What's new

After Modi's Big Win: Can India and Pakistan Enhance Relations?

India needs to come out of this big brother dilemma ,India doesn't need to entertain anyone.

Their is a need for Pakistan to come clean on issues related to cross border infiltration,mumbai attacks.etc

If they chose not to, strengthen the internal security and ignore them.Why hurry ? maintain the status quo.

 
.
It has devised new way to Interfere like Kargil.
Same thing happend back in case of Siatchen dude.........
Well Musharraf days and policy is long over..

When you are fired unprovoked, You have to retaliate. Diplomacy do not come in way.
I thought it was BSF jawan captured from Pakistani territory and returned just back a day or two...
Stop Infiltration before crying..........:lol:
 
.
I thought it was BSF jawan captured from Pakistani territory and returned just back a day or two...


We appreciate this but beheading our soldier is also a reality like you guys returning the soldier.
 
.
We appreciate this but beheading our soldier is also a reality like you guys returning the soldier.
I wanna see that body dude(1)..........
And proves he was beheaded in Pakistani territory(2)
By Pakistani Soldiers(3).....
Bismillah start sharing
 
. .
India just needs an excuse to stay out of the dialogue process and it has a convenient one, blame the PA.

As for the article itself, there is nothing new, it speaks from the Indian perspective making Pakistan look like the epicentre of all Evil. Pakistan needs India as much as India needs Pakistan. Author's notion that while India can integrate in the global economy and doesn't need Pakistan, why is the same not true for Pakistan? Why cant Pakistan integrate into the global economy and only needs India for its economic survival?

India is in no position to give any sort of incentive to Pakistan. Yes our economy is in shambles but it has more to do with the on going war and poor governance of the successive governments and less with India. There is nothing at this stage that India can provide to Pakistan which will change any of the above circumstances.

Moreover this convenient belief in India that PA exists only because of the threat from India is also highly misplaced. We can say the same about Indian army as well that their sole existence is because to counter Pakistan and China however it would be naive because India considers itself a global player and they need their military to protect and project his power and even if the threat from Pakistan and China suddenly disappears they will still need to maintain a minimum credible defence.. Pakistan too faces multi dimensional threats and PA will always be there to counter them irrespective of India. This is a highly flawed misconception within the Indian ranks that the utility and importance of PA will diminish if the threat from India goes and hence PA is against any approach of betterment towards India.
 
.
Then Modi should keep patta tight on his minister's necks...........
No Army don't give a damm about Nawaz's foreign policy,till now under new command it never interfeared and I hope it won't...

PA will always have a final say on matters related to INDIA
 
.
When you are fired unprovoked, You have to retaliate. Diplomacy do not come in way.

And guess what? The Pakistanis will think the same thing.
"If they attack us, we'll attack them."
This will be the basis of the relationship between Pakistan and India.
"If they attack us, we'll attack them."
No negotiations, no trials, no court martials, no nothing.
"If they attack us, we'll attack them."

India needs to come out of this big brother dilemma ,India doesn't need to entertain anyone.

Their is a need for Pakistan to come clean on issues related to cross border infiltration,mumbai attacks.etc

If they chose not to, strengthen the internal security and ignore them.Why hurry ? maintain the status quo.


Siachen has been called "Hell on Earth" by a Pakistani general.
Idk why the Pakistani Military finds it so important, but it's laughable to see you posting a Tweet about how Modi is saying that they want to keep that cesspit where most casualties are caused by the environment.
 
.
with all the hulla bolo in Pakistan,,,it will be wise,IMHO,to wait n watch
 
.
Then what's up with the border firing going on?
You start it, not India. What reason does India have for violating the ceasefire? None!

Pakistani Rangers at the IB and the PA on the LoC violate the ceasefire at regular intervals in order to provide covering fire to infiltrate terrorists into J&K. That's the long and short of it.
 
.
And guess what? The Pakistanis will think the same thing.
"If they attack us, we'll attack them."
This will be the basis of the relationship between Pakistan and India.
"If they attack us, we'll attack them."
No negotiations, no trials, no court martials, no nothing.
"If they attack us, we'll attack them."

What do you suggest. What should be the response to unprovoked firing?
 
.
You start it, not India. What reason does India have for violating the ceasefire? None!

Pakistani Rangers at the IB and the PA on the LoC violate the ceasefire at regular intervals in order to provide covering fire to infiltrate terrorists into J&K. That's the long and short of it.

You have no proof, no source, no anything.
Don't make any claims until you have information to back it up.

What do you suggest. What should be the response to unprovoked firing?

If there is unprovoked firing, there should be a warning by the Indian government and a demand made to stop such actions.
There is little communication going on over this issue.
The only people suffering are civilians since from what I hear, they're the usual targets of both sides.
 
.
You have no proof, no source, no anything.
Don't make any claims until you have information to back it up.



If there is unprovoked firing, there should be a warning by the Indian government and a demand made to stop such actions.
There is little communication going on over this issue.
The only people suffering are civilians since from what I hear, they're the usual targets of both sides.


But that may take some time by which damage or casualty may take place.

What about the idea of observing restrain and no unprovoked firing?
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom