What's new

90 Paratroopers vs. 2000 Jihadists: Russia Marks 20 Years Since Unit’s Last Stand in Chechnya

.
Are you serious, stop putting a spin on the defeat the Chechnyans gave you. You should be looking at how 2000 Chechnyans defeated 90000 Russian troopers.

If that was true, Chechnya would be an independent country. The Russians brutally put down the Chechnyan rebellion whether we like to admit or not.
 
. . .
You are thanking a person who would switch sides faster than a hoe if it was Iran instead of Pak.
Just like Shamil son, who converted to Christianity, right? :D

Also, dear Malikkkkkkkk, you are by far the biggest hypocrite here, why do you lecture others? You are talking your religious nonsense all around the place having Tony Montana as avatar, wtf bro?
 
Last edited:
. .
Big deal!........Pakistan has been facing a huge ugly monster that is more than 7× bigger than us and has the full backing of the West and Russia for nearly 73 years and yet we are still standing and prospering. If the Russian Air force didn't assist those paratroopers the Chechens would have been having them for lunch or dinner.

:lol: Now you try to change history to present yourself as a survivor against all odds and feel good about yourself. Pakistan has had 100% US support all the way to the 90s. Not just that, you have had Chinese support since 1960s. US even sent a carrier group to scare us off in 1971, but eventually retreated once they realized our soviet friends had their submarines trailing them ready to blow them out. So basically, we have had just Soviet support, you have had US and Chinese support. US only changed sides after late 90s

As for 7x bigger and what not. Population might be 7x bigger, not the army and its the army that fights, not common people. Indian and Pakistani armies were very well matched all the way to the 2000s. Even today, our airforce is less than 2x your size, same with the infantry numbers. Navy is the only department where there is a mismatch.
 
.
:lol: Now you try to change history to present yourself as a survivor against all odds and feel good about yourself. Pakistan has had 100% US support all the way to the 90s. Not just that, you have had Chinese support since 1960s. US even sent a carrier group to scare us off in 1971, but eventually retreated once they realized our soviet friends had their submarines trailing them ready to blow them out. So basically, we have had just Soviet support, you have had US and Chinese support. US only changed sides after late 90s

As for 7x bigger and what not. Population might be 7x bigger, not the army and its the army that fights, not common people. Indian and Pakistani armies were very well matched all the way to the 2000s. Even today, our airforce is less than 2x your size, same with the infantry numbers. Navy is the only department where there is a mismatch.




Change history????????.........:lol:........so says the same person who's ilk claimed to have killed exactly 350 terrorists in Balakot and shot down an F-16.............:lol:

The 7× bigger population of india can be used as an economic factor in helping india buy top of the line Western and Russian defence equipment as well as garner their support. So YES, Pakistan has been fighting a 7× bigger enemy for nearly 73 years who has the full backing of the West and Russia......that is a fact. NO OTHER nation in the ENTIRE history of mankind has EVER done this before........:azn:


In 1971, the US fleet in the indian ocean was on a pre-secheduled war games manoeuvre. Pakistan's war with india had nothing to do with it.The Americans would NEVER fight for Pakistan. They only fight for White-Anglo-saxon-protestant Western Europeans.

By the way, our cruise missiles are the great equalizer to the indian navy..... if it wasn't indians would have attacked by now.......:azn:
 
.
Change history????????.........:lol:........so says the same person who's ilk claimed to have killed exactly 350 terrorists in Balakot and shot down an F-16.............:lol:

The 7× bigger population of india can be used as an economic factor in helping india buy top of the line Western and Russian defence equipment as well as garner their support. So YES, Pakistan has been fighting a 7× bigger enemy for nearly 73 years who has the full backing of the West and Russia......that is a fact. NO OTHER nation in the ENTIRE history of mankind has EVER done this before........:azn:


In 1971, the US fleet in the indian ocean was on a pre-secheduled war games manoeuvre. Pakistan's war with india had nothing to do with it.The Americans would NEVER fight for Pakistan. They only fight for White-Anglo-saxon-protestant Western Europeans.

By the way, our cruise missiles are the great equalizer to the indian navy..... if it wasn't indians would have attacked by now.......:azn:

No other nation has done this before :lol:

Taiwan vs China
Vietnam vs US
Finland Vs Soviet Union

Like dozens of examples, won't even bother listing all. The countries listed above actually fought hard enemies. Pakistan fought an almost equally matched(until recently)soft state where 80% of defense budget goes towards pensions and salary, so hardly any room for new acquisitions.

Also what a silly example regarding cruise missiles. If cruise missiles were an equalizer, no country would bother having ships. If SAMS were an equalizer, no country would buy fighter aircraft. If anti submarine aircraft were equalizers, no country would buy submarines, if anti tank weapons were an equalizer, no one would buy tanks.
 
.
No other nation has done this before :lol:

Taiwan vs China
Vietnam vs US
Finland Vs Soviet Union

Like dozens of examples, won't even bother listing all. The countries listed above actually fought hard enemies. Pakistan fought an almost equally matched(until recently)soft state where 80% of defense budget goes towards pensions and salary, so hardly any room for new acquisitions.

Also what a silly example regarding cruise missiles. If cruise missiles were an equalizer, no country would bother having ships. If SAMS were an equalizer, no country would buy fighter aircraft. If anti submarine aircraft were equalizers, no country would buy submarines, if anti tank weapons were an equalizer, no one would buy tanks.





And those countries did for 73 years?..............:azn:
 
.
And those countries did for 73 years?..............:azn:

They faced a massively superior enemy. Like no comparison to what Pakistan faced. Also, its not like we have fought a war every day for 73 years. Wars went on for a few weeks and it was back to normal.
 
Last edited:
.
They faced a massively superior enemy. Like no comparison to what Pakistan faced. Also, its not like we have fought a war every day for 73 years. Wars went on for a few weeks and it was back to normal.



We've been fighting since August the 14th 1947. The fighting has NEVER stopped on the LOC.
 
.
We've been fighting since August the 14th 1947. The fighting has NEVER stopped on the LOC.

India- Pakistan wars weren't even that bad, let alone fighting along the loc. All our wars had a few thousand soldiers dead. In WW2 where millions were dying everyday, no one would have even noticed those soldiers missing. Same with wars like Vietnam, more soldiers died everyday than most India-Pak wars combined together.

India Pak wars = small insignifant battle in WW1 or WW2. So pretending like you have pulled a rabbit out of a hat is pretty hilarious.

WW1, WW2, Iran-Iraq war, Bosnian war Syrian war, now those are real wars, neither of us has faced any of those.
 
Last edited:
.
India- Pakistan wars weren't even that bad, let alone fighting along the loc. All our wars had a few thousand soldiers dead. In WW2 where millions were dying everyday, no one would have even noticed those soldiers missing. Same with wars like Vietnam, more soldiers died everyday than most India-Pak wars combined together.

India Pak wars = small insignifant battle in WW1 or WW2. So pretending like you have pulled a rabbit out of a hat is pretty hilarious.




Not when the 7× smaller rabbit pulls the magician into the hat...........:azn:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom