What's new

20% increase in tiger population in India

rajusri

BANNED
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
790
Reaction score
0
India with half of the world's tigers, now got more as tiger's population increase by 20% in 5 years.






20% increase in tiger population :yahoo:

http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/article2302956.ece
25bgMYKJCHI-W068_GE_733788f.jpg

The increase in the numbers is due to the fact that tiger populations in Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown an increase in their density, says a report. File photo: M.A. Sriram
The Hindu The increase in the numbers is due to the fact that tiger populations in Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown an increase in their density, says a report. File photo: M.A. Sriram

India registered a 20 per cent increase in tiger population last year, says a report, ‘Status of tigers, co-predators and prey in India-2010,' released here on Thursday by Jagdish Kishwan, Additional Director-General (Wildlife), Ministry of Environment and Forests.

“The estimated population of 1, 706 individual tigers represents a 20 per cent increase from the last survey in 2006, which estimated a number of 1,411 tigers. The increase is based on the survey of additional areas as well as an increase in the number of tigers within high-density populations,'' the report said.

The assessment of tigers, co-predators and prey included 17 States with tiger population and involved 4, 77, 000 work-days by forest staff and 37, 000 work-days by professional biologists, making it the largest exercise of its kind in the world. It is done once every four years and is a collaborative initiative between the National Tiger Conservation Authority, the Wildlife Institute of India, tiger States and outside expertise.

“The increase in the numbers is due to the fact that tiger populations in Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown an increase in their density.

The inclusion of Sunderbans, some portions of the North-East and parts of Maharashtra have also contributed to the increase and the methodology consisted of a double sampling approach,” noted Mr. Kishwan.

But despite the good news, the report warns that tigers are still in danger due to an overall 12.6 per cent loss of habitat, which means that more tigers are being squeezed into smaller areas, which could lead to a lack of dispersal and consequent loss of genetic exchange between populations, and an increase in human-tiger conflict.

“Human wildlife conflict has been one of the major issues that we need to work around to ensure that not just tigers but other endangered species have a chance of flourishing.

The Ministry of Environment and Forests is also looking at amending and bringing in harsher penalties for those caught under the Wildlife Act. We will also bring in the eco tourism guidelines very soon.”

Lead author of the report, Dr. Y. V. Jhala, said: “The loss of corridors does not bode well for the tiger. Poaching can wipe out individual tiger populations, but these can be re-established by reintroductions as has been done in the Sariska and Panna reserves.

However, once habitats are lost, it is almost impossible to claim them back for restoration. We found that tigers require good forests and prey, along with undisturbed breeding areas, for long-term term survival.”
 
.
India with half of the world's tigers now got more with 20% in population in 5 years.


20% increase in tiger population :yahoo:

The Hindu : Sci-Tech / Energy & Environment : 20% increase in tiger population
25bgMYKJCHI-W068_GE_733788f.jpg

The increase in the numbers is due to the fact that tiger populations in Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown an increase in their density, says a report. File photo: M.A. Sriram
The Hindu The increase in the numbers is due to the fact that tiger populations in Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown an increase in their density, says a report. File photo: M.A. Sriram

India registered a 20 per cent increase in tiger population last year, says a report, ‘Status of tigers, co-predators and prey in India-2010,' released here on Thursday by Jagdish Kishwan, Additional Director-General (Wildlife), Ministry of Environment and Forests.

“The estimated population of 1, 706 individual tigers represents a 20 per cent increase from the last survey in 2006, which estimated a number of 1,411 tigers. The increase is based on the survey of additional areas as well as an increase in the number of tigers within high-density populations,'' the report said.

The assessment of tigers, co-predators and prey included 17 States with tiger population and involved 4, 77, 000 work-days by forest staff and 37, 000 work-days by professional biologists, making it the largest exercise of its kind in the world. It is done once every four years and is a collaborative initiative between the National Tiger Conservation Authority, the Wildlife Institute of India, tiger States and outside expertise.

“The increase in the numbers is due to the fact that tiger populations in Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Karnataka have shown an increase in their density.

The inclusion of Sunderbans, some portions of the North-East and parts of Maharashtra have also contributed to the increase and the methodology consisted of a double sampling approach,” noted Mr. Kishwan.

But despite the good news, the report warns that tigers are still in danger due to an overall 12.6 per cent loss of habitat, which means that more tigers are being squeezed into smaller areas, which could lead to a lack of dispersal and consequent loss of genetic exchange between populations, and an increase in human-tiger conflict.

“Human wildlife conflict has been one of the major issues that we need to work around to ensure that not just tigers but other endangered species have a chance of flourishing.

The Ministry of Environment and Forests is also looking at amending and bringing in harsher penalties for those caught under the Wildlife Act. We will also bring in the eco tourism guidelines very soon.”

Lead author of the report, Dr. Y. V. Jhala, said: “The loss of corridors does not bode well for the tiger. Poaching can wipe out individual tiger populations, but these can be re-established by reintroductions as has been done in the Sariska and Panna reserves.

However, once habitats are lost, it is almost impossible to claim them back for restoration. We found that tigers require good forests and prey, along with undisturbed breeding areas, for long-term term survival.”
good news,all those efforts hs found its result
 
.
I was reading an article which was quoting that calculation of tiger nos as 1411 was sort of misleading and even that time there were 200-300 more. Anyways it is good attempt. The very significant impact was made by his holiness Dalai Lama who asked Tibetans to drop Tiger dress (Which was very auspicious to them) and Tiger bones which reduced high demand. We need more such steps from Mainland China where tiger bones are still used in traditional Chinese medicines.
 
. . . . .
I was sad. How can we kill our own national animal?

Tiger is a magnificent cat and am happy that the tiger population has increased by 20%. I say we should aim for around 10000 tigers by 2020.
 
. .
I was sad. How can we kill our own national animal?

Tiger is a magnificent cat and am happy that the tiger population has increased by 20%. I say we should aim for around 10000 tigers by 2020.

That is tough. We have to increase the forest cover for that. Unfortunately we have been losing our forest cover at an unreasonable rate.
 
. .
Good for the tiger. Can people please save the Asiatic lion now?
 
. . .
Major animal species are a world treasure, not just belonging to a country.

There is good news with the big cats with the possible exception of the cheetah. They breed very well in captivity. With good programs that track genetics, the cats themselves will not go extinct, but lazy cats in zoos are very different from their wild cousins.

Cheetahs are already at a genetic bottleneck, and their future is in doubt.

I've always thought the world should "buy" (somehow) huge tracts of land, the size of a small nation like Luxembourg, in Africa, India, Alaska, etc, and make trespass by hmans illegal. Just leave them alone. Maybe let scientists in.

In the Amazon basin, they could cordon off a HUGE area that would become an incredible preserve for nature.

It's not practical, but it'd be nice to see. Game parks and the like that we already have in Africa aren't large enough to be stable.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom