Assam, Meghalaya aim to boost trade with Bangladesh

[Leishangthem]

You are blabbering same thing again and again. There is no comparison between a country with 160 million and primitive tribal of 1 million or 2 whose living standard has not been changed for ages and unlikely will be changed in near future.

What do you want to mean by poor people? Don’t you understand average of 160 million people’s living standard is twice that of your tribes? Even in big cities like New York and London has plenty of poor and homeless people. Even Mumbai’s 60% people lives in slum. Now will you compare your tribe to that of these cities?

Plus from where you have got the idea Bangladeshis are going to India illegally for better living standard? Do you have any stat to support your claim? We have discussed in detail in this forum numerous time. There are no such proof. This is just a BJP/RSS propaganda during election time.

Bottom line is your tribe and your kingdom was always remained as a backwater state of Bengal Sultanat and now as well. The difference will only increase over time. Plus don’t forget you are just a landlocked region. Without cooperation with Bangladesh you don’t have much scope for progress.

What do you mean by living standard? it would have been one thing if we were talking about some developed nation but here's the case for a tragical south asian nation,and the infamous poverty state Bangladesh.
You're gloating about living standard with 2x higher infant mortality rate in comparison?lower human development index and lower literacy. When foreigners enter therein ,they pray to not get raped,mugged,or don't get diseased.
So don't go off rambling bs about living standard,it's not your kind's forte.

Oh,and I have no interest in Mumbai,same ol filthy south asian hellhole teeming with rapists,muggers,criminals,filth and uncivilized savages .

Those are all typical of any place every where these south asian culture prevails,they will turn everything into hell,some place much worse,and that's about it. You might fancy Mumbai ,I don't, to me it's just a slum with more concrete and more .

Bottom line is your tribe and your kingdom was always remained as a backwater state of Bengal Sultanat and now as well.

Am I wrong or are you implying that my state was part of bengal ?I know BD failed in literacy and but that would still be one of the most asinine historical bs I head for a while.
Bengal was always a poor backward filthy .lawless region like all of south asia back then as it is now ,it's in culture and genetic trait,they can't help it, as noted through out history ,and Bengal never extended beyond some khasi hills, and they never had any presence nor audacity to enter any deeper.
Only thing they were good in is breeding like cray in a small area..

 

[SpaceMan18]

What do you mean by living standard? it would have been one thing if we were talking about some developed nation but here's the case for a tragical south asian nation,and the infamous poverty state Bangladesh.
You're gloating about living standard with 2x higher infant mortality rate in comparison?lower human development index and lower literacy. When foreigners enter therein ,they pray to not get raped,mugged,or don't get diseased.
So don't go off rambling bs about living standard,it's not your kind's forte.

Oh,and I have no interest in Mumbai,same ol filthy south asian hellhole teeming with rapists,muggers,criminals,filth and uncivilized savages .

Those are all typical of any place every where these south asian culture prevails,they will turn everything into hell,some place much worse,and that's about it. You might fancy Mumbai ,I don't, to me it's just a slum with more concrete and more .


Am I wrong or are you implying that my state was part of bengal ?I know BD failed in literacy and but that would still be one of the most asinine historical bs I head for a while.
Bengal was always a poor backward filthy .lawless region like all of south asia back then as it is now ,it's in culture and genetic trait,they can't help it, as noted through out history ,and Bengal never extended beyond some khasi hills, and they never had any presence nor audacity to enter any deeper.
Only thing they were good in is breeding like cray in a small area..

Face it buddy your whole India has been ruined by the BJP , besides India with a population of 1 billion is still decades behind China who's has a dictatorship India can't stand up to the Chinese industrial might and influence.

India is literally surrounded by Chinese allies or just people who don't get along with India anymore , Nepal doesn't also want Indian influence or Chinese influence. Also Sri Lanka who owes dept to China also didn't buy your guys trash Tejas and actually wanted JF-17s LMAO and Myanmar is literally a Chinese puppet state.

Bangladesh is India's only last stronghold and they're gonna lose it soon , so all BJP is trying to do is $hit on Bangladesh for fun but yet Bangladesh is still going ahead despite Bangladesh still being filled with corruption.

You keep forgetting India's leadership is terrible and cries every time some one points a fact about India.

Talk smack about Bangladesh all you want and using the same excuses of MUH HUH ILLEGAL MIGRANTS , and you know why mate ? It's all cause your government trying to suppress ours via traitors or spies. Cause the last thing they want is a stronger Bangladesh socially and militarily it'll hurt their stupid SUPAPOWA 2020 EGO

 

[SpaceMan18]

There is absolutely no point in belabouring this nonsense.

I would let them get on with their wet dreams of the NE merging with Bangladesh.

So yes carry on. NE will merge with Bangladesh and the Indian Union will wilt at the ferocious Bangladeshi economy currently sustained by Least Developed Country tariffs given in kindness by the West.
No doubt since , as Bilal says, every Bangladeshi drives a Lamborghini or a Porcha these days, I am sure the NE will be envious of Bangladeshi riches and plead to join it. Bangladeshi after a great deal of reluctance in accepting such poor backward people will out of generosity accept their poor NE compatriots.

There you have it, by fellow Indians, the future is thus writ and there aint notin yous can do about it.

Oh by the way the Bangladeshi economy is smaller than the economy of a few states in India.

Are you fuking stupid or low just IQ ? With your stupid logic Trump was being nice to India by not calling it a $HITHOLE.

Do these people look Assamese to you??
Lungi infestation making Assam poorer..
Also these people talk about per capita GDP...look at the below video and check the difference in infra and people on the Bangladeshi side and Indian side...
No wonder all these lungis cannot wait to get out of their shithole to our NE states

[/QUOTE]


If you think India is so superior , go verse China then and see if you can win ?

Oh wait you can't yep now sit down before they ban you for talking smack

 

[Black_cats]

What do you mean by living standard? it would have been one thing if we were talking about some developed nation but here's the case for a tragical south asian nation,and the infamous poverty state Bangladesh.
You're gloating about living standard with 2x higher infant mortality rate in comparison?lower human development index and lower literacy. When foreigners enter therein ,they pray to not get raped,mugged,or don't get diseased.
So don't go off rambling bs about living standard,it's not your kind's forte.

Oh,and I have no interest in Mumbai,same ol filthy south asian hellhole teeming with rapists,muggers,criminals,filth and uncivilized savages .

Those are all typical of any place every where these south asian culture prevails,they will turn everything into hell,some place much worse,and that's about it. You might fancy Mumbai ,I don't, to me it's just a slum with more concrete and more .


Am I wrong or are you implying that my state was part of bengal ?I know BD failed in literacy and but that would still be one of the most asinine historical bs I head for a while.
Bengal was always a poor backward filthy .lawless region like all of south asia back then as it is now ,it's in culture and genetic trait,they can't help it, as noted through out history ,and Bengal never extended beyond some khasi hills, and they never had any presence nor audacity to enter any deeper.
Only thing they were good in is breeding like cray in a small area..

Tribe in Africa or yours claim many things but in all mega cities as people from different region or background comes there will always be certain problem everywhere in the world but it also gives people opportunity to fulfill their dream.

Living in a cave like dwelling or maintaining a primitive lifestyle you will never understand that. A foreigner may go to your place for vacation for few days but will get bored and won’t live there for long as it would be so boring.

Regarding history lesson just would like to remind you two thing. First Bengal was 4th richest region in the world plus it used to produce half of the revenue of Mughal Empire. So you can easily understand the significance of the region. That’s the reason British, French, Dutch all came to these region first compared to other region. Plus by backwater I meant insignificant to Bengal sultanate with not much potential for revenue generation.

If in terms of mortality rate you are ahead that’s good for you. But mortality rate and HDI are completely two different thing. With only a tiny number of people you are expected to have higher HDI but not higher living standard.

 

[SpaceMan18]

Tribe in Africa or yours claim many things but in all mega cities as people from different region or background comes there will always be certain problem everywhere in the world but it also gives people opportunity to fulfill their dream.

Living in a cave like dwelling or maintaining a primitive lifestyle you will never understand that. A foreigner may go to your place for vacation for few days but will get bored and won’t live there for long as it would be so boring.

Regarding history lesson just would like to remind you two thing. First Bengal was 4th richest region in the world plus it used to produce half of the revenue of Mughal Empire. So you can easily understand the significance of the region. That’s the reason British, French, Dutch all came to these region first compared to other region. Plus by backwater I meant insignificant to Bengal sultanate with not much potential for revenue generation.

If in terms of mortality rate you are ahead that’s good for you. But mortality rate and HDI are completely two different thing. With only a tiny number of people you are expected to have higher HDI but not higher living standard.

Bruh just give up , Bengal is known to be great back then although it's done now. Indians won't accept defeat so they resort to whining and bringing up the past.


They can't stand who they call " inferior " being even slightly better than them , they can't stand up to China so they mock Bangladesh which is a pUssy move.

 

[Black_cats]

Bruh just give up , Bengal is known to be great back then although it's done now. Indians won't accept defeat so they resort to whining and bringing up the past.


They can't stand who they call " inferior " being even slightly better than them , they can't stand up to China so they mock Bangladesh which is a pUssy move.

This guy prefer to claim himself Manipuri tribe and superior than the south Asian. A different species than typical Indian.

 

[X-ray Papa]

This guy prefer to claim himself Manipuri tribe and superior than the south Asian. A different species than typical Indian.

They are the same species as the burmese, only that these species are under control by the sanghis.

 

[SpaceMan18]

Non south asian nation in Asia pacific with other Asian culture,are more safe,clean,progressive ,developed and better in every merit.that's just stats.

Regarding difference than typical indian,look at the crime rate,there are dozens of rape case therein but in manipur,nagaland and such ,there's one rape case in like many many years. Everything is totally different.
Watch this white guy talk about how different a random NE region is compared to mainland.

I accepted your kind are a lost cause and I get what you're trying but still for the purpose of education, there is no such thing as burmese ethnicity,it's a national Indentity,burmese population are are 40% tibeto burman,60% austronesian,the communities above the redline are generally tibeto burman which occupy much of NE india,tibet,and china .the lower half is austroasiatic people which arrived from southern archipelago . The lower you get below the red line more more the austroasiatic ethnicities and higher,the more mongoloid with 0 -M122 genetic makeup all the way up to mongolia.
But there's ofcourse movement of people from south to northward,the khasi ,chakma that are present in BD are austroasiatic in origin.

Ok then , if it's sooooo bad then just get out of India and back to Burma since it's clearly better than India isn't it ?


Oh wait it ISN'T ?

 

[bluesky]

Non south asian nation in Asia pacific with other Asian culture,are more safe,clean,progressive ,developed and better in every merit.that's just stats.

Regarding difference than typical indian,look at the crime rate,there are dozens of rape case therein but in manipur,nagaland and such ,there's one rape case in like many many years. Everything is totally different.
Watch this white guy talk about how different a random NE region is compared to mainland.

I accepted your kind are a lost cause and I get what you're trying but still for the purpose of education, there is no such thing as burmese ethnicity,it's a national Indentity,burmese population are are 40% tibeto burman,60% austronesian,the communities above the redline are generally tibeto burman which occupy much of NE india,tibet,and china .the lower half is austroasiatic people which arrived from southern archipelago . The lower you get below the red line more more the austroasiatic ethnicities and higher,the more mongoloid with 0 -M122 genetic makeup all the way up to mongolia.
But there's ofcourse movement of people from south to northward,the khasi ,chakma that are present in BD are austroasiatic in origin.

Why do you have to talk about ethnicity when discussing political matters. No ethnicity is pure and all have been mixed this way and that way during the time after the first arrival/evolution of the human race about 400,000 years ago.

People differentiate more about their respective belonging to certain areas/zones and also the common culture in that particular area/zone. All those things you wrote as the divisions of certain people in your NE are a matter of interest or discussion by the anthropologists.

Your pointing out things in your post does not prove anything except that it is an intellectual statement.

 

[Varunastra]

It is the history when I said about Tripura Maharani visited Dhaka and waited for a long one week in 1947 to talk about a merger with east Pakistan, Khwaja Nazimuddin being a hard-line Muslim Leaguer did not meet her. Finally, Tripura decided to merge with India.

This is all history and you are denying it for the sake of pointing out that Tripura people despise BD people. By the way, do you even know that young Tripura guys depend upon BD for their survival. They come and work during harvest time.

So, you have no point of arguing with the love-hate matter between BD and Tripura.

The details aren't much clear but only some people from the royal family wanted merger with East Pakistan, this view didn't have popular support as Tripura was a majority Hindu state, actually Tripura royals always had a good cultural ties with Bengali people both within their kingdom and outside maybe that's what they were thinking but they were forgetting that this new nation at that time was more muslim than Bengali centric.
Currently both Indigenous twiprasas and Bengali people of Tripura don't want any illegal immigration to take place as there is no known reason for this, this is no war time and people also don't want the religious demographic to change, people were forced to leave that land during partition and riots and that trauma of the land is still alive within elders and passed onto the next generation. Most new generation people take the Tripura royal family as their own and treat the history as their own as regions of Comilla and Noakhali from which large scale immigration took place were historically part of Tripura Kingdom.
Don't get me wrong, we want very good ties, and trade relations with bd but if someone says we want to merge or that we are bangladeshi we take offense. We have very much our own identity!

 

[bluesky]

Most new generation people take the Tripura royal family as their own and treat the history as their own as regions of Comilla and Noakhali from which large scale immigration took place were historically part of Tripura Kingdom.

No, not exactly. Some parts of today's BD around Tripura and Arakan were contested between Sube Bangal, Tripura, and Arakan. This includes also Chittagong area. Subedar Shayesta Khan fought Arakan and Portuguese troops to capture Chittagong up to Teknaf in 1665 AD and expelled all the adverse forces from this region.

Since then, the map did not change. There were two separate entities there in the British period. One is Tripura District in the Bengal Presidency and the other Tripura Rajya under a local King. However, both the Capital of these two units were located in Kumilla Town of today's BD.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

What is this native land crap ? I don't understand you tribals, the land belongs to the government... You don't own anything unless you buy it...


50 years and all this tribal rights stuff will be in the bin... Modernize people..


I want to know more about why you think a group of people can claim a piece of land all to themselves...

Fair deal. The Northern part of Arakan is also not native land of Rohingya and it belongs to the government of Myanmar.

 

[bluesky]

Fair deal. The Northern part of Arakan is also not native land of Rohingya and it belongs to the government of Myanmar.

Have you ever read even the first page of Arakan History? it was not a Burmese land but was independent Arakan until Burma captured it only a few decades ago.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Have you ever read even the first page of Arakan History? it was not a Burmese land but was independent Arakan until Burma captured it only a few decades ago.

So what? It was the age of conquest.

Muslim rulers also conquered Iran, Iraq and many other lands which were not theirs will you give them back to their original owners now after centuries?

 

[X-ray Papa]

So what? It was the age of conquest.

Muslim rulers also conquered Iran, Iraq and many other lands which were not theirs will you give them back to their original owners now after centuries?

Also yes I agree with you that it was not Burmese land but it was the land of Rakhine Buddhists. The kingdom of Mrauk U was a Rakhine Buddhist kingdom who lost control of Arakan to kingdom of Alaungpaya.

Personally I don't care about ethnicity. For me religious identity is more important. No matter if the ruler of Arakan is Rakhine or Bamar, the most satisfying thing is that it is under the rule and domination of Buddhists that's what's important. Ethnicity can go down in the gutter.

Then why are you poking your nose in muslim bangladesh, piss off kafir.