What's new

‘Aridaman’, India’s second nuclear-armed submarine, is ready for launch

you fool our then economy not capable enough to buy type52 DDG or Type54 FFG it was based upon Type53H which is 1980 design but we are getting upgraded F-22P with same capabilities of Type54B in near future and for JF-17 is specially design for PAF not for PLAAF they have J-10 for that role they need medium weight jet not light weight jet with the except of range and weapon loadJF-17 and J-10 is quite comparable to each othe.
sorry to burst your bubbles kid we live in realty not your supa powa Indian EGO kid:lol::enjoy::omghaha::sarcastic::help:


Good, you are comparing with India and China.
And you also happy with downgrade and older generation version ships and fighter plane. JF-17 and J-10 is not comparable at all. J-10 is much better plane then j-17 and that's the reason Chinese are not considering jf-17 . These ships and fighter plane is good for Pak, srilanka, Nigeria, myanmar or small countries.
 
. . .
Azmat class FAC and F-22P and aogosta 90B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22P_Zulfiquar-class_frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNS_Azmat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agosta-class_submarine
3rd F-22P and 3rd Agosta class entirely built in Pakistan with TOT with China and France respectively
sorry to burst your bubbles kid:enjoy:
you are not class with Chinese navy and Russian is selling you their obsolete designs to IN for higher cost take care:enjoy:

Azmat class FAC and F-22P and aogosta 90B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22P_Zulfiquar-class_frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNS_Azmat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agosta-class_submarine
3rd F-22P and 3rd Agosta class entirely built in Pakistan with TOT with China and France respectively
sorry to burst your bubbles kid:enjoy:
you are not class with Chinese navy and Russian is selling you their obsolete designs to IN for higher cost take care:enjoy:
C'mon we've built scores of defense equipment with ToT or transfer of assembly lines and you guys comparing PN with IN is making me to ROFL. Our coast guard could beat your navy hands down and when did you evaluate our Ships and named them as obsolete Russian designs. Do ready my posts, I'm talking about designing in-house and local production of the same. Just stop blindly bashing anything related to India saying that some country sold their designs to us without substantial backing
 
. .
Good, you are comparing with India and China.
And you also happy with downgrade version ships and fighter plane. JF-17 and J-10 is not comparable at all. J-10 is much better plane then j-17 and that's the reason Chinese are not considering jf-17 . These ships and fighter plane is good for Pak, srilanka, Nigeria, or small countries.
i give the valid reason go ask Chinese senior members J-10 A and JF-17 have a almost same capabilities
sorry to burst your bubbles kid :lol::lol: and don't divert topic you guys ask that Pakistan wont have the capabilities to build navy ships and subs i shows you the evidences of that Pakistan can:p:
if you butthurt use this on your butts
burnol.jpg
its a pain killer:lol::rofl:
and make your junk cow piss vedic out of this universe 1000000000000 generation Tej@ss your indigenous product then you concerns our JF-17:help::hang3::hang2::suicide2::suicide:

C'mon we've built scores of defense equipment with ToT or transfer of assembly lines and you guys comparing PN with IN is making me to ROFL. Our coast guard could beat your navy hands down and when did you evaluate our Ships and named them as obsolete Russian designs. Do ready my posts, I'm talking about designing in-house and local production of the same. Just stop blindly bashing anything related to India saying that some country sold their designs to us without substantial backing
Butthurt use this on your A$$
burnol.jpg

its a pain killer and i shows you a evidence that Pakistan building a navy ship and subs:p: i could shows you later because its night in USA and i will go on job tomorrow morning i'm going to have a nap
:lazy2:
 
. .
Azmat class FAC and F-22P and aogosta 90B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22P_Zulfiquar-class_frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNS_Azmat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agosta-class_submarine
3rd F-22P and 3rd Agosta class entirely built in Pakistan with TOT with China and France respectively
sorry to burst your bubbles kid:enjoy:
you are not class with Chinese navy and Russian is selling you their obsolete designs to IN for higher cost take care:enjoy:

Azmat class FAC and F-22P and aogosta 90B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22P_Zulfiquar-class_frigate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNS_Azmat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agosta-class_submarine
3rd F-22P and 3rd Agosta class entirely built in Pakistan with TOT with China and France respectively
sorry to burst your bubbles kid:enjoy:
you are not class with Chinese navy and Russian is selling you their obsolete designs to IN for higher cost take care:enjoy:

LOL thanks for showing what a real 70s navy looks like...

No VLS....no AESA....thanks for the laugh! Come back when you've actually gotten hands on a proper modern warship. Your Navy's tech is a joke.
 
.

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...ter-maintaining-years-of-secrecy-1529359.html


NEW DELHI: The country’S first indigenously developed nuclear submarine Arihant will soon be unveiled after years of secrecy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit Visakhapatnam for its formal commissioning and dedicate it to the nation at the Eastern Naval Command, according to a top government official.

But before its operational deployment, its developers are struggling to fix a critical issue in its pressurised water reactor, which has not been able to generate adequate power for the submarine’s functioning.

According to sources, the nuclear-powered submarine was inducted into the fleet a few days back, but its commissioning is yet to happen before it’s formally put on operational deployment in the deep sea.

Explaining further, an official said a warship requires a flag and pennant number before being commissioned into service, while induction is only its entry into the service.

“There will soon be an opportunity to talk about Arihant,” vice admiral G S Pabby said while indicating a formal announcement is to be made soon.

The 6,000-tonne Arihant is armed with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles and will be the third leg of the ‘triad’ of land, air and sea-launched nuclear weapons envisaged by India’s nuclear doctrine of 1998. In 2013, the nuclear reactor of the submarine went ‘critical’ and from December 2014 onwards, the sea trials began, which included the test firing of K-series of missiles.

But since then, its 83 MW pressurised light-water reactor at its core, developed with extensive assistance from the Russia, has been facing multiple technical glitches.

A top official said its pressurised water reactor has not been synchronised with other vital systems. And because of it, the reactor has not been able to generate the ‘required’ power to operate the submarine.

“Synchronization of its pressurised water reactor to other key systems was a tricky job. Its configuration to generate 83 MW nuclear energy has not been successfully done, resulting in repeated delays in its operational deployment,” said
a top defence source.


A joint team of Russian and Indian scientists has been actively working round-the-clock to fix the critical issue.

Arihant, powered by an 83-MW pressurised water reactor with enriched uranium fuel, was launched symbolically into water on July 26, 2009, by then PM Manmohan Singh’s wife Gursharan Kaur. And since then, it is missing its deadline, as the Navy wanted the submarine to be ready for deterrent patrol by 2014, which means it should be equipped with nuclear weapons. But, sources also claimed that deterrent patrol will be a further step and will take some months to actually deploy.

Some months back, Arihant was integrated with the K-15 submarine-launched ballistic missile, which has a range of 750-km and the K-4 that has aa range of up to 3,500-km.

warship requires a flag and pennant number before being commissioned into service

What is the pennant number of Arihant?

I guess your logic states that if PDF indians do not know our nuclear codes, nuclear weapons should not exist....Guess you have to personally ask Modi that...lol
 
.
LOL thanks for showing what a real 70s navy looks like...

No VLS....no AESA....thanks for the laugh! Come back when you've actually gotten hands on a proper modern warship. Your Navy's tech is a joke.
You guys really a retard head @Centurion2016 and other guys ask me show the capabilities of Pakistan to built ships and subs I provide you guys the evidence, at the time deal with China for F-22P our economic condition wasn't that powerful to buy TYPE 54 FFG or TYPE52 DDG,F-22P is a basically upgraded TYPE 53H but our next upcoming upgraded F-22 P will equipped with medium range naval version of HQ-16 with VLS, similar to your BARAK-8
Sorry to bursting your bubbles kid
We lives in reality not Indian supa powa EGO:rofl::lol:
 
.
You guys really a retard head @Centurion2016 and other guys ask me show the capabilities of Pakistan to built ships and subs I provide you guys the evidence, at the time deal with China for F-22P our economic condition wasn't that powerful to buy TYPE 54 FFG or TYPE52 DDG,F-22P is a basically upgraded TYPE 53H but our next upcoming upgraded F-22 P will equipped with medium range naval version of HQ-16 with VLS, similar to your BARAK-8
Sorry to bursting your bubbles kid
We lives in reality not Indian supa powa EGO:rofl::lol:
So your navy will have in future,but ours already having. Yet IN navy is obsolete,70s tech compares to that of yours.
 
.
So your navy will have in future,but ours already having. Yet IN navy is obsolete,70s tech compares to that of yours.
Based on 70s design but heavily upgraded with latest system and weaponry but ship design 70s era FFG and DDG i am not talking tech
 
. .
i give the valid reason go ask Chinese senior members J-10 A and JF-17 have a almost same capabilities
sorry to burst your bubbles kid :lol::lol: and don't divert topic you guys ask that Pakistan wont have the capabilities to build navy ships and subs i shows you the evidences of that Pakistan can:p:
if you butthurt use this on your butts
View attachment 420881 its a pain killer:lol::rofl:
and make your junk cow piss vedic out of this universe 1000000000000 generation Tej@ss your indigenous product then you concerns our JF-17:help::hang3::hang2::suicide2::suicide:


Butthurt use this on your A$$
View attachment 420885
its a pain killer and i shows you a evidence that Pakistan building a navy ship and subs:p: i could shows you later because its night in USA and i will go on job tomorrow morning i'm going to have a nap
:lazy2:

:lol::lol::lol::lol: can't help you man, we are fine with 1970 era design and your 22 century design. Cheers
 
.
Even f22 is loosely based on wright brothers design.
Even f22 is loosely based on wright brothers design.
Hull design based 70s era Soviet based that all i trying trying to say

:lol::lol::lol::lol: can't help you man, we are fine with 1970 era design and your 22 century design. Cheers
This no you speaking but your false Indian supa powa EGO speaking your Navy is nothing infornt of Chinese TYPE 52 series DDG and TYPE 54 FFG and upcoming TYPE 55 cruiser and forget US, Russian, European Navies you are acting like a insane kid:suicide::suicide2::help::lol::rofl::hitwall:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom