What's new

Afghanistan Is The Big Winner In U.S. Foreign Aid

Narcissist

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
235
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
http://time.com/43836/afghanistan-is-the-big-winner-in-u-s-foreign-aid/

  1. POLITICS
Afghanistan Is The Big Winner In U.S. Foreign Aid
By FINDTHEBEST/KIRAN DHILLON
March 31, 2014
In fiscal year 2012 the U.S. gave $42 billion in aid to 186 countries around the world. But the money was not evenly divided.

While Sub Saharan Africa, which has 49 countries—including 18 of the top 20 poorest in the world—received only $7.2 billion in aid, South and Central Asia (13 countries) received more than twice that, at $15.1 billion.



Most of the aid to South and Central Asia went to just two countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Together, they accounted for about $14.02 billion of the $15.1 billion that went to the region, and were among the top recipients of U.S. aid worldwide in 2012.


The bulk of the $12.9 billion in aid to Afghanistan—$9.95 billion—went towards spending on military and security assistance to arm and train Afghan military and police forces.



With U.S. military forces planning for a withdrawal later this year, it remains unclear just how much lasting impact all of that money will have. According to an article published by the Journal of World Affairs in 2013, “The Money Pit: The Monstrous Failure of US Aid to Afghanistan,” the aid has been exactly that, a failure. Since 2002, approximately 100 billion has been appropriated for aid, and “all of that has not brought the United States or Afghanistan a single sustainable institution or program.”

USAID has handed almost every project over to independent contractors, and has failed to monitor those projects’ progress, the Taliban have attacked or bombed hundreds of new schools and buildings, and corrupt government officials find ways to hoard profits from aid for themselves, by, for example, declaring trailers and non-motorized conveyances in a list of vehicles needing fuel supplied by the U.S. In the words of Heather Barr of the Human Rights Watch, the country is a “perfect case study of how not to give aid.”

This article was written for TIME by Kiran Dhillon of FindTheBest.
 
.
Whats with the title, is OP reading the content ?

Most of the aid to South and Central Asia went to just two countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Together, they accounted for about $14.02 billion of the $15.1 billion that went to the region
 
. . . .
You entered the thread, tell us what you were expecting ?

Something about Ashraf ghani the prostitute..
But man you rreally had Bobs and vegana in your head before 'entering' the thread.:ashamed:
 
.
Looking at the content of the thread, seems like Pakistan earned more in this profession.
 
.
Looking at the content of the thread, seems like Pakistan earned more in this profession.
still cant beat Mother India
48098921.jpg
 
. .
http://time.com/43836/afghanistan-is-the-big-winner-in-u-s-foreign-aid/

  1. POLITICS
Afghanistan Is The Big Winner In U.S. Foreign Aid
By FINDTHEBEST/KIRAN DHILLON
March 31, 2014
In fiscal year 2012 the U.S. gave $42 billion in aid to 186 countries around the world. But the money was not evenly divided.

While Sub Saharan Africa, which has 49 countries—including 18 of the top 20 poorest in the world—received only $7.2 billion in aid, South and Central Asia (13 countries) received more than twice that, at $15.1 billion.



Most of the aid to South and Central Asia went to just two countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Together, they accounted for about $14.02 billion of the $15.1 billion that went to the region, and were among the top recipients of U.S. aid worldwide in 2012.


The bulk of the $12.9 billion in aid to Afghanistan—$9.95 billion—went towards spending on military and security assistance to arm and train Afghan military and police forces.



With U.S. military forces planning for a withdrawal later this year, it remains unclear just how much lasting impact all of that money will have. According to an article published by the Journal of World Affairs in 2013, “The Money Pit: The Monstrous Failure of US Aid to Afghanistan,” the aid has been exactly that, a failure. Since 2002, approximately 100 billion has been appropriated for aid, and “all of that has not brought the United States or Afghanistan a single sustainable institution or program.”

USAID has handed almost every project over to independent contractors, and has failed to monitor those projects’ progress, the Taliban have attacked or bombed hundreds of new schools and buildings, and corrupt government officials find ways to hoard profits from aid for themselves, by, for example, declaring trailers and non-motorized conveyances in a list of vehicles needing fuel supplied by the U.S. In the words of Heather Barr of the Human Rights Watch, the country is a “perfect case study of how not to give aid.”

This article was written for TIME by Kiran Dhillon of FindTheBest.




They can't be that much of winners if millions of them want to come and live in Pakistan.
 
.
Why are we hungry of US aid?
This is not called a winning if country is not progressing toward prosperity and strong economically.
 
.
Most of the aid to South and Central Asia went to just two countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Together, they accounted for about $14.02 billion of the $15.1 billion that went to the region, and were among the top recipients of U.S. aid worldwide in 2012.


The bulk of the $12.9

Pakistan gets 1.08 billion, the rest of South Asia gets 1.08 billion, and Afghanistan gets 12.9 billion

Writing that "Most of the aid to South and Central Asia went to just two countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan." is the definition of propaganda, this is atrociously terrible journalism.
 
.
Why are we hungry of US aid?
This is not called a winning if country is not progressing toward prosperity and strong economically.

You're right but that aid gets used in ways counter to our interest. We need to watch what people, who have self disclosed animosity towards us, do.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom