Search results

Film photos.Not real PLA.

this makes my day~

indian navy deserves respect. Each navy would be faced with some problems.but we have seen indian navy growing fast these years.hope IN to play a positive role

so we should not judge them by what it looks like.i try to explain their differences in english but i failed-_-||. well,mbt3000 is 99a's cousin,old99's nephew....

this is impossible.mbt3000 is not a modification of t99.the newest version 99 turrent is quite big.but the under part of these 2 tanks looks similar.this can be explained as mbt3000 absorbs some of the 99 techs. meanwhile we shouldnt forget that 99 and china's export tanks have diffirent...

indian friends.....if you really want to talk about chinese culture and history with chinese,at least get some history knowledge please....

PLA is definitely the fans of America.

Do whatever you want,India.It's your right.

WS-10 has been installed in quite a number of planes....

congratulations to Iran. I was browsing military webs and found this news.We dont see military news from iran quite often recently.This intends to be a breaking news.

and after this exercise countries with su27 series need not complain about air threat from J10

well i must say history is not the excuse for pirate. but whether u think chinese Flankers are pirates or not,SAC manages to assemble it with own devices.

sorry for the money u paid.

smart~ when u say Su30mki is not a copy,u just stress the difference between Su33 and it,and ignore their similarities. but when it comes to J15,u only notice their similarities.

then it is a copy.well,works well i can find similar reasons like u to say J-15 is not a copy of Su-33.different radars,different material,different avics,etc..

is Su-30MKI a copy of Su-33? is Su-30mk2 a copy of Su-27sk? same thing as J-15.

well,even farnborough air show dont have a sticky thread.maybe a normal one is ok enough.

this was shot in Xinjiang Korla.

now CD forum is full of discussion of maiden flight.

people in Chinese forum say its not 2003.its modification of 2002