What's new

Afghan Army Chief’s Statement on Durand Line

relativiti

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 13, 2011
Messages
396
Reaction score
0
Recently I was watching a TOLO TV talk show hosted by Dawood Sultanzoy. He was interviewing the Chief of Armed Forces General Shir Ahmad Kairimi about the capability of Afghan security forces and the transition of security from international troops to Afghans. During the questions, Sultanzoy asked General Karimi about the rocket firings from Pakistan into Afghanistan which made hot headlines in recent weeks when Chief of Border Police in Eastern provinces resigned asking President Karzai to allow him to strike back on Pakistani security forces in response to the rocket attacks.

General Karimi gave a shocking explanation, saying Afghanistan's border is the Indus River in Pakistan. I am quoting General Karimi's all words. He said, "Durand Line agreement was for hundred years, it's over now and Afghanistan has the right to claim its territory in Pakistan.

Durand Line agreement signed in 1893 for hundred years was imposed by the imperialist power of the time. It was a political game by the imperial power in the region, and divided our borders, and we lost our territory. Our border is known, it's the Indus River. Even Chatral was part of Afghanistan, we have documents to prove, the ruler of Chatral was appointed by Afghanistan. Pakistan and its military know that we don't recognize the Durand Line.

Since 60 years, we have been claiming it. The last time it was martyred Sardar Dawood, former President of Afghanistan, who claimed our Pashtunistan land officially. Pakistan after 66 years of its birth has now claimed some changes in the Durand Line saying that the real line was some kilometers inside Afghanistan. ISAF (International Security Assistance Forces) have drawn their claim on map, it's with me. It's a political game by Pakistan to persuade the international community to come and see.


Both lines that they claim will be in favor of Pakistan, asking us to sign. Pakistan is trying to make us recognize the Durand Line that way. The purpose of the recent rocket attacks is to provoke us for a reaction. President Karzai announced that we won't attack Pakistan. Because if we attack on the other side of the Line [Durand], it's our own territory, we will attack our own brothers. We won't react and undermine our future with their provocation, but I want to make it clear for the international community that our border is not the Durand Line, it's the Indus River. We will even not talk on Durand Line, when you call us to come and resolve the issue of some kilometers on that line".

That was the summary of what the Chief of Afghanistan's Armed Forces said. The issue of Durand Line is an unspoken root cause of disputes between the states of Afghanistan and Pakistan for the past several decades. It reached peak during the rule of President Dawood, when the slogan of Pashtunistan and claims beyond Durand Line were the official mantra of the time. Both Islamabad and Kabul started proxy campaigns when President Dawood allowed the mass migration of Baloch separatists in Kabul who were fighting in the mountains of Balochistan against Pakistan Army.

In response, Islamabad for brief period raised the slogan of independent Hazarajat through some circles in central Afghanistan. A media war through Radio Kabul and Radio Pakistan became the channel of that proxy campaign. The Islamic fundamentalists who were fighting against President Dawood were supported by the then Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. President Dawood made new claims extending the supposed Pashtunistan territory in parts of Balochistan province.

Most successive Afghan Governments have been taking up the issue of legitimacy of Durand Line not accepting it as international border. But strange is that, the state never officially condemns the brutal dictator of the time Abdul Rahman Khan who signed the Durand Line Agreement in 1893. It's a bogus stand to keep mum on the deeds of this tyrant ruler, but denounce his agreement.
Previous Afghan Governments have questioned the legitimacy of Durand Line. In 1949, the Afghan parliament cancelled all previous treaties with Britain, including the Durand Line Agreement. But strangely, following governments kept requesting the British Government to intervene in the cold war between Afghanistan and Pakistan in that era.

The Afghan governments in the period from 1949 to 1973 have all failed to persuade the international community and forums to intervene on the issue of Pashtunistan. The international community considers the Durand Line as the international border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Even if the current crippled Government which cannot control our present territory and extend the write of Government, succeeds in bringing the issue of Durand Line on international level, it will be almost impossible to prove the stance our previous governments have been taking. When we cannot control the current territory and masses don't trust our security forces to maintain their security, the Army Chief talks about a non-existent dispute which should have been resolved long ago.

The statement of General Karimi has come in the context of recent Pakistani attempts to make the Afghan state recognize the border officially. But our Army Chief makes claim all across the Sindh river. Its good he didn't go too far across Indus inside India and claim the territory invaded by Ahmad Shah Abdali or even back in the era of Mehmood Ghaznavi.

We are going to get to nowhere with such foolhardiness. The Durand Line dispute has been a game of interest between rulers in Kabul and Islamabad. I conclude this piece with words of Daily Outlook's former executive editor Musa Khan Jalalzai, "The people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa across the Durand Line are not willing to join Afghanistan.

Pakistan and Afghanistan must not allow the Durand Line to become a flashpoint. Most of the Asian frontiers have not been demarcated by Asians themselves, but by colonial powers, therefore nobody can insist on the inviolability of any frontier, including the Durand Line. The Great Game and military confrontations between Russia and Great Britain caused the fixing of the Durand Line, which brought the Khyber Pass and Quetta under British-Indian control".

Army Chief?s Statement on Durand Line | The Daily Outlook Afghanistan
 
. .
This is the reason for all the terrorism in the region. Afghanistan does not respect the international border, & is the reason for all this mess. And the sad thing is, the Afghanis & Afghanistan is the one that is going to suffer the most because of the Afghan establishment's stupidity.
 
. . . .
ofcourse they have since its against Pakistan. Btw Pakistan should have much more area than they got in 1947. We should get it back too i guess.

They have Valid Point since they are talking about agreement of 100 years ( aka Hong Kong ) which has expired.

Pakistan was made for all the muslims of the Indian Subcontinent..but as muslims decided to stay in India, Pkaistan shoudl cease to exist....and even if they exist, they should be no bigger than Nepal.
 
.
This is nothing new that the General has said.

Even the Taliban does not recognise the Durand Line.

Terrorist sanctuaries - Asad Munir - Cached
8 Jul 2011 – The Taliban should need not to be seen as a hedge against Afghanistan. ... They do not recognise the Durand Line Treaty signed by Amir Abdul ...
 
.
whats the point in making such claims ? they wont get it anyways even if their logic has any weight....they are not in a position to take it back
 
. .
well -- now the audience will know why we are forced to ''consider'' a certain ''calculus'' when dealing with the increasingly troublesome Afghanistan.

If I could give him one piece of advice, it would be to cool down his posture and be careful about how he speaks in public. This is the Chief of an Army that has, over the years, seen a LOT of defectors --some turning against their own despite the oath they swore (if they did swear an oath in the first place, that is)

a force whose men have often sold weapons to the taleban they CLAIM (or otherwise fail miserably) to be fighting.


Just a thought :)



Pakistan can only do so much. Time and time again we've heard similar jingoistic, laugh-worthy language from certain people in Afghanistan --some representing official positions.



many of those men are in their graves tossing and turning because of the wrong decisions they made........several examples could be cited.
 
.
So Afghanistan wants Pakistani land ? wouldn't that start a war ? can't wait to see a nuke get dropped on Kabul.
 
.
They have Valid Point since they are talking about agreement of 100 years ( aka Hong Kong ) which has expired.

Pakistan was made for all the muslims of the Indian Subcontinent..but as muslims decided to stay in India, Pkaistan shoudl cease to exist....and even if they exist, they should be no bigger than Nepal.

Incorrect assessment.
Pakistan was envisioned as a country where Muslims of Subcontinent can live and practice their religion without any chance of Hindu domination.

PS: A person is either a Muslim or an Indian. What are you talking about ?
 
.
Afghanistan is a failed state when we leave we should partition it to a Pashtun state Tajik state Hazara state Uzbek state, after that if they keep fighting let them kill each other off.

afghanistan-ethnic-map.jpg
 
.
Afghanistan is a failed state when we leave we should partition it to a Pashtun state Tajik state Hazara state Uzbek state, after that if they keep fighting let them kill each other off.

What if they all stick together ..... ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom