What's new

‘57 billionaires control 70% of India’s wealth … India is second most unequal economy after Russia’

onebyone

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
7,550
Reaction score
-6
Country
Thailand
Location
Thailand
India is the second most unequal economy in the world, according to an Oxfam report released recently at the World Economic Forum. Oxfam India CEO Nisha Agrawal tells Himanshi Dhawan that demonetisation has only aggravated this inequality with no significant long-term benefits.



Oxfam’s new report ‘Economy for 99%’ claims that since 2015, eight men own the same amount of wealth as the poorest half of the world. In India, the richest 1% control 60% of the total wealth. Your comments?

In 2016, India is the second most unequal economy after Russia. Inequality is fracturing our economy and the reality is that today 57 billionaires control 70% of India’s wealth. Even International Monetary Fund recently warned that India faces the social risk of growing inequality. As per IMF, India’s Gini coefficient rose to 51 by 2013, from 45 in 1990, mainly on account of rising inequality between urban and rural areas as well as within urban areas.

India is currently too dependent on a regressive tax structure of indirect taxes and should move towards a more progressive taxation system that raises more tax revenues from the wealthy to fund more public expenditures on health and education to create a more equal opportunity country.

What have been the reasons behind this growing inequality? Would you say successive governments have failed to address the concerns of the 99%?

Over the last 25 years, the top 1% has gained more income than the bottom 50% put together. Far from trickling down, income and wealth are being sucked upwards at an alarming rate. Like many other countries, in India too policies have not focussed on raising the incomes of the poorest. India’s liberalisation in the early 1990s has seen an explosion in inequality since it created opportunities in a few high end sectors such as banking, IT, telecom and airlines that only created a handful of jobs for the highly skilled and educated. Not many policy reforms have happened either in agriculture or labour intensive manufacturing that could have created millions of jobs and raised incomes of the poor. Furthermore, not much effort has been made to raise more revenues and spend on basic education and health so that the poor could benefit from the opportunities being created.

In the current context of demonetisation, has the problem of inequality aggravated?

India could face significant short-term economic costs from the ban on large-denomination currency notes, with no significant long-term benefits. IMF has just lowered its projections for GDP growth in 2016-17 by a whole percentage point from 7.6% to 6.6% due to the disruption caused by demonetisation. Since the demonetisation has been affecting the incomes of the poor more than those of the rich, it is indeed likely to further aggravate the problem of high and sharply rising inequality in India.

What are some of the false myths around economic growth that the report talks of?

The current economy of the 1% is built on a set of flawed assumptions. Contrary to popular belief, many of the super-rich are not ‘self-made’. Over half the world’s billionaires either inherited their wealth or accumulated it through industries prone to corruption and cronyism.

What policy actions do you think are required to address this growing inequality?

Governments need to stop obsessing about GDP and build an economy for the 99% of humanity instead of the 1%. Inequality can be addressed through initiatives of proper taxation and expenditure policies domestically; complemented by a concerted effort of countries to check some transnational problems, namely tax havens, tax dodging and tax avoidance. The tax havens should be closed and public expenditure on health and education increased. It is time that education for all – with good learning outcomes – is made a reality.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatime...-is-second-most-unequal-economy-after-russia/
 
.
India is the second most unequal economy in the world, according to an Oxfam report released recently at the World Economic Forum. Oxfam India CEO Nisha Agrawal tells Himanshi Dhawan that demonetisation has only aggravated this inequality with no significant long-term benefits.



Oxfam’s new report ‘Economy for 99%’ claims that since 2015, eight men own the same amount of wealth as the poorest half of the world. In India, the richest 1% control 60% of the total wealth. Your comments?

In 2016, India is the second most unequal economy after Russia. Inequality is fracturing our economy and the reality is that today 57 billionaires control 70% of India’s wealth. Even International Monetary Fund recently warned that India faces the social risk of growing inequality. As per IMF, India’s Gini coefficient rose to 51 by 2013, from 45 in 1990, mainly on account of rising inequality between urban and rural areas as well as within urban areas.

India is currently too dependent on a regressive tax structure of indirect taxes and should move towards a more progressive taxation system that raises more tax revenues from the wealthy to fund more public expenditures on health and education to create a more equal opportunity country.

What have been the reasons behind this growing inequality? Would you say successive governments have failed to address the concerns of the 99%?

Over the last 25 years, the top 1% has gained more income than the bottom 50% put together. Far from trickling down, income and wealth are being sucked upwards at an alarming rate. Like many other countries, in India too policies have not focussed on raising the incomes of the poorest. India’s liberalisation in the early 1990s has seen an explosion in inequality since it created opportunities in a few high end sectors such as banking, IT, telecom and airlines that only created a handful of jobs for the highly skilled and educated. Not many policy reforms have happened either in agriculture or labour intensive manufacturing that could have created millions of jobs and raised incomes of the poor. Furthermore, not much effort has been made to raise more revenues and spend on basic education and health so that the poor could benefit from the opportunities being created.

In the current context of demonetisation, has the problem of inequality aggravated?

India could face significant short-term economic costs from the ban on large-denomination currency notes, with no significant long-term benefits. IMF has just lowered its projections for GDP growth in 2016-17 by a whole percentage point from 7.6% to 6.6% due to the disruption caused by demonetisation. Since the demonetisation has been affecting the incomes of the poor more than those of the rich, it is indeed likely to further aggravate the problem of high and sharply rising inequality in India.

What are some of the false myths around economic growth that the report talks of?

The current economy of the 1% is built on a set of flawed assumptions. Contrary to popular belief, many of the super-rich are not ‘self-made’. Over half the world’s billionaires either inherited their wealth or accumulated it through industries prone to corruption and cronyism.

What policy actions do you think are required to address this growing inequality?

Governments need to stop obsessing about GDP and build an economy for the 99% of humanity instead of the 1%. Inequality can be addressed through initiatives of proper taxation and expenditure policies domestically; complemented by a concerted effort of countries to check some transnational problems, namely tax havens, tax dodging and tax avoidance. The tax havens should be closed and public expenditure on health and education increased. It is time that education for all – with good learning outcomes – is made a reality.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatime...-is-second-most-unequal-economy-after-russia/

Thank you for the information :-)
 
.
How do these studies calculate that? I guess it takes data from income tax deptt.

Also, what I dont understand is the categorization of poor. My maid has more savings than me, for example. I pay taxes, and pretty much spend all my income on household expenditure, school fee, Home loan EMI and house rent. She doesn't file tax returns, opened her bank account after demonetization but still keep most of her earnings in cash (everybody pays their maids and household helps in cash). For any govt data - she is a poor, urban poor with no clarity on how much she earns, or if she earns at all. I guess, in govt records (and in reports like this), she will be considered a poor.
 
.
We don't have a coherent policy for dealing with wealth/income gap. India's political framework talks in terms of kisaan, gareeb, pichchdi jaati etc. In other words, labels meant for vote bank politics.

This only accentuates the global trend of neo-liberal, trickle-down economics advocated by the Chicago School of Economics, led by Milton Friedman etc. Policy makers are usually divided between this school and those who follow Keynesian economics. For long, our policy framing has been captured by those who are fans of Milton Friedman. We are now seeing the results.

Some may argue that inequality itself is not a problem as long as poverty levels in general are brought down. This approach misses the broader point that once the gap crosses a certain threshold, the poor and even the middle class stand totally disenfranchised from decision-making. The state machinery becomes subservient to corporate oligarchy and no matter who you vote for ultimately works for them, thereby defeating the purpose of democracy.
 
.
guess this study is in line with the global poverty index which places india as number 1 in the list of countries with the most amount of poor people in the world.
 
. .
It is not an issue unless 20 years later, it is still the same set of families that control 70% of Indian wealth. Wealth inequality doesn't matter much if it comes with high wealth mobility. In fact, it could serve as a big incentive for people to work hard.
 
.
who is this Aziz Mian qawwal? :rofl:

edit-Nisha-Agrawal-cutout.jpg
 
.
Wealth tax. If India introduces a wealth tax it will accelerate the lives of it's poorest as fast as it has improved the lives of it's wealthiest people. At the end of the day, everyone is human and each of us should look out for the best interests of the other. Islam has zakat as a basic version of a wealth tax, non Muslim nations should adopt a wealth tax for their extremely weathly, even if it's a small amount, like 0.5%. Charge anyone who owns say more than $10 million USD.
 
.
It has always been the case if one investigates few families of india there share would be much bigger. Tata, Birla, with new entrants in 80s like Ambanis, Mittal has made moat of fortune outside. Parsis (tata, mistry, wadias, etc..) jains (birla), gujaratis with some hindu baniya castes. Such a thing was widely criticized in Pakistan in 60s when 22 families had taken hold of most of economy.
 
.
It is good,they create lakhs of jobs for normal people

Wealth tax. If India introduces a wealth tax it will accelerate the lives of it's poorest as fast as it has improved the lives of it's wealthiest people. At the end of the day, everyone is human and each of us should look out for the best interests of the other. Islam has zakat as a basic version of a wealth tax, non Muslim nations should adopt a wealth tax for their extremely weathly, even if it's a small amount, like 0.5%. Charge anyone who owns say more than $10 million USD.


Super rich in India pay 50% income tax.
 
.
It has always been the case if one investigates few families of india there share would be much bigger. Tata, Birla, with new entrants in 80s like Ambanis, Mittal has made moat of fortune outside. Parsis (tata, mistry, wadias, etc..) jains (birla), gujaratis with some hindu baniya castes. Such a thing was widely criticized in Pakistan in 60s when 22 families had taken hold of most of economy.

I agree, we should replicate the Pakistani economic model
 
.
These 57 billionaires have more money than Pakistan GDP alone.

Anyway regarding India, its bad news, but the likes of Reliance boss is giving most Indians free phone service etc and creating jobs.
 
.
If I were a Pak strategist I'd have said, "Elhamdulillah!" It means these 57 folks have the ultimate say!!! And, this is the biggest embedded conjecture - remember, they believe in conjectures!!! This much after so many years of socialist policies and practices!!!!

*Rules of thumb: If sons of Adam (PBUH) are offered a mountain full of gold they vie for the second one!! Mankind have been created to be in haste; they are stringent when wealthy and impatient when under trouble!!!
 
.
Wealth tax. If India introduces a wealth tax it will accelerate the lives of it's poorest as fast as it has improved the lives of it's wealthiest people. At the end of the day, everyone is human and each of us should look out for the best interests of the other. Islam has zakat as a basic version of a wealth tax, non Muslim nations should adopt a wealth tax for their extremely weathly, even if it's a small amount, like 0.5%. Charge anyone who owns say more than $10 million USD.

A tax on total wealth is difficult to implement. India already has a wealth tax law but it is poorly implemented because of various difficulties. A more practical solution is what is known as an estate tax. When a person dies a certain percentage of his wealth goes to the state. That will be a disincentive to hoarding of wealth through generations.

Super rich in India pay 50% income tax.

Yes they do, but unlike for salaried people, the super rich have so many loopholes that you will be amazed at how less their final taxable income is. All laws do not impact everyone equally. Tax laws are disproportionately harsh towards the honest businessmen (yeah surprisingly there are a few) and the salaried classes.

These 57 billionaires have more money than Pakistan GDP alone.

Anyway regarding India, its bad news, but the likes of Reliance boss is giving most Indians free phone service etc and creating jobs.

Any and every criticism of India cannot be met with a knee jerk reaction. Concentration of wealth beyond a particular limit is a danger to a free society and we should acknowledge that regardless of where the criticism is coming from.

I have no issues with a business friendly government as you and @Ryuzaki rightly pointed out that wealth creation does lead to job growth and may be a catalyst for development. However, that is not an absolute rule and must be examined constantly to ensure the desired outcome is being delivered.

You vote for a government. That means you vote for policies laid down by it. Excess concentration of wealth has a feedback loop with policy making and you don't want to live in a society where Ambani makes the rules. Because we didn't vote for him as PM.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom