Search results

I will tell you my final conclusion: When you see an aircraft turning you must ask 2 questions? Did it turn at its max turn rate? To answer that you need to see the bank angle, a 82 deg turn rate is telling you 9Gs are applied no human pilot seated will endure for more than 9Gs for the entire...

First let me tell you this: If in the past I was rude with you, I beg you to forgive me for such behavior, I do not like feel I have disrespect any one, so please forgive me if I was rude, offensive or unpolite. Now I do not want to speak pages, basically I have said all. The video has a turn...

I care less about you banning me, as long as I am right, and there are more forums I am happy, any way math does not lie, a bank angle in a turn close to 80 degs means 9Gs, it means corner speed. Can I say the exact Turn rate of J-20? no of course not, but by looking at that bank I can see it...

J-20 is still limited by TWR, So using a lighter aircraft is better for a naval fighter. Regardless of opinion, the bank angle tells you the max G load a 82 deg of bank angle generates 9Gs and the aircraft is close to stall, at Zhuhai the J-20 showed bank angles near 80 or more. When they get...

The Zhuhai air displays tells a lot about J-20 performance and specifications. First since it lacks thrust vectoring nozzles it had no post stall capability, but it also tell another fact, have you seen models of Su-57 on board of potential russian aircraft carriers? well Su-57 has a very short...

180 deg in 3 seconds is 60 STR, that will be post stall, there is no postall maneovre in that video, in fact A Hornet can not get very good numbers above 500km/h. What you are saying is fantasy, most aircraft even the most agile are in the region of 25-28 deg/s and here I am saying with TVC...

Realistic turn rates for J-20 are around 30 deg/sec Instantaneous turn rate and 25 deg/sec sustained and that is a very high STR. see Mig 29'smaximum turn-rate of 28 degrees per second is better than that of the nimblest of West's fighters: F 16's 26 degrees per second. And its sustained turn...

that is not possible, at that speed, a Max 25 deg/sec which is very high, it will take more than 3 seconds,. You are quoting a 60 deg/sec which basically is not even real, J-20 must be flying at least at 400 km/h consider that formula, consider the aircraft has a bank angle. The J-20 in...

Future will talk :-)

thanks. The J-20 only needs high thrust, I mean Eurofighter can keep up with F-22 just by having a very low wing loading and high thrust to weight ratio. What I mean post stall is useful, but nowadays helmet mounted sights and highly off boresight missiles can do the same in combat. Usually...

Instantaneous turn rate is only the result of lift, thrust vectoring can not enhance it. Sustained turn rate is improved by thrust vectoring and so is roll rate. X-31 was able to defeat F-18s on TVC nozzles, however it was one on one combat. On multi-aircraft engagements the over use of...

I agree, but point is not to belittle any aircraft, is based upon physics, chemestry, that even a high school student should know. To put it simple carbon and aluminium are the lightest materials used in aerospace and all aircraft use them, basically is a limitation by chemestry. Speed demand...

it is around 21 meters, it could be 20.9 or 21.1, in the picture you posted the Su-27 is slightly ahead of where the J-20`s tail end, the Flanker is around 21.9 almost 22 meters, of course since the details are so blur people will see what ever they want, the F-22 and J-20 picture i posted...

To be honest this picture convinced me it was its length see some one long time ago, and it was not me, some person calculated the size, the canopies are almost equal sized, so the calculation this person made was correct. About J-10 it is simple to do cobra you need pitch down the nose to...

Long long time ago i said it is near 21,3 meters check MiG-29 post in sino defence nobody believe and so was Su-35 purchase and so was J-10 only can do cobra with thrust vectoring and Su-57-5 was going to be rebuilt, of course while some hate aerodynamics, aerodynamics tell things things people...

The tweet is funny since most of it is written in Chinese and only the japanese part which i can read says it says the J-11 B will be modernized and called J-11BG whenever you want to distinguish Japanese from Chinese just see Chinese does not use Hiragana and Katakana and some kanjies as in...

thanks, by the way two of my favorite aircraft are F-14 and F-111, but i love MiG-23 and MiG-29, and from China the J-8 is my favorite Saludos

thanks it is a roll, i was thinking it was a roll, but i doubted since is difficult to calculate the vector sum, but the wings trailing edges flaps of that picture are asymmetrically deflected and the aircraft is vertical well a bit diagonal hinting a climb or roll, but any way thanks, you have...

they are asymmetric for a law of vectors remember V tails are rudders and tailerons simple like that you do not understand that law, if you really understand how they work you will know the rudder and taileron are basicaly pitch and yaw, the J-20 was doing pitch and yaw at the same time there is...

you asked a question my answer was right, in fact i was not off topic since you were the one that asked, I never did anything wrong, i fact i wonder why you never said you are wrong or right, why my answer was wrong, are not people to exchange ideas in forums? In fact I gave you an...