What's new

A Theory on Why Dhaka Has the Best Spot on Earth for a City.

Homo Sapiens

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,641
Reaction score
-1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
https://www.citylab.com/design/2017...has-the-best-spot-on-earth-for-a-city/519219/
A Theory on Why Dhaka Has the Best Spot on Earth for a City
Geographically speaking, the Bangladeshi city has all the right criteria to be the "central point of human civilization."

Linda Poon, 2017/03/10,3:01 PM ET
lead_large.jpg

A vendor sells vegetables at Kawran Bazar in Dhaka, Bangladesh. (Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters)


Politics and history aside, the single best place on Earth to build a city may be right where Dhaka, Bangladesh, sits. At least, that’s the conclusion that Wendover Productions, makers of snazzy explainer videos on things like failing trains and European density, comes to during its dive into the theories that explain why cities are located where they are today.

To understand what makes Dhaka—or rather, its location—so precious for cities, the video takes us to a 1930s theory by the German geographer Walter Christaller. Called the central place theory, it argues that cities and towns serve primarily to provide goods and services to surrounding areas. The more specialized goods a settlement has, the larger its sphere of influence. That’s what helps cities, which tend to have advanced hospitals and airports, for example, serve more people farther away. The idea is that people are willing to travel to use those services.

But Christaller’s theory is just that. It doesn’t account for variation in economics, social influences, and, more importantly, the topography of Earth. Mountains may form barriers to development for some cities, while providing a wealth of mineral resources for others. If cities are meant to provide goods and services, then access to resources is a must. Similarly, the video notes that 14 of the 15 largest cities developed near oceans and rivers; access to water is valuable for both trade and transport.

Lastly, it’s perhaps no coincidence that prosperous cities tend be in Europe and Asia. That region is also where the four largest empires persisted, and as far as one theory goes (and there are many), those emperors and kings can thank their lucky stars for the wide shape of those continents. Since emerging civilization, in the video’s explanation, depended on the domestication of plants and animals, it was easier to expand horizontally, where climate stayed pretty constant, than vertically.

That all brings us back to Dhaka, which sits in South Central Asia. It’s in the sweet spot that is Eurasia, with plenty of space to both its right and left for expansion. Does it have the mineral-rich mountains, waterways, and other resources it needs to prosper? Check, check, and check. Bangladesh’s hills and mountains are rich with minerals, biodiversity, and other forest resources. The city itself sits near several rivers, including the enormous Ganges-Brahmaputra delta, which benefits Bangladesh’s agricultural economy.

It’s worth noting, however, that this conclusion is strictly a geographical one. Between air pollution, poverty, Dhaka has its fair share of problems that currently make it one of the least livable cities in the world. But had history played out differently, Dhaka could have been, as the video puts it, the "central point of human civilization."
 
Last edited:
.
Wendover productions. One of the finest factual channel on YouTube!

And according to the video... of we had new world order... Dhaka would be the capital of the unified world!!! So if someone was to unify the world... he would have to start from there... mind blowing facts
 
.
Wendover productions. One of the finest factual channel on YouTube!

And according to the video... of we had new world order... Dhaka would be the capital of the unified world!!! So if someone was to unify the world... he would have to start from there... mind blowing facts

Its typical reverse-psychology. Pick the worst dump you can think of and project it as a potential new york city.....if only things went to "plan". The shock value dissonance is bread and butter for their message....which ultimately thinks a communist one world govt "utopia" is somehow the natural state of humanity (against all evidence to the contrary).

Some other leftist-globalist channel was doing the same for lagos in another hypothetical scenario.

You need like back log of 100's, even 1000's of years of things occuring way differently to even have a chance...in BD case it would most definitely require not being invaded and converted from buddhism-hinduism for starters....so it could be inherently integrated with what surrounds it today at even a minimum level (it really wouldn't be BD current boundary/political existence at all)

Then you needed full local political control when Bengali enlightenment/renaissance started....which needed all (or at least large part) of subcontinent to be under a local, unified, indigenous empire (that could have resisted all foreign invasions to prevent the higher degree of cultural and domestic political fracturing that took place on the base that was developed over millenia).

All of what happened in history have massive multiplier effects (on even such things as average population IQ - which is essential for genuine civilisation + wealth + industrial development) past any "natural" projections using hypothetical dreamworld of globalists.
 
.
https://www.citylab.com/design/2017...has-the-best-spot-on-earth-for-a-city/519219/
A Theory on Why Dhaka Has the Best Spot on Earth for a City
Geographically speaking, the Bangladeshi city has all the right criteria to be the "central point of human civilization."

Linda Poon, 2017/03/10,3:01 PM ET
lead_large.jpg

A vendor sells vegetables at Kawran Bazar in Dhaka, Bangladesh. (Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters)


Politics and history aside, the single best place on Earth to build a city may be right where Dhaka, Bangladesh, sits. At least, that’s the conclusion that Wendover Productions, makers of snazzy explainer videos on things like failing trains and European density, comes to during its dive into the theories that explain why cities are located where they are today.

To understand what makes Dhaka—or rather, its location—so precious for cities, the video takes us to a 1930s theory by the German geographer Walter Christaller. Called the central place theory, it argues that cities and towns serve primarily to provide goods and services to surrounding areas. The more specialized goods a settlement has, the larger its sphere of influence. That’s what helps cities, which tend to have advanced hospitals and airports, for example, serve more people farther away. The idea is that people are willing to travel to use those services.

But Christaller’s theory is just that. It doesn’t account for variation in economics, social influences, and, more importantly, the topography of Earth. Mountains may form barriers to development for some cities, while providing a wealth of mineral resources for others. If cities are meant to provide goods and services, then access to resources is a must. Similarly, the video notes that 14 of the 15 largest cities developed near oceans and rivers; access to water is valuable for both trade and transport.

Lastly, it’s perhaps no coincidence that prosperous cities tend be in Europe and Asia. That region is also where the four largest empires persisted, and as far as one theory goes (and there are many), those emperors and kings can thank their lucky stars for the wide shape of those continents. Since emerging civilization, in the video’s explanation, depended on the domestication of plants and animals, it was easier to expand horizontally, where climate stayed pretty constant, than vertically.

That all brings us back to Dhaka, which sits in South Central Asia. It’s in the sweet spot that is Eurasia, with plenty of space to both its right and left for expansion. Does it have the mineral-rich mountains, waterways, and other resources it needs to prosper? Check, check, and check. Bangladesh’s hills and mountains are rich with minerals, biodiversity, and other forest resources. The city itself sits near several rivers, including the enormous Ganges-Brahmaputra delta, which benefits Bangladesh’s agricultural economy.

It’s worth noting, however, that this conclusion is strictly a geographical one. Between air pollution, poverty, Dhaka has its fair share of problems that currently make it one of the least livable cities in the world. But had history played out differently, Dhaka could have been, as the video puts it, the "central point of human civilization."

Dhaka's reasoning starts at 12:45......

Ignore the trolls presenting pointless arguments.....
 
.
Its typical reverse-psychology. Pick the worst dump you can think of and project it as a potential new york city.....if only things went to "plan". The shock value dissonance is bread and butter for their message....which ultimately thinks a communist one world govt "utopia" is somehow the natural state of humanity (against all evidence to the contrary).

Some other leftist-globalist channel was doing the same for lagos in another hypothetical scenario.

You need like back log of 100's, even 1000's of years of things occuring way differently to even have a chance...in BD case it would most definitely require not being invaded and converted from buddhism-hinduism for starters....so it could be inherently integrated with what surrounds it today at even a minimum level (it really wouldn't be BD current boundary/political existence at all)

Then you needed full local political control when Bengali enlightenment/renaissance started....which needed all (or at least large part) of subcontinent to be under a local, unified, indigenous empire (that could have resisted all foreign invasions to prevent the higher degree of cultural and domestic political fracturing that took place on the base that was developed over millenia).

All of what happened in history have massive multiplier effects (on even such things as average population IQ - which is essential for genuine civilisation + wealth + industrial development) past any "natural" projections using hypothetical dreamworld of globalists.
wasn't indus valley civilisation the first on earth? and weren't they formed on the region talked about in the video?
 
. .
wasn't indus valley civilisation the first on earth? and weren't they formed on the region talked about in the video?

Depends how you qualify civilisation.

The sumerians and egyptians may have been earlier than the Indus depending on what you define.

These are all after all the major rivers that human migration out of Africa came across (Nile, fertile crescent and Indus) that had enough seasonal change present (and thus more basic aptitude requirement compared to say congo or niger river areas) so its no surprise these 3 were the earliest major civilisations.

I'd say they are all roughly created around the same time once humans developed a threshold of sustained farming (which needed seasonal aptitude and basic logic development) in seasonal climates so that buffers could be developed for what constitute "civilisation" beyond just growing food.

There is nothing especially "super" about the south asian region in civilisational forming compared to similar regions of the world.....just by coincidence it was earlier in the path of original human migration along with the other 2 mentioned.
 
.
Depends how you qualify civilisation.

The sumerians and egyptians may have been earlier than the Indus depending on what you define.

These are all after all the major rivers that human migration out of Africa came across (Nile, fertile crescent and Indus) that had enough seasonal change present (and thus more basic aptitude requirement compared to say congo or niger river areas) so its no surprise these 3 were the earliest major civilisations.

I'd say they are all roughly created around the same time once humans developed a threshold of sustained farming (which needed seasonal aptitude and basic logic development) in seasonal climates so that buffers could be developed for what constitute "civilisation" beyond just growing food.

There is nothing especially "super" about the south asian region in civilisational forming compared to similar regions of the world.....just by coincidence it was earlier in the path of original human migration along with the other 2 mentioned.
all on point.
didn't say there was anything "super" about it
 
. .
https://www.citylab.com/design/2017...has-the-best-spot-on-earth-for-a-city/519219/
A Theory on Why Dhaka Has the Best Spot on Earth for a City
Geographically speaking, the Bangladeshi city has all the right criteria to be the "central point of human civilization."

Linda Poon, 2017/03/10,3:01 PM ET
lead_large.jpg

A vendor sells vegetables at Kawran Bazar in Dhaka, Bangladesh. (Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters)


Politics and history aside, the single best place on Earth to build a city may be right where Dhaka, Bangladesh, sits. At least, that’s the conclusion that Wendover Productions, makers of snazzy explainer videos on things like failing trains and European density, comes to during its dive into the theories that explain why cities are located where they are today.

To understand what makes Dhaka—or rather, its location—so precious for cities, the video takes us to a 1930s theory by the German geographer Walter Christaller. Called the central place theory, it argues that cities and towns serve primarily to provide goods and services to surrounding areas. The more specialized goods a settlement has, the larger its sphere of influence. That’s what helps cities, which tend to have advanced hospitals and airports, for example, serve more people farther away. The idea is that people are willing to travel to use those services.

But Christaller’s theory is just that. It doesn’t account for variation in economics, social influences, and, more importantly, the topography of Earth. Mountains may form barriers to development for some cities, while providing a wealth of mineral resources for others. If cities are meant to provide goods and services, then access to resources is a must. Similarly, the video notes that 14 of the 15 largest cities developed near oceans and rivers; access to water is valuable for both trade and transport.

Lastly, it’s perhaps no coincidence that prosperous cities tend be in Europe and Asia. That region is also where the four largest empires persisted, and as far as one theory goes (and there are many), those emperors and kings can thank their lucky stars for the wide shape of those continents. Since emerging civilization, in the video’s explanation, depended on the domestication of plants and animals, it was easier to expand horizontally, where climate stayed pretty constant, than vertically.

That all brings us back to Dhaka, which sits in South Central Asia. It’s in the sweet spot that is Eurasia, with plenty of space to both its right and left for expansion. Does it have the mineral-rich mountains, waterways, and other resources it needs to prosper? Check, check, and check. Bangladesh’s hills and mountains are rich with minerals, biodiversity, and other forest resources. The city itself sits near several rivers, including the enormous Ganges-Brahmaputra delta, which benefits Bangladesh’s agricultural economy.

It’s worth noting, however, that this conclusion is strictly a geographical one. Between air pollution, poverty, Dhaka has its fair share of problems that currently make it one of the least livable cities in the world. But had history played out differently, Dhaka could have been, as the video puts it, the "central point of human civilization."

The most successful city of last 100 years is Karachi and no other city come close to that. In hundred year this city start from none to become one of the biggest city in the world
220px-Karachi_population.svg.png
 
. . .
The huge population density itself proves that Bangladesh is the best place created by the nature to live on Earth.

But we are too lazy to preserve the gifts of nature.
 
. .
https://www.citylab.com/design/2017...has-the-best-spot-on-earth-for-a-city/519219/
A Theory on Why Dhaka Has the Best Spot on Earth for a City
Geographically speaking, the Bangladeshi city has all the right criteria to be the "central point of human civilization."

Linda Poon, 2017/03/10,3:01 PM ET
lead_large.jpg

A vendor sells vegetables at Kawran Bazar in Dhaka, Bangladesh. (Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters)


Politics and history aside, the single best place on Earth to build a city may be right where Dhaka, Bangladesh, sits. At least, that’s the conclusion that Wendover Productions, makers of snazzy explainer videos on things like failing trains and European density, comes to during its dive into the theories that explain why cities are located where they are today.

To understand what makes Dhaka—or rather, its location—so precious for cities, the video takes us to a 1930s theory by the German geographer Walter Christaller. Called the central place theory, it argues that cities and towns serve primarily to provide goods and services to surrounding areas. The more specialized goods a settlement has, the larger its sphere of influence. That’s what helps cities, which tend to have advanced hospitals and airports, for example, serve more people farther away. The idea is that people are willing to travel to use those services.

But Christaller’s theory is just that. It doesn’t account for variation in economics, social influences, and, more importantly, the topography of Earth. Mountains may form barriers to development for some cities, while providing a wealth of mineral resources for others. If cities are meant to provide goods and services, then access to resources is a must. Similarly, the video notes that 14 of the 15 largest cities developed near oceans and rivers; access to water is valuable for both trade and transport.

Lastly, it’s perhaps no coincidence that prosperous cities tend be in Europe and Asia. That region is also where the four largest empires persisted, and as far as one theory goes (and there are many), those emperors and kings can thank their lucky stars for the wide shape of those continents. Since emerging civilization, in the video’s explanation, depended on the domestication of plants and animals, it was easier to expand horizontally, where climate stayed pretty constant, than vertically.

That all brings us back to Dhaka, which sits in South Central Asia. It’s in the sweet spot that is Eurasia, with plenty of space to both its right and left for expansion. Does it have the mineral-rich mountains, waterways, and other resources it needs to prosper? Check, check, and check. Bangladesh’s hills and mountains are rich with minerals, biodiversity, and other forest resources. The city itself sits near several rivers, including the enormous Ganges-Brahmaputra delta, which benefits Bangladesh’s agricultural economy.

It’s worth noting, however, that this conclusion is strictly a geographical one. Between air pollution, poverty, Dhaka has its fair share of problems that currently make it one of the least livable cities in the world. But had history played out differently, Dhaka could have been, as the video puts it, the "central point of human civilization."

Dhaka has the best location for a city but somehow it ended up being the second most unlivable city in the world. Do you realise what it says about those who have been running the show? Most sycophants don't.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom