@Indo-guy
Please understand. There is only one way to kill an insurgency.
Become a better killer than the insurgents.
50,000, 70,000, what does it really matter? These are numbers. Spread over a quarter century.
Please look at what is at stake, and the numbers it impacts, and THEN measure that against the 50-70,000.
India is looked at as a model around the world now in terms of state stamina, patience, ability to stay the course, and readiness to kill, in the numbers required, when it comes to the integrity of the nation. All bets are off then. Witness the action taken against the Sikhs after more than a decade of bloodshed and violence versus the softer current approach against the naxals. Let the naxals make that one final mistake of raising the pitch to secession, and see that change.
You think it is a bed of roses keeping a nation as diverse as India together, with its plethora of fault lines? Blood was spilt, blood is being spilt, blood will be spilt. But the integrity of the nation will not be compromised. That message by now has gone out pretty clearly.
The Kashmiris understand that pretty well by now as well. New generations will be born, but fewer and fewer will need to be killed, as the message takes hold deeper into their psyche. Till the insurgency dies off of its own natural accord. The state can out-wait the insurgents, and the old snakes with the maximum poison are close to their death bed now. No need to help them along. Nature will prevail in the end.