What's new

A protest Pakistan wants to hide from the world

They deserve their freedom. These types of discrimination and abuse won't go unnoticed for long. Hope these persecuted people will succeed in what they r trying to achieve here.

For your trolling I can say,

Abongli supa pawa along with bharti and bhutani supa pawa can try if they are birth of 1 single man.
 
.
DyzPRhiXgAAMiF1.jpg
 
.

This Afghan whore Ghani has been put in his rightful place. Totally bypassed during the talks LOL

The Taliban have made life a living hell for this Ghani swine. His Afghani brothers and sisters are languishing in Pakistan. What kind of a leader would let his people languish in another country he accuses of so much ? Ghani would. He begs the Taliban to listen to him. He pleads on his knees. The Taliban show a big middle finger to this slave. Very very enjoyable.

Time has come to throw these Afghan scum out of Pakistan. Let's see how the BBC, CNN and other mouthpieces can safe the Afghans. Let's play a little game with Ghani and his minions. It is called: "Throw the Afghans out of Pakistan". Time has come to pile up the pressure.
 
Last edited:
.
'Gross interference': FM Qureshi rejects Afghan president's statement on protests in KP, Balochista
Dawn.comUpdated February 07, 2019
Facebook Count7
Twitter Share
79
5c5c0ee7e8642.jpg




Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Wednesday rejected a tweet shared by Afghan President Ashraf Ghani earlier in the day. — File photo

Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Wednesday rejected a tweet shared by Afghan President Ashraf Ghani earlier in the day, regarding alleged violence against protesters in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and Balochistan provinces, and called the "irresponsible" statement a "gross interference".

Taking to Twitter, Qureshi said: "We reject the tweet by President Ashraf Ghani. Such irresponsible statements are only gross interference. Afghan leadership needs to focus on long-standing serious grievances of the Afghan people."


Shah Mahmood Qureshi

✔@SMQureshiPTI

https://twitter.com/SMQureshiPTI/status/1093434832569417728

We reject the tweet by President Ashraf Ghani. Such irresponsible statements are only gross interference. Afghan leadership needs to focus on long-standing serious grievances of the Afghan people.


6,394

2:02 AM - Feb 7, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

2,477 people are talking about this





The tweet came hours after the president of neighbouring Afghanistan said that the Afghan government had "serious concerns about the violence perpetrated against peaceful protesters and civil activists" in the two provinces.


Ashraf Ghani

✔@ashrafghani

· 8h

The Afghan government has serious concerns about the violence perpetrated against peaceful protestors and civil activists in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.


Ashraf Ghani

✔@ashrafghani


We believe it is the moral responsibility of every government to support civil activities that take a stand against the terrorism and extremism that plagues and threatens our region and collective security. Otherwise there could be long-standing negative consequences.


2,242

8:51 PM - Feb 6, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

1,225 people are talking about this





In a subsequent tweet, Ghani added: "We believe it is the moral responsibility of every government to support civil activities that take a stand against the terrorism and extremism that plagues and threatens our region and collective security. Otherwise there could be long-standing negative consequences."

Afghan president appeared to be referring to a sit-in of the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement (PTM) in Loralai on Saturday during which PTM leader Arman Loni died.

A shutter-down strike in Quetta was observed on Monday following Loni's death, which the PTM alleged was a killing.

Later on Tuesday, during a protest outside the Islamabad Press Club called over Loni's death, rights activist Gulalai Ismail and 17 others associated with the PTM were detained by the capital police. Ismail was released Wednesday night.

PTM is a rights-based alliance that, besides calling for the de-mining of the former tribal areas and greater freedom of movement in the latter, has insisted on an end to the practices of extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and unlawful detentions, and for their practitioners to be held to account within a truth and reconciliation framework.
 
.
bbc should be sued btw for spreading lies that Loni was killed by the police. they should prove what they claim or else pay up.
 
.
Wow.. Thats interesting. Coming from a head of neighboring state.
Indicative of the malaise that Afghanistan, especially its political leadership, is steeped in - a malaise that has infected and continues to damage the Afghanistan-Pakistan relationship. Interfering in the internal affairs of Pakistan is not going to repair the trust deficit and elicit cooperation.

Patriots better find a better, much better response to "da sanga azadi da"
We already have, which is why the PTM remains a marginal movement despite it's lofty claims. The response is development and integration of FATA. Note that the PTM was largely silent on the mainstreaming of FATA, though it should have been celebrating the move and supporting the government and military for pushing it through. For a movement that claims to want to extend the rule of law to all parts of Pakistan and all Pakistanis, such a major change (integrating and mainstreaming FATA) almost seemed to disappoint them.

Note also that Pashtun's continue to be successfully integrated into Pakistan's military, bureaucracy and government. They reside in large numbers in every single province of Pakistan. PTM simply does not have the numbers or conditions to develop into a major threat to the 'patriots' as you put it.
 
Last edited:
.
They deserve their freedom. These types of discrimination and abuse won't go unnoticed for long. Hope these persecuted people will succeed in what they r trying to achieve here.


As A Pashtun Let Me Assure You We Are Free You Would Do Well To Liberate Your Country From India

Patriots better find a better, much better response to "da sanga azadi da".


We Have, We Call It

"Daa tor makh de wrak sha"

Get Your Loyal Poodle Pashteen To Translate It
 
Last edited:
.
As A Pashtun Let Me Assure You We Are Free You Would Do Well To Liberate Your Country From India




We Have, We Call It

"Daa tor makh de wrak sha"
As A Pashtun Let Me Assure You We Are Free You Would Do Well To Liberate Your Country From India




We Have, We Call It

"Daa tor makh de wrak sha"
Many Indian's and Afghan's tend to jump around from one issue to the next in their fantasies of 'Pakistan breaking up'. If there's a minor protest by Sindhi nationalists they're jumping up and down claiming Sindhi's are being presecuted and Pakistan will break up.

They've been dreaming about Balochistan breaking up Pakistan for decades, and now the PTM is yet another propaganda tool for them to fantasize about Pakistan breaking up.
 
.
Many Indian's and Afghan's tend to jump around from one issue to the next in their fantasies of 'Pakistan breaking up'. If there's a minor protest by Sindhi nationalists they're jumping up and down claiming Sindhi's are being presecuted and Pakistan will break up.

They've been dreaming about Balochistan breaking up Pakistan for decades, and now the PTM is yet another propaganda tool for them to fantasize about Pakistan breaking up.


Trust Me Establishment Doesn't Need To Do Anything Pashtuns Themselves Are Enough To Handle This Rent A Crowd
 
.
Many Indian's and Afghan's tend to jump around from one issue to the next in their fantasies of 'Pakistan breaking up'. If there's a minor protest by Sindhi nationalists they're jumping up and down claiming Sindhi's are being presecuted and Pakistan will break up.

They've been dreaming about Balochistan breaking up Pakistan for decades, and now the PTM is yet another propaganda tool for them to fantasize about Pakistan breaking up.

With the negotiations hinging on Pakistan's assurances that no attack on USA will be staged from the region again, the PTM ploy is a move by India to undermine that position by creating doubts on the USA side that Pakistan can deliver on its commitments being proposed.

International geopolitics at work, nothing new.
 
.
PTM will no longer ever be relevant. There go the dreams of ANP and their Indian handlers.

Come withdrawal, there will be no place left for them but Western countries
 
.
With the negotiations hinging on Pakistan's assurances that no attack on USA will be staged from the region again, the PTM ploy is a move by India to undermine that position by creating doubts on the USA side that Pakistan can deliver on its commitments being proposed.

International geopolitics at work, nothing new.
The PTM is old wine in a new bottle, the packaging makes it more interesting (young, charismatic Pashtun leader etc etc) that the West laps up to push it's own biased views about Pakistan. Politicians like Achakzai from the PKMAP have been around for decades sucking up to the Afghans and bashing Pakistan in the same manner as the PTM.

Don't you find it odd that the bigger story here isn't the remarkable improvement in domestic security, mainstreaming of FATA, a new government (led by a Pashtun) at least making the right noises about corruption, development etc?

Eastern India has been in turmoil for years, Kashmir continues to fester, yet they barely get the kind of coverage in the West that a minor group like the PTM gets.
 
.
The PTM is old wine in a new bottle, the packaging makes it more interesting (young, charismatic Pashtun leader etc etc) that the West laps up to push it's own biased views about Pakistan. Politicians like Achakzai from the PKMAP have been around for decades sucking up to the Afghans and bashing Pakistan in the same manner as the PTM.

Don't you find it odd that the bigger story here isn't the remarkable improvement in domestic security, mainstreaming of FATA, a new government (led by a Pashtun) at least making the right noises about corruption, development etc?

The PTM ploy is designed very carefully for its intended audience and effect at a critical juncture, no doubt. Pakistan needs to play its hand carefully in its responses, equally undoubtedly. I would tend to favor the Pakistani outcome as being more likely, but this is an uncertain game at present for many reasons.

PS: Still no luck on that unnotified unjustified thread ban?
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom