What's new

A detailed reply to Michael Kugelman.

Path-Finder

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
24,393
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom







@WebMaster @Horus @Foxtrot Alpha there was a pinned WOT thread! I was going to post it in there but it wasn't pinned anymore so instead posting it here.
ffs:angry: sort it out.
1609871697964.png
 
Last edited:
. . .
Pakistan would have suffered less or equal if the dictator just said No.

20 years have been lost. We have a generation suffering from PTSD. The war took out our intellectuals and academia.

We will never partake in anyone's war anymore.

Pakistan should use nuclear deterrence if ISIS Khorasan is pushed into the country.
 
. .
Afganistan Bahane, Pakistan Nishane, Hindustan Shahane....

It was a combo ops to destroy Pak from the entire spectrum of the Ehl-i Sheyatin, but they're destined to be doomed by HIS PERMISSON, WILL, PLANNING, EXCEUTION etc....
 
Last edited:
.
hmmn, had your mian stayed in power(God Forbid) after its kartoot in the 90's. would mian have said NO?
But he could have been overthrown or made a escape goat.

These invasions or wars don't get planned over 2 months.
 
.
But he could have been overthrown or made a escape goat.

These invasions or wars don't get planned over 2 months.
don't twist things. answer me question, your paper bag lion mian. would it have become actual 'sher' and said NO?
 
. .
hmmn, had your mian stayed in power(God Forbid) after its kartoot in the 90's. would mian have said NO?
dont know if mian would have said no but on the balance of probabilities dictators (and kings) the world over are more prone to take decisions unpopular with their masses but more acceptable to the foreign governments that back them.

I would argue the best chance the 'state' had of saying 'no' would be through a civilian government, case in-point Yemen.
 
. .
With Alqaeda settling in Pakistans tribal areas by planning of US bombing, only choice Pakistan had to allow US direct boots on ground in Tribal areas(which was US ultimate plan) , destroying any semblance of sovereignty or take them on ourselves to maintain some control over the areas.
Only mistake our establishment did was pre sept 11, where they didn't anticipate such a scenario where Alqaeda in Afghanistan will become a problem one day and US one day will come to this region. We were caught off guard as proven by angry response of Musharraff to US bombing flush Alqaeda to ourside. They didn't realise in years to come Pakistan will be the main target.
 
.
Pakistan would have suffered less or equal if the dictator just said No.

20 years have been lost. We have a generation suffering from PTSD. The war took out our intellectuals and academia.

We will never partake in anyone's war anymore.

Pakistan should use nuclear deterrence if ISIS Khorasan is pushed into the country.
One can assume what would have happened.. my guess is America would have targeted Pakistan and then Afghanistan..
 
.
Kugelman is a joke as a South Asia analyst. I recall seeing him on TV saying Pakistan had no capacity to retaliate against India after the Balakot aggression. He was making these comments at the same time as the PAF was dropping bombs on Indian military bases and shooting down Indian AC. :lol:

Most American South Asia analysts are lobbyists for Kabul or New Delhi. That's largely why USA strategy in the region hasn't worked. My advice to any military guys on this forum is not to pay too much attention to these lobbyist think tankers.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom