What's new

American war hero exposes how US and UK provided fangs to Pakistan's 'snake

sachin@india

BANNED
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
739
Reaction score
-1
WASHINGTON: The gnawing and growing misgivings that the US and other western governments have endangered their own men and mission by arming an extremist Pakistan to the teeth has burst into public domain with an American war hero questioning the policy in a legal scrap.

Dakota Meyer is the first living marine to receive the nation's highest decoration, the Medal of Honor, since the Vietnam War for his role in repulsing an attack and saving the lives of many of colleagues in Afghanistan. Following his stint in the US forces, Meyer began working for armament maker BAE Systems in the US in March this year and straightaway ran into issues that evidently conflicted with his ground experience in Afghanistan of essentially fighting Pakistan and its proxies.

In an email to his supervisor earlier this year, Meyer complained that it was "disturbing" how Pakistan was being supplied with advanced thermal optic scopes made by BAE Systems when US troops were being issued outdated equipment. He argued that the firm was endangering US troops selling the scope to "the same people who are killing our guys."

"We are simply taking the best gear, the best technology on the market to date and giving to guys that are known to stab us in the back," Meyer was quoted saying in an email cited in a lawsuit he has filed against BAE Systems and his supervisors there. The lawsuit also refers to his fighting "Pakistani insurgents" in Afghanistan, and points to the growing resentment on the ground of US and Nato troops who see Pakistan as an enemy but are constrained by the political and diplomatic exigencies of their governments in coddling Pakistan.

The case is particularly relevant after the recent Nato/US attack on two Pakistani posts that killed 24 Pakistani troops and injured 12 in what Islamabad claims was a deliberate and unprovoked attack. But US ground commanders and troops have long complained in private that Pakistan supports terrorist proxies who attack and kill western and Afghan troops in Afghanistan and head back to Pakistan under covering fire - a charge echoed by Meyer in his lawsuit.

In the past, Pakistani ISI personnel have been killed in Afghanistan while training Taliban and al-Qaida elements, most notably in Khost in 1998 during the Clinton Presidency. The Bush administration also allowed Pakistan to airlift its terrorist assets from Afghanistan in the aftermath of the US invasion following 9/11. Successive US governments have continued to supply lethal arms to Pakistan under what many experts have said are spurious excuses about fighting terrorists, when, according to the US government's own account, the arms are being stacked up for use against India.

But even as Washington has complained about Pakistan keeping "snakes in its backyard," to paraphrase Hillary Clinton's complaint, it turns out that US and UK (BAE is a British firm) are providing the fangs.

That military equipment, not to speak of fungible civilian aid, is coming back to bite US forces, a sentiment that is common among troops returning from the combat zone. The supplies include F-16 fighter jets, which Washington gave to Pakistan despite objections from India that it was not useful in the war on terror, and which Pakistan is now threatening to use against its patron and supplier.

American war hero exposes how US and UK provided fangs to Pakistan's 'snakes in the backyard' - The Times of India
 
.
Sigh...

Another bogus article from the "Time of India."

The Times of India newspaper is known for lying. Indian media is known to be lying.

This article would be on Wall Street Journal or CNN. This story is not on either of them.
 
.
Sigh...

Another bogus article from the "Time of India."

The Times of India newspaper is known for lying. Indian media is known to be lying.

This article would be on Wall Street Journal or CNN. This story is not on either of them.

Debate on the issue. They didn't make up the story of their own.
 
. .
TOI $hitty news service with credibility.

Americans have no right to complain US supplied ammo and advanced US technology of that time Stingers to Talibans and they kill thousands of Soviet Union troops now you guys are in A'stan simply what goes around comes around.
 
.
The supplies include F-16 fighter jets, which Washington gave to Pakistan despite objections from India that it was not useful in the war on terror, and which Pakistan is now threatening to use against its patron and supplier.

We purchased it from a private american company!!!
 
. .
Ok so this is what reuters said:


Medal of Honor Lawsuit Serves Lessons in Law

Tweet
inShare
1
Share this

Email
Print
By Andrew Chow at FindLaw.com
Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:50pm EST
An American hero, a recipient of the Medal of Honor, is suing a former employer in a case that spotlights what employers can -- and cannot -- say about ex-employees.

U.S. Marine Sgt. Dakota Meyer's lawsuit accuses his former bosses at BAE Systems OASYS in San Antonio of ruining his shot at landing another job, The Wall Street Journal reports.

BAE managers allegedly told a prospective employer that Meyer was mentally unstable and had a drinking problem, the Journal reports.

That's a far cry from the Dakota Meyer who's credited with saving 36 lives during an attack in Afghanistan in 2009, when Meyer was 21. Meyer received the Medal of Honor from President Obama at a White House ceremony in September.

But Meyer's war zone experience also led to disagreements at BAE Systems. After Meyer sent an email objecting to BAE's plans to sell equipment to Pakistan, BAE supervisor Bobby McCreight allegedly began to belittle Meyer, his military service, and even his then-pending Medal of Honor, the lawsuit says.

Meyer is seeking unspecified damages in the workplace retaliation lawsuit filed Monday. He filed a separate suit claiming defamation in June.

Meyer's claims serve as a reminder about some salient points on employment law.

In workplace retaliation cases, employees can sue if their employer took action against them for filing some sort of complaint. Even if the employee's complaint has no merit, an employer can still be liable for retaliatory action such as demotions or reductions in pay.

Here, the link between McCreight's verbal insults and any employer retaliation are still unclear. Will Meyer be trying to convince a court that verbal insults, while not the same as a demotion or pay cut, are still retaliatory acts?

In defamation cases, employees can sue if their boss intentionally hurt their reputation by making untrue statements. Even if an employee is fired, a boss can still be liable for defamation by discussing the circumstances of the firing with a prospective employer.

Here, Meyer seems to have a stronger case. His lawsuit includes an email from his potential employer, saying Meyers was not being hired "due to being mentally unstable," among other reasons given by his BAE bosses.

The best advice for employers: Keep unflattering comments to yourself, and just stick to facts that you can verify.

Medal of Honor Lawsuit Serves Lessons in Law | Reuters
 
. .
We purchased it from a private american company!!!
And who provided those 2 $ billion per year !!???Jardari Saab's will OR Benazir left for pakistani people..!!!
It is completely fault of US and they have face this as they r the root cause for it..
 
. .
And who provided those 2 $ billion per year !!???Jardari Saab's will OR Benazir left for pakistani people..!!!
It is completely fault of US and they have face this as they r the root cause for it..

A total of 20 billion dollar are given in 10 years and we lost 70 billion dollars because of war on terror. its a complete loss with stupid american allegations for free.
 
.
A total of 20 billion dollar are given in 10 years and we lost 70 billion dollars because of war on terror. its a complete loss with stupid american allegations for free.
Hey these 20B$ were supplied back to Europe into the Swiss banks accounts and equally distributed between the US ruling elites and their Pakistani sell outs rulerz....nothing is spent on our poor Armed forces otherwise they wouldn't have been killed like that by the NATO attack. They didn't even have the anti-aircraft missiles to keep them safe from the air attack.....The regular 12.7mm and the other gunz are 50 or 60 years old weapons systems cant defend the country by them.....:angry:
 
.
times of india :rofl::rofl::rofl:


khuli bezati by Obama to toilet news

---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------

Ok so this is what reuters said:


Medal of Honor Lawsuit Serves Lessons in Law

Tweet
inShare
1
Share this

Email
Print
By Andrew Chow at FindLaw.com
Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:50pm EST
An American hero, a recipient of the Medal of Honor, is suing a former employer in a case that spotlights what employers can -- and cannot -- say about ex-employees.

U.S. Marine Sgt. Dakota Meyer's lawsuit accuses his former bosses at BAE Systems OASYS in San Antonio of ruining his shot at landing another job, The Wall Street Journal reports.

BAE managers allegedly told a prospective employer that Meyer was mentally unstable and had a drinking problem, the Journal reports.

That's a far cry from the Dakota Meyer who's credited with saving 36 lives during an attack in Afghanistan in 2009, when Meyer was 21. Meyer received the Medal of Honor from President Obama at a White House ceremony in September.

But Meyer's war zone experience also led to disagreements at BAE Systems. After Meyer sent an email objecting to BAE's plans to sell equipment to Pakistan, BAE supervisor Bobby McCreight allegedly began to belittle Meyer, his military service, and even his then-pending Medal of Honor, the lawsuit says.

Meyer is seeking unspecified damages in the workplace retaliation lawsuit filed Monday. He filed a separate suit claiming defamation in June.

Meyer's claims serve as a reminder about some salient points on employment law.

In workplace retaliation cases, employees can sue if their employer took action against them for filing some sort of complaint. Even if the employee's complaint has no merit, an employer can still be liable for retaliatory action such as demotions or reductions in pay.

Here, the link between McCreight's verbal insults and any employer retaliation are still unclear. Will Meyer be trying to convince a court that verbal insults, while not the same as a demotion or pay cut, are still retaliatory acts?

In defamation cases, employees can sue if their boss intentionally hurt their reputation by making untrue statements. Even if an employee is fired, a boss can still be liable for defamation by discussing the circumstances of the firing with a prospective employer.

Here, Meyer seems to have a stronger case. His lawsuit includes an email from his potential employer, saying Meyers was not being hired "due to being mentally unstable," among other reasons given by his BAE bosses.

The best advice for employers: Keep unflattering comments to yourself, and just stick to facts that you can verify.

Medal of Honor Lawsuit Serves Lessons in Law | Reuters

more pawnage :rofl::rofl:

toilet news
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
times of india :rofl::rofl::rofl:


khuli bezati by Obama to toilet news

---------- Post added at 10:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------



more pawnage :rofl::rofl:

toilet news

Hilariously, the TOI forgot the mentally unstable and drinking problems of Meyer. :lol: So much for Indian journalism! :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Back
Top Bottom