What's new

Arundhati Roy in pakistan...

Khajur

BANNED
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
0
‘I’m here to understand what you mean by Taliban’
by Salman Siddiqui
Friday, 08 May, 2009 | 11:32 PM PST |

Celebrated Indian author and social activist Arundhati Roy addresses a gathering at the Karachi Press Club on Friday

Is there a threat of Talibanisation engulfing the entire region?

I think it has already engulfed our region. I think there’s a need for a very clear thinking (on this issue of Talibanisation). In India, there are two kinds of terrorism: one is Islamic terrorism and the other Maoist terrorism. But this term terrorism, we must ask, what do they mean by it.

In Pakistan, I’m here to understand what they mean by this term. When we say we must fight the Taliban or must defeat them, what does it mean? I’m here to understand what you mean when you say Taliban. Do you mean a militant? Do you mean an ideology? Exactly what is it that is being fought? That needs to be clarified.

I think both needs to be fought. But if it’s an ideology it has to be fought differently, while if it’s a person with a gun then it has to be fought differently. We know from the history of the war on terror that a military strategy is only making matters worse all over the world. The war on terror has made the world a more dangerous place. In India, they have been fighting insurgencies military since 1947 and it has become a more dangerous place.

Swat and the Taliban boy

It is very important for me to understand what exactly is going in Swat. How did it start? A Taliban boy asked me why women can’t be like plastic bags and banned. The point is that the plastic bag was made in a factory but so was the boy. He was made in a factory that is producing this kind of mind(set). (The question is) who owns that factory, who funds it? Unless we deal with that factory, dealing with the boy doesn’t help us.

Water is the main issue

One danger in Pakistan is that we talk about the threat of Taliban so much that other important issues lose focus. In my view, the problem of water in the world will become the most important problem. I think big dams are economically unviable, environmentally unsustainable and politically undemocratic. They are a way of taking away a river from the poor and giving it to the rich. Like in India, there’s an issue of SEZs (Special Economic Zones), whereby the land of the people are given to corporations. But the bigger problem is that there are making dams and giving water to the industries. This way the people who live in villages by the streams and rivers have no water for themselves. So building dams is one of the most ecologically destructive things that you can do.

Fight over Siachen glacier

There are thousands of Pakistani and Indian soldiers deployed on the Siachen glacier. Both of our countries are spending billions of dollars on high altitude warfare and weapons. The whole of the Siachen glacier is sort of an icy monument to human folly. Each day it is being filled with ice axes, old boots, tents and so on. Meanwhile, that battlefield is melting. Siachen glacier is about half its size now. It’s not melting because the Indian and Pakistani soldiers are on it. But it’s because people somewhere on the other side of the world are leading a good life….in countries that call themselves democracies that believe in human rights and free speech. Their economies depend on selling weapons to both of us. Now, when that glacier melts, there will be floods first, then there will be a drought and then we’ll have even more reasons to fight. We’ll buy more weapons from those democracies and in this way human beings will prove themselves to be the stupidest animals on earth.

Money and the Indian elections

Whatever system of government you have, whether it is a military dictatorship or a democracy, and you have that for a long time, eventually big money manages to subvert it. That has begun to happen even in a democracy (like India). For example, political parties need a lot of publicity, but the media is also run by corporate money. If you look at the big political parties like the Congress and the BJP, you see how much money is being put out just in their advertising budgets. Now where does all that come from?

RSS and the Indian establishment

The RSS has infiltrated everything to a great extent. In India, we have 120-150 million Muslims and it’s considered a minority…It’s impossible to not belong to a minority of some sort in India. Caste or ethnicity or religion or whatever, in some way everyone belongs to a minority. The fights that many of us are waging against the RSS and against the BJP are to say that we live in a society which accommodates everybody. Everybody doesn’t have to love everybody, but everybody has to be accommodated. The RSS has infiltrated the (Indian) army as much as various kinds of Wahabism or other kinds of religious ideology have infiltrated the ISI or the armed forces in Pakistan. They are human beings like everyone else and they too get influenced.
(i personally dont think so,she is merely trying to do some balancing act here. )


Indian media and sensationalizing of news coming out from Pakistan

I think the media in both countries play this game. Whenever something happens here, they hype it up there, while when something happens there, they hype the news here. We say that we live in times of an information revolution and free press, but even then nobody gets to know the complete picture…

The Pakistani media is a little different from the Indian media. They stand on a slightly different foundation. But both share the problem of a lack of accountability…The trouble in India is that 90 per cent of their revenue comes from the corporate sector…there’s increasing privatization and corporatization of governance, education, health, infrastructure and water management. So in India you see an open criticism of governance, but very rarely criticism of corporations. It’s a structural problem. It’s not about good people or bad people. It’s just that you can’t expect a company to work against itself. This is a very serious issue which needs to be sorted out.

Is the Indian army a sacred cow?

The Indian army is quite a sacred cow especially on TV and Bollywood. But at the same time if you talk to the people in the Indian army, they say that they feel that the media is very critical of them. I don’t share that view. I think it is a sacred cow. People are willing to give them a lot of leeway.

Women and their fight for justice

When women fight for justice, we must fight for every kind of justice…We must fight for justice for men and justice for children. Because if you fight for one kind of justice and you tolerate another, then it’s a pretty hollow fight. You may not be able to fight every battle, but you should be able to put yourself on the line and say I believe this.

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/Pakistan/arundhati-roy-sal-02
 
. .
I think Arundhati Roy is a fantastic author but her opinions on world affairs are misinformed.

The best thing about her is the fact she's a pest in the RSS/BJP/ABVP side. I remember a talk that i went to in Delhi University on V-Day this year where she was the main speaker, ABVP morons were trying their best to disrupt her speech by making catcalls and singing loudly. Finally the students got so sick of them that they started chanting anti-ABVP slogans whenever the ABVP goons tried to interrupt her. It turned into a shouting match. Mercifully, the goons got tired soon after and left.

The Indian army is quite a sacred cow especially on TV and Bollywood. But at the same time if you talk to the people in the Indian army, they say that they feel that the media is very critical of them. I don’t share that view. I think it is a sacred cow. People are willing to give them a lot of leeway.

The media does give the Army leeway, the only time they came under question was during the whole Abhinav Bharat scandal.

he RSS has infiltrated the (Indian) army

This is ridiculous. No it hasn't. One Col Purohit doesnt mean anything.
 
.
Parasite who supports Kashmir being part of Pakistan. At least she is at 'home' and hopefully , she went there on a one way ticket ! Buner and Swat are very beautiful at this time of the year, Madam !!:D
 
.
Arundhati Roy is hardly a "parasite". At least her ideology is not based on hate. I prefer her opinions to those spouted by Modi, Thackeray, etc.
 
.
Arundhati Roy is hardly a "parasite". At least her ideology is not based on hate. I prefer her opinions to those spouted by Modi, Thackeray, etc.

She supports the breakup of India. Modi and Thakeray do not do that. Your opinions are your own but I will never support anyone who wants to break up India !
 
. .
She supports the breakup of India. Modi and Thakeray do not do that. Your opinions are your own but I will never support anyone who wants to break up India !

Yeah, Modi only wants to subjugate 150 million of our citizens, no big deal at all.:rolleyes:

And Thackeray? What do i say about him? If he left maharashtra, the chances are that he would be lynched. There was an sms going around in Delhi when the whole North Indian controversy was going on in Mumbai, it went something like this - (I apologise if some find it crude) What do you call a Maharashtrian Child Abuser? - Bal Thock - Ray!!:lol:

Arundhati Roy criticizes Human rights abuses in Kashmir as is her right. At least she doesnt propagate violence.
 
. .
Let this lady come back to India then she will write a big article in the Outlook criticizing Pakistan and their society.

She just has a superinflated ego. Went and tried to hijack the Narmada agitation and got kicked out by Medha Patekar.

Please keep her there and do not send her back to India.:cheers:
 
. .
Link? Are you saying that communal forces are not trying to destroy the secular fabric of society? That Hindutva ideology is not based on setting up a so-called Hindu Rashtra?

would you call the Left Front secular. The Sachar committee report has shown the condition of the minorities under 25 years of their rule.

Also 6 years of NDA Rule has not led to creation of Hindu Rashtra.
 
.
Link? Are you saying that communal forces are not trying to destroy the secular fabric of society? That Hindutva ideology is not based on setting up a so-called Hindu Rashtra?

By the very definition communal forces are anti secularism, so yes.

However, I asked for link for Modi wanting to subjugate the 150 million muslims of india, what that subjugation means, how is it defined, what are their laws going to be like, how they'll further move away from uniform civil code etc.
 
.
would you call the Left Front secular.

Yes.

The Sachar committee report has shown the condition of the minorities under 25 years of their rule.

Hmm, I'm not aware of the details of the report. However, name one communal incident that has happened during left rule in Bengal and Kerela.

Also 6 years of NDA Rule has not led to creation of Hindu Rashtra.

But it did lead to the perhaps the darkest incident in Modern India - The Gujarat riots. Do you have any idea how disillusioned the minorities became after Gujarat? And why wouldn't they be. Thankfully, the scars of Gujarat seem to be healing.

When our own citizens are massacred, are we (as in the rational secular Indian) supposed to stand by and support the BJP? People talk about how Gujarat has developed under Modi, who cares?? When 2000 citizens are killed by rampaging mobs under your rule and you do nothing to stop it, everything you do after becomes irrelevant.

By the way, please read the philosophy of the RSS ideologues like "Veer" Savarker, they all claim that their objective is a Hindu Rashtra. As the BJP is the political wing of the RSS, that is their objective, irrespective of what Advani and co may say now.
 
.
Nemesis,

Let me begin by saying that the Gujarat Riots are a big blot on on our country and it should not have happened at all.

I may admire Modi, as a capable administrator, for the development that Gujarat is achieving but Godhra will always be a stain that we have to bear for all our lives. Now the SC has appointed the SIT for investigating his role,let us wait for the results, as this will a totally impartial probe.

Regarding the Sachar Committee report it makes for avery good reading. It was set up by the UPA Govt. as a sort of Fact Finding mission on the state of all the minorities, not just muslims.

What was very surprising was the state of muslims in West Bengal, a state that had been ruled for 2 decades by secular Left Front. On every factor Muslims fared very badly and in fact over the 20 year period their condition be it employment, education, life expectancy, had actually plummeted.

Compared to them Muslims in Gujarat were way ahead of the National Average.

This was indeed an eye opener. Just by counting the number of riots does not make you secular. Just by giving lip service and slogans you do not become secular.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom