What's new

2 US carrier groups operating in Philippine Sea

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
SUB-CARRIER-master768.jpg

The aircraft carriers John C. Stennis, left, and Ronald Reagan, right, and other warships on Saturday in the Philippine Sea.


BEIJING — In a show of strength before an international court’s ruling on China’s claims in the South China Sea, the United States Navy sent two aircraft carriers and their accompanying ships on training drills in the western Pacific Ocean on Saturday.

The carriers John C. Stennis and Ronald Reagan sailed close together in the Philippine Sea as part of air defense and sea surveillance operations that involved 12,000 sailors, 140 aircraft and six smaller warships, the United States Pacific Fleet in Hawaii said in a statement.

“We must take advantage of these opportunities to practice war-fighting techniques that are required to prevail in modern naval operations,” Rear Adm. John D. Alexander said in a statement.

The operations occurred on the eastern side of the Philippines, in a body of water that is not adjacent to the South China Sea but is close, a spokesman for the Pacific Fleet said. China seeks to dominate the western Pacific Ocean as part of its long-term strategy, American strategists say.

The message of the exercise by the two carriers and their attendant warships was unmistakable, and the timing was deliberate, said an American official familiar with the planning of the operation who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. It could have been conducted later, he said.

An international arbitration court in The Hague is deliberating a case filed by the Philippines in 2013 against China’s claims in the South China Sea, and its decision is expected in the coming weeks.

The Philippines is challenging China’s claims to what has come to be known as the nine-dash line, an area that covers almost all of the South China Sea, including waters close to the Philippine coast.

The issue of the nine-dash line is delicate because China has claimed it since ancient times as its territory, and the South China Sea has become part of the increasingly nationalistic vocabulary of President Xi Jinping.

In the past two years, China has built artificial islands equipped with military runways in the Spratly archipelago, inside the line and not far from the Philippines.

In a statement on the exercise involving the carriers, the Pacific Fleet said: “As a Pacific nation and a Pacific leader, the United States has a national interest in maintaining security and prosperity, peaceful resolution of disputes, unimpeded lawful commerce, and adherence to freedom of navigation and overflight throughout the shared domains of the Indo-Asia-Pacific.”

The Stennis conducted exercises with Japanese and Indian naval forces in the western Pacific and the South China Sea earlier in the week, an operation that was shadowed by a Chinese surveillance vessel.

The Stennis then joined the Reagan, which had been undergoing maintenance at a United States base in Japan, the Pacific Fleet spokesman said.

Early this month, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona and the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, foreshadowed the dual-carrier exercise during a speech in Singapore, saying it was part of the United States’ increased vigilance in the Pacific.

“The United States will soon have two aircraft carriers operating together in the Pacific, which is a strong statement about America’s enduring commitment to regional security,” Mr. McCain said.

Also this past week, the United States dispatched four Navy electronic attack aircraft, known as Growlers, and 120 military personnel to Clark Air Base in the Philippines.

At a conference in Beijing on Saturday hosted by Global Times, a state-run newspaper known for its strident coverage, some analysts warned of an arms race in the western Pacific.

“The Chinese side is determined to increase its power, and Obama is determined to defend the United States’ position,” said Shi Yinhong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in Beijing.

Both militaries need to be cautious in the South China Sea, said another participant, Teng Jianqun, the director of the department of American studies at the China Institute of International Studies. “Any misunderstanding could lead to a disaster between the two countries,” Mr. Teng said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/w...n-pacific-hoping-china-takes-notice.html?_r=0
 
I do believe 2 US carrier groups r unwork to stop China building islands in SCS, many countries in this world willing to see a War between U.S and China, between world N.o1 and world N.o2, and the SCS dispute is a good reason for both.

Except war the building in SCS from China will continue, War for our Great U.S is the only way to deal with Great China ! R u ready to become Dragon Slayer, Uncle SAM ?!:D
 
Aha. New York Times is not worth the paper it is printed on.

What show of strength? NYT is doing one of their regular disingenuous and dishonest media spin.

The US Navy is doing their one of their training drills in the western Pacific Ocean.

US aircraft carriers used to sail in the Taiwan Straits in the 1990's.

Ever wonder why they are not doing it now. Think about it carefully before replying to this post.
 
Face saving move by the US.
If China was Iraq, they would have started the war before we could even discuss.

lol, do tell the reason why US must invade China for these island?

US have no claim on these island, nor was they important to anything in the region. There are no reason for war over these island, these island are of no value to the US, beside being a talking point. On the other hand, would China go to war with the US in these island ??

Geopolitically, what the United States doing is to use these island dispute to enhance the negative image and portray China as a bad guy, which along with Taiwan, what US have to do is to hold the status quo and their job's done. They do not need to use force to take those island to trap China in a negative sense and isolate China, these island worth more to the US in Chinese hand rather than taking it by force.

People are not quite stupid like most of the folks here on PDF, actual people starts war for own gains, do tell me what US would gains from these island so much they are to start a war with anyone? Yeah, you build something on some island and I start a war with you, even I have nothing to do with these island to begin with?? What is under this logic??
 
lol, do tell the reason why US must invade China for these island?

US have no claim on these island, nor was they important to anything in the region. There are no reason for war over these island, these island are of no value to the US, beside being a talking point. On the other hand, would China go to war with the US in these island ??

Geopolitically, what the United States doing is to use these island dispute to enhance the negative image and portray China as a bad guy, which along with Taiwan, what US have to do is to hold the status quo and their job's done. They do not need to use force to take those island to trap China in a negative sense and isolate China, these island worth more to the US in Chinese hand rather than taking it by force.

People are not quite stupid like most of the folks here on PDF, actual people starts war for own gains, do tell me what US would gains from these island so much they are to start a war with anyone? Yeah, you build something on some island and I start a war with you, even I have nothing to do with these island to begin with?? What is under this logic??


actually i don't want to see US mobilized again like the last time she did in WW II...... and China know better about that
 
Aha. New York Times is not worth the paper it is printed on.

What show of strength? NYT is doing one of their regular disingenuous and dishonest media spin.

The US Navy is doing their one of their training drills in the western Pacific Ocean.

US aircraft carriers used to sail in the Taiwan Straits in the 1990's.

Ever wonder why they are not doing it now. Think about it carefully before replying to this post.

They did, the US Navy transit thru Taiwan Strait regularly, just because there were not much tension in the region, these report weren't show in mainstream channel.

Everytime when the US 7th Fleet come down from Japan to Philippine, they transit thru Taiwan strait. Some time they actually docked at Hong Kong to resupply and had some R&R.
 
lol, do tell the reason why US must invade China for these island?

US have no claim on these island, nor was they important to anything in the region. There are no reason for war over these island, these island are of no value to the US, beside being a talking point. On the other hand, would China go to war with the US in these island ??

Geopolitically, what the United States doing is to use these island dispute to enhance the negative image and portray China as a bad guy, which along with Taiwan, what US have to do is to hold the status quo and their job's done. They do not need to use force to take those island to trap China in a negative sense and isolate China, these island worth more to the US in Chinese hand rather than taking it by force.

People are not quite stupid like most of the folks here on PDF, actual people starts war for own gains, do tell me what US would gains from these island so much they are to start a war with anyone? Yeah, you build something on some island and I start a war with you, even I have nothing to do with these island to begin with?? What is under this logic??
.
I agree with your assessment. There is no good reason for US to fight with China, definitely not over some rocks thousands of miles away from US shores.

Hence, the two big boys won't fight with each other. They will both lose much more than they can gain.

The pawns will be sacrificed. The US and China have their own annual "Strategic & Economic Dialogue" to further their own interests.

As Singapore's veteran diplomat, Mr Bilahari Kausikan notes, small countries would "pay the price" when big countries reach an agreement.
 
actually i don't want to see US mobilized again like the last time she did in WW II...... and China know better about that

lol.........

Unless China want a full blown war with the US, this is not going to happen. Literally nothing gain by taking these island by force. It's quite stupid to actually do anything to these island, better let China build it and piss off other Asian Country. that way, at least US can sell some weapon to wary Chinese Neighbour.

There are no way China can attack the US that deep that require a full mobilisation, To do that, the Chinese would first need to take all US interest and US soil in Asia Pacific (Japan, Guam, Korea, Singapore), then move on to Hawai'i, then move on to US East Coast, only if the Chinese can achieve that, the American would then need a general mobilisation.

.
I agree with your assessment. There is no good reason for US to fight with China, definitely not over some rocks thousands of miles away from US shores.

Hence, the two big boys won't fight with each other. They will both lose much more than they can gain.

The pawns will be sacrificed. The US and China have their own annual "Strategic & Economic Dialogue" to further their own interests.

As Singapore's veteran diplomat, Mr Bilahari Kausikan notes, small countries would "pay the price" when big countries reach an agreement.

We should be glad that the US and Chinese Foreign Ministry does not operate by these PDF warmonger type.........
 
They did, the US Navy transit thru Taiwan Strait regularly, just because there were not much tension in the region, these report weren't show in mainstream channel.

Everytime when the US 7th Fleet come down from Japan to Philippine, they transit thru Taiwan strait. Some time they actually docked at Hong Kong to resupply and had some R&R.
.
I stand corrected.

Yes, the US aircraft carrier group only sails to Hong Kong (via Taiwan Strait) with the expressed permission of China.

However, recently in April, China denied permission for USS John C. Stennis and accompanying vessels to sail into Hong Kong.
 
I do believe 2 US carrier groups r unwork to stop China building islands in SCS, many countries in this world willing to see a War between U.S and China, between world N.o1 and world N.o2, and the SCS dispute is a good reason for both.

Except war the building in SCS from China will continue, War for our Great U.S is the only way to deal with Great China ! R u ready to become Dragon Slayer, Uncle SAM ?!:D

No. 2 for what?
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom