What's new

Akash SAM Successfully Test Fired Again

Ambitious.Asian

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
789
Reaction score
0
Balasore, May 26, 2012

Two days after its successful trial, India on Saturday again test-fired the indigenously developed surface-to-air Akash missile from the test range at Chandipur near here. "The user specific trial, which formed part of theg country's routine air defence exercises, was conducted from the ITR," said a Defence Research Development Organisation (DRDO) official associated with the ‘Akash’ missile project.


To re-validate the technology and operational efficacy of the anti-aircraft missile, Defence forces conducted the trial with logistic support provided by the ITR.

They had test-fired Akash successfully from the same test range on May 24.

The missile, which has a strike range of 25 km with warhead of 60 kgs, was test fired from a mobile launcher from launch complex-III of the ITR at about 1110 hours, Defence sources said.

"During the trial, the missile sought to intercept a floating object supported by a pilot less target aircraft (PTA), flown from launch complex-II, at a definite altitude over the sea," they said.

Akash, an anti-aircraft defence system, can simultaneously engage several targets with ‘Rajendra’ radar developed by Electronics and Radar Development Establishment (LRDE), a DRDO laboratory situated at Bangalore. Rajendra does the surveillance, tracks the target, acquires it and guides the missile towards it.

The development of Akash missile took place during 1990s under country’s integrated guided missile development programme (IGMDP). After many trials, was inducted into armed forces in 2008. An air-force version of ‘Akash’ missile has also been developed by DRDO.

Rajendra is a multifunction radar, capable of tracking as many as 64 targets and controlling up to 12 missiles simultaneously.

Defence experts have compared Akash missile system with the American MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile system.

They claim that like the MIM-104, the Akash is capable of neutralising aerial targets such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), fighter jets, cruise missiles and air-to-surface missiles.




Surface-to-air Akash missile successfully test fired - Hindustan Times
 
.
Akash is a thorough game changer, under-rating this system will be foolish for any adversary. The next step might be to export this system to friendly regime's.
 
. . .
missiles for these tests were picked from production lots to verify production quality. good to see both the tests were successful.
Going to be a dumb question but bear with me...How exactly a sam is tested..I mean what is going to be a potential target?? Obviously it cannot be a plane as such..then what exactly is it tested against...
 
.
Going to be a dumb question but bear with me...How exactly a sam is tested..I mean what is going to be a potential target?? Obviously it cannot be a plane as such..then what exactly is it tested against...

may be on UAV as a target
 
.
again????is it user trial or just tested to check some improvement???
 
.
Akash is a thorough game changer, under-rating this system will be foolish for any adversary. The next step might be to export this system to friendly regime's.

i think Malaysia showed interest in the purchase of Akash, but given the fears that the tech. can reach the Pakistanis it is highly unlikely.

India, Russia yet to reach breakthrough on Gorshkov - Times Of India

also were the first trial 100% successful or was in doubt which necessitated the second test?
 
.
Going to be a dumb question but bear with me...How exactly a sam is tested..I mean what is going to be a potential target?? Obviously it cannot be a plane as such..then what exactly is it tested against...

Its tested against PTA Lakshya. You can see two small missiles under the wings of Lakshya. One of them is fired from Lakshya and engaged by Akash. Thats why Akash has good anti-cruise missile capability and ability to destroy stealthy small RCS targets.

6516173245_c3725e1616_z.jpg
 
. .
i think Malaysia showed interest in the purchase of Akash, but given the fears that the tech. can reach the Pakistanis it is highly unlikely.

India, Russia yet to reach breakthrough on Gorshkov - Times Of India

also were the first trial 100% successful or was in doubt which necessitated the second test?

Dost keiseee baaatein kartaa hai ? We're a friendly country too....! :kiss3:

Eik do bheeej dei mein hum bhi tou bhai log hein border ke isss taraf !

On a serious note : I'm a complete noob so if someone would like to bear with me I'd be much obliged - How well does this compare with the SPADA ?
 
.
Akash is no doubt a capable SAM especially against low flying high subsonic land attack cruise missiles and air crafts performing CAS missions.But the focus should be now on developing the 120 km range version of Barak 2 and converting the existing AAD into LR SAMs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
.
Akash is no doubt a capable SAM especially against low flying high subsonic land attack cruise missiles and air crafts performing CAS missions.But the focus should be now on developing the 120 km range version of Barak 2 and converting the existing AAD into LR SAMs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I want to ask a question, if akash & barak & other missiles in our arsenal can detect & kill an incoming missile like cruise missile, why do we need missile defence systems then???
 
.
I want to ask a question, if akash & barak & other missiles in our arsenal can detect & kill an incoming missile like cruise missile, why do we need missile defence systems then???

there is a hugedeferance between a subsonic cruse missile or an air crafe which at most can reach to a speed of 2 mach.
but a balestic missile in its terminal phase may touch 15mach (of course deepending up on the range of the system.

the logic in SAM & BMD is very different, BMD missiles need to be very agile & quick. the reaction time is in the fraction of seconds in a hit & a miss.
 
.
I want to ask a question, if akash & barak & other missiles in our arsenal can detect & kill an incoming missile like cruise missile, why do we need missile defence systems then???

Cruise missiles,UAVs,manned fighter-all follow similar horizontal flight trajectory and can be intercepted by regular anti air craft missiles.But BMs are totally different ball game.Because average IRBMs have midcourse altitude of 350-400 km (700km for Agni IV) and terminal velocity of upto mach 20-24 which is completely out of the league of regular SAMs.That's why we need specialised interceptor missiles to take out inbound enemy BMs and that's what DRDO is developing.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom