is based on four components – undernourishment, child wasting, child stunting and child mortality.

The share of child wasting or acute undernutrition in Bangladesh decreased from 14.4% during 2012-2016 to 9.8% during 2017-2021, as per the report.

Bangladesh has shown the biggest improvement in curbing child stunting. From 2012 to 2021, the country reduced child stunting or chronic undernutrition by 8.2%.

Around 11.4% of the total population are experiencing undernourishment or insufficient calorie intake in between 2019 to 2021, a decrease by 2.7% from the previous period of 2013 to 2015.

Additionally, the country witnessed a 2.9% under-five mortality rate in 2020, suggesting an improvement of only 1.1% during the period.

The report also mentions that undernourishment is an indicator of inadequate food supply and unhealthy environments.
Although Bangladesh has made considerable improvement in food security, as shown in the GHI, challenges remain.

"Persistent undernutrition represents a significant and complex barrier to building a thriving, prosperous country," said Gretta Fitzgerald, acting country director, Concern Worldwide in Bangladesh.

"There has been Covid-19 and exceptional increases in basic costs. For Bangladesh to continue on its positive trend of reducing malnutrition, robust measures must be taken to ensure that those who are most vulnerable to malnutrition are not left behind," she added.

The index includes six South Asian countries with Sri Lanka (64th) tops the ranking followed by Nepal (81th) and Bangladesh (84th). Both Sri Lanka and Nepal are placed in the "moderate" severity level.

Afghanistan (109th), India (107th) and Pakistan (99th) are the bottom three countries in South Asia. The GHI has not included Bhutan and Maldives in the 2022 report.

The GHI found that South Asia has the world's highest levels of child stunting (low body weight to height) and child wasting (malnourished or emaciated) while south Saharan countries in Africa have the highest levels of undernourishment and child mortality rates.

This year's GHI report considers one important avenue for food systems transformation – community action that engages local leaders and citizens in improving governance and accountability.

"Progress made to tackle world hunger has largely halted. The toxic cocktail of conflict, climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic had already left millions exposed to food price shocks and vulnerable to further crises," said Dominic MacSorley, chief executive of Concern Worldwide.


The hunger index differentials are backed up by solid data.

India produces 6 times more grains than BD.

BUT!!!!

India exports a massive amounts whilst BD imports a massive amount.

How is India able to feed ten times the population with six times production - WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPORTING MILLIONS OF TONS OF GRAIN?

@UKBengali
@EasyNow

Pls enlighten us!!!
 
.
The hunger index differentials are backed up by solid data.

India produces 6 times more grains than BD.

BUT!!!!

India exports a massive amounts whilst BD imports a massive amount.

How is India able to feed ten times the population with six times production - WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPORTING MILLIONS OF TONS OF GRAIN?

@UKBengali
@EasyNow

Pls enlighten us!!!

I can surmise a couple of reasons for this:

Indian land mass is 22x larger than Bd - this means it is less affected by regional floods etc. BD agri production has been majorly affected by recent floods.

The larger area also means that India is producing much more agri generally, not just grain. Indians have a more diverse diet - with many other food options and less reliant on grain, theyre able to export more of the produce. BD diet is devoted to rice.


OT: I am not surprised by the report. Anyone who knows Bangladesh knows that starvation and extreme hunger have been pretty much non existent for a while now.
 
Last edited:
.
Being ahead of Afghanistan isn't really an accomplishment but it's nice to see we're moderate I guess.
 
. .

Bangladesh ahead of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan in reducing hunger​

BANGLADESH

Noshin Tasnim Zaman
13 October, 2022, 03:00 pm
Last modified: 13 October, 2022, 11:15 pm

hunger_index_info.png

Infographic: TBS

Bangladesh has moved eight notches down to rank 84th among 121 countries in the Global Hunger Index (GHI) 2022, still surpassing neighbouring India (107th), Pakistan (99th) and Afghanistan (109th).

This year, the country has scored 19.6 in the index, which is considered a moderate level of hunger.

A higher score in the index implies a worsening hunger situation, whereas zero is the best score – indicating no hunger.

In the last edition of the global ranking published in 2021, Bangladesh ranked 76th out of 116 countries, with a score of 19.1.

In the last two decades, Bangladesh showed an improvement by 40% from a GHI score of 34.1 in 2000 but continued to be in the 'serious' category, the report said.

The GHI assigns the scores in five severity levels – low (9.9 or less), moderate (10.0-19.9), serious (20.0-34.9), alarming (35.0-49.9) and extremely alarming (50 or higher).

The latest index was published jointly on 13 October by international humanitarian organisation Concern Worldwide and Germany's Welthungerhilfe – one of the largest private aid organisations in the world.

The Global Hunger Index measures and tracks the hunger level globally, regionally and nationally to trigger actions for reducing hunger across the globe. The scoring process is based on four components – undernourishment, child wasting, child stunting and child mortality.

The share of child wasting or acute undernutrition in Bangladesh decreased from 14.4% during 2012-2016 to 9.8% during 2017-2021, as per the report.

Bangladesh has shown the biggest improvement in curbing child stunting. From 2012 to 2021, the country reduced child stunting or chronic undernutrition by 8.2%.

Around 11.4% of the total population are experiencing undernourishment or insufficient calorie intake in between 2019 to 2021, a decrease by 2.7% from the previous period of 2013 to 2015.

Additionally, the country witnessed a 2.9% under-five mortality rate in 2020, suggesting an improvement of only 1.1% during the period.

The report also mentions that undernourishment is an indicator of inadequate food supply and unhealthy environments.
Although Bangladesh has made considerable improvement in food security, as shown in the GHI, challenges remain.

"Persistent undernutrition represents a significant and complex barrier to building a thriving, prosperous country," said Gretta Fitzgerald, acting country director, Concern Worldwide in Bangladesh.

"There has been Covid-19 and exceptional increases in basic costs. For Bangladesh to continue on its positive trend of reducing malnutrition, robust measures must be taken to ensure that those who are most vulnerable to malnutrition are not left behind," she added.

The index includes six South Asian countries with Sri Lanka (64th) tops the ranking followed by Nepal (81th) and Bangladesh (84th). Both Sri Lanka and Nepal are placed in the "moderate" severity level.

Afghanistan (109th), India (107th) and Pakistan (99th) are the bottom three countries in South Asia. The GHI has not included Bhutan and Maldives in the 2022 report.

The GHI found that South Asia has the world's highest levels of child stunting (low body weight to height) and child wasting (malnourished or emaciated) while south Saharan countries in Africa have the highest levels of undernourishment and child mortality rates.

This year's GHI report considers one important avenue for food systems transformation – community action that engages local leaders and citizens in improving governance and accountability.

"Progress made to tackle world hunger has largely halted. The toxic cocktail of conflict, climate change, and the Covid-19 pandemic had already left millions exposed to food price shocks and vulnerable to further crises," said Dominic MacSorley, chief executive of Concern Worldwide.




India has less than1% of hunger poverty. How much hunger poverty does BD have?
 
.
Best of luck Bangladesh.
I wish subcontinent can compete with the mindset of "How can we get better then our competetor" then " How can i destabalize and malign my neighbor"
Thanks, we wish for brighter days for Pakistan as well, especially in these hard times.
 
.

Don't be so quick to believe Modi propaganda






Until 2022 every publication was unanimous in its view that India had extreme poverty numbering in the 100s of millions. Suddenly an Indian produced report in 2022, not peer reviewed and specifically not reflecting the views of the IMF, was published on their website. Indian media took this report and published 100s of feel good stories - mutilating the narrative and brushing millions of poor Indians under the rug.
 
Last edited:
.
@Black_cats

Kalo beral dada,

These days my dear friend the good Brofessor sahib (@RiazHaq) doesn't post much data on the comparative numbers of IND, BD and PAK. Thanks for keeping us posted!

Regards
 
.
Don't be so quick to believe Modi propaganda






Until 2022 every publication was unanimous in its view that India had extreme poverty numbering in the 100s of millions. Suddenly an Indian produced report in 2022, not peer reviewed and specifically not reflecting the views of the IMF, was published on their website. Indian media took this report and published 100s of feel good stories - mutilating the narrative and brushing millions of poor Indians under the rug.

Covid exposed their lies.

Millions died of starvation and were thrown into rivers because they couldn’t afford to cremate them.
 
.
Covid exposed their lies.

Millions died of starvation and were thrown into rivers because they couldn’t afford to cremate them.

That is the sad reality.

Unfortunately, their propaganda machine is so vast (due to their sheer numbers and penetration across all social media) that even UK media is buying the hype that free movement is worth it for Indian trade!
 
.
Don't be so quick to believe Modi propaganda






Until 2022 every publication was unanimous in its view that India had extreme poverty numbering in the 100s of millions. Suddenly an Indian produced report in 2022, not peer reviewed and specifically not reflecting the views of the IMF, was published on their website. Indian media took this report and published 100s of feel good stories - mutilating the narrative and brushing millions of poor Indians under the rug.

IMW, World bank and all reputed agencies are on Modi's payroll. Only Global times and Haq musing are neuteal print media.
 
.
IMW, World bank and all reputed agencies are on Modi's payroll. Only Global times and Haq musing are neuteal print media.

Why don't you read the link before spouting nonsense? Scroll.in is an Indian site and it debunks that report.

IMF specifically state that they do not endorse what is published on their site.
 
.
The hunger index differentials are backed up by solid data.

India produces 6 times more grains than BD.

BUT!!!!

India exports a massive amounts whilst BD imports a massive amount.

How is India able to feed ten times the population with six times production - WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPORTING MILLIONS OF TONS OF GRAIN?

@UKBengali
@EasyNow

Pls enlighten us!!!
With a sample of 3000 in a country of 1.3 billion people and as big a country as India, you have to ask if it is a good analysis and gives a good picture of a country. Also 3 out 4 categories for hunger are related to children i.e. child stunting, child malnutrition and child mortality and not actually about overall hunger. So, take the conclusion with a grain of salt.
 
.
With a sample of 3000 in a country of 1.3 billion people and as big a country as India, you have to ask if it is a good analysis and gives a good picture of a country. Also 3 out 4 categories for hunger are related to children i.e. child stunting, child malnutrition and child mortality and not actually about overall hunger. So, take the conclusion with a grain of salt.

If you cannot feed your kids - I doubt the adults - particularly women - are faring much better.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom