What's new

All races are different: Racial realism

Are some races better than others?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 45.0%
  • No

    Votes: 11 55.0%

  • Total voters
    20
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's face it, we can't talk about it...Then why bother?
 
.
Let's face it, we can't talk about it...Then why bother?
There are many many factors involved in IQ and there are many many different types of IQ. Culture, parental expectations, nutrition, pollution all have an effect. Not so long ago women were considered stupid, they were not allowed to vote, and their opinions were not regarded. A generation ago women did worse than men in anything that requires intellect, there were no women doctors, scientists or even writers and yet today women do better than men on average in college and areas like medicine is rapidly becoming feminized.

Folk who transitioned directly from hunter gatherer societies to modern tend to need more time to catch up with the educational attainments of folk who have a longer agrarian and trading history. It is very dumb to equate things like penile length with IQ. Presumably penile length has something to do with overall size , a 5' 4" chinaman with it hanging to his knees will find life difficult. The connection is more with the bodies center of gravity than with IQ.

IQ is increasing around the world in every continent with every generation, though the gene pool has not changed. Every one does not start with an even playing field. We do not have enough information to talk about this intelligently.
 
.
The IQ test should not be taken as an absolute measure of intelligence. The way the tests are designed have a lot to do with the performance of a subject. It is much like a survey, in which the way the question is framed often determines/influences the response.

The very basis of an IQ test is the definition of "intelligence", and not everyone agree what intelligence really means. There is an abundance of literature that criticizes the IQ measure.

So to judge people based on "intelligence" and IQ tests is wrong, misleading, and unfortunately has often been used to promote racist arguments and narratives. Lux provides a good example here.

Correct, IQ is measured through several subject (3D, math, etc) , so some one can have good score by having good at all of the tested subjects regardless their respective important in solving a frequent but specific life problem. For example, to analyze social problem ( economy, politics, psychology etc ) we dont need a good 3 D ability. IQ test uses similar weigh into all of the tested subject, despite in real life a particular subject can be more important than the other subject.
 
Last edited:
.
Also, all IQ tests show more variation within races than between. So the difference in IQ between the lowest percentile and the highest percentile Chinaman will be greater than the difference in mean IQ between the chinese population and say the European population.
 
. . .
Did someone say race wars?

race.jpg
 
.
Race is a "social construct" just like Gender behavior. There is nothing biological to it.

However, it is true that throughout history...different peoples/races..have outperformed other people/races. It wasn't because they were "inherently" superior to others. It was based on MANY different factors (resources, geography, tribal energy, conquests, and so on)...

If one race was biologically better than others...then it would have dominated entire history. But we don't see that, do we?

Egyptians dominated culture, Persians, Romans, Greeks did..then Arabs did, Chinese/Indians made significant contributions as well...

Only an idiot would believe that just because you are born with a certain skin tone, you are "superior" to other human beings...

LOL!!
LOL, it's like saying if you're 5'0 130 lbs you can play professional football as a linebacker? Race and IQ is different for all races. It's been a controversial subject for decades but scientific fact show that race/IQ make a difference overall.

Race, Genes, Intelligence - Facts Are Facts

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2007-01201-000

http://hsmt.history.ox.ac.uk//courses_reading/undergraduate/authority_of_nature/week_8/lynn_1991.pdf

bolt-51.jpg


Does the picture look familiar? Year after year, match after match, you see the same thing in this event: total domination by black people. Now you are going to tell me this is all the results of hard work, smart training and genetics has nothing to do with it? Clearly genetics differences do exist and they are more than just the colors of our skins.

However, accepting the differences is difficult and is detrimental to those who are deemed "genetically inferior". If I were in charge of Chinese sports, I'd dismantle the 100m sprint team. Because obviously we are inept in this thing. Even if China may produce a world class sprinter once in a blue moon, it'll only be an isolated genetic anomaly. China will never be able to compete in this event consistently. That is how we are built, that is fact. But, it is unthinkable if China really stops competing in Olympic 100 m sprint events. That means the whole nation has completely given up on this sports. It will never happen.

So basically, when it comes to genetic differences between people, the unspoken rule is:
Do not talk about it, ignore it and believe what you want to believe. Cheers:cheers:

Exactly. People who ignore science to be politically correct will be their own doom. For example, to be an accountant, the average IQ is around 110. So if your IQ is less than 90, find another profession or you won't be successful.

Just like if you are 5'0, 130 lbs--regardless of how many times you train per day or even have professional coaching YOU WILL NOT MAKE IT TO THE NFL AS A DEFENSIVE TACKLE. So you won't plan your career as a football player, you will be disappointed .
 
.
This thread is racist ! Oh,the OP is Chinese,not a Caucasian White guy.Ok,it's fine than,nevermind.

We can't say one race is "superior" than another. But I think it's Ok to say Africans generally do better in basketball and running while Chinese generally do better in maths...They are facts, every race has its own merit.

Running had its merit 2500 years ago when mankind was hunting gazelles for its survival.Today,not so much.
 
.
This thread is racist ! Oh,the OP is Chinese,not a Caucasian White guy.Ok,it's fine than,nevermind.



Running had its merit 2500 years ago when mankind was hunting gazelles for its survival.Today,not so much.

Funny you mentioned the race of the OP. He may be a Chinese. But he is just a small time amateur in this area. You know how a Caucasian White guy would go about it? He'll collect data, do analysis, create fancy terms and write "scientific" reports to "prove" that certain people are of lower quality. Remember British Richard Lynn's famous "Bell Curve" theory? Or Canadian psychology professor John Rushton's anti immigration study which claims the Indians have low IQ?
 
. .
I hope you know the difference between sameness, equality.... and ideal state and current states.

Races are not the same, and they for now are not entirely equal in most of the world, but they should be equal.
^That's the accurate yet politically correct statement and there is nothing wrong with it.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom