AIDS WOMAN (Sonia) FIRES MINISTER WHO SAID NO PRIVATE/U.S. COMPANIES IN NUCLEAR POWER

[kaal2009]

On February 14, 2009, the Minister of State for Commerce and Power, Jairam Ramesh, reportedly said no private companies will be allowed in the nuclear power field until the year 2020:
No nuclear power plants for Pvt Cos till 2020- Policy-Economy-News-The Economic Times
In fact, what he said was:
""I do not foresee a role for the private sector in the first generation of production of nuclear power of 20,000 mega watt on strategic [emphasis added], safety, fuel and management grounds. Expansion of nuclear energy has necessarily to be based either on Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) or on its joint venture with public entities as only such companies could take a 10 year perspective without worrying over cash flows, borrowings or meltdown," Mr Ramesh told reporters on Saturday. He was in Mumbai to attend the signing ceremony of a memorandum of understanding between the NPCIL and National Thermal Power Corporation."

Since the target of generating 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power by 2020 included a large proportion from reactors imported from the United States and other countries, this meant no American or other private companies were to be allowed in the nuclear field in the first 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power, in effect nullifying a part (only a part; it did not nullify the disadvantages from importing light water reactors and fuel from Russia's government-owned entity and the deadliest and strategically fatal part of the nuclear deal -- the new IAEA agreement which brings additional Indian reactors and even research institutions such as the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research under restrictions and IAEA inspections, especially if this new IAEA agreement is ratified/finalised on the pretext that it is needed for the highly injurious import of light water reactors and fuel from Russia) of the C.I.A.-RAW-engineered treasonous, strategically suicidal nuclear deal with "its various aspects — replacing indigenous production of uranium and reactors with imports, the capping, rollback and elimination of India’s nuclear weapons program, media control and buying up politicians, scientists, etc. for this purpose"; see post # 1 in the following thread as well as the links at the bottom of that post:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html

A couple of days ago, according to a press report, the AIDS woman (Sonia) told Jairam Ramesh to resign. It was the statement above by him which led to this "surprise" step. A report yesterday had a minister in the Prime Minister's office say that an amendment to the Atomic Energy Act to allow private companies in the field has already been prepared and will be passed right after the elections:
Atomic Energy Act to be amended soon

That is, if the Prime Minister's office and the parliament, etc., still exist, which they won't. Click on the links at the bottom of post # 1 in the following thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html

 

[kaal2009]

After a letter of mine to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in December, 1982 about the necessity for India to defend against a nuclear first strike by the United States, two strategic programs, both directed at defence against the United States, were started: the Integrated Guided Missiles Program and the Centre for Advanced Technology (CAT) near Indore. The slowing and suppression by India’s government of the strategic missiles program over the years is well known. The gutting of the strategic programs of CAT started during the Vajpayee government and now it has been turned into a civilian research facility that operates in collaboration with American research laboratories, allowing them to monitor it and eliminating its objective of developing defences against the United States.

 

[kaal2009]

The Bharat Rakshak online discussion forum, most of whose moderators are operatives of C.I.A.-RAW, does not allow a discussion thread on an indigenous Medium Combat Aircraft, only on imports, just as it has numerous threads inciting the vilest hatred toward Pakistan but promptly bans anyone who refers to India defending itself against the United States.

 

[kaal2009]

My reference to the Medium Combat Aircraft above has to be put in perspective. The following is what I said on January 25, 2008:-

"The bottom line is that India must have military supremacy over all nations of the world -- which in this age means nuclear supremacy -- and since the United States is the most powerful nation in the world today, India's principal task is to attain nuclear supremacy over the United States and that cannot be attained by depending on the United States or other countries for 'aid'; India is quite capable of attaining nuclear supremacy over the United States and [India's C.I.A.-RAW-controlled media] try to prevent it by falsely running DRDO down, promoting foreign dependence and imports, etc., and this is part of the tactics foreign intelligence agencies use, through Indians on their payroll, to keep India down.
India has no shortage of manpower and my proposal about money (click on the links at the bottom of post # 1 of the following thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html ) can be used to make India both militarily and economically number 1 in the world but military supremacy -- that is, nuclear supremacy -- is even more important than economic supremacy because, without it, it can be subjugated and enslaved (let's leave out who does the subjugation and enslavement). All of the invaders who conquered and enslaved India came from much poorer countries than 'the Golden Hind'.
DRDO is doing great work, but that does not mean things can't be even better. I have said that India should set up ten parallel DRDOs, each the size of the present DRDO and let three of them compete for a successful tank design, three for a successful figher plane and so on and let the best design win. The Soviet Union had a system of internal competition between government-owned design and production organisations of this kind and it can work for India also (though I don't think DRDO's work has suffered due to a lack of competition; having ten times as many people work on defence R & D may simply enable ten times as many things to be done). Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same investment of time and effort ('bang for the buck') so far as increasing a country's military power is concerned. Since India's principal aim should be nuclear supremacy, it should focus on designing and producing intercontinental ballistic missiles more than tanks and fighter planes; if you have nuclear supremacy over the United States, most other defence-related issues will take care of themselves. And, as I said, designing and building ICBMs that will do the job can be done a lot faster and require fewer resources, though India has the resources to build both ICBMs and tanks and fighter planes. The main advantage of focusing on ICBMs is time; it will bring India military supremacy a lot sooner than giving a lot of attention to tanks and fighter planes (which will never bring India military supremacy over the United States). Another point is that although India should build nuclear-propelled, nuclear-armed submarines carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles (SSBNs), like the ATV it is building, building these weapons platforms (SSBNs) is a lot more time and resource-consuming than building ICBMs that can be launched from road and rail-mobile vehicles. It is a mistake to make India's nuclear arsenal primarily a second strike resource (which is what SSBNs are good at); India's nuclear arsenal should primarily be for a first strike -- that is how you gain nuclear supremacy, by being able to carry out a successful first strike -- and a sufficiently large arsenal of road and rail-mobile ICBMs can be produced a lot faster than an arsenal based on SSBNs. Again, time is important. This does not mean India should not produce SSBNs, just that the emphasis should be on producing a large number of road and rail-mobile ICBMs. I also believe that India's anti-ballistic missile systems will be considerably better than those of the United States -- as DRDO has correctly said, its systems to defend against short and medium range missiles are already better than those of the United States -- if India can avoid sabotage by politicians and RAW on the C.I.A.'s payroll who try to shove american 'help' down India's throat. This is another reason India can afford to focus on road and rail-mobile ICBMs rather than on SSBNs (SSBNs are inherently difficult to destroy; with a really effective ABM system, India's road and rail-mobile ICBMs will also be difficult to destroy). Avoiding foreign 'help' is not a matter of 'false pride'; avoiding foreign help is essential for India's nuclear supremacy.
Instead of ICBMs, India's nuclear weapons may primarily be delivered by the hyperplane (Avatar) under development. And its defence against enemy ICBMs may be provided by the space-based weapons, Durga (Directionally Unrestricted Ray-Gun Array) and Kali (Kinetic Attack Loitering Interceptor) systems."

And it is necessary to put tanks and fighter planes in general in perspective. This is what I said on February 27, 2008:-

"DRDO are India's real warriors, not the military. In the old days, the sword-makers could make the swords, but warriors had to wield them. Even today's tanks and fighter planes need warriors to drive or fly them. But DRDO, along with the nuclear scientists and production units such as Bharat Dynamics, can make nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles and the people who do the research and development and production can also push the button to send them off to obliterate the enemy. The military muscle from nuclear-tipped ICBMs is milllions of times greater than the power of tanks and fighter planes. The scientists and engineers are also the real soldiers. They should have their hand on the nuclear button, not the military or the politicians. The military simply obey the politicians and India's politicians are all traitors on the payrolls of the C.I.A. etc. The military are not needed to launch the nuclear-tipped ICBMs; that can be done by scientists and engineers pushing a button sitting at a desk. The tanks and fighter planes the military can drive/fly are insignificant and nearly worthless in the military power they provide. Since they (the military) also obey the traitor politicians and civil servants, they are worse than worthless. It is time scientists and engineers are recognised for what they are -- the true defenders and guardians of the country.
The military should obey and take orders from DRDO; the same for civil servants and politicians. This can be done by amending the Constitution; if the politicians don't agree to amending the Constitution, it can be done in other ways."