What's new

A murder in Bangalore: what a techie's crime tells about the Indian dr

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
A murder in Bangalore: what a techie's crime tells about the Indian dream
A murder in Bangalore: what a techie's crime tells about the Indian dream - Hindustan Times

Sometime on a cool Bangalore evening, in the quiet of a 13th-floor flat of a suburban residential tower built for hard-working, ambitious professionals, in the course of an argument with his wife Roopa, Madhusudhan YG flew into a murderous, psychotic rage, grabbed a kitchen knife and stabbed his wife 49 times.



The police found her and the three-bedroom flat — bought to mark Madhusudhan and Roopa’s sixth wedding anniversary — a bloody mess. After unsuccessfully trying to hang and burn himself, Madhusudhan jumped from a balcony to his death. Their shocked families, struggling to deal with the six-year-old they left behind, refused to comment.

Madhusudhan was an engineer, a techie in local parlance, one of about a million primarily responsible for making Bangalore a global brand name. Many come from modest backgrounds and small towns, vaulting from cram schools to be plugged in to a global 24/7/365 workplace of extreme pressures. The reward is a piece of the great Indian dream — to be able to buy a flat and a car by 30.

They aren’t classified as such, but here are some murders, involving male techies and wives, over the last three years:

After an argument, a 37-year-old strangled and chopped his wife into 72 pieces over two months. He hid her in a freezer, frequently spraying the house with perfume and telling his six-year-old twins their mother was away on work.

A 31-year-old stabbed his estranged wife, also an engineer, 11 times after she refused to jointly apply for a loan.

A 30-year-old suspected his wife, a banker, of an affair, so he smothered her and hung himself.

A 25-year-old raped and strangled his wife, an HR manager, because, a week after their marriage, she refused sex.

A 32-year-old believed his wife, a school teacher, was not being nice to his parents, so he strangled her and slit her throat

A married 31-year-old engineer-turned-yoga-instructor killed his Israeli lover and kept her body in a refrigerator for 18 days.

All the men were married (at least two after falling in love), worked in companies that techies aspire to (IBM, Infosys, Accenture and Siemens), and appeared to have had problems dealing with a working wife.

It is not my case that techies are somehow losing it. But these cases offer some evidence of the pressures in the lives of working techie couples. They represent a modern Indian ideal, but to get there they must navigate the sometimes extraordinary headwinds of tradition, gender roles and their own expectations. Almost everywhere, the basic issue is the inability to let the wife realise her potential.

“Usually, the woman gets the rougher end of the stick, both from family and company,” Swami Manohar, founder and managing director of Limberlink, a company attempting to re-engineer engineering education, tells me. Men, he says, tend to brood or be disturbed if wives earn more than them. In general, male techies tend to marry women with lower salaries and qualifications, happy to have the extra money but secure in the knowledge that she will stay home when a child is born.

Academic studies of the tech sector reveal how the bountiful employment it offers women is circumscribed by old gender roles. Nearly half of all IT employees recruited are now women, but by middle management that figure falls by half; in top management, no more than 8% are women, according to industry data. “It has not been possible for the women in the IT sector to challenge the structural inequalities and gender relations respectively at the workplace and at home,” says a 2012 study by the Indian Statistical Institute.

One reason that Madhusudhan, the man with the murderous rage, appeared to resent his wife, a police officer (requesting anonymity because the investigation is underway), tells me, was because she earned about twice as much as he did. There were, he says, frequent squabbles over the fact.

Some couples have transcended the old ways. Abhishek Prasad, 35, an engineer, MBA and manager with Oracle in Singapore, freely acknowledges that his wife, Nandini Jayram, 33, out-earns him. There are more like them, he says, confident of the other’s success and feeding off it. Jayram, a senior manager with Unilever in Bangalore, calls Prasad her “tennis parent”, someone who pushes her to do better. Nandini says progress is always about a choice that a woman has but does not make. That, as she notes, is because most men struggle with spousal success. “While I’ve come through, the general trend is that men are comfortable with self-assured women as classmates or colleagues, not as wives.”

Embarrassed and requesting his last name be withheld, an engineer I talk to tells me how disturbed he was after his wedding last year. Sreejesh says he has a “good job”, earning Rs. 30,000 a month. His wife, whom he says has worked two years to his five, has a bigger salary. That’s how the market works, I say. He responds: “But how can a man live like this? I have no choice because the market is so bad.”

If the global gloom continues, things will worsen, unless more men think differently. Shreelesh Kumar, 33, did. Although he was promised a promotion as team leader, Kumar, in June, quit his job at a BPO that did medical transcription. Business is dwindling in a sector badly hit by competition from countries like the Philippines and the movement of jobs back to the West. Kumar was on the bench, and he knew there would be no promotion. So, he’s now a wedding photographer, earning “much less” than Deepa, 31. She’s an analyst, checking for quality in subtitles her company pastes on films sent to them by global clients. He’s happy for her and comfortable with himself — but that’s now. “Earlier,” he says, “I would never admit to this.”
 
Ok...So? One out of a population of 1.2 billion, stabs another and it becomes breaking news for Hafizzzzzz? Jeeezzzz!

sleep-057.gif
 
This spells the end of evil yindoo India.
This murder is the end of India and all her dreams.

:laughcry:
EPIC BRAINFART - smells ... :pissed:
A murder in Bangalore: what a techie's crime tells about the Indian dream
A murder in Bangalore: what a techie's crime tells about the Indian dream - Hindustan Times

Sometime on a cool Bangalore evening, in the quiet of a 13th-floor flat of a suburban residential tower built for hard-working, ambitious professionals, in the course of an argument with his wife Roopa, Madhusudhan YG flew into a murderous, psychotic rage, grabbed a kitchen knife and stabbed his wife 49 times.



The police found her and the three-bedroom flat — bought to mark Madhusudhan and Roopa’s sixth wedding anniversary — a bloody mess. After unsuccessfully trying to hang and burn himself, Madhusudhan jumped from a balcony to his death. Their shocked families, struggling to deal with the six-year-old they left behind, refused to comment.

Madhusudhan was an engineer, a techie in local parlance, one of about a million primarily responsible for making Bangalore a global brand name. Many come from modest backgrounds and small towns, vaulting from cram schools to be plugged in to a global 24/7/365 workplace of extreme pressures. The reward is a piece of the great Indian dream — to be able to buy a flat and a car by 30.

They aren’t classified as such, but here are some murders, involving male techies and wives, over the last three years:

After an argument, a 37-year-old strangled and chopped his wife into 72 pieces over two months. He hid her in a freezer, frequently spraying the house with perfume and telling his six-year-old twins their mother was away on work.

A 31-year-old stabbed his estranged wife, also an engineer, 11 times after she refused to jointly apply for a loan.

A 30-year-old suspected his wife, a banker, of an affair, so he smothered her and hung himself.

A 25-year-old raped and strangled his wife, an HR manager, because, a week after their marriage, she refused sex.

A 32-year-old believed his wife, a school teacher, was not being nice to his parents, so he strangled her and slit her throat

A married 31-year-old engineer-turned-yoga-instructor killed his Israeli lover and kept her body in a refrigerator for 18 days.

All the men were married (at least two after falling in love), worked in companies that techies aspire to (IBM, Infosys, Accenture and Siemens), and appeared to have had problems dealing with a working wife.

It is not my case that techies are somehow losing it. But these cases offer some evidence of the pressures in the lives of working techie couples. They represent a modern Indian ideal, but to get there they must navigate the sometimes extraordinary headwinds of tradition, gender roles and their own expectations. Almost everywhere, the basic issue is the inability to let the wife realise her potential.

“Usually, the woman gets the rougher end of the stick, both from family and company,” Swami Manohar, founder and managing director of Limberlink, a company attempting to re-engineer engineering education, tells me. Men, he says, tend to brood or be disturbed if wives earn more than them. In general, male techies tend to marry women with lower salaries and qualifications, happy to have the extra money but secure in the knowledge that she will stay home when a child is born.

Academic studies of the tech sector reveal how the bountiful employment it offers women is circumscribed by old gender roles. Nearly half of all IT employees recruited are now women, but by middle management that figure falls by half; in top management, no more than 8% are women, according to industry data. “It has not been possible for the women in the IT sector to challenge the structural inequalities and gender relations respectively at the workplace and at home,” says a 2012 study by the Indian Statistical Institute.

One reason that Madhusudhan, the man with the murderous rage, appeared to resent his wife, a police officer (requesting anonymity because the investigation is underway), tells me, was because she earned about twice as much as he did. There were, he says, frequent squabbles over the fact.

Some couples have transcended the old ways. Abhishek Prasad, 35, an engineer, MBA and manager with Oracle in Singapore, freely acknowledges that his wife, Nandini Jayram, 33, out-earns him. There are more like them, he says, confident of the other’s success and feeding off it. Jayram, a senior manager with Unilever in Bangalore, calls Prasad her “tennis parent”, someone who pushes her to do better. Nandini says progress is always about a choice that a woman has but does not make. That, as she notes, is because most men struggle with spousal success. “While I’ve come through, the general trend is that men are comfortable with self-assured women as classmates or colleagues, not as wives.”

Embarrassed and requesting his last name be withheld, an engineer I talk to tells me how disturbed he was after his wedding last year. Sreejesh says he has a “good job”, earning Rs. 30,000 a month. His wife, whom he says has worked two years to his five, has a bigger salary. That’s how the market works, I say. He responds: “But how can a man live like this? I have no choice because the market is so bad.”

If the global gloom continues, things will worsen, unless more men think differently. Shreelesh Kumar, 33, did. Although he was promised a promotion as team leader, Kumar, in June, quit his job at a BPO that did medical transcription. Business is dwindling in a sector badly hit by competition from countries like the Philippines and the movement of jobs back to the West. Kumar was on the bench, and he knew there would be no promotion. So, he’s now a wedding photographer, earning “much less” than Deepa, 31. She’s an analyst, checking for quality in subtitles her company pastes on films sent to them by global clients. He’s happy for her and comfortable with himself — but that’s now. “Earlier,” he says, “I would never admit to this.”
 
5 insane incidents and the Indian dream ends, do you know what is the population of Banaglore ?

It took only 1 person (Adolf Hitler) to start world war 2 !

And you say your not obsessed with India?

In Flourishing India, An Old Obsession With Pakistan
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120470801

protest_wide-794adbaac1a773e04de970c9f7fc83c6208fdb8b-s6-c30.jpg


No one knows exactly how many people died in the communal bloodletting that followed the partition of India in 1947. Estimates say it was more than 1 million.

Santosh Madhok, 81, remembers the hurried departure of the bankrupt British as they folded up their empire. She remembers a multitude of Asians on the move — Hindus and Sikhs fleeing the newly created nation of Pakistan, and Muslims trudging across the landscape in the other direction.

She and her family, who are Hindus, fled to India from the city of Multan, now in Pakistan.

After crossing the newly created border, they traveled by train to New Delhi, India's capital. The usual seven-hour train ride took four days because the tracks were littered with dead bodies, and gunfire erupted outside the train windows.

"Every other person was so sad, crying, the children; and the trains were full," she recalls.

Since then, India and Pakistan have fought three wars. Both countries have built nuclear arsenals. And they have become locked in a relationship rooted in rivalry and suspicion.

Obsessing On Pakistan

"I actually feel we give too much time in our minds to Pakistan," says Rahul Gandhi of India's ruling Congress Party. He thinks it's time for attitudes to change.

His mother, Sonia Gandhi, is the party's president. His grandmother was former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, the assassinated daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first prime minister.

Rahul Gandhi, who many observers believe will one day lead India, would like to see his nation spending much less time obsessing about Pakistan.

"We are now becoming a serious international player. Pakistan is a very small piece of our worldview," he says.

Many analysts believe India's biggest foreign policy challenge these days is its rivalry with China.

But changing attitudes about Pakistan isn't going to be easy. The subject dominates India's news media, which often makes no attempt to disguise its bias. A recent television newscast used the phrase "most preposterous" to describe a position espoused by Pakistan's interior minister.

"It's hysterical. It's absolutely, totally unprofessional," says Seema Mustafa, editor of India's Covert magazine. "I think the television channels have actually forgotten they are journalists, and they've become advocates for war."

She says the relationship between India and Pakistan is a paradox. "At the individual level, it turns into a whole level of camaraderie. And at the political level, it is akin to hate," Mustafa says.

Indians who take a hard-line stance on Pakistan sometimes display a strangely contradictory view of that country, Mustafa says.

"People who have been sort of going hammer and tongs about nuking Pakistan — of taking your army across and finishing that country — are people I have seen visit Islamabad and be even friendlier with the Pakistanis. And the families all start visiting each other, big gifts are taken. Then after that, they come back and say the same thing," Mustafa says.

Peace Process On Hold

In 2004, India and Pakistan started a peace process, and opened up some trade and transport routes. They came close to a framework agreement over Kashmir, the disputed territory at the heart of their dispute.

But it lost momentum when then-Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf ran into political trouble at home.

Then, last November, a team of militants sailed in from Pakistan and attacked India's commercial capital, Mumbai. After nearly three days of sieges and gunfights, they had killed more than 160 people.

Gopalapuram Parthasarathy, a former Indian senior diplomat who served in Pakistan, says the Mumbai attacks were a turning point.

"Deep down, there is a sense within the country that we can't go back to business as usual with Pakistan until they act decisively against the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks, and more importantly close down what we call the infrastructure of terrorism," Parthasarathy says.

A few days after the Mumbai attack, thousands of Indians took to the streets to protest.

Prahlad Kakkar, a leading advertising executive in Mumbai, was among them. Kakkar says the crowd was angrier with India's politicians, for failing to protect the country, than with Pakistan.

He still feels that way. "We should look within ourselves to see what the problems are, not look at Islamabad. Islamabad is not a superpower," Kakkar says.

But Kakkar believes Indian attitudes toward Pakistan have since hardened.

"Today, I don't think there's any sympathy for Pakistan in India, whether it's among the Hindus or the Muslims, to be very honest. Because they are so alarmed by what's happening in Pakistan. They just see the state sliding into chaos," Kakkar says.

After the Mumbai attacks, India's government froze the peace negotiations, officially known as "the composite dialogue."

Terrorism And Regional Alliances

India has since signaled its willingness for the dialogue to resume, but only if Pakistan takes effective action against the Mumbai attackers and other militant organizations on Pakistani soil.

Parthasarathy says Pakistan's current campaign to root out the Taliban is not enough.

"The Pakistan military has targeted only those radical Islamic groups which have challenged the writ of the state, but are still retaining as their own instruments groups that are targeting Afghanistan or India," he says.

Afghanistan is a big source of friction. India is spending more than $1 billon a year there, much of it on infrastructure projects.

That alarms Pakistan, which fears that India is extending its influence to its western border.

Meanwhile, India has accused Pakistani intelligence of a role in one of two deadly attacks on its embassy there.

Some in India are opposed to renewing peace talks with Pakistan on any terms.

"The composite dialogue has no potential for resolving these problems," says Ajai Sahni of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi.

"Any of the problems between India and Pakistan can only be resolved by an alteration of the equation of power between the two countries. It is power politics that will decide these things. Nothing on the table can be negotiated," Sahni says.

More than 60 years after partition, India and Pakistan are still struggling to find a way to live peacefully side by side.

Santosh Madhok is still haunted by the memory of her terrible train journey. But she believes the time has come for India to look to the future, not the past.

"Well, it's better to forget, because one can do nothing about it now," she says. "So it is better to forget and forgive."
 
i have this feeling that many pakistanis are hoping and praying to their allah for india to fail and rot away
 
Back
Top Bottom