What's new

A Modern U.S.-Japan Alliance

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,960
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
Frank A. Rose
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance
American Center
Tokyo, Japan
February 23, 2015

-------------

Introduction

Thank you very much for allowing me to join you today.

My name is Frank Rose, and I am the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, Verification and Compliance.

I have had the privilege of being welcomed to Japan many times to discuss our nations’ shared interest in and commitment to international peace and security.

Those discussions have focused on several important topics, including nuclear policy and disarmament, extended deterrence, missile defense, and outer space security.

I’m especially pleased to be here this week, as our governments are nearing the end of their work to finalize a review of the guidelines for U.S.-Japanese Defense Cooperation. This review process aims to make the links underlying the U.S.-Japan Alliance stronger than ever and thus contribute more effectively to regional and global peace and security.

So today, I’d like to offer a few comments on our joint efforts to strengthen our alliance, particularly in the areas of new strategic capabilities like cyber and outer space security.

I will also cover two other critical areas of the modern-day U.S.-Japan Alliance: missile defense and space. After that, I look forward to your questions.

A Modern U.S.-Japan Alliance

The United States-Japan Alliance long has been the cornerstone of peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region.

As you know, at the 2013 “2+2” meeting in Tokyo, Secretary of State Kerry, then-Secretary of Defense Hagel, and their Japanese counterparts announced their decision to review the U.S.-Japan Guidelines for Defense Cooperation.

The bilateral defense guidelines, which serve as the policy framework that outlines each country’s roles, missions, and capabilities within the Alliance, were last updated in 1997.

The world is much changed since 1997. While longstanding threats to Japan such as North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs remain a concern, emerging threats in areas such as cyber security, space security, and freedom of navigation present new challenges.

U.S. policy affirms that as long as nuclear weapons exist, the U.S. nuclear arsenal will play a role in our extended deterrence commitments to Japan and our other allies. That said, it is important that we recognize the full range of strategic capabilities beyond the nuclear that contribute to effective deterrence—to include space, cyber, and missile defense.

The updated guidelines will provide a framework for Japan to expand its contributions to international peace and security in concert with the United States and like-minded partners during the coming decades. This is important as Japan is an increasingly important participant in international security operations, from counter-piracy to humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.

Ultimately, strengthening the U.S.-Japan Alliance will allow our countries to more effectively contribute to peace and stability both here in the Asia-Pacific region and around the world.

Missile Defense in the Asia Pacific

In 1998, the DPRK irresponsibly test launched a long range ballistic missile that overflew Japan and dropped a rocket stage very near Japanese territory. The launch was not successful, but it did succeed in being highly provocative and, as a result, the United States and Japan initiated a more concerted effort to monitor, deter, and counter North Korean ballistic missiles.

Since 1998, North Korea has continued to make quantitative and qualitative advances in its ballistic missile force. For example, in 2012 North Korea unveiled what appeared to be a mobile ICBM that potentially could reach the United States.

In response to this growing threat the United States and Japan continue to deepen their cooperation on BMD.

Just this past December, the United States and Japan announced the deployment of the second AN/TPY-2 radar to Kyogamisaki, and we greatly appreciate Japan’s hard work in making the deployment possible despite a challenging timeline.

As many of you are aware, this asset will serve as a critical addition to our regional deterrence and defense architecture, enhancing the protection of both Japan and the U.S. homeland against the threat of ballistic missile attack.

This deployment builds on a deep and broad cooperative relationship that includes a AN/TPY-2 deployed to Shariki, Japan in 2006, cooperation on an advanced interceptor known as the SM-3 Block IIA, and continuing work on enhancing interoperability between U.S. and Japanese forces.

We also welcomed the inclusion of missile defense in the interim report on the revision of the defense guidelines, and we hope the final revision will reflect the valuable contribution of BMD to our collective self-defense as well as to regional stability.

These regional missile defenses help to reassure Japan and deter North Korea from seeking to coerce or attack its neighbors. Missile defenses contribute to regional stability because the protection that defenses offer can reduce pressures for a preemptive strike, or a large retaliation to a provocation that can escalate a crisis. We continue to encourage our allies to contribute to their own defense but also to provide capabilities in a multilateral context that can enhance their own security and contribute to stability in the Asia-Pacific region.

There has been a lot of discussion in the press recently about the possible deployment of a Terminal High Attitude Area Defense or THAAD system in the region. Let me be clear, this system is a purely defensive system to defend against short- and medium-range regional ballistic missiles from North Korea. It does not and cannot impact broader strategic stability with Russia and China. Such a system would provide additional defensive capabilities to support our forces on the peninsula. That said, there are no negotiations ongoing between the U.S. and the Republic of Korea to deploy THAAD to the Republic of Korea.

U.S.-Japan Cooperation on Outer Space Security

Finally, as some of you may know, I am in Tokyo this week to lead the U.S.-Japan Space Security Dialogue and attend the Japan Space Forum. So let me conclude my remarks with a few thoughts on U.S.-Japan cooperation on outer space security.

Space cooperation between the United States and Japan has a long history, built on the extensive civil and scientific cooperation among NASA, NOAA, and other U.S. agencies and their Japanese counterparts. Our discussions on these issues have grown into one of the most important relationships we have with our Allies and partners on outer space security issues.

The United States’ rebalance in the Asia-Pacific reflects a recognition that we must broaden and deepen our engagement in the region at all levels including the long-term sustainability, stability, safety, and security of the space environment.

Cooperation on space security is now part of the Common Strategic Objectives of the Alliance, and bilateral cooperation on civil and security space was recognized in the outcomes of summits between President Obama and former Prime Minister Noda in 2012 and again with Prime Minister Abe in 2014.

Recognizing the numerous opportunities for cooperation on space issues, the United States and Japan have held several space security dialogues in the last five years, in addition to ongoing civil space dialogues.

In fact, due to the success and robustness of our space security and civil space dialogues, our governments have also established a Comprehensive Dialogue on Space in order to address the bilateral relationship at a strategic level and to ensure a whole-of-government approach to space matters. We have held two Comprehensive Dialogues to date, with a third meeting to be held later this year in Japan.

Through these dialogues, we not only discuss possible avenues of cooperation and exchange space policies; we also have made tremendous progress in furthering our tangible space security cooperation.

In regards to improving our space situational awareness – specifically, improving our shared ability to rapidly detect, warn of, characterize, and attribute natural and man-made disturbances to space systems – in 2013 the United States signed a Space Situational Awareness (SSA) information sharing agreement with Japan.

Building on the foundation of that agreement, we are also exploring the possibility of establishing “two-way” SSA sharing with Japan. We hope that as our space surveillance capabilities improve, we will be able to notify satellite operators earlier and with greater accuracy of a need to maneuver a satellite in order to prevent collisions in space.

We are also looking at how we can expand cooperation on utilizing space systems for maritime domain awareness. To that end, the United States and Japan held the first “Use of Space for Maritime Domain Awareness” table top exercise last year.

Multilateral Cooperation

We also work closely together to cooperate and to coordinate positions on multilateral space issues. We hold an annual trilateral space security dialogue with Australia and Japan to coordinate our positions on these space security issues.

Our joint efforts to advance the work of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS) Working Group on Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (LTS) continue to make progress.

Perhaps one of the most beneficial transparency and confidence-building measures, or TCBMs, for ensuring sustainability and security in space could be the adoption of an International Code of Conduct to prevent mishaps, misperceptions, and mistrust in space. A code would establish guidelines, or rules of the road, to reduce the risks of debris-generating events, including collisions.

The United States is working with the European Union and other spacefaring nations, like Japan, to advance such a Code in the Asia-Pacific region. Both Japan and Australia have also endorsed its development.

Conclusion

In his State of the Union Address, President Obama spoke of the need to modernize our alliances in the Asia Pacific to meet common international challenges.

With the Government of Japan as a strong partner both on the guidelines as well as on a host of strategic issues, we are working together to do just that. Thanks very much, and I look forward to the discussion.


A Modern U.S.-Japan Alliance


@CENTCOM , @SvenSvensonov , @AMDR , @KAL-EL , @Peter C , @Oldman1 , @boomslang , @MastanKhan , @F-22Raptor, @LeveragedBuyout .
 
.
Long Live the Japanese-American Global Alliance !
Once upon a time , we were both the greatest of enemies,
But the ashes of war has transformed us into Brothers
Brothers committed towards World Peace , and World Stability
Long Live our Brotherhood...!!


scr_bb_111024-F-RG147-682c[1].jpg


I'll thumb you up for now, offer my input in the morning. Right now I've got to go to the emergency room/hospital - urgent matter... Not how I want to spend my night:(!!!

Godspeed, my friend. Will keep you in my prayers.
 
.
Hi,

Japan would be better of playing neutral and having better relationship with china---. You cannot fight America's wars at the expense of your real estate.

In case of war--America will come out to be the winner----japan will be totally pulverized---china will suffer setbacks but will get back on track.

It is middle east all over again in the south asia.
 
.
Long Live the Japanese-American Global Alliance !
Once upon a time , we were both the greatest of enemies,
But the ashes of war has transformed us into Brothers
Brothers committed towards World Peace , and World Stability
Long Live our Brotherhood...!!
From Foes to Friends Sanity has been prevailed between both of the countries there are lots of examples like these, former enemies like France and Germany now friends .......
I am hopeful that both the countries would learn from their mistakes from the past and move forward there is nothing beautiful than peace , hence peace should be the priority and ultimate objective and i am hopeful that india and pakistan would learn something from you guys too
 
.
Hi,

Japan would be better of playing neutral and having better relationship with china---. You cannot fight America's wars at the expense of your real estate.

In case of war--America will come out to be the winner----japan will be totally pulverized---china will suffer setbacks but will get back on track.

It is middle east all over again in the south asia.

Japan and the United States will continue to work together on various strategic parameters to ensure that there are no threats to our enshrined interests in Asia-Pacific and Abroad. Japan, as the 3rd largest economy in the world, and the United States , the largest economy int his world, have interests in Asia-Pacific, Middle East, the Americas, and Africa. With our eyesight affixed on the future , we will continue to work together as well as with our various partners to ensure this lasting peace and stability.
 
.
Long Live the Japanese-American Global Alliance !
Once upon a time , we were both the greatest of enemies,
But the ashes of war has transformed us into Brothers
Brothers committed towards World Peace , and World Stability
Long Live our Brotherhood...!!


View attachment 197909



Godspeed, my friend. Will keep you in my prayers.


Sir,

It is not an alliance---alliances are not between those you have conquered . They came and smashed you to a pulp and then they conquered you and then pummeled you---and took every bit of dignity out of you---then raised you up to do their bidding under their supervision.

Japan is just a 'yessir' of the united states---( Plz don't get mad at me ). Your nations only saving grace is that you will be ultimately turned into a Christian nation ( again plz no disrespect meant ). This is what the U S is doing---. It has different standards for the supposedly "god less" nation to those of Muslim nations.

Theborn again Christianity is not for world peace---it wanted a war it got its war----it is waiting for the armagedon---coming of the Mesiah----.
 
Last edited:
.
Sir,

It is not an alliance---alliances are not between those you have conquered . They came and smashed you to a pulp and then they conquered you and then pummeled you---and took every bit of dignity out of you---then raised you up to do their bidding under their supervision.

Japan is just a 'yessir' of the united states---( Plz don't get mad at me ). Your nations only saving grace is that you will be ultimately turned into a Christian nation ( again plz no disrespect meant ). This is what the U S is doing---. It has different standards for the supposedly "god less" nation to those of Muslim nations.

Theborn again Christianity is no for world peace---it wanted a war it got its war----it is waiting for the armagedon---coming of the Mesiah----.

I completely understand your point of view @MastanKhan and there is no need for you to apologize in wanting to share your opinion. I respect your opinion, and I am empathetic to your view of the importance of understanding the sensitivities in the Sino-American strategic paradigm, rest assured that the Government of Japan and its Agencies will work with its American Partners to ensure peace, freedom of navigation, and working towards calming tensions.

While there are various threats to world peace now in the Middle East, as well as some sensitive developments in Asia-Pacific, continued political correspondence by leaders in aforementioned region will only help to secure this stability and peace.

Japan, as an Independent Power, as well as a nation that has been a belligerent in the past, knows full well of the calamities of war, especially on the civilian population; foreign and domestic. And this is why , @MastanKhan , Japan and the United States will work together in any capacity.


Thank You.
 
.
Long Live the Japanese-American Global Alliance !
Once upon a time , we were both the greatest of enemies,
But the ashes of war has transformed us into Brothers
Brothers committed towards World Peace , and World Stability
Long Live our Brotherhood...!!


View attachment 197909

Godspeed, my friend. Will keep you in my prayers.

Lol Nihon, you sure know how to sugar and add honey into the American's taste :lol:
 
.
Lol Nihon, you sure know how to sugar and add honey into the American's taste :lol:

I personally would like to see the development of Chinese-Japanese Brotherhood. And as soon as we can find a way to get past our minor political impasse, there is no reason why we cannot realize this. Afterall, i am in the opinion that Japan, China and the United States are natural allies. Perhaps it may not seem obvious now, but in the future, I feel that this will be realized. There are vast potential for this. And I am optimistic.So should you.


:)
 
.
Hi,

I personally think that Japan will find its own place in the coming years as a world military power. It is the only nation that attacked the U S and that is the only nation that concerns the united states. For that reason the U S will always want to have cordial relationship with Japan.

Losing Japan will be disaster for the U S if it came to that---even if Japan announced being neutral in a war.

And indeed Japan is a big big concern for the U S---the what if factor keeps the americans on their tows.
 
. .
Japan Mulls Creating Its Own CIA
Japan Mulls Creating Its Own CIA | The Diplomat

As Japan recovers from the shock of the hostage crisis, lawmakers are beginning to consider how they could have responded to the situation better. One of the key issues being discussed is how to overcome Japan’s reliance on foreign intelligence agencies to gather information abroad, because Japan does not currently have an independent intelligence-gathering entity.

A Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) project team is looking into changing that. The team, chaired by House of Representatives lawmaker Takeshi Iwaya, will look at the possibility of creating an independent intelligence-gathering agency like the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency or the United Kingdom’s Secret Intelligence Service. The team will meet with U.S. and British experts and learn about the British model firsthand over the summer. They are scheduled to draft a proposal by this autumn.

The thought of creating a new intelligence-gathering organization is in line with Japanese Prime Minster Shinzo Abe’s pledge to develop Japan’s intelligence capabilities. “It is vital to strengthen the government’s intelligence functions and gather more accurate, prompt information that will be reflected in the state’s strategic decision-making,” Abe told the House of Representatives last week.

Public opposition has so far prevented the creation of a dedicated intelligence agency, attitudes might be changing in light of the government’s recent failure to rescue two Japanese hostages from Islamic State. The weakness of the current structure was vividly highlighted by Japan’s reliance on the CIA, Turkish intelligence, and Jordanian intelligence during the crisis. As it stands now, a senior NPA official said, “Japan has no choice but to depend on foreign countries’ information. If a terrorist attack was plotted in Japan, the current state of preparedness could not prevent it from occurring.” A more serious failure of the Japanese intelligence community was the revelation in spring 2004 that a senior member of an Al Qaeda-related organization had been hiding in Japan from September 1999 to September 2003 without being marked by the Japanese authorities.

Creating a new intelligence entity would be Japan’s logical next step after having created the National Security Council, which coordinates analysis of information gathered by other government bodies such as the foreign ministry, the defense ministry and the National Police Agency. Abe has also begun taking additional steps to bolster intelligence gathering, sending more defense attaches to embassies in Jordan and other Middle East states. These defense attaches will be important for gathering military information; as Abe put it, “Military intelligence units tend to only share information with other defense personnel.”

@Nihonjin1051 - As you said, this will be a "Pacific Century" :)
 
.
Hi,

I personally think that Japan will find its own place in the coming years as a world military power. It is the only nation that attacked the U S and that is the only nation that concerns the united states. For that reason the U S will always want to have cordial relationship with Japan.

Losing Japan will be disaster for the U S if it came to that---even if Japan announced being neutral in a war.

And indeed Japan is a big big concern for the U S---the what if factor keeps the americans on their tows.


I would like to add that many strategic analysts in the United States put too much emphasis on the China Threat. In my opinion, to know a country, and to predict their actions, knowledge of their military arsenal, production potential is only a fraction of the story. In order to understand a people, specifically the Chinese, one has to understand their psychology, their thinking, their cultural and personal dynamic.

A thorough knowledge of Chinese psychology will lead one to understand that the Chinese do not , collectively speaking, do not yearn for a war, in fact they are a thoroughly peace-loving people. They are a reactive people, they will only engage in hostilities if there is a perception or obvious military confrontation and engagement on them and their interests. They are different from prior enemy combatants the United States has ever experienced , which have either declared war on the United States first or attacked the United States and its military. An examination of the Chinese involvement in Korea is testament to this.

This is why I am confident that peace will be maintained. The Chinese people , especially the Chinese Leadership, is fixed on the notion of communication , specifically bilateral communication to solve issues of discontent. In fact, since 1972, the Chinese and Japanese Leaderships have been involved through direct intergovernmentalism that has led to the amelioration of disagreements in fishing agreements, to trade links, to political statements such as the Kono Agreement, and many more (too many to name). So long as Diplomacy can be enshrined to the triltateral interests of Japan, China and the United States, and so long as we understand each others' sensitivities, then the future is bright.

Very Bright. :)

Yeah, indeed very lovely.

View attachment 197921

Japanese and Americans are thorough minded. Serious when we have to, but at the end of the day, we get along.



Serious:
_74363017_162362771(1)[1].jpg



After business talks: ;)

nn20130224a3a[1].jpg
 
.
I would like to add that many strategic analysts in the United States put too much emphasis on the China Threat. In my opinion, to know a country, and to predict their actions, knowledge of their military arsenal, production potential is only a fraction of the story. In order to understand a people, specifically the Chinese, one has to understand their psychology, their thinking, their cultural and personal dynamic.

A thorough knowledge of Chinese psychology will lead one to understand that the Chinese do not , collectively speaking, do not yearn for a war, in fact they are a thoroughly peace-loving people. They are a reactive people, they will only engage in hostilities if there is a perception or obvious military confrontation and engagement on them and their interests. They are different from prior enemy combatants the United States has ever experienced , which have either declared war on the United States first or attacked the United States and its military. An examination of the Chinese involvement in Korea is testament to this.

This is why I am confident that peace will be maintained. The Chinese people , especially the Chinese Leadership, is fixed on the notion of communication , specifically bilateral communication to solve issues of discontent. In fact, since 1972, the Chinese and Japanese Leaderships have been involved through direct intergovernmentalism that has led to the amelioration of disagreements in fishing agreements, to trade links, to political statements such as the Kono Agreement, and many more (too many to name). So long as Diplomacy can be enshrined to the triltateral interests of Japan, China and the United States, and so long as we understand each others' sensitivities, then the future is bright.

Very Bright. :)



Japanese and Americans are thorough minded. Serious when we have to, but at the end of the day, we get along.



Serious:
View attachment 197922


After business talks: ;)

View attachment 197923

Very sensible comment.
But don't u sleep at this time of midnight?
It is 1pm in China:-)
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom