What's new

A Taiwan Crisis May Mark the End of the American Empire

What do you think would happen to the world economy when a chipmaker like Taiwan's TSMC just goes offline because their workers are busy dealing with a full scale war? No more (reliable) chips for western cars, computers, laptops, phones, *refrigerators* and many other household appliances. Our populations would be forced to support Taiwanese freedom from "governance" by Beijing. We've seen how the Chinese do that with Tibet, Hong Kong, and Xinjiang.

SO JUST LOSING TAIWANESE INDUSTRIAL OUTPUT ALONE, WOULD CALL IN FORCES THAT THANKFULLY CURRENTLY STILL REMAIN HIDDEN. UNLIKE YOU, WE DON'T BOAST ABOUT OUR MILITARY'S PROWESS. WE PRAY WE DON'T HAVE TO FACE THE DAY WHERE WE PROVE OUR SUPERIORITY IN TERMS OF STRENGTH AND STAMINA, BUT WE'RE ALWAYS MAKING SURE WE'RE READY FOR THAT DAY.
(in all caps because i want this to stand out in this otherwise somewhat clumsy thread - clumsy from the side of Beijing supporters like yourself)

However, and i'm very grateful for this, these hidden forces *are* conveyed to each other during diplomatic confrontations.

Whatever Taiwan can make so can China. Actually, China has more powerful industrial base than Taiwan by a far stretch.
 
. .
I'll do something even better , get you banned on defencepk and make sure you don't spread nonsense on here


No the whole world knows it'll be bad , on people like you think it'll be good so shove it

So what? Don't pretend to represent the world.
 
.
ROTFFLMFAO
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I thought you said




LIES AS WITH ALL THE OTHER LIES YOU SPOUTING ABOUT HERE

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

i hadn't said that bit about TSMC yet, dude.
and *you're* the ones that keep provocating.
Whatever Taiwan can make so can China. Actually, China has more powerful industrial base than Taiwan by a far stretch.
So let me get this right.. We're supposed to stand aside while you take over by force a free people?
And then we're supposed to buy from you, the aggressor?

don't make me laugh.
 
.
i hadn't said that bit about TSMC yet, dude.
and *you're* the ones that keep provocating.

So let me get this right.. We're supposed to stand aside while you take over by force a free people?
And then we're supposed to buy from you, the aggressor?

don't make me laugh.


ROTFFLMFAO
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I thought you said


PeaceGen said:
i've said all that i wanted to say in this thread.
and find it no point to start repeating myself.
LIES AS WITH ALL THE OTHER LIES YOU SPOUTING ABOUT HERE

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
 
. .
Why is that silly Dutch man meddling with Chinese internal affairs? Maybe he thinks the Dutch has the right to intervene. Someone remind him how we Chinese slaughtered those Dutch in 1662. Good job by our patriot Koxinga
 
. . . .
You really do know nothing at all about modern warfare do you?
Lemme put it this way : if a foreign nuke detonates anywhere in the US and the perpetrator is found, they will suffer nuclear retaliation on a massive scale. The fact that this sends in all the nukes from the opposing side, makes no never mind in that case. It's called Mutually Assured Destruction. The MAD principle of modern warfare. And exactly that will prevent countries from *starting* a nuclear war.
The problem is US will probably be the one tempted to use nuke on China first. China DF-21D most likely will over whelm US air defense and sink a USN CVN with 5000 american sailor onboard all killed.

You must remember China is a nuclear power with un intercept DF-41 MIRV ICBM that can ensure destruction of USA if they attempt to use nuke on China.

China demonstrated H-bomb with 3300times the explosion in hiroshima

Thr world most advance road mobile ICBM with highest payload and longest range which can reach USA mainland in 30mins, Hawaii even in 18mins once launched from China.

Let me ask you, what will US do if we sink a USN carrier if they involved in Taiwan strait crisis?

 
.
The problem is US will probably be the one tempted to use nuke on China first. China DF-21D most likely will over whelm US air defense and sink a USN CVN with 5000 american sailor onboard all killed.

You must remember China is a nuclear power with un intercept DF-41 MIRV ICBM that can ensure destruction of USA if they attempt to use nuke on China.

China demonstrated H-bomb with 3300times the explosion in hiroshima

Thr world most advance road mobile ICBM with highest payload and longest range which can reach USA mainland in 30mins, Hawaii even in 18mins once launched from China.

Let me ask you, what will US do if we sink a USN carrier if they involved in Taiwan strait crisis?



Murican sailors then don't go flying like Armenians?
How then to munch on my popcorn and chips and dips then to that show?

But I guess those 5000 sailors will remain eternally young

:D :D:D

:dance3: :dance3::dance3:

Get your popcorn chips and dips and drinks ready



tenor.gif



tenor.gif



sixoverone-a-six-pack-bottle-opener-3699.gif



EmptyJealousFeline-size_restricted.gif
 
.
Not only an Internet crow

A crow that tell lies after lies



ROTFFLMFAO
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I thought you said



LIES AS WITH ALL THE OTHER LIES YOU SPOUTING ABOUT HERE

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
where have i lied, and how?!
The problem is US will probably be the one tempted to use nuke on China first. China DF-21D most likely will over whelm US air defense and sink a USN CVN with 5000 american sailor onboard all killed.

You must remember China is a nuclear power with un intercept DF-41 MIRV ICBM that can ensure destruction of USA if they attempt to use nuke on China.

China demonstrated H-bomb with 3300times the explosion in hiroshima

Thr world most advance road mobile ICBM with highest payload and longest range which can reach USA mainland in 30mins, Hawaii even in 18mins once launched from China.

Let me ask you, what will US do if we sink a USN carrier if they involved in Taiwan strait crisis?

When i read up on the nuclear first use policies on wikipedia, i read that China has as recently as 2011 re-confirmed that they have a no-first-use policy.

The US however, does not. Not in the case of a conventional attack on their homeland, OR on their allies.

So i recommend against sinking a US carrier that is involved in the defense of Taiwain.
Murican sailors then don't go flying like Armenians?
How then to munch on my popcorn and chips and dips then to that show?

But I guess those 5000 sailors will remain eternally young

:D :D:D

:dance3: :dance3::dance3:

Get your popcorn chips and dips and drinks ready



tenor.gif



tenor.gif



sixoverone-a-six-pack-bottle-opener-3699.gif



EmptyJealousFeline-size_restricted.gif
war should not be talked about so disrespectfully.
 
.
where have i lied, and how?!



ROTFFLMFAO
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


I thought you said


PeaceGen said:
i've said all that i wanted to say in this thread.
and find it no point to start repeating myself.
LIES AS WITH ALL THE OTHER LIES YOU SPOUTING ABOUT HERE

:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:




The US however, does not. Not in the case of a conventional attack on their homeland, OR on their allies.

So i recommend against sinking a US carrier that is involved in the defense of Taiwain.

war should not be talked about so disrespectfully.

Those that do not show respect and demand to go doing phony FONOPs dont deserve any respect
shown to them either

Since their bodies will be at bottom of ocean and not retrieved, no need for extra Arlingtons
A wall to engrave their names will do

Like in the time Muricans got their butts kicked real hard




main-qimg-61197b6c6028beee7f3fd7585fc4b176







1605082379126.png







main-qimg-11003006604f74849f854de55330e016
 
.
i hadn't said that bit about TSMC yet, dude.
and *you're* the ones that keep provocating.

So let me get this right.. We're supposed to stand aside while you take over by force a free people?
And then we're supposed to buy from you, the aggressor?

don't make me laugh.
China just want its STOLEN ISLAND back.
Those "free people" are FREE to go stay at your SINKING PLACE.

Is anybody pointing a gun to your head to make you buy anything now?
You buying stuff due to CHARITY?
.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom