What's new

Afghan wealth tempts India, China but hurdles remain

xenia

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
785
Reaction score
0
Afghan wealth tempts India, China but hurdles remain​


By Sanjeev Miglani

SINGAPORE: For all the lure of the mineral wealth believed to be lying untapped beneath war-ravaged Afghanistan, Asia’s two major economies, India and China, are not rushing in with pick axes and shovels just yet.

Both resource-hungry nations, jockeying for influence in Afghanistan as the United States prepares to pull out its troops next year, are hungrily eyeing the deposits of iron ore, copper and key industrial metals such as lithium, estimated to be worth more than $1 trillion.

But while this bounty is enough to transform Afghanistan’s bedraggled $11 billion economy, the security and logistical challenges involved in extracting the minerals and bringing them to the global market from the landlocked nation are just as daunting for the Indians and the Chinese as they are for Western investors, officials and analysts say.

“China and India are not going to walk away from this.

There is a huge opportunity here and they are going to position themselves for it, but I just don’t see this taking off in the immediate future,” said Kamran Bokhari, Regional Director, Middle East and South Asia at global intelligence firm STRATFOR.

“We tend to often underestimate the sheer amount of limitations any power faces operating in another country, in terms of logistics, even a rising power such as China.” Even with the best of infrastructure, mining minerals is very expensive and time-consuming compared to drilling for oil.

Gold, silver, copper and oth er minerals are usually locked in ore that must be tunnelled down to, blasted out by the ton, carried to the surface, and ground into powder for processing.

Digging the shafts and building elevators, processing plants, railroads and tarmac roads can cost up to several billion dollars for a single mining operation.

In mountainous, undeveloped Afghanistan, which has no railroad link to the world or adequate electric power infrastructure, these problems multiply ten-fold.

Roadshow for riches Indian and Chinese companies are expected to lead the pack at a roadshow the Afghan government has organised in London on Friday to drum up investor interest in its mining sector.

With the United States planning to begin a military withdrawal from July 2011, India and China along with Afghanistan’s other neighbours such as Pakistan and Iran have stepped up efforts to increase influence in the unstable region.

India has spent $1.2 billion building roads, power transmission lines and even the parliament building, hoping to win goodwill. The Chinese have focused on deepening commercial links, investing in the resources sector as well as producing many of the goods sold in Afghanistan.

At the roadshow, officials will provide details of the Hajigak iron ore deposits in central Afghanistan that will open for bidding later this year. The area is said to hold the largest unmined iron de posits in Asia.

Several Indian companies reached the last stages of the tender process for the mine estimated to hold 1.8 billion tonnes of high quality ore. These included Essar Minerals Ltd, Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd and Ispat Industries Ltd.

China’s Metallurgical Group Corp, which along with Jiangxi Copper Co won the contract for the Aynak copper deposits in 2007 in the largest non-military foreign investment in the country, was also a bidder for the Hajigak deal. But it pulled out following allegations it had won the Aynak contract by giving bribes. The firm denied the charges.

“Investors are concerned about President Karzai’s tenuous domestic and international standing, Kabul’s weak control of the provinces, the government’s lack of capacity to implement the new 2005 Mining Law and lack of credible investment law and framework, and wide-scale corruption across institutions,” Maria Kuusisto, analyst at Eurasia Group wrote in a research note.

Having won the Aynak concession, the Chinese are having to build local road connections, trans-national railway lines and other infrastructure in an investment that is expected to hit $4 billion. The project is already 18 months behind schedule.

Bigger problem for Indians Kabul is keen on a greater Indian role in the mining sector and last week Afghan Mines Minister Wahidullah Shahrani flew into New Delhi for talks with his Indian counterpart.

But the Indians have a bigger problem than the Chinese.

Even if they were able to set up the mining infrastructure inside Afghanistan, the they have to transport the products through Pakistan.

India and Afghanistan have been trying to persuade Pakistan to allow limited movement of trucks carrying fruits and vegetables through its territory. Islamabad, which is strongly opposed to a deepening Indian role in Afghanistan, has shown little sign of flexibility.

“India has Pakistan standing between it and Afghanistan, and Pakistan will do everything possible to prevent it getting a deeper stake. In fact they will align themselves with the Chinese in the mineral race, if only to stop the Indians,” Bokhari said.

New Delhi has been trying to access Afghanistan using Iran as a corridor and has built road networks in the area as an alternative to Pakistan.

But experts say using the Iran route to ship out mined products may not be a feasible option, given the deposits are concentrated in southern and eastern Afghanistan near the border with Pakistan and also because dealing with Iran itself is a complicated issue because of the sanctions imposed on it.

“Security is a real issue for Indian companies. Indians have been attacked. The big question will be how do you ensure the security of the people working there,” said Shanthie Mariet D’Souza, an expert at the National University of Singapore.—Reuters

Afghan wealth tempts India, China but hurdles remain
 
.
first u.s and what ever will be remained can be shared b/w india and china.
 
. . .
guys.. you are talking about a Sovereign country. Not stock of a publically listed company.

How many treat Afghanistan as a soverign country though? Time and time again the coments are about when "we" take over after the Americans leave, China, India, Pakistan and Iran all have their own idea of how they will run things that dont seem to centre on what the Afghani's want.
 
.
How many treat Afghanistan as a soverign country though? Time and time again the coments are about when "we" take over after the Americans leave, China, India, Pakistan and Iran all have their own idea of how they will run things that dont seem to centre on what the Afghani's want.

Unfortunate but true..:undecided:
 
.
then why this rant of development projects:blah:
everyone is aiming at a share of influence...
 
. . .
Jana.. I appreciate your sentiments. But honestly, going by past experience, Put Pakistan First, US Second, Iran Third and India 4th. Not sure about Chinese influence there... so have it as last.
 
.

Afghan wealth, Afghan resources belong to people of Afghanistan NOT India, US, China, Iran or Pakistan.



People of Afghanistan are capable of exploring this wealth and utilise it for their development

Well the Afghans (at least some of them) have already spoken: Seems they want Japan to have first priority in helping them develop the resources. :smitten:
 
.
Jana.. I appreciate your sentiments. But honestly, going by past experience, Put Pakistan First, US Second, Iran Third and India 4th. Not sure about Chinese influence there... so have it as last.

The first three are not for Afghan Wealth rather its again that same influence game which is mainly due to US and Russian cold war.

Anyway thats a separate issue. If you want my personal opinion then its better for all bordering countries Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan and Russia, to join hands. This will also boost economy of these countries and the biggest beneficiary will be Afghanistan in terms of trade and development.
 
. .
Alteast we are not trying to influence through blackmail are we

Dont try to be saint man. India is a non-entity in Afghan issue. You guys are trying to get in by hook or by crook for purely your interests which are not threatened directly as you dont have any border with Afghanistan.

On the other hand its interests of Afghanistan and its people besides all its bordering countries including Iran, Russia, Pakistan, to join hands.

This will lead to three-prong trade for Afghanistan by providing access huge open market and this can be extended to China as well using Pakistani highway.


If these countries get to consensus and join hands then all parts of Afghanistan including North and current Taliban areas, will have equal level of development.

But giving access to only one country out of all these three result in same tug-of-war
 
.
Dont try to be saint man. India is a non-entity in Afghan issue. You guys are trying to get in by hook or by crook for purely your interests which are not threatened directly as you dont have any border with Afghanistan.

On the other hand its interests of Afghanistan and its people besides all its bordering countries including Iran, Russia, Pakistan, to join hands.

This will lead to three-prong trade for Afghanistan by providing access huge open market and this can be extended to China as well using Pakistani highway.


If these countries get to consensus and join hands then all parts of Afghanistan including North and current Taliban areas, will have equal level of development.

But giving access to only one country out of all these three result in same tug-of-war

Jana, look at the map of Afghan again. Russia is nowhere near Afghan. Rather it is China, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Kryghistan that are direct neighbors.

Did you forget there's a large minority that is of Chinese descent who are "native" to Afghan?
;)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom