truthseer
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2011
- Messages
- 4,439
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Wow, @The Eagle, he's calling me an animal. Is this allowed?Hey I don't talk with animals and patwaris..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, @The Eagle, he's calling me an animal. Is this allowed?Hey I don't talk with animals and patwaris..
Just check your DPWow, @The Eagle, he's calling me an animal. Is this allowed?
Anyone can prosecute, there's no proof to prove him guilty. If there is, court will say he's guilty and disqualify him on that.the information minister has insisted repeatedly along with many others that no conclusive evidence was found against Nawaz Sharif................
I personally think he is just being prosecuted because he eats alloo gosht
My DP is a cartoon.Just check your DP
Insallah NOT will be eliminated from this trial. He has looted the money taken kick backs, built his estate on state money and still misusing the resources.a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Profit is not a political aim. It's called being criminal. We have corruption laws for that. Nawaz is being tried under those, and IN SHA ALLAH WILL BE FOUND NOT GUILTY!
A simple answer to your question is that it is DEMOCRACY which is stopping them to intervene directly. It is the responsibility of civilian government to take action or order the army to take action against these protesters. NOW the biggest question which these goons can raise in the court if other sit-ins did not make life of common citizens difficult?We all know the exceptional power establishment enjoy in Pakistan. So what is making them stop taking some serious actions against these goons in Islamabad. Establishment’s intention maybe is crystal clear. But taking no step is indirectly supporting their cause.
It is hard for a sane mind to accept that one extremists group is given all the freedom to blockade the capital city without no support from agencies.
Please refer to supreme court remarks on this matter followed by a complete judgement where they have answered the question of MUJHAY KIUN NIKALA. It is not iqama. what is the hitch in providing money trail if that is not an ill gotten moneyAnyone can prosecute, there's no proof to prove him guilty. If there is, court will say he's guilty and disqualify him on that.
Right now, they've disqualified him for not taking money through an Iqama and not doing corruption
My DP is a cartoon.
There is no proof of this. Muslims shouldn't spread rumours, it's what the Prophet (SAW) commanded against.Insallah NOT will be eliminated from this trial. He has looted the money taken kick backs, built his estate on state money and still misusing the resources.
Anyone can prosecute, there's no proof to prove him guilty. If there is, court will say he's guilty and disqualify him on that.
Right now, they've disqualified him for not taking money through an Iqama and not doing corruption
Army should not intervene independently. why every time they should be made responsible for mess created by politicians. If the government wants army to act against these protesters then the Government should pass a resolution in the parliament and thus order the army which army already said they will obey. Otherwise any direct action without government order will result in consequences like Lal Masjid for the armyStill takes many decision independently I’m sure for the good of the soil and citizens
Why can’t now?
It is hereby declared that having failed to disclose his un-withdrawn receivables constituting assets from Capital FZE Jebel Ali, UAE in his nomination papers filed for the General Elections held in 2013 in terms of Section 12(2)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 (ROPA), Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif is not honest in terms of Section 99(f) of ROPA and Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and therefore he is disqualified to be a Member of the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament).Please refer to supreme court remarks on this matter followed by a complete judgement where they have answered the question of MUJHAY KIUN NIKALA. It is not iqama. what is the hitch in providing money trail if that is not an ill gotten money
sometime power is extended to make a person a more humiliating destiny. He the almighty has said that we test people by giving wealth and power (and words to that effect)No, one subset of people is corrupt, a few of them are actual criminals who can be prosecuted. None of them are terrorists, since none set out to cause terror, in fact, they want people to think everything is normal, so they can carry on looting.
As for Nawaz, ALLAH has seen him made PM 3 times with his Rahmat, despite scheming. No proof of his corruption
Btw, I note no one from PTI, which has done a ton of corruption in KPK. So PTI's new strategy is kill everyone else.
And Nawaz passed the test so he got Power again.sometime power is extended to make a person a more humiliating destiny. He the almighty has said that we test people by giving wealth and power (and words to that effect)
Receivable is an income, declaring all asset is requirement of Law and the one who conceals it is not honest in declaration.It is hereby declared that having failed to disclose his un-withdrawn receivables constituting assets from Capital FZE Jebel Ali, UAE in his nomination papers filed for the General Elections held in 2013 in terms of Section 12(2)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 (ROPA), Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif is not honest in terms of Section 99(f) of ROPA and Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and therefore he is disqualified to be a Member of the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament).
So he was removed for failing to withdraw money. Disgusting
alhaj nawab sharif sahabImran was a playboy, Nawaz went on Hajj!
human specie they say is a form of monkeys but then monkeys can't be patwarisWow, @The Eagle, he's calling me an animal. Is this allowed?