What's new

Are All Muslims TERRORISTS?

Khalsa

BANNED
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Are All Muslims TERRORISTS?

Dont judge me just from the title, this was a article in the Pakistani newspaper. I thought it might be interesting.

Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

"MUSLIMS ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS AND TERRORISTS"

This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to declare a ‘Middle Eastern conspiracy’ behind the attack. The culprit was later identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.

Let us analyze this allegation of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘terrorism’:



1. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’

A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science.



2. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same

One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fundamentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much respect.



3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist

I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels.



4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’

According to Webster’s dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.

According to the Oxford dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’.

Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist.



5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist

Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word ‘terrorist’ is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people.



6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e. ‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’

Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom fighters.

It is therefore important that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing. Both sides of the argument should be heard, the situation should be analyzed, and the reason and the intention of the person should be taken into account, and then the person can be judged accordingly.



7. Islam means peace

Islam is derived from the word ‘salaam’ which means peace. It is a religion of peace whose fundamentals teach its followers to maintain and promote peace throughout the world.

Thus every Muslim should be a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the fundamentals of the Religion of Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards the antisocial elements in order to promote peace and justice in the society.

Are All Muslims TERRORISTS?
 
What a childish article.

Full of oversimplifications, generalizations and errors.
 
4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’

According to Webster’s dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.

Interstingly Khalsa till before 9/11 according to Wesbter Dictionary the Word Fundamentalist was definde as someone associated with the Movement of Catholic Protestants in America and a person who follows protestant faith strictly and hence the word was associated with Christianity.


According to the Oxford dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’.

Now more intresting is that Soon Aftre 9/11 the Oxford Dictionary changed the meaning of fundamentalism and added one two words deliberatly and that are "especially Islam"
 
Interstingly Khalsa till before 9/11 according to Wesbter Dictionary the Word Fundamentalist was definde as someone associated with the Movement of Catholic Protestants in America and a person who follows protestant faith strictly and hence the word was associated with Christianity.
There are no "Catholic Protestants" in America (or any other place for that matter). It is silly to assume that a term like "fundamentalism" can in literal terms be associated selectively with one religious group.
 
There are no "Catholic Protestants" in America (or any other place for that matter). It is silly to assume that a term like "fundamentalism" can in literal terms be associated selectively with one religious group.

That is what the Webster Dictionary said till 9/11 incident.

It is the defination given by Webster Dictionary and im sure you know that Muslims are not behind these dictionaries :)
 
Jana, I suppose that you have no idea whatsoever how word definitions are decided.

Usually, dictionaries list the most common meanings of a word first, followed by less popular ones and finally archaic or extinct definitions.
Incase a particular word is associated strongly with a certain definiton, the term "esp." or especially is used to describe that particular usage.

Don't blame the dictionary for recording popular usage. Don't shoot the messenger, as they say.
 
That is what the Webster Dictionary said till 9/11 incident.

It is the defination given by Webster Dictionary and im sure you know that Muslims are not behind these dictionaries :)
I'm looking at one right now, and I still do not see any mention of "Catholic-Protestants." Also, I hope you realize that the mention of the resurgence of biblical literalists in the early 20s whose movement was coined "fundamentalism" is an example of western ethnocentrism which was and in some ways still is, rampant in the English language (which happens to be their creation).
Also, the word is no longer limited to any one specific religious group and that there are many forms of fundamentalism, Islamic fundamentalism being one of them. It is hence clearly stated that the earlier attribution to Protestantism is a capitalization of the term; but not its literal meaning.

Similar patterns of capitalization of otherwise generic phrases exist all throughout the English language dictionaries; "democracy" for instance being one of them.

merriam-webster dictionary said:
1 often capitalized : a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching b: the beliefs of this movement c: adherence to such beliefs
2: a movement or attitude stressing strict and literal adherence to a set of basic principles <Islamic fundamentalism> <political fundamentalism>
— fun·da·men·tal·ist \-t&#601;-list\ noun
— fundamentalist or fun·da·men·tal·is·tic \-&#716;men-t&#601;-&#712;lis-tik\ adjective
 
That is what the Webster Dictionary said till 9/11 incident.

It is the defination given by Webster Dictionary and im sure you know that Muslims are not behind these dictionaries :)


Can you give a link?

It is stupid to state that there is Catholic Protestants. It is as stupid as saying there are people who are Sunni- Shia!

Catholics and Protestants are two different sects of Christianity as Sunni and Shias are in Islam.

It is more stupid if one does not know the difference, but then education and knowledge is not everyone's forte!

If you can't produce a link, it will just be another proof of yellow journalism and sensationalism purveying falsehood as truth and nothing more!

Don't get cute about dictionaries not being written by people of the Islamic faith.Just get the act together and give the link lest one suspects you to be a mere rabble rouser and a purveyor and a devout of yellow journalism!
 
All are NOT Terrorists.

To call all Terrorists is a total canard.
 
Yesterday's mujahideen is todays terrorists.
Precisely!
The word terrorist, seemed to me, is used just for the interests of few.
WoT is making some people rich ( as I see it )
 
No. All muslims are not terrotist but most of terrorist are from muslim religion. And the reason for this is
Muslim religion is based on fear and not open thinking. The koran for muslims is something that can not be challenged. Muslims want all world to be of their religion. Which is next to impossible. They are feared of " Allah" and fear is very basis of the respect to god.
this has lead to serious problem of muslim mentality; that no one except muslim shd be in power of muslim countries. people there cant tolerate rise of other religions.Practice of other religion is crime and is unacceptable in many muslim countries.
Muslims want to establish there religion everywhere. They think that people of other religion are threat to their religion. they wont do yoga which is primarily for health just because it relates to hinduism.
This fear of "allah" is induced to every human being, contrast to buddhism and jainism where every person is no less to god.
This method of inducing fear has resulted in extremism and terrorism.
Hope god will enlighten muslims to think more scientifically and power to tolerate other religions.
 
@i_l_p
Too many misconceptions there, I didn't even read all of it, but some I'd like to offer corrections:

1-Our relationship to Allah is that of love not fear. His love for us is akin to a mother's, only infinitely greater. We're supposed to appreciate and respond.

2-The practice os no other religion is crime (maybe proselytizing is prohibited but of that too I'm unsure). Currently no muslim country is muslim so their actions couldn't be ascribed to Islam.
 
Just a play on semantics and not addressing anything.

right out the book of mr zakir naik.

Exactly - its just word-jugglery aimed at tugging at the heartstrings of less-experienced readers. Nothing of substance.
 
Back
Top Bottom